Grant (WA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grant (WA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grant (WA)
22,737
Total Investors in Grant (WA)
9,974
Investor Owned SFR in Grant (WA)
7,253(31.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
9,411
SFR Owned
6,437
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
563
SFR Owned
874
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,253 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 96.3% of Grant County's Investor Market as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 31.9% of the SFR market in Grant County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 96.3% of that share versus a mere 0.1% for institutions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 30.9% of homes sold, while institutional investors were net sellers for the year, solidifying a market driven by local, small-scale capital.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 7,253 SFR properties in Grant County, with individuals holding a dominant 88.7%.
Of these holdings, 57.0% (4,132 properties) were purchased with cash, outpacing the 43.0% (3,121) that are financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 98.7% of all investor-owned properties being rented out.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 6.3% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
This Q4 premium of $27,498 contrasts sharply with significant discounts in Q3 (11.3%) and Q1 (18.3%), indicating a volatile pricing dynamic. The average landlord purchase price has appreciated by 41.1% since the 2020-2023 period ($327,983 vs $462,850).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 30.9% of all SFR properties sold in Grant County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove this activity, accounting for 88.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions. The market saw 77 new single-property landlords enter in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Grant County, controlling 96.3% of all investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio (10 properties). Given their zero acquisitions in Q4, their market share is stagnant. Single-property landlords alone own 79.1% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 10 properties.
The crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 82.6% of the homes. Below this, individuals dominate, controlling 94.0% of single-property portfolios and 65.0% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 98837 zip code, which holds 2,967 investor-owned properties.
While 98837 leads in volume, other zip codes show far higher market penetration. The 98824 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at a staggering 83.3%, followed by 98860 (66.7%). This reveals distinct pockets of intense investor focus.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This strong net buying activity (90 buys vs. 15 sells in Q4) is consistent with the full-year trend (403 buys vs. 46 sells). In stark contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, selling two properties while acquiring only one. Acquisition volume remained stable year-over-year, with 403 purchases in 2025 compared to 401 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 27.7% of all Grant County SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors acquiring a second property (Tier 02) paid the highest average price ($992,221) and sourced 75.0% of their purchases from other landlords. In contrast, new investors (Tier 01) paid much less ($409,596) and sourced only 6.4% from other landlords. Large investors (101-1000 tier) paid an average of $713,623.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 7,253 SFR properties in Grant County, with individuals holding a dominant 88.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Grant County, owning 7,253 single-family residential properties, which accounts for 31.9% of the total SFR market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual ownership. Individuals own 6,437 properties (88.7% of the total), while companies own just 874 (12.1%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in entity counts, where 9,411 individual landlords comprise 94.4% of all investor entities, compared to just 563 company landlords.

On average, company landlords manage larger portfolios (1.55 properties per entity) than individual landlords (0.68 properties per entity), indicating that incorporation is a strategy for portfolio growth.

Investor portfolios are heavily geared towards rental income, with 7,155 properties (98.7%) classified as rented, confirming a strong rental market focus.

Cash is the preferred financing method, with 4,132 properties (57.0%) owned outright, compared to 3,121 properties (43.0%) that are financed, signaling significant capital deployment by investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 6.3% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift during Q4 2025, landlords paid an average price of $462,850, which was 6.3% more than the average traditional homeowner paid ($435,352), a premium of $27,498 per property.

This trend marks a significant departure from earlier in the year, where landlords secured substantial discounts. For instance, in Q1 2025, they paid 18.3% less than homeowners, representing an $80,500 discount per property.

The landlord-homeowner price gap is highly volatile, swinging from deep discounts to premiums within the same year. This suggests investors are acting opportunistically, paying above market rate for desirable assets while still capitalizing on deals when available.

Property values have seen strong appreciation since the pandemic era. The average Q4 2025 landlord acquisition price of $462,850 is 41.1% higher than the average price from 2020-2023 ($327,983).

The full-year data for 2025 shows an average purchase price of $425,209, indicating that the Q4 price surge was a significant driver of the annual average.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 30.9% of all SFR properties sold in Grant County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 59 of the 191 available single-family homes, capturing a 30.9% market share of all sales.

The acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) purchased 53 properties, making up 88.3% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

New market entrants were a primary driver of demand, with 77 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 49 properties, which alone accounts for 81.7% of all investor purchases.

In stark contrast to the active small landlord segment, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4.

A small number of larger, non-institutional investors were also active, with two entities in the 101-1000 property tier acquiring 7 properties, representing 11.7% of the quarter's landlord purchases.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Grant County, controlling 96.3% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Grant County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.3% of all investor-owned SFR housing.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, alone accounting for 5,891 properties, or 79.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Conversely, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, holding only 10 properties, which represents a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned stock.

The mid-size investor segment (11-1000 properties) is also relatively small but contains pockets of concentration. The 'Large' tier (101-1000 properties) holds 183 properties, or 2.5% of the total, suggesting a few significant local players.

The distribution clearly shows that the rental market's structure is highly fragmented and reliant on thousands of small-scale owners rather than a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios larger than 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary drivers of ownership in smaller portfolios, accounting for 94.0% of properties in the single-property tier and maintaining majority control up to the 10-property mark.

