Door (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Door (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Door (WI)
16,673
Total Investors in Door (WI)
8,183
Investor Owned SFR in Door (WI)
6,169(37.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,583
SFR Owned
4,671
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,600
SFR Owned
1,636
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,169 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Door County, Owning 99.9% of Rental Homes and Driving 36% of Q4 Sales
Investors own 6,169 SFRs in Door County (37.0% of the market), with individual mom-and-pop landlords controlling a near-total 99.9% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, these small investors acquired 36.4% of all homes sold, reversing a trend of discounts to pay a 3.0% premium over homeowners. The market is characterized by aggressive accumulation from small players, while institutional investors remain entirely absent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,169 SFR properties in Door County, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding 75.7%.
Cash purchases dominate the portfolio, with 5,826 properties (94.4%) owned outright versus just 343 that are financed. The vast majority of the portfolio, 6,113 properties (99.1%), are designated as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 3.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $512,071 per property.
The Q4 premium represents a significant reversal from earlier in the year when landlords secured deep discounts of 18.0% in Q2 and 18.3% in Q1. This dynamic has swung dramatically, from an $88,023 average discount to a $14,822 premium.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.4% of all SFR properties sold in Door County during Q4, totaling 20 purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of landlord buying activity, while institutional investors made zero purchases. New landlords entering the market (Single-property tier) accounted for 90% of all investor acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.9% of Door County's investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.0% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone own 5,618 properties, representing 88.4% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate every investor tier, owning 74.5% of single-property portfolios and 65.2% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any tier in Door County; individuals are the dominant owner type across the entire spectrum. Q4 2025 purchase data shows all new activity was from small individuals, indicating no company growth.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 54235 zip code, which contains 2,295 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 54211 zip code, where investors own 69.7% of all SFRs. Several other zip codes, including 54210, 54246, 54212, and 54202, all have investor ownership rates above 52%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring 17 properties for every one they sold.
This activity reflects a remarkable buy-to-sell ratio based on 426 purchases versus only 25 sales. This indicates strong confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion among investors in Door County during that period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 31.9% of all real estate transactions in Q4, totaling 23 transactions.
All 23 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional activity. Notably, 0% of these purchases came from other landlords, meaning investors sourced all new properties from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,169 SFR properties in Door County, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding 75.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is a significant force in Door County, with landlords holding 6,169 SFR properties, which comprises a substantial 37.0% of the total market of 16,673 homes.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of this market, owning 4,671 properties. This accounts for 75.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, while companies own the remaining 1,636 properties (26.5%).

The landlord landscape is similarly dominated by individuals, with 6,583 individual landlords compared to 1,600 company landlords, a ratio of over 4-to-1.

Cash is overwhelmingly the preferred method of acquisition in Door County. A massive 94.4% of the investor-owned portfolio (5,826 properties) is held in cash, compared to only 5.6% (343 properties) being financed.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 6,113 properties, or 99.1% of all investor-owned homes, classified as rented, signaling a clear focus on long-term holds.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 3.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $512,071 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market shift, landlords in Door County paid more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $512,071 compared to the homeowner average of $497,249. This represents a $14,822 premium, or 3.0% more per property.

This Q4 premium marks a dramatic reversal from trends earlier in the year. In Q2 and Q1 of 2025, landlords enjoyed significant discounts of 18.0% ($88,023) and 18.3% ($75,101) respectively, paying tens of thousands less than homeowners.

The pricing swing is pronounced and signals a highly competitive market for investors at the end of the year, a stark contrast to the buyer's advantage seen in the first half.

The third quarter of 2025 saw an even larger premium, with landlords paying $542,315 on average—a 14.1% premium over homeowners, or an extra $67,177 per property.

Comparing recent activity to the pandemic-era boom (2020-2023), the average Q4 2025 landlord acquisition price of $512,071 is 25.8% higher than the $407,042 average from that period, signaling significant price appreciation in the market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.4% of all SFR properties sold in Door County during Q4, totaling 20 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Door County housing market in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of the 55 single-family residential properties sold and capturing a 36.4% market share of all acquisitions.

The entirety of this Q4 buying activity was driven by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who accounted for 100% of all investor purchases. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties were completely absent from the buying market.

New market entrants dominated activity, with the single-property tier alone responsible for 18 of the 20 investor purchases (90.0%). This activity was driven by 21 distinct new landlord entities, signaling a fresh wave of small-scale investment.

The data highlights a highly fragmented and localized investor base, with no acquisitions made by mid-size or large-scale landlords during the quarter.

The remaining 10.0% of landlord purchases were made by investors in the two-property tier, further reinforcing the dominance of small-scale players in the current market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.9% of Door County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Door County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the backbone of the market, holding 5,618 properties, which accounts for 88.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's highly fragmented nature.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no footprint in the county, owning just 2 properties, which rounds to 0.0% of the investor market share.

The concentration at the small end of the scale is immense; landlords with 1-5 properties collectively own 6,329 homes, or 99.6% of the total investor-owned stock.

Mid-size investors are also exceedingly rare, with only 3 properties in total held by landlords in the 11-1000 property tiers, further underscoring that Door County is not a target for large-scale portfolio aggregation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate every investor tier, owning 74.5% of single-property portfolios and 65.2% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a strong majority ownership across all small landlord tiers in Door County, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market.

In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 4,276 properties (74.5%) compared to 1,462 for companies. This pattern holds true across other tiers, with individuals owning 73.8% of two-property portfolios and 81.1% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

Unlike in larger metropolitan markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold a 65.2% majority.

Company ownership shows a slight increase in concentration as portfolio sizes grow, from 25.5% in the single-property tier to 34.8% in the 6-10 property tier, but they remain the minority owner throughout.

This data reinforces that the investor market in Door County is characterized by local, individual ownership rather than corporate consolidation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 54235 zip code, which contains 2,295 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Door County is highly concentrated, with the 54235 zip code alone accounting for 2,295 investor-owned properties, nearly 3.3 times more than the next highest area.

While 54235 leads in volume, it has a more moderate investor ownership rate of 27.9%. Other zip codes show much higher market penetration, led by 54211, where investors own a commanding 69.7% of all SFR properties.

A cluster of zip codes demonstrates extremely high investor saturation, with rates exceeding 50%. These include 54210 (53.9%), 54246 (53.5%), 54212 (52.9%), and 54202 (52.3%).

The top five regions by sheer count (54235, 54202, 54234, 54210, 54212) collectively hold 4,695 properties, representing 76.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

This geographical analysis reveals distinct patterns: one area (54235) serves as the volume hub, while several smaller areas exhibit the highest density of investor control, suggesting different market dynamics at play across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2024, acquiring 17 properties for every one they sold.
Detailed Findings

In 2024, landlords in Door County were overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for portfolio growth. They purchased 426 SFR properties while only selling 25 throughout the year.

This imbalance reveals a powerful accumulation trend, with a buy-to-sell ratio of approximately 17-to-1. For every property an investor sold, 17 more were acquired by other investors.

The net gain of 401 properties to landlord portfolios in a single year indicates significant capital deployment and a bullish outlook on the local real estate market.

Data on institutional-level transactions was not available, but the overall market trend is clearly one of expansion driven by the broader investor community.

The low sales volume suggests that existing landlords are adopting a long-term hold strategy, choosing to retain assets rather than divest, which tightens the available inventory for other buyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 31.9% of all real estate transactions in Q4, totaling 23 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a significant role in Q4 market liquidity, participating in 23 of the 72 total SFR transactions, which constitutes a 31.9% share of all market activity.

The entire volume of landlord transactions was driven by small-scale mom-and-pop investors, with 21 transactions from the single-property tier and 2 from the two-property tier. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.

A clear pricing strategy emerges by tier: new, single-property landlords paid a significantly higher average price of $530,613, while two-property landlords paid an average of $373,000, a 29.7% discount.

Investors sourced 100% of their Q4 acquisitions from the open market rather than from other landlords. The 'Bought From Landlords' metric was 0 for all tiers, indicating a lack of inter-investor trading during the period.

This suggests that new entrants are willing to pay a premium to enter the market, while slightly more established small investors are more disciplined on price.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Door County's Market, Owning 99.9% of Rental Homes Amidst Zero Institutional Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 6,169 SFR properties, representing a significant 37.0% of the market in Door County, WI. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 4,671 properties (75.7%), compared to companies which own 1,636 (26.5%).
Pricing
In a sharp reversal from earlier in the year, landlords paid a 3.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, with an average purchase price of $512,071 versus $497,249 for traditional buyers.
Activity
Landlord purchasing accounted for 36.4% of all Q4 home sales (20 properties), with activity driven entirely by small investors. The market saw 21 new single-property landlords enter in the last quarter alone.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control over the investor market, owning 99.9% of all rental housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint with just 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Door County, holding a majority stake in every tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the primary owner type.
Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 17 properties for every one they sold (426 buys vs 25 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording no buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Door County, WI is fundamentally shaped by small, individual landlords who command a near-monopoly on the rental market. Investors own a substantial 6,169 single-family properties, representing 37.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This ownership is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 99.9% of the portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors have virtually no presence. The market is propelled by individuals, who own 75.7% of investor-held properties and comprise over 80% of all landlord entities.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signaled a highly competitive environment. Landlords purchased 36.4% of all homes sold, and notably, this activity was driven entirely by new or small-scale investors. This demand created a pricing shift, as investors paid a 3.0% premium over traditional homeowners—a significant reversal from the deep discounts secured earlier in the year. Transaction data from 2024 confirms a strong accumulation trend, with landlords operating as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 17 homes for every one they sold. All recent acquisitions were sourced from the open market, not from other landlords, indicating fresh capital entering the space.

The key takeaway is that Door County's rental market is not a target for corporate consolidation but rather a stronghold of local, small-scale capitalism. The data refutes any narrative of large institutions driving the market; instead, it reveals a hyper-localized ecosystem where individual investors and new entrants are the primary drivers of demand, competition, and pricing. This dynamic suggests that market conditions are dictated by the financial capacity and strategic goals of thousands of individual owners, not a handful of large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:21 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDoor (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices