Calumet (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calumet (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calumet (WI)
14,044
Total Investors in Calumet (WI)
1,704
Investor Owned SFR in Calumet (WI)
1,167(8.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,557
SFR Owned
1,057
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
147
SFR Owned
161
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,167 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.4% of Investor Housing in Calumet County, Aggressively Expanding Portfolios
Investors own 1,167 SFRs (8.3% of the market) in Calumet County, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.4% of that portfolio while institutional investors have zero presence. In Q4, landlords purchased properties at a 15.6% discount to homeowners and are strong net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 90.6% of Calumet County's 1,167 investor-owned SFRs, reinforcing local ownership.
Cash-owned properties (812) outnumber financed properties (355) by more than two to one, indicating significant equity in the market. A massive 97.6% (1,139 of 1,167) of investor properties are rented, showing a clear focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors bought Q4 properties at a 15.6% discount, paying $59,430 less than traditional homeowners.
The landlord discount is highly volatile, ranging from a 31.2% discount ($114,584) in Q1 to investors paying a 7.6% premium ($29,087) in Q2. Average acquisition prices in 2025 ($325,167) are down slightly from 2024 ($332,678) but remain higher than the pandemic-era average ($302,367).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 8.8% of all SFRs sold in Q4, with new single-property investors driving the activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 80.0% of all investor purchases this quarter. In fact, 11 new single-property landlords entered the Calumet County market, accounting for 70% of all investor acquisitions, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Calumet County, controlling 99.4% of all investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, alone owning 85.8% (1,018) of all investor properties. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county, highlighting a completely localized investment landscape.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Individuals overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 89.3% of single-property investments. The crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 75.0% of the properties. Institutional companies (Tier 09) own zero properties in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is most concentrated in zip code 53014, with 321 properties, or 27.5% of the county's total.
The areas with the highest investor penetration are different from those with the highest raw counts. Zip code 53088 leads with a 38.5% investor ownership rate, while 53014, the leader in count, has a more modest 14.0% rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.09 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Acquisition velocity has increased significantly, with 89 purchases in 2025 already surpassing the 63 purchases in all of 2024. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, showing their complete lack of activity in this market's buying or selling.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 7.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with new investors paying the lowest prices.
New single-property landlords paid an average of $282,709, substantially less than the $633,000 paid by a mid-size investor. These new entrants sourced 18.2% of their properties from existing landlords, indicating a level of portfolio churn among smaller operators.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 90.6% of Calumet County's 1,167 investor-owned SFRs, reinforcing local ownership.
Detailed Findings

In Calumet County, investors own 1,167 single-family residential properties, making up 8.3% of the total 14,044 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who control 1,057 properties (90.6% of the investor-owned portfolio), compared to just 161 properties (13.8%) held by companies.

A strong indicator of market health and investor equity is the prevalence of cash ownership, with 812 properties owned outright versus 355 that are financed—a ratio of over 2-to-1.

The investor portfolio is intensely focused on generating rental income, as demonstrated by the 1,139 rented properties, which account for 97.6% of all investor-owned homes.

The market is composed of a large base of small-scale landlords, with 1,557 individual landlord entities compared to only 147 company entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors bought Q4 properties at a 15.6% discount, paying $59,430 less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $321,514, which is 15.6% below the $380,944 average paid by traditional homeowners—a cash discount of $59,430 per property.

This investor discount has been inconsistent throughout the year, suggesting opportunistic buying rather than a stable market inefficiency. After securing a massive 31.2% discount in Q1, investors surprisingly paid a 7.6% premium in Q2 before the discount returned in Q3 (22.0%) and Q4 (15.6%).

Overall prices have appreciated since the pandemic boom. The average 2025 landlord acquisition price of $325,167 represents a 7.5% increase over the 2020-2023 average of $302,367.

However, the market shows signs of recent cooling, with the average price paid by landlords in 2025 dipping by 2.2% compared to the 2024 average of $332,678.

The volatility in the price gap between landlords and homeowners suggests that investors are adept at capitalizing on specific deals rather than benefiting from a consistent, market-wide discount.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 8.8% of all SFRs sold in Q4, with new single-property investors driving the activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 accounted for 8.8% of all single-family home purchases in Calumet County, with landlords acquiring 10 of the 113 properties sold.

The market's growth is being fueled by new entrants, as 70% of all investor purchases (7 properties) were made by single-property landlords, with 11 new landlord entities recorded in this tier.

Small, local investors were the exclusive buyers this quarter. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 80.0% of all investor acquisitions, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape.

Beyond new investors, one mid-size landlord in the 11-20 property tier was also active, acquiring 2 properties and accounting for 20% of the quarter's investor purchase volume.

This purchase activity underscores a market characterized by organic growth from new, small-scale participants rather than consolidation by large-scale operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Calumet County, controlling 99.4% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Calumet County is defined by the near-total dominance of small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 99.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the foundation of this market, with this tier alone accounting for 1,018 properties, or 85.8% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in Calumet County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The ownership structure is extremely fragmented at the top end, with mid-size and large investors (those owning more than 10 properties) controlling a negligible 0.6% of the market combined.

This distribution reveals a highly accessible market with low barriers to entry, primarily attracting local individuals and small businesses rather than large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios scale: individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, while companies take control of larger portfolios.

Individual investors overwhelmingly own the smallest portfolios, accounting for 89.3% of single-property holdings and 87.7% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership jumps to 75.0%, indicating a common threshold for landlords to incorporate their holdings into a formal business structure.

This trend continues in the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 80.0% of the properties.

While companies are prevalent in larger tiers, their overall impact is limited by the small number of properties in these tiers, reinforcing the market's foundation of individual ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is most concentrated in zip code 53014, with 321 properties, or 27.5% of the county's total.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Calumet County is highly concentrated geographically, with the top five zip codes by property count holding 772 properties, which represents 66.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The zip code 53014 (Chilton) is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 321 investor-owned homes, nearly double the next-closest area.

A significant divergence exists between total property counts and investor market share. For instance, zip code 53088 has the highest penetration rate at 38.5%, indicating investors own over a third of the housing stock, despite not being a leader in raw count.

Conversely, zip code 54915 has the fourth-highest count of investor properties (135) but one of the lowest ownership rates (4.0%), suggesting it's a large market where investors have a smaller relative footprint.

This data highlights two distinct geographic strategies: one targeting high-volume areas and another focusing on smaller markets to achieve a higher concentration of ownership.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.09 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Calumet County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers across all recent timeframes. In 2025, they purchased 89 properties while selling only 11, a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.09x.

The pace of acquisitions has accelerated notably. The 89 properties purchased year-to-date in 2025 already represent a 41% increase over the 63 properties purchased during the entirety of 2024.

Selling activity remains low and is declining, with only 11 properties sold by landlords in 2025 compared to 17 in the previous year, signaling a clear hold-and-rent strategy.

The net result is a significant expansion of investor portfolios, with a net gain of 78 properties in 2025 alone.

Institutional investors were entirely absent from the transaction market, recording zero buys and zero sells, confirming that market liquidity is driven exclusively by smaller players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 7.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with new investors paying the lowest prices.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 14 of the 188 total SFR transactions in Calumet County, capturing a 7.4% share of market activity.

A distinct pricing strategy emerged among different investor tiers. New single-property landlords focused on more affordable homes, paying an average of $282,709 per property.

In contrast, the most active mid-size investor (11-20 property tier) targeted higher-value assets, acquiring two properties at an average price of $633,000.

New landlords were the only group to acquire properties from existing investors, with 18.2% of their 11 purchases (2 properties) sourced from other landlords. This suggests smaller investors are the primary source of inter-investor market liquidity.

The vast majority of landlord acquisitions (over 80%) still come from the open market, indicating that investors are primarily competing with traditional homebuyers for inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of investor housing in Calumet County as they aggressively expand portfolios.
Holdings
Investors own 1,167 SFR properties, representing 8.3% of Calumet County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,057 properties (90.6%), compared to companies with 161 (13.8%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 15.6% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for an average of $321,514—a substantial $59,430 discount compared to the homeowner price of $380,944.
Activity
Landlords purchased 8.8% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (10 properties), with activity driven by small investors. The market saw 11 new single-property landlords emerge this quarter, who alone accounted for 70% of all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% share, showing their complete absence from the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger, suggesting a trend of incorporating as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with an 8.09x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (89 buys vs 11 sells), significantly accelerating portfolio growth. Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero buys or sells recorded.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Calumet County, Wisconsin, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale operators. Landlords own 1,167 SFR properties, or 8.3% of the total market, but this portfolio is highly fragmented. Individual investors control 90.6% of these homes, while 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) command a staggering 99.4% share. In stark contrast to national trends, large-scale institutional investors have zero presence, making this a market shaped entirely by community-level capital.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic pricing. In 2025, landlords have been strong net buyers, purchasing over eight properties for every one they sold, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio expansion. This activity is led by new entrants, with 11 new single-property landlords joining the market in Q4 alone. These investors consistently secure properties at a discount, paying 15.6% less than traditional homeowners in the last quarter, a testament to their ability to find value in the marketplace.

The key takeaway for the Calumet County housing market is that its rental stock is managed by a broad base of individuals, not a handful of corporations. This dynamic fosters a competitive and accessible investment environment but also means that pressure on the for-sale housing supply comes from local buyers expanding their holdings. The accelerating pace of net buying by these small landlords indicates that competition for available properties is likely to intensify, directly impacting local housing affordability and availability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 10:17 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalumet (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price