A distinct strategic shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios scale. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own a commanding 82.6% of properties, marking the clear crossover point from individual to corporate dominance.

This pattern suggests that while individuals fuel entry-level investment, portfolio growth and professionalization are strongly correlated with incorporation.

Even in the smallest portfolios, a corporate structure is utilized by some. Companies own 356 properties in the single-property tier (6.0%) and 97 properties in the two-property tier (16.3%).

The 6-10 property tier acts as a transition zone. While individuals still own the majority (65.0%), company ownership grows to 35.0%, signaling the beginning of the shift toward more formal business structures.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 98837 zip code, which holds 2,967 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Grant County is geographically concentrated, with the top five zip codes by count accounting for 5,663 properties, or 78.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The 98837 zip code is the clear epicenter of activity in terms of volume, containing 2,967 investor properties. This is more than double the second-highest zip code, 98848, which has 1,166 properties.

A key finding is the divergence between high-volume and high-penetration areas. The 98824 zip code has the county's highest investor ownership rate at 83.3%, indicating a market almost entirely composed of rental housing, despite not being a leader in total property count.

In contrast, the volume leader 98837 has a more moderate investor ownership rate of 25.4%, suggesting it is a larger, more balanced housing market.

Several areas, such as 98851 (49.7% rate) and 99349 (47.3% rate), show both high investor counts and high ownership rates, signaling they are mature and significant rental submarkets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Grant County are firmly in an accumulation phase, posting a 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025 with 90 acquisitions and only 15 dispositions.

This net buyer stance is a consistent, long-term strategy. For the entire year of 2025, landlords acquired 403 properties while selling only 46, an 8.8x ratio resulting in a net portfolio expansion of 357 homes.

A critical divergence in strategy is visible between large and small investors. While the overall market is expanding, institutional (1000+) investors were net sellers in 2025, acquiring only one property while selling two, indicating a strategic retreat from the area.

The overall pace of investor acquisitions has remained remarkably stable. The 403 properties purchased by landlords in 2025 is nearly identical to the 401 properties purchased in 2024, signaling steady and persistent demand.

The transaction data confirms that the growth in Grant County's investor market is being driven exclusively by small and mid-sized players, who are actively absorbing inventory while the largest firms are divesting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 27.7% of all Grant County SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a key source of liquidity and activity in the Q4 2025 housing market, participating in 90 of the 325 total transactions, for a 27.7% market share.

A clear pattern of tiered pricing strategies emerged. New, single-property investors focused on affordability, paying the lowest average price at $409,596 per transaction.

Conversely, investors graduating to their second property (Tier 02) paid the highest average price by a wide margin ($992,221), suggesting a strategic focus on acquiring higher-value or multi-unit potential assets to grow their portfolio.

Large landlords (101-1000 tier) also targeted higher-priced assets, with an average purchase price of $713,623, well above the entry-level tier but below the premium paid by Tier 02 investors.

Sourcing channels also differ significantly by experience level. Small investors expanding their portfolio (Tier 02) heavily utilized the landlord-to-landlord market, with 75.0% of their purchases coming from other investors. New entrants (Tier 01), however, primarily bought from the open market, with only 6.4% of deals sourced from other landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords dominate Grant County's 7,253 investor-owned homes as institutional players retreat as net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 7,253 SFR properties, representing a significant 31.9% of Grant County's market. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 6,437 of these properties (88.7%), with companies owning the remaining 874 (12.1%).
Pricing
In a Q4 2025 market reversal, landlords paid a 6.3% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average purchase price of $462,850 compared to the homeowner's $435,352.
Activity
Landlords purchased 59 properties in Q4 2025, accounting for 30.9% of all market sales. This activity was driven by small investors, including 77 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.3% of investor housing in Grant County, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies take majority control with 82.6% ownership.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (90 buys vs. 15 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers for the year, signaling a strategic retreat.
Market Narrative

Grant County's real estate investment landscape is defined by substantial local participation and minimal institutional influence. Investors own 7,253 single-family residential properties, a significant 31.9% of the total market in Grant County, Washington. The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 9,411 individual investors who control 88.7% of the portfolio. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) command a 96.3% share of investor housing, while large institutional firms own just 0.1%, challenging the narrative of corporate consolidation in this market.

Investor activity remains robust, with landlords accounting for 30.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025. This momentum is driven by new entrants, as 77 first-time landlords acquired properties this quarter. Pricing behavior is dynamic; after securing discounts earlier in the year, landlords paid a 6.3% premium over homeowners in Q4. Overall, investors are in a strong accumulation phase, buying six homes for every one they sold in the last quarter, while the largest institutional players were simultaneously net sellers for the year.

The data paints a clear picture of a decentralized, resilient rental market in Grant County, Washington, powered by local capital. The dominance of small landlords and the simultaneous retreat of institutional capital suggest the market's health is tied to the financial stability of individual investors rather than corporate strategy. High investor penetration in specific zip codes like 98824 (83.3%) indicates the formation of mature rental submarkets. This dynamic implies a stable supply of rental housing but also heightened competition for entry-level homes between first-time homebuyers and a steady stream of new local investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGrant (WA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison