Bennington (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bennington (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bennington (VT)
12,461
Total Investors in Bennington (VT)
4,084
Investor Owned SFR in Bennington (VT)
2,774(22.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,484
SFR Owned
2,303
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
600
SFR Owned
523
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,774 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small, Cash-Rich Landlords Dominate Bennington County, Paying 21% Premiums to Aggressively Expand Portfolios
In Bennington County, investors own 22.3% of the SFR market (2,774 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling virtually the entire stock (99.9%). Uniquely, these landlords pay significant premiums over traditional homeowners—20.9% in Q4—and are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 24.0% of all homes sold while funding 100% of their holdings with cash.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,774 SFR properties, with 100% of portfolios held entirely in cash.
Individual landlords comprise 83.0% of property ownership (2,303 SFRs), while companies own the remaining 18.9% (523 SFRs). An overwhelming 99.5% of investor-owned properties are designated as rentals (2,760 properties), signaling a strong focus on income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 20.9% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $518,080 per purchase.
This trend of paying more than homeowners intensified throughout the year, with the premium reaching a staggering 69.5% in Q2. This pattern sharply contrasts with typical investor behavior, suggesting fierce competition for limited inventory in Bennington County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 24.0% of all homes sold in Q4, totaling 31 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of this activity, with no purchases from institutional firms. The market saw the entrance of 29 new single-property landlords, who alone accounted for 93.5% of all investor purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.9% of all investor-owned housing in Bennington County.
Single-property landlords alone own 91.9% of the investor-held SFR stock (2,603 properties). Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have absolutely no presence in this market (0.0% share).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own over 72% of properties in every landlord tier, showing dominance at all scales.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Bennington County. In the largest active tier (3-5 properties), individuals still own 75.8% of the homes. Companies' highest penetration is 27.3% in the two-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with a 64.7% ownership rate in zip code 05340.
Zip code 05343 holds the highest investor penetration rate at 66.7%. In contrast, zip code 05201 has a much lower investor ownership rate of just 10.2% despite having a high count of 365 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend remained strong in Q4 with 47 purchases versus only 6 sales. Buying activity has moderated slightly from 2024, when the buy-to-sell ratio was an even more extreme 19-to-1 (228 buys vs 12 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 24.1% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop buyers.
New, single-property investors paid the highest average price among active tiers at $519,854. Inter-landlord trading is minimal, with only 4.4% of purchases by new investors sourced from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,774 SFR properties, with 100% of portfolios held entirely in cash.
Detailed Findings

In Bennington County, investors hold a significant 22.3% of the single-family housing market, totaling 2,774 properties.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete lack of leverage; 100% of the 2,774 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero properties recorded as financed. This indicates a highly capitalized and financially resilient investor base.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 2,303 properties (83.0% of the investor portfolio), compared to 523 properties (18.9%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 3,484 individual landlords operate, outnumbering the 600 company landlords by a ratio of nearly 6-to-1.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: 2,760 of the 2,774 properties (99.5%) are classified as rented, underscoring that virtually the entire investor-owned stock is actively serving the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 20.9% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $518,080 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of national trends, landlords in Bennington County consistently pay a significant premium over traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $518,080, which is $89,642 (20.9%) more than the average homeowner price of $428,438.

This premium was not an anomaly but the continuation of a year-long trend. The price gap was even more pronounced earlier in 2025, reaching a remarkable 69.5% premium in Q2 ($769,749 vs. $454,151) and 52.0% in Q1 ($524,768 vs. $345,242).

This investor behavior suggests a highly competitive market where landlords are willing to outbid traditional buyers to secure properties, likely driven by strong rental demand or a belief in future appreciation.

The average acquisition price for landlords in 2025 ($552,938) represents a 14.6% increase from the pandemic-era average of $482,688 (2020-2023), highlighting significant price appreciation in the market.

This willingness to pay above homeowner prices indicates that investors are not seeking deep discounts but are instead focused on acquisition at nearly any cost, a strategy enabled by their all-cash position.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 24.0% of all homes sold in Q4, totaling 31 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity remained robust in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 31 of the 129 single-family homes sold, capturing 24.0% of the total market share.

The acquisition market is exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 31 properties purchased by investors, with zero activity from mid-size or institutional players.

New entrants are the primary force behind this activity. Landlords purchasing their very first investment property (Tier 01) acquired 29 homes, representing 93.5% of all investor buying for the quarter.

The remaining investor purchases were minimal, with one property bought by a two-property landlord and one by a small landlord in the 3-5 property tier.

This data illustrates a market characterized by a continuous influx of new, small-scale landlords rather than the expansion of large, consolidated portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.9% of all investor-owned housing in Bennington County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bennington County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 99.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the bedrock of the market. The single-property tier alone accounts for 2,603 properties, representing an overwhelming 91.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

Portfolio concentration drops off sharply after the first property. Two-property landlords hold just 126 properties (4.4%), and those with 3-5 properties hold 99 (3.5%).

The scale of ownership is extremely limited, with only two properties held by landlords in the 6-10 tier and no significant ownership beyond that.

Institutional capital is completely absent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier have a 0.0% market share, underscoring that the local rental market is entirely controlled by small, local operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own over 72% of properties in every landlord tier, showing dominance at all scales.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant ownership force across every portfolio size in Bennington County, dispelling any notion of corporate control.

In the foundational single-property tier, which comprises 91.9% of all investor housing, individuals own 2,189 properties (82.5%) compared to 463 for companies (17.5%).

Unlike in other markets, there is no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Even as portfolios grow, individuals maintain their majority stake.

In the two-property tier, individuals own 93 properties (72.7%), and in the 3-5 property tier, they own 75 properties (75.8%).

This persistent dominance by individuals at every level highlights a market driven by personal investment rather than corporate strategy, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of Bennington County's rental housing providers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with a 64.7% ownership rate in zip code 05340.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Bennington County is geographically concentrated in specific zip codes, with some areas seeing investors own more than half of the housing stock.

The zip code 05340 is a major hub for investor ownership, containing 657 investor-owned properties, which constitutes a 64.7% ownership rate in that area.

The highest penetration is found in zip code 05343, where two-thirds (66.7%) of all single-family properties are investor-owned, indicating a market heavily skewed towards rentals or second homes.

Conversely, some areas show a disconnect between high volume and high penetration. For example, zip code 05201 has 365 investor-owned homes but a relatively low ownership rate of 10.2%.

Other hotspots include 05254 (59.4% investor-owned) and 05152 (56.4% investor-owned), reinforcing the pattern of intense investor focus in select communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bennington County are overwhelmingly focused on portfolio growth, consistently buying far more properties than they sell.

Across all of 2025, investors were strong net buyers, acquiring 168 properties while selling only 21, resulting in a net gain of 147 properties and an 8.0x buy-to-sell ratio.

This acquisitive trend continued through the latest quarter, with 47 properties bought and only 6 sold in Q4 2025, for a ratio of 7.8-to-1.

While still aggressive, the pace of acquisitions has cooled slightly compared to the prior year. In 2024, investors purchased 228 properties and sold just 12, a remarkable 19-to-1 ratio.

Institutional investors recorded no transactions, meaning all buying and selling activity is being driven by the county's mom-and-pop landlord base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 24.1% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop buyers.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 47 of the 195 total SFR transactions in Bennington County, accounting for a 24.1% share of market activity.

All 47 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero activity from larger institutional players, mirroring the overall ownership structure.

New investors entering the market (Tier 01) dominated transaction volume with 45 purchases and paid an average price of $519,854. This was notably higher than the $367,000 paid by landlords in the 3-5 property tier.

The market for investor properties is not an insular one. Of the 45 properties purchased by single-property landlords, only 2 (4.4%) were acquired from other landlords. This indicates that investors are primarily buying their properties from the traditional homeowner market.

This low level of landlord-to-landlord sales suggests investors are in a holding pattern, focused on acquisition rather than portfolio churning or divestment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Bennington County's real estate market is fueled by cash-flush individual investors who control 99.9% of rentals and pay 21% premiums.
Holdings
Investors own 2,774 single-family properties in Bennington County, representing 22.3% of the total market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio at 83.0% (2,303 properties).
Pricing
Defying convention, landlords paid a 20.9% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4, with an average acquisition price of $518,080 compared to the homeowner average of $428,438.
Activity
Landlords purchased 24.0% of all homes sold in Q4 (31 properties), an effort led by 29 new single-property investors who accounted for 93.5% of all landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with a 99.9% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio size, owning 82.5% of single-property rentals and 75.8% of rentals in the 3-5 property tier, with no crossover point to corporate majority.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 7.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (47 buys vs 6 sells), and institutional investors are completely inactive in the transactional market.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Bennington County, VT, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small-scale, individual landlords. Investors command a significant 22.3% of the single-family housing market, owning 2,774 properties. This portfolio is almost entirely in the hands of mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who control 99.9% of investor-owned stock, while institutional firms are completely absent. Ownership is deeply personal, with individuals owning 83.0% of the properties, and uniquely, every single investor-owned home is held with cash, indicating a market insulated from financing pressures.

Investor behavior in Bennington County subverts national norms, particularly in pricing. In Q4, landlords paid a steep 20.9% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for scarce inventory. This aggressive, cash-fueled acquisition strategy saw investors purchase 24.0% of all homes sold in the quarter. Transaction data further reveals a market focused on accumulation, not churn; landlords were strong net buyers with a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 8-to-1, and they primarily acquire properties from homeowners rather than from other investors.

The key takeaway is that Bennington County's rental market is not driven by large corporations but by a resilient and highly capitalized base of local, individual investors. Their willingness to pay premiums and their all-cash position creates a competitive environment for traditional homebuyers. This dynamic suggests that rental demand is exceptionally strong and that these investors are confidently banking on long-term appreciation, making them a powerful and enduring force in the local housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBennington (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail