Ozaukee (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Ozaukee (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Ozaukee (WI)
28,262
Total Investors in Ozaukee (WI)
2,009
Investor Owned SFR in Ozaukee (WI)
1,689(6.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,561
SFR Owned
1,169
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
448
SFR Owned
527
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,689 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Ozaukee County with 98% of Holdings, Paying 65% Premium in Q4
In Ozaukee County, investors own 1,689 SFR properties, making up 6.0% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (98.0%), with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.2%. In a dramatic market shift, Q4 2025 saw landlords pay a 64.6% premium over traditional homeowners, a complete reversal from significant discounts earlier in the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,689 SFR properties in Ozaukee County, with individual landlords holding 69.2%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,353) compared to financed (336), representing an 80.1% cash position. An overwhelming 95.1% of the portfolio (1,607 properties) is designated as non-owner-occupied rentals, underscoring a strong focus on investment returns.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a shocking 64.6% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $871,333 per purchase.
This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from the prior three quarters, where landlords enjoyed discounts of 29.8%, 16.8%, and 25.8% respectively. This shift suggests a new, aggressive purchasing strategy or competition for premium properties at year-end.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 6.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors making 100% of those buys.
All 5 landlord purchases in Q4 were made by small investors in the 1-10 property tier, with zero activity from institutional buyers. The quarter saw the entry of 5 new landlord entities, all operating in the single-property tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 98.0% of Ozaukee County's investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent footprint, owning just 3 properties, which amounts to only 0.2% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone account for 77.3% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners only in portfolios of 6-10 properties, while individuals dominate smaller tiers.
For portfolios of 1-5 properties, individuals are the clear majority, owning 73.4% of single-property portfolios and 65.2% of 3-5 property portfolios. The data does not provide pricing comparisons between owner types.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in Port Washington (53074) and Cedarburg (53012) by property count.
The Village of Belgium (53013) has the highest investor ownership rate at a remarkable 28.2%. Port Washington (53074) is notable for appearing in the top five for both absolute count (329 properties) and ownership rate (8.6%).
Historical Transactions
In 2024, Ozaukee County landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 183 properties while selling only 34.
This activity reflects a strong accumulation phase, with landlords buying over five properties for every one they sold. Data on institutional-only transactions and landlord-to-landlord sales was not available for this period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 5.3% of all Q4 property transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
New, single-property landlords paid an average of $971,600 per home, a 162% premium over the $370,000 paid by two-property investors. No Q4 landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,689 SFR properties in Ozaukee County, with individual landlords holding 69.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a total of 1,689 Single-Family Residential properties in Ozaukee County, which constitutes 6.0% of the county's 28,262 total SFR properties.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,169 properties (69.2%), while companies own the remaining 527 properties (31.2%).

This individual dominance extends to the number of entities, with 1,561 individual landlords compared to just 448 company landlords, highlighting a highly fragmented market structure.

A striking 95.1% of the investor-owned portfolio (1,607 properties) is classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, indicating a clear and focused rental strategy among Ozaukee County landlords.

Investor portfolios are predominantly owned outright, with 1,353 properties held in cash versus only 336 that are financed. This 4-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio signals a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a shocking 64.6% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $871,333 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a stunning reversal of typical market behavior, landlords in Q4 2025 paid an average price of $871,333, a massive 64.6% premium over the traditional homeowner average of $529,515. This amounts to investors paying an extra $341,818 per property.

This Q4 premium represents a complete inversion of the trend seen earlier in the year. In Q3, landlords secured a 29.8% discount ($161,524), in Q2 a 16.8% discount ($91,273), and in Q1 a 25.8% discount ($124,894).

The sharp pivot from deep discounts to a significant premium suggests a dramatic shift in market dynamics, possibly driven by new, high-end inventory or increased competition among investors for a limited number of available properties.

Comparing prices over time, the average landlord acquisition price has seen significant volatility, jumping from an average of $453,222 in 2024 to $524,748 for the full year 2025, heavily skewed by the high-priced Q4 acquisitions.

The data does not contain a sufficient sample to compare individual versus company pricing, but the overall trend indicates that investors in Q4 were targeting a much higher-priced segment of the market than both homeowners and their own previous purchasing patterns.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 6.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors making 100% of those buys.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity accounted for 6.0% of the total market in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 5 of the 83 SFR properties sold in Ozaukee County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords. Investors in the 1-10 property portfolio range (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the landlord acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors.

The market saw an influx of new participants, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 80.0% of investor acquisitions, purchasing 4 properties across 5 new entities.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely dormant in the Q4 purchasing market, reinforcing the theme of a market dominated by small, local operators.

The data reveals a concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with 4 of the 5 properties going to first-time landlords and the remaining property acquired by an investor with a two-property portfolio.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 98.0% of Ozaukee County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Ozaukee County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 98.0% of all investor-held SFRs.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, holding just 3 properties, which represents a mere 0.2% of the investor market.

The market is highly fragmented, with the single-property landlord tier being the largest single group. These first-time or small-scale investors own 1,332 properties, accounting for 77.3% of all investor-owned homes in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also represent a very small portion of the market, collectively owning just 34 properties or 1.8% of the investor portfolio.

This distribution underscores a market driven not by large corporations, but by a large number of individual community members and small businesses operating at a hyper-local level.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners only in portfolios of 6-10 properties, while individuals dominate smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point in ownership structure occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies first become the majority owners, holding 54.4% of properties (31) compared to individuals' 45.6% (26).

In all smaller portfolio tiers, individual investors are the dominant force. They own 981 single-property homes (73.4%), 62 two-property homes (63.9%), and 133 homes in the 3-5 property tier (65.2%).

This pattern indicates that while individuals form the foundation of the rental market, a strategy of incorporation becomes more prevalent as portfolios begin to scale beyond five properties.

Even at the smallest tier, companies have a significant presence, owning 356 single-property rentals (26.6%), suggesting many investors choose a corporate structure from their very first purchase.

The available data does not include a breakdown of acquisition prices by owner type, preventing a direct comparison of purchasing strategies between individual and company landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in Port Washington (53074) and Cedarburg (53012) by property count.
Detailed Findings

The highest volume of investor-owned properties is found in the zip code 53074 (Port Washington), with 329 properties, followed closely by 53012 (Cedarburg) with 318 properties.

When measured by market penetration, the zip code 53013 (Village of Belgium) stands out with an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 28.2%, far exceeding any other area in the county.

The top five regions by sheer count are 53074 (Port Washington), 53012 (Cedarburg), 53092 (Mequon), 53024 (Grafton), and 53080 (Saukville), indicating where the bulk of rental inventory is located.

The list of highest ownership rates reveals different pockets of investor concentration, including 53075 (Port Washington Town), 53004 (Belgium), and 53074 (Port Washington City), suggesting specific neighborhoods are heavily targeted.

Port Washington's 53074 zip code is a clear hub for investor activity, ranking first for the total number of investor-owned properties and fourth for the highest ownership percentage (8.6%).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
In 2024, Ozaukee County landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 183 properties while selling only 34.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Ozaukee County demonstrated a strong bullish sentiment on the market in 2024, operating as significant net buyers.

Across 2024, investors purchased 183 SFR properties while only selling 34, resulting in a net addition of 149 properties to their collective portfolio.

The buy-to-sell ratio of 5.38-to-1 indicates a clear strategy of portfolio growth and accumulation rather than divestment or churn.

There is no specific data available for institutional-level (1000+ tier) transactions, but given their minimal ownership footprint, their activity is likely negligible.

Information on the percentage of transactions occurring between landlords was not available, preventing an analysis of market liquidity and internal trading.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 5.3% of all Q4 property transactions, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor transactions comprised 5.3% of all market activity in Q4 2025, with landlords participating in 6 of the 113 total SFR transactions in Ozaukee County.

All 6 of these transactions were conducted by 'mom-and-pop' investors, with 5 purchases made by single-property landlords and one by a two-property landlord, highlighting the absence of larger players.

A massive price disparity emerged between investor tiers: new single-property landlords paid an average of $971,600, while the two-property landlord paid $370,000. This suggests new entrants are competing for premium, high-cost properties to enter the market.

None of the landlord acquisitions in Q4 were purchased from other landlords (0.0%). This indicates that investors are exclusively acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market rather than trading assets among themselves.

With zero transactions, institutional investors were completely inactive in Q4, reinforcing their static and minimal role in the local market's transactional flow.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 98% of Ozaukee County's rental market and paid a 64.6% Q4 premium.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,689 SFR properties, representing 6.0% of the Ozaukee County market, with individual investors holding a dominant 69.2% of that portfolio compared to 31.2% for companies.
Pricing
In a striking Q4 reversal, landlords paid a 64.6% premium over homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $871,333 versus the homeowner average of $529,515.
Activity
Investors purchased 6.0% of homes sold in Q4, with all 5 acquisitions made by mom-and-pop landlords, including 5 new entities entering the market at the single-property level.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.0% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 183 properties versus 34 sold, while institutional transaction activity in Ozaukee County was nonexistent.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Ozaukee County, WI, is defined by small, local operators rather than large corporations. Investors own 1,689 single-family homes, making up 6.0% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a staggering 98.0% of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.2%. The ownership is further characterized by individuals, who hold 69.2% of properties, solidifying the market's community-based, fragmented nature.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 marked a dramatic and unexpected shift. After securing significant discounts earlier in the year, landlords paid an average price of $871,333, a 64.6% premium over traditional homeowners. This aggressive, high-end purchasing was driven entirely by new and small-scale investors, who comprised 100% of the quarter's landlord acquisitions. Throughout 2024, landlords acted as decisive net buyers, demonstrating strong confidence in the local market by purchasing over five homes for every one they sold.

The key takeaway for Ozaukee County is that its rental housing market is almost entirely in the hands of local, small-scale investors. The narrative of institutional takeover holds no weight here. Instead, the data points to a competitive environment where new landlords are paying a substantial premium to gain a foothold, a trend that bucks national patterns of investor discounts. This suggests strong demand for rental property and a belief in the long-term value of the Ozaukee County housing market among local investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:40 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyOzaukee (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail