San Juan (WA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the San Juan (WA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in San Juan (WA)
9,136
Total Investors in San Juan (WA)
6,928
Investor Owned SFR in San Juan (WA)
4,821(52.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,932
SFR Owned
3,914
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
996
SFR Owned
1,085
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,821 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate San Juan County, Owning 52.8% of Homes and Driving 75% of Q4 Market Activity
Investors now own 4,821 Single-Family Residences in San Juan County, representing a significant 52.8% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small 'mom-and-pop' landlords who control 99.6% of the investor portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 75.0% of all homes sold while securing an average discount of 14.5% compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,821 SFRs (52.8% of the market), with individuals holding 81.2%.
Cash purchases significantly outweigh financing, with 3,426 properties owned outright versus 1,395 financed. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, as 4,802 of 4,821 properties (99.6%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 14.5% discount in Q4, paying $152,924 less than homeowners.
This marks a dramatic reversal from the previous three quarters, where landlords consistently paid significant premiums, including a 42.2% premium in Q3. The average Q4 landlord purchase price of $904,755 is actually below the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $918,006.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 75.0% of all single-family homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove virtually all of this activity, accounting for 97.9% of investor purchases. Meanwhile, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing their complete absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 85.1% of all investor-held housing (4,256 properties). In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property, representing a 0.0% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 11-20 property tier, holding 90.0% of homes.
While individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios (80.8% of single-property tier), companies become the dominant owner type as portfolios grow. This crossover highlights differing strategies between individual and corporate investors.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with five zip codes holding 87.3% of all landlord-owned homes.
The 98250 zip code is the largest hub with 1,905 investor-owned properties. However, several smaller zip codes like 98001, 98003, and 98040 show 100.0% investor ownership rates, indicating niche areas are fully controlled by investors.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of strong accumulation has been consistent, with landlords also being net buyers throughout 2025 and 2024. In Q4, landlords bought 73 properties while selling only 6, signaling strong confidence in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors drove 74.5% of all Q4 market transactions, with new entrants paying the highest prices.
New single-property landlords paid an average of $885,887, notably more than smaller multi-property landlords who averaged $694,823. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only 8.6% of new investor purchases sourced from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,821 SFRs (52.8% of the market), with individuals holding 81.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a majority stake in the San Juan County housing market, owning 4,821 of the 9,136 Single-Family Residences, which constitutes a 52.8% market share.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of this market, owning 3,914 properties (81.2%), while company-owned properties number 1,085 (22.5%). This demonstrates a market dominated by smaller-scale participants rather than large corporations.

There is a strong preference for cash ownership among landlords in the county. Cash-owned properties (3,426) are more than double the number of financed properties (1,395), indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income. An overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned SFRs (4,802 out of 4,821) are non-owner-occupied, underscoring the rental-centric strategy of local landlords.

The market consists of 6,928 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (5,932) vastly outnumbering company landlords (996), reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of San Juan County's investor landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 14.5% discount in Q4, paying $152,924 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average of $904,755, which is 14.5% less than the $1,057,679 paid by traditional homeowners—a substantial discount of $152,924 per property.

This Q4 discount represents a stark market shift. In the three preceding quarters of 2025, landlords were paying considerable premiums over homeowners, including a 42.2% premium ($323,589) in Q3 and a 23.6% premium ($199,073) in Q1.

The acquisition price trend indicates a cooling market for investors. The Q4 average price of $904,755 is not only lower than previous quarters in 2025 but also slightly below the average price of $918,006 from the 2020-2023 boom years, defying typical appreciation trends.

The dramatic swing from paying large premiums to securing a deep discount within a single year suggests a rapid change in market dynamics, potentially giving seasoned investors an advantage over traditional buyers in the current environment.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 75.0% of all single-family homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity reached a remarkable peak in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 45 of the 60 total SFRs sold, capturing a 75.0% share of all market purchases.

The 'mom-and-pop' segment was the exclusive driver of this activity. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) made up 97.9% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 46 properties.

The market saw a significant influx of new participants, with 58 new single-property landlord entities entering the market and acquiring 36 homes, which represents 76.6% of all investor-bought properties for the quarter.

In stark contrast to the hyperactivity of small investors, institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely inactive, acquiring zero properties in Q4. This highlights a market exclusively shaped by smaller, local players.

The data reveals a clear pattern of market absorption by small-scale investors, with a single entity in the 11-20 property tier being the largest active buyer in the fourth quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in San Juan County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. 'Mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) own 99.6% of all investor-held SFRs, dispelling any notion of significant corporate control.

First-time or single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with this tier alone accounting for 4,256 properties, which is 85.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

The scale of small investor dominance is profound. The first three tiers combined (1-5 properties) represent 99.2% of all investor-owned homes, showing extreme concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum.

Institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent in this market. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own just one property, accounting for a statistically insignificant 0.0% share.

The market structure reveals a highly fragmented ownership base, with thousands of small landlords shaping the rental market rather than a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 11-20 property tier, holding 90.0% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A clear bifurcation exists between individual and company ownership based on portfolio size. Individual investors are dominant in smaller tiers, holding 80.8% of single-property portfolios and 74.4% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier (Small-medium). At this level, company ownership surges to 90.0%, indicating that scaling beyond 10 properties is primarily a corporate endeavor in this market.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, companies have a substantial presence, owning 95 properties for a 39.1% share, suggesting that incorporation is a common strategy even for relatively small but growing landlords.

This pattern reveals that while individuals form the foundation of the market, portfolio growth and professionalization are strongly correlated with a shift to a corporate ownership structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with five zip codes holding 87.3% of all landlord-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in San Juan County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top five zip codes by property count (98250, 98245, 98261, 98279, 98280) contain a combined 4,210 properties, representing 87.3% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 98250 is the epicenter of investor activity, with 1,905 landlord-owned SFRs, though its investor ownership rate is 48.5%.

A distinction exists between high-volume and high-penetration areas. Several small zip codes (98001, 98003, 98040) report a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting these are small, exclusive investor enclaves.

The 98280 zip code stands out as a hotspot for both volume and penetration, ranking in the top five for both metrics with 229 investor-owned properties and a high 72.0% ownership rate.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting specific communities, leading to hyper-localized markets where landlord activity has an outsized impact on housing availability and pricing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 12 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in San Juan County are in a phase of aggressive accumulation, acting as strong net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 73 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of over 12-to-1.

This net buying behavior is a persistent trend, not a quarterly anomaly. Landlords were also significant net buyers for the full years of 2025 (260 buys vs. 19 sells) and 2024 (256 buys vs. 13 sells).

The high volume of acquisitions compared to dispositions signals strong investor confidence and a long-term hold strategy prevalent in the county.

With institutional transaction data unavailable, the market's transactional behavior is entirely reflective of the smaller 'mom-and-pop' investors who are actively expanding their portfolios.

The consistent net buying pressure from this large base of small investors is a primary factor driving the high landlord market share in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors drove 74.5% of all Q4 market transactions, with new entrants paying the highest prices.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the dominant force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 73 of the 98 total transactions, a commanding 74.5% share of all activity.

A clear pricing hierarchy emerged among tiers. New investors in the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $885,887, suggesting a willingness to pay a premium to enter the market.

In contrast, more established small landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for a lower average price of $694,823, indicating that experience may lead to more favorable purchasing strategies.

The largest transaction of the quarter was an outlier, with a single property purchased by an entity in the 11-20 tier for $1,800,000, skewing the overall average.

Investors are primarily acquiring properties from the open market, not from each other. Only 8.6% of purchases made by single-property landlords were from other landlords, showing that the majority of new inventory is coming from former homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control San Juan County, Owning 52.8% of All Homes and Driving 75% of Q4 Sales
Holdings
Landlords own 4,821 SFR properties, representing a 52.8% majority share of the San Juan County market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 3,914 properties (81.2%), compared to 1,085 (22.5%) held by companies.
Pricing
In a sharp market reversal, landlords paid 14.5% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $152,924 per property ($904,755 vs $1,057,679) after paying significant premiums earlier in the year.
Activity
Landlords acquired 75.0% of all SFRs sold in Q4, with activity overwhelmingly driven by the smallest investors. The quarter saw the entry of 58 new single-property landlord entities into the market.
Market Share
The market is defined by small-scale ownership, as 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1,000+) own just 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties, where they control 90.0% of the homes.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 12.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (73 buys vs 6 sells), a trend of rapid accumulation that has been consistent for over two years. Institutional investors were completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in San Juan County, Washington is fundamentally shaped by real estate investors, who now own a majority 52.8% of all SFR properties, totaling 4,821 homes. This market is not the territory of large corporations; instead, it is overwhelmingly dominated by 5,932 individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords who control 99.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. This highly fragmented ownership structure underscores a community-level investment trend, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 85.1% of all rental housing.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic purchasing. Landlords captured 75.0% of all homes sold, signaling deep market control. This activity was coupled with a significant shift in pricing power; after paying premiums for three straight quarters, investors secured a 14.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. As strong net buyers—acquiring over 12 properties for every one they sold—these small investors are actively and rapidly expanding their holdings, fueled by an influx of 58 new single-property entities in Q4 alone.

The key takeaway from San Juan County is that significant investor penetration can be driven almost entirely by local, small-scale players rather than distant institutions. This dynamic creates a unique market where the line between homeowner and landlord is increasingly blurred. The intense, localized competition and rapid accumulation by a growing base of mom-and-pop investors are the defining forces shaping housing availability, affordability, and the future of the rental landscape across the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:39 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySan Juan (WA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell