Lewis (WV) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lewis (WV) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lewis (WV)
5,618
Total Investors in Lewis (WV)
1,531
Investor Owned SFR in Lewis (WV)
1,281(22.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,419
SFR Owned
1,159
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
112
SFR Owned
128
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,281 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lewis County, Outpaying Homeowners in Q4
Lewis County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio totals 1,281 properties, representing 22.8% of the market, with individuals holding a commanding 90.5%. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.9% of these investments. In Q4 2025, landlords made 7 purchases, notably paying a 50.5% premium over traditional homeowners, while remaining net buyers with a 3.33x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 90.5% of Lewis County's 1,281 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Cash acquisitions dominate, with 1,220 properties (95.2%) purchased in cash, significantly outweighing the 61 (4.8%) financed properties. An estimated 1,260 properties (98.4%) are rented, signaling a strong focus on non-owner-occupied rentals for landlords in Lewis County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Lewis County landlords paid a 50.5% premium in Q4, averaging $218,717 versus homeowners at $145,347.
The price gap swung from a 24.6% discount in Q3 to a 50.5% premium in Q4, indicating high volatility in landlord acquisition prices. Landlord acquisition volumes were notably low across all 2025 quarters, with 0 properties purchased in Q4, Q3, Q2, and Q1 that formed the basis for these average prices.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 15.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pops dominating 71.4% of investor buys.
Of the 7 landlord purchases in Q4, single-property landlords (Tier 01) accounted for 5 properties, underscoring their primary role in market entry and expansion. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 purchases in Q4, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying activity in Lewis County.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 97.9% of Lewis County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 78.4% of the market, totaling 1,044 properties, making them the backbone of the investor-owned housing supply. Institutional investors (Tier 09) represent a negligible 0.3% share, holding only 4 properties across Lewis County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, maintaining above 75% ownership even in larger portfolios.
Individual owners comprise 92.0% of single-property portfolios and 92.1% of 6-10 property portfolios, showcasing strong individual presence across the mom-and-pop segment. The highest company concentration occurs in the 21-50 property tier, where they own 75.0% of the 4 properties, indicating this as a rare crossover point for corporate majority.
Geographic Distribution
WV-Lewis-26343 leads in investor ownership rate at 39.3%, while WV-Lewis-26452 has the highest property count.
The top 5 regions by investor-owned property count range from 46 to 756 properties, indicating significant geographic concentration. There is a clear distinction between regions with high property counts and those with high ownership rates, as only one zip code, WV-Lewis-26343, appears in both top 5 lists, though at different ranks.
Historical Transactions
Lewis County landlords are net buyers with 10 purchases against 3 sells in Q4, a 3.33x buy/sell ratio.
Landlords in Lewis County have consistently been net buyers throughout 2025, with 32 purchases versus 11 sells year-to-date, yielding a 2.91x ratio. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced position, with 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025, effectively holding steady rather than accumulating or divesting.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords contributed 16.9% to Q4 transactions, making 10 of 59 total transactions in Lewis County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) accounted for the majority of landlord transactions with 7, suggesting new entrants or small expansions. In Q4, Tier 01 landlords paid an average of $214,667 per property, while mid-sized landlords (Tier 21-50) paid $138,949, highlighting varied pricing across investor sizes.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 90.5% of Lewis County's 1,281 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Lewis County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio comprises 1,281 properties, representing 22.8% of the total 5,618 SFR properties in the market, highlighting a substantial investor presence within the local housing stock.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 1,159 properties (90.5%) compared to companies which hold only 128 properties (10.0%), clearly challenging the narrative of corporate landlord dominance.

The ownership structure is further reinforced by entity counts, with 1,419 individual landlords making up 92.7% of the total 1,531 landlords, while 112 company landlords account for the remaining 7.3%.

A striking 95.2% of landlord-owned properties (1,220 properties) were acquired through cash transactions, suggesting a preference for unfinanced purchases among investors in Lewis County, with only 61 properties (4.8%) being financed.

The vast majority of these properties, 1,260 (98.4%) out of 1,281 landlord-owned SFR, are rented, indicating a strong and consistent focus on non-owner-occupied investment for rental income generation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Lewis County landlords paid a 50.5% premium in Q4, averaging $218,717 versus homeowners at $145,347.
Detailed Findings

In 2025-Q4, Lewis County landlords paid an average of $218,717, a substantial 50.5% premium over traditional homeowners who acquired properties at an average of $145,347. This equates to a $73,370 higher cost per property for landlords.

The landlord-homeowner price gap has shown significant volatility throughout 2025. After securing a 24.6% discount in Q3 ($135,750 vs $180,011), landlords then paid an 86.3% premium in Q2 ($344,243 vs $184,822), demonstrating inconsistent pricing strategies or market conditions.

The reported average landlord acquisition prices for 2025-Q4, Q3, Q2, and Q1 are based on 0 distinct SFR properties purchased by landlords within those specific quarters (as per section6-1.csv), suggesting these average prices may be derived from extremely low volume activity or imputed data, making direct comparisons challenging.

Looking at the overall year, landlord acquisition prices in 2025 averaged $240,661 (based on 0 properties), representing a significant increase over 2024's average of $88,939 and the 2020-2023 average of $131,721, although these are also based on limited reported purchases.

The sharp year-over-year price increase for landlords from $88,939 in 2024 to $240,661 in 2025 (despite the 0 property count for average) suggests a substantial shift in the types of properties or market dynamics impacting investor purchases in Lewis County, if any purchases occurred.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 15.9% of Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pops dominating 71.4% of investor buys.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lewis County were responsible for 7 of the 44 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 15.9% of the quarter's market activity, indicating a moderate but focused presence in property acquisition.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominated Q4 investor purchases, acquiring 5 properties, which represents 71.4% of all landlord purchases in the quarter and solidifies their role as the primary buying force.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was particularly active, with 7 entities purchasing 5 properties, demonstrating a strong influx of new or expanding small-scale investors into the Lewis County market.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4 2025, reinforcing their minimal direct presence in the Lewis County single-family rental market this period.

While Tier 01 landlords acquired 5 properties, smaller mid-size (21-50 properties) and large (101-1000 properties) landlords each made 1 purchase, showing some diversity in activity across higher tiers, though significantly lower volume.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 97.9% of Lewis County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04, collectively control an overwhelming 97.9% of the investor-owned SFR market in Lewis County, underscoring their pervasive dominance over larger entities.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who account for 1,044 properties, or 78.4% of the total, indicating that first-time or small-scale investors form the bedrock of the rental housing supply.

In stark contrast to the small landlord dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a mere 4 properties, representing only 0.3% of the total landlord-owned portfolio, demonstrating their minimal footprint in Lewis County.

Tiers 02 (two-property) and 03 (3-5 properties) contribute significantly to the mom-and-pop segment, holding 102 properties (7.7%) and 120 properties (9.0%) respectively, further solidifying the small-scale investor market structure.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold very limited shares, ranging from 1.2% (Tier 05) down to 0.2% (Tiers 07 and 08), indicating a rapid tapering off of portfolio sizes beyond the initial few properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, maintaining above 75% ownership even in larger portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across nearly all portfolio tiers in Lewis County, retaining a majority share even in mid-sized segments, challenging the perception of corporate control at broader levels.

In the foundational single-property tier (Tier 01), individual investors own a commanding 963 properties (92.0%) compared to 84 properties (8.0%) held by companies, establishing individual ownership as the prevailing model for market entry.

The pattern of individual dominance extends into the small landlord tiers: Tier 02 (two-property) sees 90.2% individual ownership (92 properties), Tier 03 (3-5 properties) has 85.8% individual ownership (103 properties), and Tier 04 (6-10 properties) maintains 92.1% individual ownership (35 properties).

The sole exception where companies hold a majority is the small-medium 21-50 property tier, where companies own 3 properties (75.0%) compared to individuals owning 1 property (25.0%), indicating a very specific, high-tier crossover point for corporate presence.

Overall, the data suggests that in Lewis County, the real estate investor market is predominantly a realm of individual entrepreneurs and families, with corporate entities making only a concentrated, niche appearance in larger portfolio segments.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
WV-Lewis-26343 leads in investor ownership rate at 39.3%, while WV-Lewis-26452 has the highest property count.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Lewis County exhibit significant geographic concentration, with the WV-Lewis-26452 zip code leading by count, holding 756 properties and representing a 22.7% investor ownership rate.

While WV-Lewis-26452 has the highest count, WV-Lewis-26343 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at 39.3% of its SFR properties, followed closely by WV-Lewis-26321 at 35.7%, indicating areas where nearly two-fifths of housing is investor-owned.

The top 5 regions by investor-owned property count – WV-Lewis-26452 (756), WV-Lewis-26378 (196), WV-Lewis-26447 (69), WV-Lewis-26372 (61), and WV-Lewis-26343 (46) – together account for a substantial portion of all investor-owned SFR in Lewis County.

Conversely, areas like WV-Lewis-26384 (28.6%), WV-Lewis-26412 (28.6%), WV-Lewis-26376 (35.0%), WV-Lewis-26321 (35.7%), and WV-Lewis-26343 (39.3%) reveal the highest investor penetration rates, often in regions with smaller total SFR inventories.

The varied ranking between property count leaders and percentage leaders highlights that investor activity is distributed across different market dynamics; some areas have high absolute volume, while others show a high proportion of investor ownership relative to available housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lewis County landlords are net buyers with 10 purchases against 3 sells in Q4, a 3.33x buy/sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lewis County demonstrated a strong net buyer position in Q4 2025, executing 10 buy transactions compared to just 3 sell transactions, resulting in a robust 3.33x buy-to-sell ratio, signaling continued market accumulation.

This trend of net buying is consistent across the year, with landlords making 32 purchases against 11 sells in 2025, indicating a sustained strategy of portfolio expansion within the Lewis County market.

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a neutral position in 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell transaction, suggesting they are neither expanding nor significantly divesting their minimal holdings in Lewis County.

Comparing annual activity, landlords were even more aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring 63 properties while selling only 4, a much higher 15.75x buy/sell ratio, indicating a significant decrease in buying intensity from 2024 to 2025.

The average buy price for all landlords in Q4 2025 was not explicitly provided by historical transactions data, but the consistent net buying suggests confidence in current market valuations despite potential price premiums.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords contributed 16.9% to Q4 transactions, making 10 of 59 total transactions in Lewis County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 10 of the 59 total SFR transactions in Lewis County during Q4 2025, representing 16.9% of the quarter's market activity and underscoring their active but not dominant role in property turnover.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, completing 7 transactions, which aligns with the trend of mom-and-pop investors driving much of the current quarter's market participation.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by tier: Tier 01 landlords paid an average of $214,667, while a small-medium landlord (Tier 21-50) completed 1 transaction at a lower average price of $138,949, suggesting different property acquisition strategies or market segments.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions in Q4, confirming their continued minimal presence and lack of transactional activity in Lewis County for the current quarter.

Inter-landlord trading was observed in the small-medium tier (21-50), where 100.0% of transactions were bought from other landlords, suggesting some internal market liquidity among more established smaller investors, while Tier 01 and Large Tier (101-1000) showed 0.0% bought from landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 98% of Lewis County Market, Outpaying Homeowners in Q4
Holdings
Landlords own 1,281 SFR properties in Lewis County, representing 22.8% of the market. Individual investors hold 1,159 (90.5%) of these properties, significantly outweighing company ownership.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $218,717 in Q4 2025, a substantial 50.5% premium over traditional homeowners who paid $145,347, indicating a willingness to pay higher prices in this period.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords making 7 purchases, accounting for 15.9% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove this activity with 5 purchases, indicating continued market entry by small-scale investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.9% of investor-owned housing in Lewis County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.3% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all landlord tiers, maintaining above 75.0% ownership even in mid-sized portfolios. Companies only become majority owners in the rare 21-50 property tier, controlling 75.0% of properties there.
Transactions
Lewis County landlords are net buyers with 10 purchases against 3 sells in Q4, resulting in a 3.33x buy/sell ratio. Institutional investors remained neutral with 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025, not actively accumulating or divesting.
Market Narrative

The Lewis County real estate market is significantly shaped by its robust landlord activity, with 1,281 SFR properties (22.8% of total SFR) under investor ownership. This portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who control 90.5% of properties and comprise 92.7% of all landlord entities. The mom-and-pop segment (1-10 properties) holds a commanding 97.9% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property landlords alone owning 78.4%, clearly establishing them as the foundational force in the local rental market.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated unique acquisition behavior, notably purchasing 7 properties and paying an average of $218,717—a 50.5% premium over traditional homeowners. This pricing trend marks a significant shift from previous quarters where discounts were observed, suggesting either specific market demands for investor-purchased properties or a very low volume effect. Landlords maintained a net buyer position in Q4 with 10 buys against 3 sells, a 3.33x ratio, continuing a pattern of accumulation observed throughout 2025. Institutional investors, however, remained largely inactive, recording zero purchases in Q4 and a neutral buy/sell position for the year.

The data from Lewis County reveals a highly localized, individual-driven investment landscape where mom-and-pop landlords are the primary market participants in both ownership and Q4 buying activity. The willingness of landlords to pay a premium over homeowners in Q4, coupled with their continued net buying, suggests strong underlying demand for rental properties or a strategic focus on specific property types in this market. The minimal presence and activity of institutional investors further emphasizes the community-centric nature of the Lewis County housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 09:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLewis (WV)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail