Lafayette (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lafayette (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lafayette (WI)
4,852
Total Investors in Lafayette (WI)
766
Investor Owned SFR in Lafayette (WI)
650(13.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
669
SFR Owned
573
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
97
SFR Owned
85
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 650 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Lafayette County's Investor Market, 100% Owned by Mom-and-Pops, Froze with Zero Purchases in Q4 2025
Investors own 650 SFR properties in Lafayette County, representing 13.4% of the market, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 100% of this portfolio. While investors demonstrated strong buying power with a 14.3% price discount compared to homeowners in early 2025, purchasing activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025 with zero acquisitions recorded.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 650 SFR properties in Lafayette County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 88.2% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 629 owned with cash versus only 21 being financed. In total, 766 landlords operate in the county, of which 669 are individuals and 97 are companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors secured a 14.3% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025, paying $30,063 less per property.
The average landlord purchase price was $180,400 versus the traditional homeowner price of $210,463 in Q1 2025. This reflects a consistent trend of significant year-over-year price appreciation from an average of $127,000 during the 2020-2023 period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity in Lafayette County completely halted in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of acquisitions.
There were zero SFR purchases by landlords in Q4 2025, a stark contrast to previous activity. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero acquisitions for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control, owning 100% of the investor-owned SFR housing in Lafayette County.
Single-property landlords are the foundation of the market, holding 552 properties, which accounts for 82.3% of all investor-owned homes. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1,000+ properties) in this county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with companies holding a minority share across all portfolio sizes.
Individuals own 86.2% of single-property portfolios and over 88% in every other active tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner in Lafayette County.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 53530 zip code, which holds 197 investor-owned properties, the most in Lafayette County.
While 53530 leads in volume, the 53522 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 25.0%. The top five regions by investor count all have ownership rates above 13%, indicating a pattern of clustered investment.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers in Lafayette County, acquiring 44 properties while selling only 3.
This net acquisition of 41 properties demonstrates a strong appetite for portfolio growth throughout 2024. Due to a complete absence of institutional investors, all transaction activity was driven by smaller landlords.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented 0.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Lafayette County, as investor activity came to a complete standstill.
There were zero transactions across all investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest local players. This halt meant there was no inter-landlord trading and no new acquisitions from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 650 SFR properties in Lafayette County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 88.2% share.
Detailed Findings

In Lafayette County, investors own 650 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 13.4% of the total 4,852 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the overwhelming majority, holding 573 properties (88.2%), while companies own the remaining 85 properties (13.1%), underscoring a market driven by small-scale participants.

The investor portfolio is predominantly owned outright, with cash purchases accounting for 629 properties. In stark contrast, only 21 properties are financed, signaling a low-leverage, high-equity strategy among local landlords.

A deep dive into property use reveals a strong rental focus, with 633 of the 650 investor-owned homes classified as rented, confirming their primary role as rental housing providers.

The landlord landscape is composed of 766 distinct entities. This is split between 669 individual landlords and 97 company landlords, resulting in a ratio of nearly 7 individual investors for every one company investor.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors secured a 14.3% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025, paying $30,063 less per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties at an average price of $180,400. This was 14.3% below the average price of $210,463 paid by traditional homeowners, a notable discount of $30,063 per home.

Acquisition prices have shown consistent and strong appreciation over time. The average price in Q1 2025 ($180,400) is a marked increase from the 2024 average of $133,965 and the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $127,000.

Despite a clear pricing trend from past data, investor acquisition activity completely paused in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by landlords during the quarter.

The price appreciation for landlords outpaced the market slightly, with their average purchase price growing by over 42% from the 2020-2023 average to Q1 2025, signaling a competitive but strategic acquisition environment before the Q4 pause.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity in Lafayette County completely halted in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 marked a period of total inactivity for real estate investors in Lafayette County, with zero SFR properties being purchased by this group. Landlords' market share of purchases dropped to 0.0%.

This halt in activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who constitute the entirety of the local investor base, made zero purchases.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) also recorded zero purchases, which is consistent with their non-existent presence in the county's overall ownership portfolio.

The lack of Q4 purchases means there were no new landlords entering the market, a significant shift from prior periods of active acquisition and market entry.

This complete freeze in investor buying represents a major deviation from historical trends and suggests a potential shift in market sentiment or a lack of available, desirable inventory at prices investors are willing to pay.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control, owning 100% of the investor-owned SFR housing in Lafayette County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lafayette County is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the 650 investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, owning 552 properties. This single tier accounts for a massive 82.3% of all investor-owned housing, highlighting the hyper-localized and small-scale nature of rental ownership.

The next largest tiers are small landlords with 3-5 properties (55 homes, 8.2% share) and two-property owners (43 homes, 6.4% share), further cementing the dominance of small-portfolio holders.

Investors with 6-10 properties represent the smallest segment of the mom-and-pop category, holding just 21 properties for a 3.1% share.

There is a complete absence of mid-size (11-1,000 properties) and institutional (1,000+ properties) investors, making Lafayette County a market defined entirely by small, local participants.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, with companies holding a minority share across all portfolio sizes.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single investor tier in Lafayette County. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 481 of the 552 properties (86.2%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues up the scale. For two-property portfolios, individuals own 38 of 43 properties (88.4%), and for landlords with 3-5 properties, they own 53 of 55 (96.4%).

Even at the highest local tier of 6-10 properties, individual ownership remains overwhelming at 95.2% (20 of 21 properties), with only a single property held by a company.

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership is the defining characteristic of the investor landscape at every level in this county.

Company ownership is minimal and scattered, representing only 13.8% of single-property landlords and dwindling to less than 5% in the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 53530 zip code, which holds 197 investor-owned properties, the most in Lafayette County.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is heavily concentrated in specific areas of Lafayette County. The 53530 zip code is the epicenter of activity, with 197 investor-owned properties, representing a 14.9% ownership rate.

Following 53530, the highest counts of investor properties are found in 53586 (82 properties), 53803 (72 properties), and 53504 (70 properties), all of which have landlord ownership rates between 13.4% and 14.6%.

While some regions lead by sheer volume, others stand out for their high density of investor ownership. The 53522 zip code has the highest penetration rate, with 25.0% of its SFRs owned by investors, followed by 53599 at 23.3%.

The data reveals a distinction between areas with high counts and areas with high rates. For example, 53587 has a relatively modest 59 investor properties but boasts a high 17.3% ownership rate, ranking it in the top five for both metrics.

This clustering suggests investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities within the county, leading to pockets of high rental density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers in Lafayette County, acquiring 44 properties while selling only 3.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 shows that landlords in Lafayette County were overwhelmingly net buyers, signaling a strong phase of portfolio expansion.

Throughout 2024, landlords purchased 44 SFR properties while selling only 3, resulting in a net gain of 41 properties to their collective portfolio.

This high buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 15-to-1 underscores the bullish sentiment among investors in the period directly preceding the Q4 2025 activity freeze.

All of this transaction activity was conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, as institutional investors have no presence or transaction history in the county.

The active buying in 2024 provides a crucial baseline, highlighting the dramatic shift in market dynamics that led to the complete cessation of investor purchasing in late 2025.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented 0.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Lafayette County, as investor activity came to a complete standstill.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the investor transaction market in Lafayette County was dormant, with landlords participating in zero transactions and holding a 0.0% share of market activity.

This inactivity was consistent across all tiers. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who represent the entire investor base, recorded zero purchases or sales during the quarter.

As a result, there was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions of any kind took place.

The average purchase price by tier was $0, a direct reflection of the complete lack of buying activity from any investor segment.

This Q4 freeze on transactions is a significant market event, contrasting sharply with the aggressive net buying observed in the preceding year and indicating a potential shift in strategy or economic conditions impacting local investors.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Lafayette County's investor market is 100% controlled by mom-and-pops, who halted all buying activity in Q4 2025.
Holdings
Investors own 650 SFR properties, representing 13.4% of Lafayette County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 573 properties (88.2%) compared to companies' 85 (13.1%).
Pricing
In their last active quarter (Q1 2025), landlords paid 14.3% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $30,063 per property ($180,400 vs $210,463).
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete freeze in investor activity, with landlords purchasing 0 properties (0.0% of all sales) and consequently, zero new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command 100% of the investor-owned housing market, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, from 86.2% of single-property holdings to 95.2% of 6-10 property portfolios, with no crossover tier where companies take a majority.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 (44 buys vs 3 sells), all transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025, with zero buys or sells recorded.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Lafayette County is defined by its small-scale, local character. Landlords own 650 Single-Family Residential properties, making up 13.4% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is exclusively in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), with zero ownership by institutional firms. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 88.2% of these properties (573 homes), while companies own a small fraction (85 homes).

Investor behavior shows a pattern of strategic, value-oriented acquisitions followed by a sudden pause. In early 2025, landlords secured properties at a significant 14.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. However, this momentum came to an abrupt halt in Q4 2025, when investor purchasing activity completely froze, with zero acquisitions recorded. This is a stark reversal from 2024, when landlords were aggressive net buyers, adding a net 41 properties to their portfolios.

The key takeaway from Lafayette County is the portrait of a quintessential Main Street-driven rental market that is highly sensitive to changing conditions. The 100% mom-and-pop ownership structure and the sudden halt in Q4 activity suggest that this market is influenced not by corporate boardroom strategy, but by local economic factors, interest rates, and the financial confidence of individual community members. The lack of institutional presence indicates a market that may lack the scale or returns to attract large capital, preserving its localized nature.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLafayette (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price