Grant (WV) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grant (WV) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grant (WV)
3,856
Total Investors in Grant (WV)
1,331
Investor Owned SFR in Grant (WV)
1,077(27.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,218
SFR Owned
945
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
113
SFR Owned
137
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,077 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Grant County, Aggressively Buying at 26% Discounts
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords control 97.8% of investor-owned properties in Grant County, WV, constituting 27.9% of the overall SFR market. In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average of $163,800, a significant 26.2% discount compared to homeowner purchases. Landlords remain strong net buyers in 2025 with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio, primarily driven by smaller investors as institutional activity is absent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors dominate Grant County's 1,077 landlord-owned SFR properties, holding 87.7%.
Landlord-owned properties are almost exclusively rental-focused (98.9% rented) and primarily cash purchases, with 88.7% bought without financing. Individual landlords represent 91.5% of all landlord entities in Grant County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an exceptional 26.2% discount in Q4, paying $163,800 versus homeowner's $222,026.
The landlord discount widened significantly in Q4, reaching $58,226 per property compared to Q3's $29,327. Overall 2025 acquisition prices for landlords averaged $156,581, a notable decrease from 2024's average of $204,328.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 42.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4, totaling 11 properties in Grant County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for all 100.0% of landlord purchases this quarter, with no activity from institutional investors. The majority of these purchases (63.6%) were by single-property landlords, indicating 8 new entities entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Grant County's investor market, controlling 97.8% of all investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 80.7% of the investor portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold no properties in Grant County. Acquisition pricing trends by tier cannot be assessed due to insufficient data for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual owners dominate across all investor tiers in Grant County, never ceding majority to companies.
Even in the larger small-landlord tiers (6-10 properties), individuals still hold 68.2% of properties. Pricing comparisons between individual and company landlords by tier are not available for this geography. No institutional companies are present in the provided tier data.
Geographic Distribution
WV-Grant-26847 leads with 465 investor-owned SFR, while WV-Grant-26866 has the highest penetration at 50.0%.
Two zip codes, WV-Grant-26707 (49.1%) and WV-Grant-26855 (42.1%), feature in both the top 5 by count and by ownership rate, indicating highly concentrated investor activity. Acquisition prices across these sub-geographies are not provided in the data.
Historical Transactions
Grant County landlords are robust net buyers with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (45 buys vs 5 sells).
The strong net buying trend has been consistent, with Q3 2025 showing an 11.0x buy/sell ratio (11 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no transaction activity in this geography. Landlord-to-landlord transaction percentages are not available in this historical data.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 35.7% of all Q4 transactions in Grant County, totaling 15 purchases.
All landlord transactions (100%) were by mom-and-pop investors, with no institutional presence. Despite buying at lower volumes, single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $182,125, while no properties were bought from other landlords this quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate Grant County's 1,077 landlord-owned SFR properties, holding 87.7%.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market in Grant County, WV, accounting for 945 properties, which is 87.7% of the total 1,077 investor-owned properties. Companies, in contrast, own only 137 properties, representing 12.7% of the market.

The prevalence of individual landlords is further evident in entity counts, with 1,218 individual landlords making up 91.5% of all 1,331 landlords in the county, significantly overshadowing the 113 company landlords (8.5%). This structure highlights a market driven by local, smaller-scale investors.

A striking 98.9% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Grant County are rented (1,065 properties), confirming that nearly all landlord acquisitions are for non-owner-occupied, rental-focused purposes. This signals a robust local rental market.

The method of acquisition heavily favors cash transactions, with 955 properties (88.7% of investor-owned) acquired in cash, compared to only 122 properties (11.3%) being financed. This high cash proportion suggests a financially robust or opportunistic investor base.

The average portfolio size for individual landlords is approximately 0.77 properties (945 properties / 1,218 entities), while company landlords average about 1.21 properties (137 properties / 113 entities). This indicates a highly fragmented market composed predominantly of single-property or very small portfolio owners, reinforcing the mom-and-pop structure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an exceptional 26.2% discount in Q4, paying $163,800 versus homeowner's $222,026.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Grant County demonstrated superior acquisition capabilities by paying an average of $163,800 per property, a significant $58,226 (26.2%) less than traditional homeowners who paid $222,026. This substantial discount underscores a strategic advantage for investors.

The landlord's pricing advantage has fluctuated but remained considerable throughout 2025. The Q4 discount of 26.2% was the highest of the year, exceeding Q3's 14.7% ($29,327 difference), Q2's 24.3% ($39,452 difference), and Q1's 20.9% ($40,576 difference).

Comparing annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 stood at $156,581, representing a notable decrease from the 2024 average of $204,328. This suggests a shift towards more affordable price points or increased opportunities for value acquisition in the current year.

The average price for landlords during the 2020-2023 pandemic era was $161,768, which is higher than the current 2025 average of $156,581. This indicates that landlords are now acquiring properties at prices below the pandemic boom, signaling a potential market adjustment.

While the data for individual and company landlord pricing is not available, the consistent and significant discount landlords achieve against homeowners points to a specialized market knowledge or negotiation capability that is pervasive among local investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 42.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4, totaling 11 properties in Grant County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Grant County demonstrated significant buying activity in Q4 2025, accounting for 11 of the 26 total SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 42.3% share of the market. This highlights their continued influence on property transactions.

The Q4 purchasing landscape was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who made 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 11 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchases in the county during this period, reinforcing the local, small-investor market dynamic.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, purchasing 7 properties and comprising 63.6% of all landlord purchases this quarter. This surge also indicates the entry of 8 new entities into the landlord market.

Small landlords (3-5 properties) also contributed notably, acquiring 3 properties, representing 27.3% of landlord purchases. Two entities in this tier were active, showing continued growth beyond initial single-property investments.

The relatively low total number of Q4 SFR purchases (26 properties) suggests a tight market, making the landlord's 42.3% acquisition share particularly impactful and indicative of strong investor demand despite limited inventory.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Grant County's investor market, controlling 97.8% of all investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert overwhelming control over the investor-owned housing market in Grant County, holding 97.8% of all such properties. This equates to 1,082 properties within these tiers.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who control 892 properties, representing an impressive 80.7% of the total investor portfolio. This underscores the fragmented and individualized nature of the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), those with 1000+ properties, have no presence in Grant County, owning 0 properties (0.0% share). This stark absence defies national narratives of institutional dominance and highlights the unique local market structure.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal share, with the largest tier (101-1000 properties) owning only 1 property (0.1%), further emphasizing the market's concentration at the smallest portfolio sizes.

Due to the provided data showing 0 properties acquired across all timeframes for tier-specific pricing in Grant County, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier. This limits insights into pricing strategies of different investor sizes in this geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual owners dominate across all investor tiers in Grant County, never ceding majority to companies.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership is pervasive across all landlord tiers in Grant County, demonstrating a consistent majority presence and indicating that companies do not become majority owners in any of the analyzed portfolio sizes. For instance, in the Single-property tier (Tier 01), individuals hold 89.7% of properties (804 properties) compared to companies at 10.3% (92 properties).

The dominance of individual owners continues even in larger small-landlandlord tiers; for properties in the 6-10 range, individuals still own 68.2% (15 properties) against companies at 31.8% (7 properties). This trend is consistent across all tiers where data is provided (e.g., Tier 02 at 84.0% individual, Tier 03-05 at 83.9% individual).

In the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, individual ownership is particularly high at 92.9% (13 properties), with companies holding a mere 7.1% (1 property). This further solidifies the market's individual-driven nature for larger portfolios as well.

The absence of data for institutional (1000+ properties) tiers means no comparison can be made regarding company concentration at the largest scale. However, within the active tiers, individual investors clearly maintain the primary ownership position.

Due to limitations in the provided data, a direct comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company landlords within specific tiers cannot be made, restricting insights into their differing purchasing strategies in Grant County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
WV-Grant-26847 leads with 465 investor-owned SFR, while WV-Grant-26866 has the highest penetration at 50.0%.
Detailed Findings

The zip code WV-Grant-26847 exhibits the highest concentration of investor-owned properties in the county, with 465 SFR properties. This significantly surpasses other areas, highlighting a key hub for landlord activity, despite its ownership rate of 24.0% not being the highest.

In terms of investor penetration, WV-Grant-26866 stands out with 50.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating that half of its housing stock is held by landlords. This suggests a highly landlord-dependent rental market within this specific zip code.

A notable overlap exists between areas with high investor property counts and high ownership rates. WV-Grant-26707 (55 properties, 49.1% rate) and WV-Grant-26855 (120 properties, 42.1% rate) appear in both the top 5 lists, signifying these areas are particularly saturated with landlord activity.

Other prominent areas by count include WV-Grant-26739 with 152 properties (40.4% rate) and WV-Grant-26833 with 143 properties (20.5% rate), demonstrating diverse levels of landlord penetration across different population centers within Grant County.

The data provided does not include acquisition prices for properties within these specific sub-geographies, preventing an analysis of how pricing strategies or market values differ across regions with varying investor concentrations.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Grant County landlords are robust net buyers with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (45 buys vs 5 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Grant County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating aggressive accumulation throughout 2025 with a significant buy-to-sell ratio of 9.0x (45 properties bought vs. 5 sold). This indicates a strong confidence in the local market for rental investments.

This net buyer trend has been consistent across recent quarters, with Q3 2025 showing an even higher buy-to-sell ratio of 11.0x (11 buys vs. 1 sell). Q2 2025 also reflected strong buying, with a 2.33x ratio (7 buys vs. 3 sells), suggesting sustained demand.

Comparing annual performance, the 2025 buying activity (45 properties) is higher than that of 2024 (35 properties bought), maintaining a consistent strong net positive position (31 net buys in 2024). This shows an increasing acquisition velocity.

There is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Grant County, implying a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying or selling activity. This reinforces the market's reliance on smaller, individual landlords.

The available data does not specify the percentage of buy transactions that are from other landlords, limiting the analysis of inter-landlord trading within the historical context.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 35.7% of all Q4 transactions in Grant County, totaling 15 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in Grant County's Q4 transaction market, participating in 15 out of 42 total SFR transactions, which accounts for 35.7% of all activity. This demonstrates their continued influence and market presence.

The transaction landscape was entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who comprised 100% of landlord transactions this quarter, totaling 15 purchases. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions, emphasizing the local nature of the investment market.

Despite purchasing fewer properties overall in Q4, single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded the highest average purchase price at $182,125 for their 8 transactions. In contrast, two-property landlords (Tier 02) secured properties at a notably lower average of $100,000.

Intriguingly, the data indicates that 0.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4 were from other landlords, suggesting that investors are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers. This highlights a lack of inter-investor trading activity.

The highest price spread among active tiers shows single-property landlords paying $82,125 more than two-property landlords ($182,125 vs $100,000), suggesting varying acquisition strategies or property types targeted by smaller-tier investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Grant County, Aggressively Buying at 26% Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,077 SFR properties, representing 27.9% of the total SFR market in Grant County, WV. Individual investors hold 945 properties (87.7%) compared to companies owning 137 properties (12.7%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid an average of $163,800, securing a substantial 26.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $222,026. This indicates a consistent pricing advantage in the county.
Activity
Landlords made 11 purchases in Q4, representing 42.3% of all SFR sales, with 8 new single-property landlords entering the market. All landlord acquisition activity in Q4 was driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.8% of investor-owned housing in Grant County, while institutional investors (1000+) hold 0.0%. Single-property owners alone account for 80.7% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate across all portfolio sizes, holding 87.7% of all investor-owned properties. Companies never achieve majority ownership in any of the tracked tiers, underscoring the market's individual-investor nature.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in Grant County, with a high 9.0x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (45 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors showed no transaction activity in this market.
Market Narrative

Grant County, WV, presents a housing market overwhelmingly shaped by individual and mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 1,077 SFR properties, constituting 27.9% of the county's total SFR inventory. Individual investors own 87.7% of these properties and represent 91.5% of all landlord entities, establishing a market structure distinctly absent of large-scale corporate influence. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) further cement their dominance by holding 97.8% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) showing no presence.

Investor behavior in Grant County, WV, demonstrates a strong acquisition focus, with landlords being robust net buyers in 2025, reflected by a 9.0x buy-to-sell ratio. In Q4, landlords accounted for 42.3% of all SFR purchases, securing properties at an average price of $163,800, a significant 26.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This quarter also saw the entry of 8 new single-property landlords, with all purchases driven by the mom-and-pop segment and no transactions involving institutional entities or inter-landlord trades.

These patterns reveal Grant County as a decentralized market, where local, smaller-scale investors are the primary drivers of investment activity. The substantial pricing advantage secured by landlords, coupled with a high proportion of cash purchases, indicates a strategic and opportunistic approach to acquisitions. The complete absence of institutional activity signals a market less attractive to large-scale operations but highly accessible and active for individual entrepreneurs seeking rental-focused, non-owner-occupied properties. This local dynamic contrasts sharply with broader narratives of institutional investor dominance, showcasing a unique, community-driven investment landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 09:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGrant (WV)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail