Monroe (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Monroe (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Monroe (WI)
14,208
Total Investors in Monroe (WI)
2,260
Investor Owned SFR in Monroe (WI)
2,300(16.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,812
SFR Owned
1,550
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
448
SFR Owned
755
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,300 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Monroe County's Real Estate Market, Accounting for 88% of Holdings
In Monroe County, WI, landlords own 2,300 SFR properties, representing 16.2% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by individual and small-scale 'mom-and-pop' investors (88.4% of holdings), while institutional presence is virtually non-existent. In Q4 2025, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 27.4% of all homes sold while securing modest discounts compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,300 properties in Monroe County, with individuals holding 67.4% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (2,080) versus financed (220). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,230 properties (97.0%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 1.9% less than homeowners, a narrow discount of $4,995 per property.
This Q4 discount is significantly smaller than the massive 29.2% ($99,120) gap seen in Q3 2025, showing a volatile pricing advantage. Prices for landlords have appreciated significantly from the 2020-2023 average of $165,540 to $251,172 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 27.4% of all single-family homes sold in Monroe County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, making up 88.2% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 88.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property, representing a negligible 0.0% of the market. The largest landlords in the county are mid-size, not institutional giants.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
While individuals own 81.5% of single-property portfolios, companies control 68.7% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range. This crossover highlights a clear trend where larger portfolios are more likely to be corporatized.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Sparta and Tomah, with zip codes 54656 and 54660 holding the most properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is in Warrens (54666) at 32.3%, where nearly one in three homes is investor-owned. This contrasts with Sparta (54656), which has a high count (801 properties) but a lower rate of 14.2%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Monroe County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 86 properties while selling only 4 in 2025.
This net buying trend was also strong in 2024, with 139 buys versus 26 sells. The single institutional entity was also a slight net buyer in 2024, acquiring 2 properties and selling 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 27.2% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
New, single-property landlords paid an average of $257,186, close to the $279,200 paid by more established mid-size investors. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords, indicating a focus on acquiring from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,300 properties in Monroe County, with individuals holding 67.4% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties comprise a significant 16.2% share of the single-family residential market in Monroe County, totaling 2,300 homes.

Individual investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 1,550 properties (67.4%), more than double the 755 properties (32.8%) held by companies.

The ownership structure is similarly skewed towards individuals, with 1,812 individual landlords compared to just 448 company landlords, a ratio of over 4 to 1.

A striking 90.4% of the investor portfolio (2,080 properties) is owned outright in cash, indicating a market of well-capitalized investors rather than highly leveraged players.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 2,230 of the 2,300 properties (97.0%) being rented, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income within the local market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 1.9% less than homeowners, a narrow discount of $4,995 per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Monroe County secured properties for an average of $251,172 in Q4 2025, representing a 1.9% discount compared to the $256,167 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price advantage for landlords fluctuates dramatically, shrinking to just $4,995 in Q4 from a substantial $99,120 (29.2%) discount in Q3 2025, suggesting inconsistent negotiating power or market conditions.

The average landlord acquisition price has seen substantial growth, rising from a 2020-2023 average of $165,540 to an average of $243,999 for the full year 2025.

Compared to the previous year, landlord acquisition prices in 2025 ($243,999) are 15.8% higher than in 2024 ($210,669), indicating strong market appreciation.

Throughout 2025, the landlord discount has been inconsistent, ranging from a low of 1.9% in Q4 to a high of 29.2% in Q3, making it difficult to predict their purchasing advantage from one quarter to the next.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 27.4% of all single-family homes sold in Monroe County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for over a quarter of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 17 of the 62 total SFRs sold.

The market is being shaped by new and small investors, as 21 new single-property entities entered the market, acquiring 14 properties (82.4% of all landlord purchases).

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 15 of the 17 investor purchases, a dominating 88.2% share of acquisition activity.

There was a complete absence of institutional buying activity in Q4, with the 1000+ property tier recording zero purchases.

The only other active tier was the small-medium category (21-50 properties), where a single entity acquired 2 properties, representing 11.8% of the quarter's investor activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 88.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Monroe County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 88.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords are the most significant group, owning 1,477 properties, which accounts for 62.4% of all investor-owned homes.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) control a combined 11.6% of the portfolio, showcasing a small but established segment of professional investors.

The narrative of large-scale institutional ownership does not apply here, as the 1000+ property tier holds only one property, making up a statistically insignificant 0.0% of the market.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with the top four 'mom-and-pop' tiers containing the vast majority of assets, indicating a low barrier to entry for new investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 81.5% of single-property portfolios and 58.6% of two-property portfolios.

A clear shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolio sizes increase. The crossover point is the '6-10 properties' tier, where companies own a 68.7% majority share.

Even in the '3-5 properties' tier, individuals maintain a strong 65.4% majority, showing that personal ownership remains the preferred structure for smaller-scale landlords.

The largest non-institutional tier in the data, '11-20 properties,' shows a more balanced but still company-led split, with corporations owning 72 properties (59.0%) compared to individuals' 50 (41.0%).

This data reveals a distinct lifecycle: investors enter the market as individuals and tend to incorporate as their portfolios grow beyond five properties, likely for liability and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Sparta and Tomah, with zip codes 54656 and 54660 holding the most properties.
Detailed Findings

The zip codes for Sparta (54656) and Tomah (54660) are the epicenters of investor ownership by volume, containing 801 and 738 investor-owned properties, respectively.

High investor concentration is not limited to the largest towns. Warrens (54666) has the highest ownership rate at 32.3%, indicating a significant rental market presence in a smaller community.

Several other smaller communities exhibit high investor penetration, including Norwalk (54651) at 30.9% and Cashton (54615) at 24.1%.

The data highlights a key difference between raw volume and market saturation. While Sparta has the most investor properties, Warrens has the highest proportion of them, suggesting different market dynamics.

The top five zip codes by ownership rate are all above 24%, showing that investor focus is not confined to a single area but is spread across several key communities in Monroe County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Monroe County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 86 properties while selling only 4 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors are consistently in accumulation mode, demonstrated by a strong net positive acquisition of 82 properties in 2025 (86 buys vs. 4 sells).

This pattern of aggressive buying is not new; in 2024, landlords were also significant net buyers, adding a net 113 properties to their portfolios (139 buys vs. 26 sells).

The minimal selling activity, especially in 2025 with only 4 properties sold, suggests a long-term hold strategy is prevalent among landlords in the county.

Even the market's sole institutional-tier investor is in a growth phase, albeit a small one, having been a net buyer of one property in 2024.

The consistent, high-volume net purchasing across the last two years indicates strong confidence in the Monroe County rental market from its investor base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 27.2% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 25 of the 92 total transactions, a 27.2% share.

New entrants are paying competitive prices. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $257,186, not far from the $279,200 average for small-medium investors (Tier 21-50), suggesting they are not solely focused on deep-discount properties.

The market for investor acquisitions is sourced entirely from the traditional market, as 0% of the 25 landlord transactions involved purchasing from another landlord.

Mom-and-pop landlords dominated the transaction volume, with their tiers accounting for 23 of the 25 total investor transactions.

There were no institutional transactions in Q4, reinforcing that the quarter's activity was exclusively driven by smaller to mid-sized players expanding their portfolios from the homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 88.4% of Monroe County's Investor Market as Active Net Buyers
Holdings
Landlords own 2,300 single-family properties in Monroe County, WI, representing 16.2% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who own 1,550 properties (67.4%) compared to 755 (32.8%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $251,172, a modest 1.9% discount ($4,995) compared to the $256,167 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors purchased 27.4% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with 21 new single-property landlords entering the market and mom-and-pop tiers driving 88.2% of all landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with an 88.4% share of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers, acquiring 86 properties and selling only 4 in 2025. The single institutional-scale investor was also a slight net buyer in 2024 (2 buys vs. 1 sell).
Market Narrative

In Monroe County, WI, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 2,300 properties, which is 16.2% of the total SFR market. This ownership is not concentrated in corporate hands; rather, individual investors hold 67.4% of these homes. The market structure heavily favors 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 88.4% of the investor portfolio, while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent presence.

Investor behavior in Monroe County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and a focus on the traditional housing market. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 27.4% of all homes sold, and these buyers were overwhelmingly small-scale, with 21 new single-property landlords entering the market. They are consistent net buyers, acquiring properties at a much higher rate than they sell. Their pricing advantage over homeowners is modest, securing a 1.9% discount in the latest quarter, indicating they compete directly for housing stock rather than exclusively targeting distressed assets.

The key takeaway for the Monroe County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local investors rather than a few large corporations. This fragmented ownership structure suggests a resilient rental market less susceptible to the strategic shifts of large institutional players. The primary dynamic is one of continuous acquisition from the homeowner market by individuals and small companies who are committed to long-term holds, signaling strong confidence in the local economy and rental demand.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:42 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMonroe (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct