One of the world’s largest logistics companies ran an independent, rigorous evaluation. They tested every major geocoding provider. BatchData came out on top, across every single metric.
“The BatchData documentation has been very good, and the support has been excellent relative to any of the other data providers we’ve evaluated.”
Kipper Bush, Realfinity Chief Technology Officer
BatchData ranked #1 across every primary performance category. Not just one or two metrics; every single one: overall exact match rate, spatial accuracy inside and around building polygons, coverage at scale, error rates, and quality stability as tolerance expanded. The gap over the nearest competitor was 6.1 percentage points. The gap over the weakest competitor was 26.5 points.
"Your data set is much richer and blew that out of the water." — BI & Analytics Lead at the client company, comparing BatchData to their prior provider
| Vendor | Exact Match % | Partial Match % | No Match % | No Vendor Address % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BatchData | 92.30% (2,072) | 6.20% (139) | 1.50% (34) | 0% |
| Competitor 1 | 86.20% (1,935) | 8.80% (198) | 4.60% (103) | 0.40% (9) |
| Competitor 2 | 84.30% (1,893) | 8.50% (191) | 7.10% (160) | 0.00% (1) |
| Competitor 3 | 79.80% (1,792) | 13.10% (294) | 7.00% (158) | 0.00% (1) |
| Competitor 4 | 65.80% (1,477) | 17.10% (383) | 9.60% (215) | 7.60% (170) |
| Vendor | Metric | Inside Polygon | ≤ 5m | ≤ 10m | ≤ 15m | ≤ 20m | ≤ 25m | > 25m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BatchData | Coverage | 76.70% | 83.80% | 87.40% | 90.30% | 92.30% | 93.60% | 100.00% |
| Exact Match | 99.10% | 97.60% | 96.10% | 94.80% | 94.00% | 93.80% | 92.30% | |
| Competitor 1 | Coverage | 71.00% | 78.90% | 82.80% | 86.30% | 88.20% | 89.70% | 99.60% |
| Exact Match | 94.30% | 94.20% | 93.50% | 92.10% | 91.00% | 90.70% | 86.50% | |
| Competitor 2 | Coverage | 64.60% | 73.10% | 77.10% | 79.40% | 81.20% | 82.90% | 100.00% |
| Exact Match | 96.10% | 95.90% | 95.40% | 94.90% | 94.20% | 93.60% | 84.40% | |
| Competitor 3 | Coverage | 70.10% | 78.90% | 83.80% | 86.30% | 88.20% | 90.10% | 100.00% |
| Exact Match | 88.40% | 87.20% | 86.00% | 85.10% | 84.30% | 83.50% | 79.90% | |
| Competitor 4 | Coverage | 70.00% | 74.60% | 76.60% | 78.00% | 79.40% | 80.30% | 92.40% |
| Exact Match | 77.10% | 77.60% | 77.60% | 77.40% | 77.20% | 77.10% | 71.20% |
After the client re-created individual building polygons, a large portion of earlier partial matches moved to exact matches.
| Match Status | Previous Count | Previous % | Current Count | Current % | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exact Match | 1,938 | 83.20% | 2,072 | 92.30% | +9.0% |
| Partial Match | 354 | 15.20% | 139 | 6.20% | -9.0% |
| No Match | 38 | 1.60% | 34 | 1.50% | -0.1% |
| Total | 2,330 |
We were the only vendor to support individual building polygon resolution. When the client improved their methodology, our accuracy jumped 9 full points. The data was always right; the test caught up.
Every valid address returned a result. For logistics operations processing millions of deliveries, a 7% coverage gap isn't just a data problem; it's a missed delivery. BatchData had no gaps.
Our exact match rate dropped only 5.3 points across the full buffer range. Competitors showed sharp degradation. High coverage and high quality are not mutually exclusive; BatchData proved it.
