Pepin (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pepin (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pepin (WI)
2,860
Total Investors in Pepin (WI)
567
Investor Owned SFR in Pepin (WI)
523(18.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
451
SFR Owned
403
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
116
SFR Owned
124
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 523 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Comprise 99.1% of Pepin County's Investor Market Amid a Q4 2025 Activity Freeze
Investors own 523 Single-Family Residential properties in Pepin County, WI, representing 18.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.1% of the investor-owned housing stock, with individuals owning 77.1% of all properties. While historically net buyers, the market saw a complete halt in landlord purchase activity in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 523 SFR properties in Pepin County, with individuals holding 77.1%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (514), with only 9 being financed. Portfolio analysis shows 510 of the 523 properties (97.5%) are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a staggering 68.5% discount compared to homeowners in early 2025.
Based on limited Q1 2025 data, landlords paid an average of $68,700 versus $218,100 for homeowners, a raw discount of $149,400. This contrasts with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average landlord price of $207,671, suggesting recent purchases may be distressed assets or land.
Current Quarter Purchases
The landlord purchasing market in Pepin County completely stalled, with 0% of Q4 2025 sales.
There were zero SFR purchases by landlords in Q4 2025, a significant drop-off in activity. Consequently, both mom-and-pop and institutional investors recorded no new acquisitions during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Pepin County, controlling 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 80.7% of the investor-owned housing stock (431 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just one property, or 0.2% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords dominate all small-portfolio tiers, owning over 81% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier.
Individuals own 77.8% of single-property portfolios and 67.6% of two-property portfolios. There is no tier in the provided data where companies become the majority owner, reinforcing the market's individual-driven character.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Pepin County is highly concentrated, with one zip code having a 40.7% ownership rate.
The zip code 54769 has the highest investor penetration rate at 40.7%. The zip code 54759 holds the largest number of investor-owned properties at 169, representing a 24.7% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Pepin County are decisive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2024.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with 36 properties bought versus 6 sold in 2024. In 2025, the pattern continued with 2 buys and 1 sell before activity halted. There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Confirming a market-wide pause, landlords were involved in 0.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
The complete lack of Q4 activity meant there were no transactions to analyze for any investor tier. This inactivity affected everyone from new single-property landlords to the largest portfolio holders.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 523 SFR properties in Pepin County, with individuals holding 77.1%.
Detailed Findings

In Pepin County, WI, landlords own 523 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 18.3% of the county's total 2,860 SFRs.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, holding 403 properties, or 77.1% of the investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number 124, representing the remaining 23.7%.

The investor landscape is composed of 567 distinct landlord entities. Mirroring property ownership trends, 451 of these are individuals, while 116 are registered as companies.

A striking 97.5% of investor-owned properties (510 out of 523) are designated as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the rental focus of the portfolio in Pepin County.

Cash is overwhelmingly the preferred method of ownership. A total of 514 properties are owned outright as cash assets, compared to just 9 properties that are financed, signaling a low-leverage, high-equity investor base.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a staggering 68.5% discount compared to homeowners in early 2025.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of early 2025 transactions reveals a dramatic pricing advantage for landlords in Pepin County. In Q1, landlords acquired property for an average of $68,700, a massive 68.5% less than the $218,100 paid by traditional homeowners.

This represents a substantial $149,400 price gap per property, indicating landlords may be targeting highly distressed properties or different asset types not typically pursued by retail buyers.

The Q1 2025 purchase price of $68,700 is a significant deviation from historical norms. It is drastically lower than the average prices recorded in 2024 ($204,301) and during the 2020-2023 period ($207,671).

The market experienced a complete halt in landlord acquisition activity in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased, preventing any price comparison for that period.

The stark difference between the single Q1 2025 transaction and historical averages suggests that recent landlord activity is highly opportunistic and not representative of the broader market's price trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The landlord purchasing market in Pepin County completely stalled, with 0% of Q4 2025 sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero of the SFR properties sold in Pepin County during the quarter.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made no purchases.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional investors were also inactive, recording zero acquisitions in the final quarter of 2025.

The data indicates a pause in new market entrants and portfolio expansion. No new single-property landlords entered the market, a stark contrast to typical quarters where this tier leads acquisition volumes.

The total market share for landlords in Q4 was 0.0%, reflecting a period of profound inactivity and a potential shift in investor sentiment or available inventory in the county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Pepin County, controlling 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pepin County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 99.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest group by a wide margin, holding 431 properties, which accounts for 80.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. Landlords with 3-5 properties hold 11.2% of the stock, while those with 2 properties hold 6.4%.

The presence of large-scale investors is virtually non-existent. There is only one property in the entire county held by an institutional-scale investor (1,000+ properties), representing just 0.2% of the market.

This distribution highlights a market structure reliant on local, small-scale participants rather than large corporate entities, challenging common narratives about institutional takeovers of residential housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate all small-portfolio tiers, owning over 81% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords maintain majority ownership across all significant investor tiers in Pepin County. In the single-property tier, individuals own 337 properties (77.8%), compared to 96 owned by companies.

This individual dominance continues into larger portfolios. For landlords owning 3-5 properties, individuals hold 49 properties (81.7%), while companies own just 11 (18.3%).

Even in the two-property tier, individuals represent the clear majority, owning 23 properties (67.6%) versus 11 for companies (32.4%).

There is no crossover point observed in the data where companies overtake individuals in ownership share. The market structure remains firmly in the hands of private, individual investors across all common portfolio sizes.

This pattern indicates that even as local investors scale their portfolios, they tend to do so under personal ownership rather than forming larger corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Pepin County is highly concentrated, with one zip code having a 40.7% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Pepin County is not evenly distributed, showing strong concentration in specific zip codes. The 54769 area has the highest density of investor activity, with a 40.7% ownership rate.

By sheer volume, the 54759 zip code leads with 169 investor-owned SFR properties, which translates to a significant 24.7% of that area's housing stock.

The top three zip codes by investor count are 54759 (169 properties), 54769 (142 properties), and 54736 (124 properties), showcasing where the majority of rental housing is located.

Conversely, some areas show much lower investor penetration. The 54736 zip code has an ownership rate of 10.6%, despite having a high raw count of investor properties, indicating a larger overall housing market in that area.

This geographic clustering reveals distinct sub-markets within the county, with some areas being far more attractive to rental investors than others.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Pepin County are decisive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals that landlords in Pepin County have been consistently expanding their portfolios. Throughout 2024, they acted as strong net buyers, with 36 acquisitions against only 6 sales.

This equates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.0, demonstrating a clear strategy of accumulation and a bullish outlook on the local rental market during that period.

The net buying trend, though smaller in scale, continued into early 2025 with 2 properties purchased and only 1 sold before market activity paused.

The data shows a net portfolio gain of 30 properties in 2024 and 1 property in 2025, reinforcing the role of landlords as a primary source of housing demand.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the transaction market, with zero recorded buys or sells, highlighting that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Confirming a market-wide pause, landlords were involved in 0.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a total cessation of investor transaction activity in Pepin County. Landlords accounted for 0.0% of the quarter's transactions, with zero properties bought or sold.

This market-wide freeze was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), typically the most active segment, recorded zero transactions.

Similarly, there was no activity from mid-size or institutional investors, indicating a broad-based pause rather than a shift in behavior from a specific group.

Due to the lack of transactions, no pricing analysis by tier is possible for Q4. The average purchase price for all tiers was effectively $0.

This halt in the flow of properties among investors signals a potential shift in market conditions, a lack of desirable inventory, or a wait-and-see approach being adopted by the local investor community.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Pepin County's SFR market is defined by 99.1% mom-and-pop control and a complete halt in Q4 2025 investor buying.
Holdings
Landlords own 523 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 18.3% of the market in Pepin County, WI. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 403 of these properties (77.1%) compared to 124 (23.7%) held by companies.
Pricing
Based on limited early 2025 data, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $68,700, which is 68.5% less than the $218,100 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity ceased in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of all SFR sales. This halt in activity meant no new single-property landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
The investor market in Pepin County is almost entirely composed of small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.1% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across all portfolio sizes, holding over 81.7% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier. The data shows no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio (36 buys vs 6 sells), all transaction activity came to a halt in Q4 2025. Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential investment market in Pepin County, WI, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual participants. Investors own 523 homes, making up 18.3% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.1% of all investor-held properties. Individual investors, rather than corporations, own 77.1% of these homes, firmly establishing the market as a domain of local, small-scale enterprise, with institutional investors having a near-zero presence of just 0.2%.

Investor behavior has been characterized by aggressive accumulation, as seen in 2024 when landlords operated as strong net buyers with a 6-to-1 buy/sell ratio. However, this momentum came to an abrupt stop in the last quarter of 2025, when landlord purchasing and transaction activity fell to zero. Pricing data, though sparse, points to an opportunistic strategy; the most recent transactions in early 2025 saw landlords acquiring property at a massive 68.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, suggesting a focus on distressed or non-traditional assets.

The key takeaway for the Pepin County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local landlords, insulating it from the volatility of large institutional capital. The sudden freeze in activity in Q4 2025 is the most critical recent development, signaling a potential market shift, a lack of suitable inventory, or a collective pause from investors. This halt, coupled with the dominance of cash-heavy individual owners, suggests a cautious and disciplined local market that is not prone to speculative turnover.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:42 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPepin (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords