Florence (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Florence (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Florence (WI)
4,272
Total Investors in Florence (WI)
2,422
Investor Owned SFR in Florence (WI)
1,772(41.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,037
SFR Owned
1,451
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
385
SFR Owned
404
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,772 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Florence County, Owning 41.5% of Housing and Buying at a 64% Discount
Investors own 1,772 Single-Family Residential properties in Florence County, WI, representing an exceptionally high 41.5% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.8%), who were aggressive net buyers in Q4, acquiring 41.0% of all homes sold at a staggering 63.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Institutional investors have zero presence, making this a market defined by small-scale, individual investor activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,772 SFRs, a 41.5% market share, with individuals holding 81.9% of them.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 1,586 properties owned outright versus only 186 financed. Individual landlords (2,037) far outnumber company landlords (385), reinforcing the market's small-investor character. Of the portfolio, 1,755 properties are classified as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties at a massive 63.8% discount to homeowners in Q4 2025.
This equates to an average savings of $195,916 per property, with landlords paying $111,322 versus the homeowner price of $307,238. This substantial discount has been a consistent market feature throughout 2025, previously reaching as high as 48.1% in Q2.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 41.0% of all SFRs sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors making 100% of buys.
Of the 16 properties bought by landlords, 15 (93.8%) were acquired by new single-property investors. Institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting a market completely driven by small-scale entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 87.2% of the entire investor portfolio (1,591 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, holding 79.4% in the dominant single-property tier.
Companies only achieve a 50% ownership split in the minuscule 11-20 property tier, which contains only 2 properties total. Even in the 2-property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority with 67.7% ownership.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 54121, with 1,214 landlord-owned properties.
While 54121 is the volume leader, zip code 54542 has the highest investor penetration rate at 59.6%. The top three zip codes in the county all have investor ownership rates exceeding 41%, indicating widespread investor presence.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14.5 properties for every 1 sold in Q4 2025.
This strong accumulation trend held for the entire year, with 114 properties bought and only 2 sold in 2025. Activity accelerated from 2024, when landlords acquired 84 properties and sold 6.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 46.8% of all property transactions in Q4, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Single-property investors dominated Q4 activity, accounting for 27 of the 29 landlord transactions. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,772 SFRs, a 41.5% market share, with individuals holding 81.9% of them.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Florence County represents a significant 41.5% of the entire Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, with a total of 1,772 properties held by landlords. This high penetration rate indicates that investor activity is a primary driver of the local housing landscape.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual, small-scale ownership. Individual investors own 1,451 properties, accounting for 81.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 404 properties (22.8%) held by companies. This challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

In terms of entities, there are 2,037 individual landlords compared to 385 company landlords, a ratio of more than 5-to-1. This structure highlights a broad base of small investors rather than a concentration of ownership among a few large entities.

A defining feature of this market is the preference for all-cash holdings. An overwhelming 1,586 investor-owned properties are held free of financing, while only 186 are financed. This suggests investors in this area are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 1,755 of the 1,772 properties identified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned SFRs are actively part of the rental supply in Florence County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties at a massive 63.8% discount to homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Florence County demonstrated an unparalleled ability to acquire properties at a deep discount in Q4 2025. Landlords paid an average price of $111,322, which is 63.8% less than the $307,238 paid by traditional homeowners—a staggering price gap of $195,916 per property.

This significant pricing advantage for investors is not an anomaly. The trend of securing properties well below the homeowner market rate was consistent throughout the year. In Q3 2025, landlords paid 15.7% less, in Q2 they paid 48.1% less, and in Q1 they achieved a 43.7% discount.

The persistence of this large discount suggests that landlords in this market may be targeting distressed properties, off-market deals, or properties in need of significant renovation that are unattractive to typical homebuyers. This strategy allows them to enter the market at a much lower cost basis.

While acquisition activity was low across several quarters in 2024 and 2025, the pricing data consistently shows a structural advantage for investors. This indicates a bifurcated market where landlords and homeowners operate in different pricing tiers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 41.0% of all SFRs sold in Q4, with mom-and-pop investors making 100% of buys.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 16 of the 39 total SFRs sold, capturing a 41.0% market share of all acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who acquired 100% of the 16 investor-bought properties. This demonstrates that market growth is exclusively fueled by small, independent landlords.

A surge of new entrants defined the quarter, as 15 of the 16 properties (93.8%) were purchased by single-property landlords. These acquisitions were made by 25 distinct entities, signaling a broadening of the investor base with new participants.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from the market, making zero purchases. This complete lack of large-scale activity underscores Florence County as a market fundamentally shaped by the smallest investors.

The data reveals a clear pattern of market expansion through new, small-scale investment, rather than portfolio growth from existing or large-scale players. The acquisition of 6.2% of properties by two-property landlords further supports this trend of incremental portfolio building.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total control of the market, owning 99.8% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Florence County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market's foundation rests on single-property landlords (Tier 01), who own 1,591 properties, accounting for 87.2% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights that the vast majority of landlords in the area are individuals with a single rental property, not large-scale operators.

Mid-size investors have a negligible footprint. Landlords in the 11-1000 property range collectively own just 0.3% of the investor housing stock. This indicates a significant barrier or lack of interest for portfolio growth beyond the 10-property mark.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have zero presence in Florence County, owning 0.0% of the market. This complete absence stands in sharp contrast to national headlines about corporate landlord activity and defines the local market as exclusively driven by individual capital.

This ownership structure reveals a highly fragmented market with very low concentration. The rental housing supply is provided by a wide base of thousands of small landlords rather than being consolidated in the hands of a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, holding 79.4% in the dominant single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in every meaningful portfolio tier in Florence County. In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 1,322 of the properties compared to 343 for companies, giving them a 79.4% majority share.

The pattern of individual dominance continues up the ownership ladder. Individuals own 67.7% of two-property portfolios and 84.5% of portfolios with 3-5 properties, showing that even as landlords expand, they tend to do so as private individuals rather than corporations.

The first point of parity between owner types does not occur until the 11-20 property tier, where ownership is split 50/50. However, this tier is statistically insignificant, comprising only two properties in total, making it an outlier rather than a trend.

Companies have their largest foothold in the two-property tier, where they own 42 properties (32.3%). This suggests that incorporating becomes a more common strategy for landlords once they acquire a second property, though they remain the minority owner type.

Overall, the data clearly shows that the path to building a rental portfolio in Florence County is one predominantly taken by individual investors, with corporate structures being the exception rather than the rule at every significant scale of ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 54121, with 1,214 landlord-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The bulk of investor-owned properties in Florence County is located in a single zip code, 54121, which contains 1,214 landlord-owned SFRs. This area represents the epicenter of investor activity by sheer volume.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is found in zip code 54542, where landlords own an incredible 59.6% of all SFR properties. This extremely high penetration rate suggests this area is a prime target for rental property investment.

High investor ownership is a widespread characteristic of the county, not an isolated phenomenon. Zip code 54120 follows with a 52.8% investor ownership rate, and even the volume leader, 54121, has a high rate of 41.1%. This indicates a regional market that is fundamentally shaped by investor demand.

The top four zip codes by property count are WI-Florence-54121 (1,214 properties), WI-Florence-54542 (367 properties), WI-Florence-54120 (112 properties), and WI-Florence-54151 (79 properties). These four areas collectively account for the vast majority of the county's investor-held housing.

The data reveals a clear geographic pattern where certain zip codes are hotspots for both the total number of investor properties and the percentage of the housing stock they control, signaling a highly targeted investment strategy within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14.5 properties for every 1 sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Florence County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio expansion, operating as strong net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 29 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 14.5-to-1 and a net gain of 27 properties.

This trend of accumulation is not limited to the recent quarter. For the full year of 2025, the ratio was even more pronounced, with 114 properties bought versus only 2 sold, demonstrating a consistent strategy of market acquisition throughout the year.

Transaction velocity has been increasing. In 2024, landlords were also net buyers with 84 purchases and 6 sales, but the total buy volume of 114 in 2025 indicates an acceleration of investor purchasing activity year-over-year.

Institutional investors were entirely dormant, recording zero buy or sell transactions in any tracked period. All market transaction activity is attributable to smaller, independent landlords who are actively growing their holdings.

The historical data paints a clear picture of a market where investors are consistently adding to their portfolios rather than divesting, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market and actively shifting housing stock from private ownership to the rental pool.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 46.8% of all property transactions in Q4, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a driving force in the Florence County real estate market in Q4 2025, participating in 29 of the 62 total SFR transactions for a market share of 46.8%. This high level of involvement underscores their role in shaping market dynamics.

All 29 of these landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with institutional investors making no moves. The market's liquidity and activity are entirely dependent on the decisions of small-scale players.

New or first-time investors were the most active group, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) responsible for 27 of the 29 transactions (93.1%). This signals a healthy influx of new capital from small investors entering the market.

A critical finding from the quarter is that 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords. This means every property acquired by an investor was transferred from the non-investor housing stock, primarily from traditional homeowners, directly increasing the size of the rental market.

The average purchase price for single-property landlords was $121,757. In contrast, two-property landlords paid an average of $25,000, though this is based on a very small sample size of two transactions and may reflect distressed or unique property types.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Florence County, Owning 41.5% of Housing and Buying at a 64% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,772 SFR properties in Florence County, WI, a commanding 41.5% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (1,451 properties, 81.9%) compared to companies (404 properties, 22.8%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 63.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $195,916 per property by paying $111,322 versus the homeowner average of $307,238.
Activity
Investors purchased 41.0% of all homes sold in Q4 (16 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords. This includes 25 new entities entering the market as single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control over the investor market with a 99.8% ownership share. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero market presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding 79.4% of single-property rentals. Companies only reach a 50% share in the statistically insignificant 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 14.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (29 buys vs. 2 sells), and institutional investors are completely inactive. All Q4 investor purchases were sourced from homeowners, not other landlords.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Florence County, WI is fundamentally defined by the deep penetration and dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own 1,772 properties, comprising a remarkable 41.5% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.8% of all investor-held homes, while institutional investors have no presence. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 81.9% of the properties and represent over 83% of all landlord entities, confirming that the rental market is supported by a broad base of local participants, not large corporations.

Investor behavior in Florence County is characterized by aggressive acquisition at significant discounts. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 41.0% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop buyers. They secured these properties for an average of 63.8% less than traditional homeowners, a consistent pricing advantage seen throughout the year. Transaction data reveals landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 14.5 properties for every one they sold in Q4. Crucially, 100% of these purchases came from the homeowner market, indicating a direct conversion of housing stock to rental properties.

The key takeaway for the Florence County housing market is its evolution into a landscape heavily influenced by a specific type of investor: the small-scale, often individual, and well-capitalized landlord. With nearly half the market in investor hands and a continuous flow of new entrants buying from homeowners at a steep discount, the trend points toward a growing rental sector and potentially heightened affordability challenges for traditional homebuyers. The absence of institutional players suggests this is a uniquely localized phenomenon, driven by local capital and market conditions rather than national investment trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFlorence (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional