Lamoille (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lamoille (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lamoille (VT)
7,995
Total Investors in Lamoille (VT)
2,352
Investor Owned SFR in Lamoille (VT)
1,625(20.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,911
SFR Owned
1,241
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
441
SFR Owned
431
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,625 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lamoille County with 99.7% Ownership, Driving Market with Cash Purchases
Investors own 20.3% of the single-family housing in Lamoille County, a market almost entirely controlled by small, individual landlords (99.7% of holdings). In Q4 2025, these investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 26.5% of all homes sold, often paying a premium over traditional homebuyers. The entire investor portfolio is owned with cash, and large institutional players are completely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,625 SFRs in Lamoille County, with individuals holding a 76.4% majority.
The entire investor portfolio of 1,625 properties was acquired with cash, with zero properties financed. Nearly the entire portfolio (1,618 properties) is actively rented, demonstrating a strong focus on cash flow.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Lamoille County landlords paid a 17.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
The Q4 price premium of $101,652 is a stark reversal from Q3, when landlords secured an 18.6% discount. The price relationship has been volatile, with landlords paying more than homeowners in three of the last four quarters, signaling intense competition for properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 26.5% of all SFR properties sold in Lamoille County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of this investor activity, purchasing all 18 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the market's purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Lamoille County's market with 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for a staggering 92.9% of the investor-owned housing stock. Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, holding just 2 properties (0.1%) and showing no purchasing activity in Q4.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties in Lamoille County.
While individuals dominate the single-property tier (75.9%), ownership splits evenly at the 3-5 property tier. Companies then take a commanding 90.9% majority in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a clear trend toward incorporation for scaling investors.
Geographic Distribution
The 05672 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 746 properties.
While 05672 has the highest volume of investor-owned homes, the 05653 zip code has the densest concentration with a 43.6% investor ownership rate. Other zips like 05657 also show high penetration at 31.6%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Lamoille County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14 properties for every 1 sold in Q4 2025.
This strong net-buying trend is consistent, with 92 properties bought versus only 8 sold for the full year in 2025. Transaction volume has moderated slightly from 2024 (115 buys) but remains overwhelmingly positive.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 24.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Lamoille County.
All 28 landlord transactions were executed by single-property investors, who paid an average of $679,143. These new entrants acquired 0% of their properties from existing landlords, sourcing them entirely from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,625 SFRs in Lamoille County, with individuals holding a 76.4% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors own a significant 1,625 single-family residential properties in Lamoille County, which constitutes 20.3% of the total 7,995 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is dominated by individual investors, who own 1,241 properties (76.4% of the investor-owned total). Companies hold a smaller but notable share of 431 properties (26.5%), indicating a market primarily driven by smaller-scale operators.

In a striking display of financial strength, 100% of the 1,625 investor-owned properties are held with cash. The complete absence of financing suggests that Lamoille County investors are not leveraged and are insulated from interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 1,618 properties classified as rented. This near-total rental penetration underscores the business focus of these property owners.

There are more landlord entities (2,352) than investor-owned properties (1,625), a pattern that points towards a high degree of co-ownership among individuals and companies on single assets.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Lamoille County landlords paid a 17.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $679,143, a significant 17.6% premium over the $577,491 paid by traditional homeowners. This amounts to investors paying an extra $101,652 per property.

This premium represents a dramatic and volatile shift in market dynamics. It stands in sharp contrast to Q3 2025, where landlords enjoyed an 18.6% discount ($114,138), and Q1 2025, where they paid a massive 39.0% premium ($179,838).

The fluctuating price gap suggests that landlords in Lamoille County are not consistently finding discounts. Instead, they appear to be competing directly with homebuyers for desirable properties, often bidding aggressively to win.

On an annual basis, the average landlord acquisition price has decreased from $722,316 in 2024 to $590,622 in 2025. However, the high Q4 price indicates a potential rebound or focus on higher-end properties to close out the year.

The consistent willingness to pay a premium suggests that local investors are confident in future rent growth or appreciation, justifying the higher entry cost compared to owner-occupiers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 26.5% of all SFR properties sold in Lamoille County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 18 of the 68 total SFRs sold, capturing a 26.5% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest players. All 18 properties (100.0%) were acquired by single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating that market growth is fueled by new entrants or landlords adding just one more property.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the market, recording zero purchases. This highlights a market dynamic completely independent of large-scale corporate investment trends.

A total of 28 distinct entities were involved in acquiring the 18 properties, suggesting that some purchases were made through partnerships or new entities created for a single acquisition.

This concentration of activity among new and small landlords demonstrates that the expansion of the local rental housing supply is a grassroots phenomenon, not a top-down institutional effort.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Lamoille County's market with 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lamoille County is defined by extreme concentration at the smallest scale. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Drilling down further, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the undisputed backbone of the market, owning 1,535 properties, which represents 92.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a virtually nonexistent presence, holding just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the investor-owned market.

The market structure reveals a significant gap in the middle. After the mom-and-pop tiers, ownership is very sparse, indicating that few landlords in this county scale into mid-size or large portfolios.

This distribution points to a highly fragmented market composed of thousands of individual decisions by small operators, making it resilient to the strategic shifts of large-scale investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties in Lamoille County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, owning 75.9% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 69.8% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios grow. In the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, ownership is split exactly 50/50 between individuals and companies, with each owning 19 properties.

Beyond this point, a corporate structure becomes the dominant strategy. For landlords owning 6-10 properties, companies own 10 of the 11 properties in the tier, a commanding 90.9% share.

This pattern strongly suggests that local investors who decide to scale their operations beyond a handful of properties choose to incorporate, likely for liability protection and financial management purposes.

While individuals drive market entry and small-scale ownership, companies are the vehicle for portfolio growth in Lamoille County's real estate investment scene.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 05672 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 746 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Lamoille County is heavily concentrated geographically, with the 05672 zip code accounting for 746 investor-owned properties, which is 45.9% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

However, the highest market saturation is found elsewhere. In the 05653 zip code, investors own 43.6% of all single-family properties, making it the most investor-dense area in the county.

This highlights the difference between volume and penetration. While 05672 has the most investor properties, its ownership rate of 36.9% is lower than that of 05653, indicating that different local markets have varying levels of investor saturation.

Following the top regions, investor presence drops off, with zip codes like 05655 (103 properties, 11.5% rate) and 05464 (77 properties, 10.3% rate) showing more moderate activity.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities within Lamoille County, rather than spreading their holdings evenly.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Lamoille County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14 properties for every 1 sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Lamoille County landlords demonstrated powerful conviction in the market during Q4 2025, purchasing 28 properties while selling only 2. This 14-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio signals a period of aggressive portfolio expansion.

The trend of accumulation is not isolated to a single quarter. Across all of 2025, investors have been consistent net buyers, acquiring 92 properties and divesting only 8, resulting in a net gain of 84 properties for the year.

While still robust, the pace of acquisitions has slowed slightly compared to the previous year. In 2024, landlords purchased 115 properties, indicating that 2025's activity, while strong, represents a slight moderation.

Institutional investors logged zero buy or sell transactions throughout all observed timeframes, reinforcing that their market influence is negligible and all transactional momentum comes from smaller players.

This sustained net-buying behavior from local landlords is a key factor driving housing demand and contributing to the conversion of owner-occupied housing into rental stock within the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 24.8% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Lamoille County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a quarter of the market in Q4, with landlords participating in 28 of the 113 total SFR transactions for a 24.8% share.

The transaction market was exclusively driven by new and small investors. All 28 landlord-involved transactions were purchases by entities in the single-property tier.

These new market entrants paid a high average price of $679,143 per property, which was notably 17.6% higher than what traditional homeowners paid in the same quarter, indicating intense competition.

Critically, 0% of these properties were bought from other landlords. This means every one of the 28 properties purchased by investors was removed from the general for-sale inventory available to homeowners.

The complete absence of transactions from mid-size, large, or institutional tiers underscores that the transactional flow in Lamoille County is defined by the creation of new, small-scale rental portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lamoille County with 99.7% Ownership, Driving Market with Cash Purchases
Holdings
Investors own 1,625 single-family residential properties in Lamoille County, representing 20.3% of the total market. Individual landlords hold the vast majority with 1,241 properties (76.4%), compared to 431 (26.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a reversal of typical trends, landlords in Q4 2025 paid a 17.6% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $679,143 versus the homeowner average of $577,491.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 18 properties which accounted for 26.5% of all market sales. This activity was driven entirely by new entrants, with 28 single-property entities making their first acquisition.
Market Share
The investor market in Lamoille County is almost exclusively controlled by small landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning 99.7% of the rental stock. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but a clear pattern emerges with scale: companies become majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, suggesting incorporation is a key step for growth.
Transactions
Landlords in Lamoille County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 14 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025 (28 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors were completely dormant, with zero transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Lamoille County, VT is significantly shaped by a highly active, yet fragmented, investor base. Landlords own 1,625 properties, comprising 20.3% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.7% of the investor-owned inventory. Further defying national narratives, the entire investor portfolio is owned with cash, and individual investors (76.4%) far outnumber companies (26.5%), while large-scale institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent presence at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Lamoille County is characterized by aggressive, cash-fueled acquisition. In the final quarter of 2025, landlords purchased 26.5% of all homes sold, with 100% of that activity coming from new, single-property investors. These entrants competed fiercely, paying a 17.6% premium over traditional homebuyers. This confidence is reflected in their transactional patterns, where landlords acted as strong net buyers, acquiring 14 homes for every one they sold in Q4. This activity serves to consistently convert for-sale housing into the local rental supply.

The key takeaway from the data is that Lamoille County represents a quintessential small-investor market, driven by local, cash-rich individuals and small companies, and completely insulated from institutional trends. The primary market dynamic is the steady accumulation of rental properties by new landlords who are competing directly with, and often outbidding, traditional homebuyers. This grassroots investment is the dominant force shaping the county's rental landscape and influencing overall housing market competition.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLamoille (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail