Taylor (WV) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Taylor (WV) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Taylor (WV)
4,692
Total Investors in Taylor (WV)
1,124
Investor Owned SFR in Taylor (WV)
877(18.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,054
SFR Owned
793
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
70
SFR Owned
88
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 877 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Taylor County, WV, amidst minimal recent market activity.
Landlords own 877 SFR properties (18.7% of market), with individual investors holding 90.4% versus companies at 10.0%. Taylor County saw no landlord SFR purchases in Q4 2025, but in Q2 2025 landlords secured a 6.1% discount compared to homeowners. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.0% of the investor-owned housing, with overall landlords shifting from net buyers in 2024 to net sellers in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 877 SFR properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding 90.4% versus companies at 10.0%.
A high 97.9% of these properties (859 of 877) are designated as rented, indicating a strong rental market focus. Furthermore, individual landlords outnumber companies by a significant 15.1 to 1 ratio (1,054 vs 70 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 acquisition data available; Q2 2025 landlords saw a 6.1% discount ($167,000 vs $177,773).
Prior Q1 2025 showed a substantial 68.4% price difference ($77,500 vs $245,274), likely an anomaly due to zero reported transactions. Acquisition prices trended up 24.9% from 2020-2023 ($156,402) to 2024 ($195,381).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made no SFR purchases in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
Consequently, neither mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) nor institutional (Tier 09) landlords recorded any purchases, with no new single-property landlords entering the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Taylor County, controlling 99.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 84.1% of all investor-owned properties (755 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share, consisting of just 1 property.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies gain majority ownership in portfolios larger than 5 properties, crossing over in the 6-10 property tier.
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, with 93.5% of Tier 01 properties, companies hold 68.2% of properties in the 6-10 tier and 66.7% in the 11-20 tier, indicating their focus on larger-scale holdings.
Geographic Distribution
WV-Taylor-26354 leads with 630 investor-owned properties, while 26424 has highest investor rate at 75.0%.
The top two zip codes by count, 26354 and 26347, collectively hold 744 properties, representing 84.8% of all investor-owned SFR in Taylor County. Notably, 26424 has a significantly high investor ownership rate of 75.0%, indicating a highly landlord-concentrated sub-market.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were net sellers in Year 2025 (0.8x buy/sell ratio), reversing from net buyers in 2024 (3.0x).
In 2025, landlords bought 4 properties and sold 5, while in 2024, they purchased 30 and sold 10. Institutional transaction data for 1000+ tier investors is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, indicating a complete absence of activity.
With zero total transactions, there was no activity across any investor tiers, and consequently, no inter-landlord trading or average purchase prices to report.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 877 SFR properties in Taylor County, with individuals holding 90.4% versus companies at 10.0%.
Detailed Findings

Taylor County's real estate market features 877 investor-owned Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 18.7% of the total SFR market, indicating a notable investor presence in the region.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, controlling 793 properties (90.4%) compared to company-owned properties at 88 (10.0%), underscoring the prevalence of small-scale, individual landlords.

A significant majority of landlord-owned properties, 859 out of 877, are rented, which highlights a strong focus on generating rental income from their portfolios, with 97.9% of properties serving this purpose.

In terms of entities, individual landlords are far more numerous than company landlords, with 1,054 individual landlords operating against just 70 company landlords, resulting in a 15.1:1 ratio that further emphasizes the mom-and-pop nature of the market.

The data indicates that while 862 properties are cash-owned, and 15 are financed, the primary operational focus across the portfolio is rental income, as nearly all investor-owned properties are designated for rent.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 acquisition data available; Q2 2025 landlords saw a 6.1% discount ($167,000 vs $177,773).
Detailed Findings

Taylor County experienced a complete absence of reported landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, suggesting a significant pause in investor buying activity during the quarter.

In Q2 2025, landlords demonstrated a pricing advantage, with an average acquisition price of $167,000, securing a $10,773 discount (6.1%) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $177,773.

A much larger price gap was observed in Q1 2025, where landlords' reported average price of $77,500 was $167,774 (68.4%) less than homeowners' $245,274, though these figures are based on zero reported landlord acquisitions and should be interpreted with caution as a possible statistical anomaly.

Examining historical trends, average acquisition prices for landlords rose significantly by 24.9% from the 2020-2023 period ($156,402) to Year 2024 ($195,381), indicating a period of appreciation before the current slowdown.

The average acquisition price for Year 2025 currently stands at $137,167, a notable decrease from 2024, though this figure is based on limited or no reported purchases, making a definitive trend difficult to establish without more transaction volume.

The inconsistency in reported landlord discounts, ranging from 6.1% in Q2 2025 to 68.4% in Q1 2025 (both with zero transactions), points to an unstable market with highly selective or rare investor activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made no SFR purchases in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
Detailed Findings

Taylor County experienced a complete absence of landlord SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with 0 properties acquired, indicating a notable pause in investor acquisition activity.

This lack of activity meant landlords accounted for 0.0% of all Q4 SFR purchases, effectively signaling a quarter without investor market participation.

Neither mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) nor institutional investors (Tier 09) registered any purchases in Q4 2025, indicating a universal slowdown across all investor tiers.

As a direct result of zero acquisitions, no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the market in Taylor County during the fourth quarter.

The absence of Q4 purchase data for all tiers implies that no entities across the entire landlord spectrum were actively buying properties during this period, presenting a picture of market dormancy for acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Taylor County, controlling 99.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), collectively own 889 properties, representing an overwhelming 99.0% of all investor-owned Single Family Residential (SFR) units in Taylor County.

The market is heavily concentrated in the smallest tier, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 755 properties, which is 84.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, solidifying their role as the backbone of the local rental market.

Despite widespread discussion about large-scale investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal presence in Taylor County, owning just 1 property, which constitutes a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned market.

The distribution reveals a sharp drop-off in ownership as portfolio size increases; for example, Tiers 01-04 account for nearly all properties, while Tiers 05-08 (11-1000 properties) together hold only a combined 9 properties (1.0%).

The data strongly indicates that Taylor County's investor market is characterized by a fragmented ownership structure, primarily driven by numerous small-scale, individual investors rather than large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies gain majority ownership in portfolios larger than 5 properties, crossing over in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, accounting for 93.5% of properties in Tier 01 (710 properties) and 98.0% in Tier 02 (48 properties), firmly establishing their foundational role in the market.

A significant crossover point occurs between Tier 3-5 and Tier 6-10: individual investors still hold a majority in Tier 3-5 (74.6% or 47 properties), but companies become the dominant owners in Tier 6-10, controlling 68.2% of properties (15 properties).

Companies solidify their majority ownership in the mid-size tiers, representing 68.2% of properties in the 6-10 portfolio tier and 66.7% in the 11-20 tier (2 properties), signaling their strategic focus on moderately larger property counts.

The data reveals a clear divergence in ownership strategy, with individuals building numerous small portfolios, while companies tend to concentrate their holdings in slightly larger, though still not institutional-scale, portfolios in Taylor County.

This pattern indicates that while single-property and two-property landlords are almost exclusively individuals, companies become a significant, often majority, player once an investor begins to scale beyond a few properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
WV-Taylor-26354 leads with 630 investor-owned properties, while 26424 has highest investor rate at 75.0%.
Detailed Findings

Within Taylor County, WV, Zip Code 26354 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting 630 landlord-owned properties, which represents a significant 19.5% of its total SFR market.

Following 26354, Zip Code 26347 is the next most active, with 114 investor-owned properties and a higher ownership rate of 24.6%, indicating a concentrated investor presence relative to its market size.

Interestingly, Zip Code 26424 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at a remarkable 75.0%, suggesting a niche sub-market predominantly comprised of investor-held properties, despite its property count not being listed among the top for volume.

The top two zip codes by property count, 26354 and 26347, combined account for 744 investor-owned properties, effectively consolidating 84.8% of all landlord-held SFR in Taylor County within these two areas, highlighting strong geographic concentration.

There is a clear distinction between volume and penetration: while 26354 leads in total investor-owned properties, 26424 demonstrates a much higher rate of investor ownership, indicating diverse market dynamics across different zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were net sellers in Year 2025 (0.8x buy/sell ratio), reversing from net buyers in 2024 (3.0x).
Detailed Findings

Overall landlords in Taylor County shifted from being strong net buyers in Year 2024 to net sellers in Year 2025, with a buy/sell ratio declining sharply from 3.0x (30 buys vs 10 sells) to 0.8x (4 buys vs 5 sells) respectively.

The most recent quarterly data for Q2 2025 shows landlords as net buyers, with 2 properties purchased against 1 sold, indicating a potential slight rebound or isolated activity amidst the broader annual net-selling trend.

The significant reduction in both buy and sell volumes from 2024 to 2025, dropping from 40 total transactions to just 9, signals a considerable cooling or tightening of the investor market.

The absence of transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) prevents a comprehensive comparison of their market behavior against the broader landlord population.

This shift from net buying to net selling for all landlords suggests a change in market sentiment or opportunity, where existing landlords are either consolidating their portfolios or finding favorable conditions to exit the market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No landlord transactions occurred in Q4 2025, indicating a complete absence of activity.
Detailed Findings

Taylor County experienced a complete cessation of landlord-involved transactions in Q4 2025, with zero reported activities, signifying a market standstill for investor trading.

This absence of transactions meant landlords accounted for 0.0% of all Q4 transactions, effectively showing a quarter where investors were completely inactive in buying or selling properties.

Given the zero transaction volume, there were no reported purchase prices for any investor tier, nor any inter-landlord trading activity for Q4 2025.

The data clearly indicates that both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) landlords had no transaction activity during this quarter, pointing to a widespread pause across the investor spectrum.

This lack of Q4 transactional data for all segments makes it impossible to analyze tier-specific pricing strategies or preferred transaction sources during this period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.0% of properties in Taylor County amidst low recent market activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 877 SFR properties (18.7% of Taylor County's market), with individual investors holding 793 properties (90.4%) and companies owning 88 properties (10.0%).
Pricing
While no Q4 2025 transactions were recorded, in Q2 2025, landlords secured an average $10,773 discount (6.1%) compared to traditional homeowners ($167,000 vs $177,773).
Activity
Taylor County saw no landlord SFR purchases in Q4 2025, indicating a period of minimal investor acquisition, and consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Taylor County's investor market, controlling 99.0% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors constitute the vast majority of landlords at 93.8% of entities, but companies gain a majority share in portfolios above 5 properties, particularly in the 6-10 property tier (68.2% company-owned).
Transactions
Overall, landlords in Taylor County were net sellers in Year 2025 with a buy/sell ratio of 0.8x (4 buys vs 5 sells), though they were net buyers in Year 2024 (30 buys vs 10 sells); institutional transaction data is not available.
Market Narrative

In Taylor County, WV, landlords collectively own 877 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 18.7% of the total SFR market. The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who account for 90.4% of properties (793 properties) compared to companies at 10.0% (88 properties), solidifying the prominence of smaller-scale landlords in the region. This structure is further reinforced by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an expansive 99.0% of the investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.1% share.

Recent market activity indicates a notable slowdown, with no landlord SFR purchases or transactions recorded in Q4 2025. This pause in acquisition follows a year where landlords were net buyers in 2024 (30 buys vs 10 sells), shifting to net sellers in 2025 (4 buys vs 5 sells). When transactions did occur, such as in Q2 2025, landlords demonstrated a pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average $10,773 (6.1%) less than traditional homeowners, though these figures were based on zero reported landlord acquisitions for that period. This suggests a highly strategic and price-sensitive approach to property acquisition when activity is present.

The data for Taylor County paints a picture of a robust, locally-driven rental market where individual, small-scale investors are the primary actors, far outweighing larger corporate entities. The current lack of transactional activity signals a potentially stagnant or consolidating market, with overall landlords exhibiting a net divestment trend in the current year. This implies a market where existing landlords are either holding onto assets or subtly reducing their portfolios, rather than actively expanding, highlighting a unique dynamic compared to more institutionally active markets.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 09:50 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTaylor (WV)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price