Laramie (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Laramie (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Laramie (WY)
29,154
Total Investors in Laramie (WY)
5,894
Investor Owned SFR in Laramie (WY)
4,685(16.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,080
SFR Owned
3,661
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
814
SFR Owned
1,136
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,685 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate in Laramie County, Securing Significant Acquisition Discounts
Landlords in Laramie County own 4,685 SFR properties, representing 16.1% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 97.3% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 12.9% of all SFR purchases, frequently paying a substantial 22.5% less than traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords are net buyers, but institutional activity remains minimal and price strategies vary significantly by tier.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 78.1% of 4,685 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Laramie County
A significant 97.3% of investor-owned properties in Laramie County are non-owner-occupied, reinforcing their rental-focused strategy. While 2,128 properties are financed, a higher 2,557 properties are held outright for cash. Individual landlords constitute the vast majority of entities, accounting for 5,080 of the 5,894 total landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secure 22.5% Discount in Q4, Paying $91,901 Less Than Homeowners
The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced significant quarterly fluctuations, from a 24.8% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to a 1.9% premium in Q2, before returning to a 22.5% discount in Q4. Overall, landlord acquisition prices saw a slight decline of 0.7% from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $318,753 to $316,380 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Account for 12.9% of Q4 SFR Purchases; Single-Property Investors Lead Activity
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, comprising 71.7% of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made up a mere 3.3%. Single-property investors (Tier 01) were the most active, representing 50.0% of landlord purchases and involving 46 distinct entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.3% of All Investor-Owned SFR Properties
The smallest tier, single-property landlords (Tier 01), alone constitutes 77.1% of all investor-owned properties, making them the backbone of the SFR rental market. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio, challenging narratives of corporate dominance. Overall ownership is highly concentrated in smaller portfolios.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 3-5 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Individual investors overwhelmingly lead in smaller portfolios, owning 85.6% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. However, as portfolio sizes increase, company ownership quickly gains traction, taking 73.3% in the 6-10 property tier and 86.8% in the 11-20 property tier. Institutional properties (Tier 1000+) are 87.5% company-owned.
Geographic Distribution
Laramie County Zip Codes 82001 and 82009 Lead in Investor-Owned Property Count
Zip code 82082 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 74.1%, closely followed by 82060 at 73.8%, indicating areas of intense landlord penetration. Interestingly, high count areas like 82001 (1,800 properties) show moderate ownership rates (17.2%), while other zip codes (e.g., 82082) have extremely high rates despite potentially lower total property counts, revealing diverse market dynamics.
Historical Transactions
Laramie County Landlords Remain Net Buyers in 2025, While Institutions Shift from Net Sellers
Overall landlords bought 2.05 properties for every one sold in 2025, with 348 acquisitions against 170 dispositions. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) transitioned from being net sellers in 2024 (9 buys vs 12 sells) to net buyers in 2025 (12 buys vs 7 sells), accumulating 5 properties this year. The buy/sell ratio for all landlords consistently exceeded 1.7x across all quarters in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Engage in 11.7% of Q4 Transactions; Institutions Pay 88.6% Less Per Property
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) paid a strikingly low average purchase price of $41,344 in Q4, an 88.6% discount compared to the $362,435 paid by single-property landlords. Small-medium landlords (21-50 properties) and institutional buyers (1000+ properties) showed the highest reliance on inter-landlord transactions, with 50.0% and 40.0% of their purchases, respectively, originating from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 78.1% of 4,685 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Laramie County
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Laramie County manage a substantial portfolio of 4,685 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 16.1% of the total SFR market of 29,154 properties. This highlights a considerable investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 3,661 SFR properties, which accounts for 78.1% of all landlord-owned housing. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties stand at 1,136, representing 24.2% of the investor-held portfolio.

The landlord ecosystem is predominantly comprised of individual entities, with 5,080 individual landlords far outnumbering the 814 company landlords. This demonstrates that the vast majority of rental properties are managed by smaller-scale, individual operators rather than large corporations.

A striking 97.3% of landlord-owned SFR properties (4,557 out of 4,685) are rented, underscoring a strong focus on generating rental income rather than personal occupancy. This confirms the investment-centric nature of these holdings.

Landlord portfolios are diverse in their financing, with 2,557 properties held outright in cash compared to 2,128 properties that are financed. This balance indicates a mix of debt-leveraged and debt-free investment strategies among landlords in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secure 22.5% Discount in Q4, Paying $91,901 Less Than Homeowners
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Laramie County continue to demonstrate strong market acumen, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $316,380. This represents a substantial 22.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $408,281, yielding a significant savings of $91,901 per property.

The pricing advantage for landlords has shown considerable volatility throughout 2025. While Q1 saw an impressive 24.8% discount ($105,198 difference), Q2 surprisingly recorded landlords paying a 1.9% premium ($8,346) over homeowners. However, this trend reversed, with discounts returning to 15.2% in Q3 and widening to 22.5% in Q4, indicating an inconsistent but often favorable market for investor acquisitions.

Analyzing historical trends reveals that current Q4 2025 landlord acquisition prices ($316,380) are slightly below the average prices observed during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom ($318,753). This represents a minor decrease of $2,373, or 0.7%, suggesting a cooling or stabilization in investor acquisition costs compared to recent peak years.

Despite the general trend of landlords paying less, the data indicates that Q2 2025 was an anomaly where landlords paid an average of $440,820, which was $8,346 (1.9%) more than homeowners. This quarter stands out as an exception to the typical pattern of landlord discounts.

Comparing year-over-year trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 was $361,100, which is slightly higher than Year 2024's average of $351,008. This suggests a modest increase in acquisition costs for investors over the past year, even amidst quarterly fluctuations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Account for 12.9% of Q4 SFR Purchases; Single-Property Investors Lead Activity
Detailed Findings

Landlords were active participants in the Q4 2025 market in Laramie County, securing 59 SFR properties. This represents 12.9% of the total 456 SFR purchases made during the quarter, indicating a significant but not majority share of new market activity.

The market for investor purchases in Q4 was overwhelmingly driven by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively accounted for 43 properties, or 71.7% of all landlord purchases. This highlights their continued dominance in acquiring residential rental stock.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most prolific in Q4, purchasing 30 properties, which alone represents 50.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This activity involved 46 distinct entities, suggesting a robust entry or expansion from smaller, individual investors into the market.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made a minimal impact on Q4 acquisitions, purchasing only 2 properties. This amounts to a mere 3.3% of landlord purchases, underscoring the limited role of large-scale entities in recent buying activity in Laramie County.

Mid-sized landlords also showed notable activity, with Tiers 05-08 (11-1000 properties) collectively purchasing 15 properties, or 25.0% of landlord acquisitions. Specifically, small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20) were the second most active group, acquiring 10 properties with 3 entities, suggesting strategic growth beyond initial investments.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.3% of All Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Laramie County, controlling a combined 97.3% of all 4,792 investor-held properties. This total of 4,659 properties from single-property owners up to 10-property portfolios illustrates their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

The smallest tier, single-property landlords (Tier 01), represents the largest segment of the market, holding 3,690 properties. This accounts for 77.1% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, confirming that the vast majority of investor-owned properties belong to individuals with a single rental unit.

In stark contrast to the widespread ownership by smaller entities, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share of the market, owning only 4 properties, which represents a mere 0.1% of all investor-owned SFR in Laramie County.

Ownership concentration remains high in the lower tiers, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding 358 properties (7.5%) and small landlords (3-5 properties, Tier 03) owning 452 properties (9.4%). This solidifies the market structure as primarily composed of small-scale investors.

Mid-sized landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) collectively own 124 properties, accounting for just 2.6% of the total investor-owned SFR. This suggests a sharp drop-off in the number of properties held as portfolio sizes increase beyond the small landlord categories.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 3-5 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Detailed Findings

A critical shift in ownership structure occurs in Laramie County as portfolio size increases: individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners starting at the 3-5 property tier. In this tier, companies own 52.3% of properties (240 properties), surpassing individual ownership at 47.7% (219 properties).

Individual investors overwhelmingly comprise the foundation of the market, holding 85.6% of single-property portfolios (3,232 properties). This pattern continues into the two-property tier, where individuals still account for 65.4% of ownership (238 properties), highlighting their initial dominance.

Beyond the 3-5 property tier, company ownership rapidly escalates, signifying a clear crossover point where larger portfolios become the domain of corporate entities. Companies control 73.3% of the 6-10 property tier (118 properties) and soar to 86.8% in the 11-20 property tier (79 properties).

Institutional-sized portfolios (Tier 101-1000) are almost exclusively company-owned, with companies holding 87.5% of properties (7 properties) compared to just 12.5% by individuals (1 property). This indicates that very large-scale investing is predominantly a corporate endeavor in Laramie County.

While individuals maintain a significant presence in smaller tiers, the data demonstrates a clear strategic difference: individual investors typically focus on limited property holdings, whereas companies are structured to scale into larger portfolios, with a decisive shift occurring in the mid-size landlord segments.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Laramie County Zip Codes 82001 and 82009 Lead in Investor-Owned Property Count
Detailed Findings

The 82001 zip code in Laramie County stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, holding 1,800 landlord-owned properties, making it the top region by count. This represents a significant 17.2% of the total SFR properties in that specific zip code, indicating a notable concentration of investor capital.

Following closely, zip code 82009 contains 1,201 investor-owned properties, and 82007 has 864, solidifying these three areas as the dominant sub-geographies for investor property holdings within Laramie County by sheer volume.

While volume leaders are important, investor ownership rates reveal unique market penetration. Zip code 82082 exhibits an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 74.1%, followed closely by 82060 at 73.8%, and 82050 at 54.4%. These areas are heavily influenced by landlord activity, with over half of their SFR properties owned by investors.

A comparison between property count and ownership percentage reveals distinct market profiles. Zip codes like 82001 lead in total properties but have a moderate ownership rate (17.2%), suggesting a large overall market. In contrast, 82082 boasts a very high ownership rate (74.1%) but may have a smaller total property inventory, indicating a highly concentrated investor market within a more limited area.

The diversity in investor activity across Laramie County's zip codes points to varied investment opportunities and strategies, from high-volume markets with moderate landlord presence to niche areas where investor ownership is the prevailing norm.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Laramie County Landlords Remain Net Buyers in 2025, While Institutions Shift from Net Sellers
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Laramie County consistently operated as net buyers throughout 2025, acquiring a total of 348 properties while selling 170. This results in a robust buy/sell ratio of 2.05x, indicating a strong trend of portfolio expansion rather than divestment across the entire landlord spectrum.

Drilling down into quarterly activity, landlords maintained their net buyer status in Q4 2025, with 82 buys against 38 sells, resulting in a net gain of 44 properties. This continued a consistent pattern seen throughout the year, with Q3 (85 buys vs 49 sells) and Q2 (107 buys vs 47 sells) also showing substantial net acquisitions.

Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) exhibited a significant shift in their transaction strategy. After being net sellers in 2024 (9 buys vs 12 sells, net -3), they became net buyers in 2025, with 12 acquisitions against 7 dispositions, resulting in a net gain of 5 properties. This reversal suggests a renewed interest in accumulation by large-scale entities in the current year.

Despite the change in institutional behavior from selling to buying, their transaction volume remains significantly lower than that of all landlords combined. In Q4 2025, institutional buyers accounted for 5 purchases and 4 sells, representing a tiny fraction of the overall market activity, underscoring the dominance of smaller investors in transaction volume.

The consistent net buying behavior of all landlords, with buy/sell ratios above 1.7x across all 2025 quarters, signals a healthy and expanding investor market. This sustained accumulation suggests confidence in the long-term rental market prospects in Laramie County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Engage in 11.7% of Q4 Transactions; Institutions Pay 88.6% Less Per Property
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in 82 transactions in Q4 2025, representing 11.7% of the total 700 SFR transactions in Laramie County. This indicates a notable, yet not dominant, share of market liquidity and exchange driven by investor activity during the quarter.

A significant pricing disparity emerged in Q4, particularly between the smallest and largest investors. Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) acquired properties at an average price of $41,344, which is an astonishing 88.6% less than the $362,435 average price paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01). This massive difference suggests that institutional buyers are targeting specific, perhaps distressed or unique, assets at deeply discounted valuations.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) remain the most active segment in terms of transaction volume, accounting for 46 transactions in Q4, far outstripping all other tiers. Their average purchase price of $362,435 also represents the highest among all tiers, indicating a focus on higher-value individual properties.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied significantly by tier. Small-medium landlords (Tier 21-50) made 50.0% of their Q4 purchases (2 out of 4 transactions) from other landlords. Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) also engaged heavily in landlord-to-landlord transactions, with 40.0% of their purchases (2 out of 5 transactions) coming from fellow investors, suggesting a specialized market for larger portfolio transfers.

In contrast, mom-and-pop landlords in Tiers 01, 03-05, and 05-08 showed a lower reliance on inter-landlord transactions, with approximately 10.0% of their Q4 purchases originating from other investors. This implies they are more likely to acquire properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Laramie County Market, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts
Holdings
Landlords in Laramie County collectively own 4,685 SFR properties, representing 16.1% of the total market, with individual investors holding 3,661 properties (78.1%) and companies owning 1,136 properties (24.2%) of the investor portfolio.
Pricing
Landlords secured an impressive 22.5% discount in Q4 2025, paying an average of $316,380 compared to homeowners' $408,281, a savings of $91,901 per property, despite quarterly fluctuations in this price gap.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 59 properties, accounting for 12.9% of all SFR sales, with 46 single-property entities actively contributing to this quarter's buying, predominantly within the mom-and-pop segment.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.3% of investor-owned housing in Laramie County, with single-property owners alone representing 77.1%, while institutional investors hold a marginal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the majority of landlord portfolios (85.6% in Tier 01), but companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, consolidating ownership in larger portfolio sizes.
Transactions
Laramie County landlords are net buyers with a 2.05x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (348 buys vs 170 sells), while institutional investors, after being net sellers in 2024, shifted to net buyers in 2025 (12 buys vs 7 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Laramie County, Wyoming, is heavily shaped by small-scale, individual investors, who collectively own 4,685 SFR properties, constituting 16.1% of the total SFR market. An overwhelming 97.3% of these investor-owned properties are managed by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with single-property owners forming the market's backbone at 77.1%. This structure strongly contradicts the popular narrative of large institutional dominance, as entities with 1000+ properties hold a negligible 0.1% of the total investor portfolio, underscoring the fragmented and localized nature of ownership.

In Q4 2025, Laramie County landlords continued their active participation, securing 59 properties, which accounted for 12.9% of all SFR purchases. These investors demonstrated significant market savvy, acquiring properties at an average of $316,380, representing a substantial 22.5% discount compared to the $408,281 paid by traditional homeowners. This pricing advantage, though fluctuating quarterly, signals a strategic buying approach. Overall, landlords maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025, with a healthy 2.05x buy/sell ratio, actively expanding their portfolios. Interestingly, institutional investors, after divesting in 2024, shifted to a net buyer stance in 2025, albeit with minimal transaction volume and significantly lower average acquisition prices.

The data reveals a clear bifurcation in investor behavior and market structure across Laramie County. Individual investors, focused on smaller portfolios, dominate both ownership and Q4 purchase activity, indicating a robust entrepreneurial spirit among local landlords. The sharp price discrepancy in Q4, where institutional buyers secured properties at an 88.6% discount compared to single-property landlords, highlights sophisticated and distinct acquisition strategies for larger entities. This suggests that while mom-and-pop landlords drive volume and market presence, institutional players pursue highly specialized and undervalued assets, signaling different market segments and investment theses within the county's dynamic real estate environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 09:59 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLaramie (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership