Jackson (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jackson (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jackson (WI)
8,136
Total Investors in Jackson (WI)
2,345
Investor Owned SFR in Jackson (WI)
1,872(23.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,001
SFR Owned
1,489
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
344
SFR Owned
405
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,872 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jackson County's Real Estate Market, Controlling 97.7% of Investor-Owned Homes and Purchasing at a 37.3% Discount
Investors own 1,872 Single-Family Residential properties in Jackson County, WI, representing 23.0% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (97.7%), with individual investors comprising 79.5% of the total portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords were strong net buyers and secured properties for 37.3% less than traditional homeowners, while institutional investors showed no purchasing activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,872 SFR properties in Jackson County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.5% share.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,489) versus financed (383), a ratio of nearly 4-to-1. The investor portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,837 rented properties out of 1,872 total holdings. Individual landlords (2,001) outnumber company landlords (344) by almost 6-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 37.3% less than homeowners, securing a massive $89,854 average discount per property.
The significant landlord discount has been a consistent trend, with a similar 37.7% discount observed in Q3 2025. This contrasts sharply with Q2 2025, when landlords briefly paid a 2.9% premium. Despite national trends, average landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 ($151,311) were slightly lower than during the 2020-2023 period ($152,513).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 18.1% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for every single purchase.
Small investors (Tiers 01-04) made up 100.0% of the 15 landlord purchases this quarter, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero acquisitions. The market saw an influx of 16 new, single-property landlord entities, who were responsible for 66.7% of all investor buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.7% of investor-owned SFR housing in Jackson County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.1% of the investor portfolio. The most dominant segment by far is the single-property landlord, who alone accounts for 78.7% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 69.6% of properties in that segment.
While individual investors dominate the smaller tiers, owning 82.3% of single-property portfolios, the 6-10 property tier marks the clear crossover point for professionalization. Despite this, individuals maintain a presence across nearly all tiers, holding 30.4% of properties even in the company-dominated 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 54615 zip code alone accounting for 762 investor-owned properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is found in the 54466 zip code, where investors own 51.6% of all SFRs. The top 5 zip codes by investor ownership rate all exceed 33%, showcasing deep investor penetration in specific sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jackson County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This strong net buying position was consistent throughout the year, with Q4 showing 21 buys versus 6 sells. In total for 2025, landlords added a net of 71 properties to their portfolios through market transactions. Institutional transaction data was not available, but their lack of Q4 purchases suggests minimal activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with all 21 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were the most likely to acquire properties from other investors, with 50.0% of their purchases coming from fellow landlords. New investors (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $161,307, while more established small landlords (Tier 03-05) paid less at $148,000.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,872 SFR properties in Jackson County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords hold a significant 23.0% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Jackson County, WI, with a total portfolio of 1,872 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual ownership, as these investors own 1,489 properties, accounting for 79.5% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number 405, or 21.6% of the portfolio.

A strong preference for all-cash holdings is evident, with 1,489 properties owned outright compared to just 383 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base less reliant on leverage.

The entity count further reinforces the individual investor dominance, with 2,001 individual landlords compared to 344 company landlords. This highlights that the local rental market is supported by a large number of small operators rather than a few large corporations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,837 rented properties, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income from these assets.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 37.3% less than homeowners, securing a massive $89,854 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing advantage for landlords was observed in Q4 2025, where they paid an average of $151,311 per property. This represents a staggering 37.3% discount compared to the $241,165 paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $89,854 on each purchase.

This deep discount is not an anomaly, mirroring the 37.7% discount ($95,333) seen in Q3 2025. This pattern suggests a sustained ability for investors to identify and acquire undervalued properties in the market.

The only exception to this trend in the past year was Q2 2025, when landlords paid a slight premium of 2.9% ($6,608) more than homeowners, indicating a temporary shift in market dynamics or acquisition strategy during that quarter.

Contrary to widespread price appreciation, acquisition prices for landlords in Jackson County have remained remarkably stable. The Q4 2025 average price of $151,311 is slightly below the average of $152,513 from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom.

This pricing behavior highlights a disciplined acquisition strategy among local investors, who are consistently able to purchase assets well below the typical market rate paid by owner-occupiers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 18.1% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for every single purchase.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 18.1% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 15 of the 83 SFR properties sold in Jackson County.

The quarter was defined entirely by small-scale investment, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases, indicating a lack of large-scale corporate interest in the area.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, acquiring 10 properties, which represents two-thirds (66.7%) of all investor purchasing activity. This activity was driven by 16 distinct entities, signaling a healthy influx of new participants into the rental market.

Landlords in the 3-5 property tier also showed notable activity, purchasing 4 properties (26.7% of the total), demonstrating continued accumulation by slightly more established small investors.

The data clearly shows that the growth in investor ownership in Q4 was driven exclusively by new and existing small-scale landlords, reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.7% of investor-owned SFR housing in Jackson County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jackson County is completely dominated by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, holding 1-10 properties) owning a combined 97.7% of all investor-held SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market directly refutes any narrative of a corporate takeover. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, controlling just 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 1,503 properties. This accounts for 78.7% of the entire investor portfolio, making them the single most significant group of housing providers.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply as portfolio sizes increase. Two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 7.4% of properties, and landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) own 9.3%, with all larger tiers controlling less than 2.5% each.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented market structure, where the vast majority of rental housing is supplied by thousands of local, small-scale investors rather than a handful of large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 69.6% of properties in that segment.
Detailed Findings

A clear shift in ownership structure occurs as portfolio sizes grow. While individuals dominate the smaller tiers, companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 32 properties (69.6%) compared to the 14 (30.4%) held by individuals.

This crossover point suggests that the 6-10 property range is a key threshold where investors in Jackson County tend to incorporate their holdings, likely for liability and operational efficiency reasons.

Individual ownership is most pronounced in the largest segment of the market: single-property landlords. Here, individuals own 1,249 properties, representing an 82.3% majority in that tier.

This pattern of individual dominance continues through the 2-property tier (66.7% individual) and the 3-5 property tier (73.2% individual), solidifying the role of non-corporate landlords as the primary suppliers of smaller-scale rental housing.

Even in the small-medium 11-20 property tier, individuals maintain an 80.0% majority, indicating that incorporation is not a universal strategy even as portfolios expand beyond 10 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 54615 zip code alone accounting for 762 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of investor ownership in Jackson County. The 54615 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 762 investor-owned properties, which represents a 20.1% ownership rate for that area.

However, the highest market penetration is in a different area. The 54466 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 51.6%, meaning landlords own more than half of the single-family housing stock there.

This highlights a distinction between areas with the largest number of rentals (WI-Jackson-54615) and those where investors have the largest relative market share (WI-Jackson-54466).

Several other zip codes also show very high investor saturation, including 54616 (44.0%), 54666 (35.9%), and 54754 (34.2%). This pattern indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities within the county.

In contrast, the top area by count, 54615, has a more moderate ownership rate of 20.1%, suggesting it's a larger housing market where investors have a substantial but less dominant presence.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Jackson County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jackson County demonstrated a clear and sustained strategy of portfolio expansion throughout 2025, acting as strong net buyers. For the full year, they purchased 93 SFR properties while selling only 22, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.2-to-1.

This trend of accumulation was consistent on a quarterly basis. In Q4 2025, landlords bought 21 properties and sold 6, a ratio of 3.5-to-1. This followed similar patterns in Q3 (28 buys, 6 sells) and Q2 (22 buys, 6 sells).

The net effect of this activity was a significant increase in investor-owned housing stock. In 2025 alone, landlords added a net total of 71 properties to their holdings through buying and selling activity.

This aggressive acquisition pace signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a continued drive to increase holdings among the existing investor base.

Given the complete lack of institutional purchases in Q4, this net buying activity is attributable entirely to small and mid-size landlords who are actively growing their presence in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with all 21 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 21 of the 131 total SFR transactions, capturing a 16.0% share of market activity.

The entirety of this transaction volume came from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero transactions recorded for institutional-scale players. Single-property landlords were the most active, conducting 16 of the 21 investor transactions.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among tiers. First-time investors in Tier 01 paid the highest average price at $161,307. In contrast, landlords in the 3-5 property tier, who are slightly more experienced, acquired properties for an average of $148,000, suggesting they may be securing better deals.

Inter-landlord trading was most prevalent among these more established small investors. Half (50.0%) of the properties purchased by landlords in the 3-5 property tier were acquired from other landlords, indicating a liquid market for trading rental assets among existing operators.

Newer investors in Tier 01 were less likely to buy from peers, with only 6.2% of their purchases sourced from other landlords, suggesting they are primarily acquiring properties from homeowners or new construction.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Command 97.7% of Jackson County's Investor Market, Actively Buying at a 37.3% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,872 SFR properties, representing 23.0% of the market in Jackson County, WI. Individual investors hold a commanding 79.5% of this portfolio (1,489 properties), with companies owning the remaining 20.5% (405 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $151,311 per property—a 37.3% discount worth $89,854 compared to the $241,165 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors purchased 18.1% of homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords. The market welcomed 16 new single-property landlord entities, who alone accounted for two-thirds of all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.7% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, where they control 69.6% of the properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every one they sold in 2025, adding a net 71 properties to their portfolios. There was no recorded buying or selling activity from institutional investors.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jackson County, WI is fundamentally a story of small, local enterprise. Investors own 1,872 properties, a significant 23.0% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled not by large corporations, but by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who command a staggering 97.7% share. Individual investors are the primary drivers, owning 79.5% of these homes. In contrast, institutional-scale investors have a nearly non-existent presence at just 0.1%, underscoring a market structure built on grassroots investment.

Investor behavior in Jackson County is characterized by disciplined, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent growth. In the final quarter of 2025, landlords purchased 18.1% of all homes sold, with every single acquisition made by a mom-and-pop investor. They demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure deals, paying an average of 37.3% less than traditional homeowners. This trend of accumulation is clear, as landlords acted as strong net buyers throughout 2025, purchasing over four properties for every one they sold and signaling deep confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway is that the Jackson County rental market is healthy, fragmented, and dominated by small-scale operators who are actively and successfully expanding their portfolios. The narrative of a 'Wall Street' takeover of housing does not apply here; instead, the data reveals a competitive landscape where local investors leverage market knowledge to acquire properties at a significant discount. The constant influx of new single-property landlords, coupled with the expansion of existing small portfolios, indicates that the future of rental housing in the county remains firmly in the hands of community-level investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:30 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJackson (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail