Price (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Price (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Price (WI)
10,178
Total Investors in Price (WI)
5,004
Investor Owned SFR in Price (WI)
4,269(41.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,323
SFR Owned
3,519
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
681
SFR Owned
759
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,269 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate 41.9% of Price County's SFR Market as Strong Net Buyers
Investors own 4,269 Single-Family Residential properties in Price County, WI, representing a significant 41.9% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.8%), who were strong net buyers in 2025. In Q4, investors purchased 28.0% of all properties sold, securing them at an average 26.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,269 SFR properties (41.9% of market), with individuals holding 82.4%.
All 4,269 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with zero properties showing financing. Individuals comprise the vast majority of landlords, with 4,323 individual entities compared to just 681 companies. Nearly the entire portfolio (4,225 properties) is classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords paid $231,500 per property, a 26.6% discount compared to homeowners.
The landlord pricing advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 23.4% premium in Q3 to a 26.6% discount in Q4. This represents a pricing shift of over 50 percentage points in a single quarter. Prices have appreciated significantly since the 2020-2023 period, rising from an average of $143,318 to $231,500 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 28.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of all landlord acquisitions in the fourth quarter. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had zero purchasing activity. The market saw the entry of 6 new single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.8% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords alone own 83.6% of all investor-held properties in the county. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, never ceding majority to companies.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner. Even in the largest reported tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 71.4% of the properties. The highest concentration of company ownership is 28.6% in that same 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 54555 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 1,532 properties.
While 54555 has the highest count, the 54470 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 62.1%. In several zip codes, including 54538 (57.7%) and 54564 (57.1%), investors own more than half of all SFR properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
The strong accumulation trend is consistent year-over-year, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 22.8 in 2024 (320 buys vs. 14 sells). In contrast, institutional investors are completely dormant, with a net neutral position in 2024 (1 buy, 1 sell) and no activity in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 20.5% of all Q4 2025 property transactions.
All landlord acquisitions in Q4 were sourced from the open market, with 0% purchased from other landlords. A significant price gap emerged among small buyers, with single-property landlords paying an average of $285,500, more than double the $123,500 paid by two-property landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,269 SFR properties (41.9% of market), with individuals holding 82.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 41.9% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Price County, WI, with a total of 4,269 properties under their ownership.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual owners, who control 3,519 properties, accounting for 82.4% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties total 759, or 17.8%.

A defining characteristic of this market is its reliance on all-cash transactions, as 100% of the 4,269 investor-owned properties are classified as cash holdings, with none recorded as financed.

The number of individual landlords (4,323) far surpasses the number of company landlords (681), reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 4,225 properties classified as rented, indicating a primary strategy of buy-and-hold for the vast majority of investors in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords paid $231,500 per property, a 26.6% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $231,500. This represents a substantial 26.6% discount compared to the $315,225 average paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $83,725 per property.

However, the landlord price advantage shows extreme volatility on a quarterly basis. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a 23.4% premium over homeowners, and in Q1 they paid a staggering 57.7% premium, indicating that investor purchase prices fluctuate dramatically depending on the specific properties acquired each quarter.

The data reveals significant long-term price appreciation in the market. The average landlord acquisition price of $231,500 in Q4 2025 is 61.5% higher than the average of $143,318 during the 2020-2023 period.

The sharp contrast between quarters—paying a $47,923 premium in Q3 versus securing an $83,725 discount in Q4—suggests a market where small transaction volumes can lead to large swings in average prices, likely driven by the specific type and condition of homes purchased by investors versus homeowners in a given period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 28.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 28.0% of all SFR purchases in Price County during Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 7 of the 25 total properties sold.

The fourth quarter's acquisition activity was exclusively driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 100% of these purchases, highlighting the absence of larger-scale buyers.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, purchasing 5 properties, which represents 71.4% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with 6 new landlord entities making their first purchase in Q4, signaling sustained interest from small-scale, local investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases and holding 0.0% of the quarter's acquisition share.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.8% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Price County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) holding 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The foundation of the rental market is built on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone own 3,655 properties, accounting for a massive 83.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding 8.1% and those with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) holding 7.2%.

The 'long tail' of small investors defines this market, as all tiers above 10 properties combined represent less than 0.2% of investor-owned housing.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) have virtually no footprint in Price County, with their ownership share at a statistically insignificant 0.0%, defying the narrative of large corporate landlord presence.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, never ceding majority to companies.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio size in Price County, showcasing a market structure fundamentally driven by personal holdings rather than corporate entities.

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover tier where companies overtake individuals. In the single-property tier, individuals own 83.9% of the homes, and this dominance persists even as portfolios grow.

Even among landlords with 6-10 properties, the largest group with a reported split, individuals still own a commanding 71.4% (30 properties) compared to just 28.6% (12 properties) for companies.

The highest concentration of company ownership is just 28.6%, indicating that the corporate landlord model has not gained a significant foothold at any scale within the county.

This data reveals a consistent pattern: as investors expand their portfolios in Price County, the ownership structure remains predominantly individual-based.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 54555 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 1,532 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Price County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 54555 zip code alone accounting for 1,532 investor-owned properties, representing a 43.5% ownership rate.

The top five zip codes by property count (54555, 54552, 54459, 54556, and 54513) collectively contain the vast majority of investor-held SFRs in the county.

Investor penetration is most extreme in smaller zip codes. The 54470 zip code has the highest ownership rate, where investors own 62.1% of all SFRs.

Multiple areas show investor ownership exceeding 50%, including 54538 (57.7%), 54564 (57.1%), and 54513 (50.6%), indicating these communities are primarily rental markets.

There is a distinction between the areas with the most investor properties (volume) and those with the highest investor share (penetration), although some zip codes like 54513 appear on both top-five lists.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Price County are heavily focused on portfolio growth, acting as strong net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 58 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 29-to-1.

This accumulation strategy has been consistent over time. In 2024, landlords acquired 320 properties and sold just 14, demonstrating a clear and sustained trend of market expansion.

The transaction data underscores the stark difference between mom-and-pop and institutional behavior. While small investors are actively accumulating, the 1,000+ property tier has been effectively dormant.

Institutional investors recorded only one purchase and one sale in 2024, for a net neutral position, and have had no transaction activity at all in 2025, indicating a complete lack of engagement in the market.

The high volume of buying relative to selling suggests strong confidence among local investors in the Price County rental market's long-term value and income potential.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 20.5% of all Q4 2025 property transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 8 of the 39 total SFR transactions, capturing a 20.5% share of market activity.

All investor transaction activity was confined to the smallest tiers, with single-property landlords accounting for 6 transactions and two-property landlords for the remaining 2.

Investors sourced all of their Q4 acquisitions from non-investors, as 0% of their purchases were from other landlords. This indicates they are buying properties from traditional homeowners or new inventory rather than trading within the investor community.

A notable pricing disparity appeared between the most active tiers. New, single-property landlords paid an average of $285,500, a 131% premium over the $123,500 average paid by landlords acquiring their second property.

This price difference suggests that first-time investors may be competing more directly for move-in ready homes, while slightly more experienced small landlords are targeting lower-priced properties, possibly with value-add potential.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 41.9% of Price County's Market, Driving Activity as Strong Net Buyers
Holdings
In Price County, WI, landlords own 4,269 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 41.9% of the market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 3,519 properties (82.4%), while companies own the remaining 759 (17.8%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 26.6% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $83,725 per property ($231,500 vs $315,225), though this advantage has been highly volatile quarter-to-quarter.
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 7 properties, representing 28.0% of all sales, with activity driven entirely by small investors. The quarter saw the emergence of 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) exercise near-total control over the rental market, owning 99.8% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, a pattern that holds true even for larger portfolios. Companies do not achieve majority control at any scale, owning just 28.6% of properties in the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 29-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (58 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors are entirely inactive, having registered no transactions in 2025 and a net-neutral position in 2024.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Price County, WI, is defined by the overwhelming presence of small, local landlords. Investors own a substantial 4,269 properties, representing 41.9% of the county's entire single-family housing stock. This market is fundamentally powered by individuals, who own 82.4% of the investor portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have virtually no presence, making this a quintessential main-street investment landscape.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, all-cash acquisitions and a clear focus on accumulation. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 28.0% of all homes sold, securing them at a significant 26.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is driven exclusively by new and existing small investors buying from the open market, not from each other. Over the long term, investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29 properties for every one they sold in 2025, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market's future.

The key takeaway from Price County is that it represents a market untouched by large-scale corporate investment, where the rental housing supply is almost entirely in the hands of local individuals. The high investor penetration rate, combined with all-cash purchasing and a consistent net-buyer stance, points to a stable, mature rental market. For residents, this means the local housing landscape is shaped not by distant corporations, but by community-level investors deeply embedded in the area.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:46 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPrice (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions