Campbell (VA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Campbell (VA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Campbell (VA)
19,353
Total Investors in Campbell (VA)
5,055
Investor Owned SFR in Campbell (VA)
4,598(23.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,382
SFR Owned
3,576
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
673
SFR Owned
1,067
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,598 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Activity in Campbell County, Securing Deep Discounts
Landlords in Campbell County, VA, own 4,598 SFR properties, representing 23.8% of the local market, with individuals holding a substantial 77.8% share. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 33.5% of all SFR purchases, consistently securing prices 17.6% lower than traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords are net buyers, yet institutional activity remains limited.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 77.8% of Campbell County's 4,598 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A significant 97.0% of these investor-owned properties are rented (4,461 properties), with 83.7% being cash purchases (3,850 properties), indicating a strong rental and cash-funded market. Companies constitute only 13.3% of the 5,055 total landlord entities, underscoring individual dominance.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $243,714 in Q4, a substantial 17.6% less than homeowners in Campbell County.
The landlord discount widened significantly in Q4, reaching $52,051 compared to Q3's $48,542 discount (15.9%). Landlords consistently secure lower prices, with Q1 2025 showing the largest discount at 28.0% ($66,463).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 33.5% of all SFR purchases in Campbell County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, accounting for 86.8% (59 properties) of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, acquiring 45 properties and representing the entry of 60 new entities into the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 65.8% (3,148 properties) of all investor-owned SFR. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.1% (7 properties), confirming their minimal presence in the local market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Tiers 06-10 portfolios in Campbell County, shifting from individual dominance.
Individual investors overwhelmingly lead in smaller portfolios, holding 87.4% of single-property (Tier 01) and 71.9% of small landlord (3-5 properties) assets. Company ownership dramatically increases in larger tiers, reaching 99.1% in the 21-50 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
VA-Campbell-24588 leads with 758 investor-owned properties, driving county-level concentration.
The top zip codes by property count within Campbell County are 24588 (758 properties), 24502 (694 properties), 24550 (546 properties), and 24517 (513 properties). In terms of investor ownership rate, VA-Campbell-24569 stands out with 42.9%, followed by 24528 at 35.7%, showing distinct areas of high investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Campbell County are strong net buyers with a 4.35x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025 (314 buys vs 85 sells), demonstrating sustained market confidence. In Q4, landlords bought 87 properties and sold 20, adding 67 properties to their portfolios, with no institutional transaction data available for comparison.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 30.0% of all Q4 transactions in Campbell County.
Mom-and-pop single-property buyers (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $222,020, while institutional investors (Tier 09) paid 38.0% less at $137,727. Tier 01 transactions represented the largest volume with 61 properties, and only 14.8% of these were bought from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 77.8% of Campbell County's 4,598 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the SFR investment landscape in Campbell County, owning 3,576 properties (77.8%) compared to companies at 1,067 properties (23.2%). This individual prevalence is further highlighted by the fact that 4,382 of the 5,055 distinct landlord entities are individuals, a ratio of 6.5 individuals for every company.

The total landlord-owned SFR portfolio in Campbell County stands at 4,598 properties, capturing 23.8% of the market's 19,353 SFR properties. This significant market penetration demonstrates the scale of investor involvement within the county.

A striking 97.0% of landlord-owned properties are rented (4,461 properties out of 4,598), indicating a highly rental-focused strategy across the investor base. This reveals that the vast majority of investor holdings are actively contributing to the rental housing supply in Campbell County.

Cash purchases represent a substantial portion of landlord portfolios, with 3,850 properties (83.7%) acquired without financing, compared to only 748 (16.3%) that are financed. This strong preference for cash acquisitions suggests a robust capital base and lower reliance on debt among investors in the region.

The composition of individual versus company portfolios reveals that while individuals own the majority of properties overall, companies still hold a notable 23.2% of SFR properties, suggesting a diverse market where both owner types play a role, albeit with individual landlords forming the bedrock.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $243,714 in Q4, a substantial 17.6% less than homeowners in Campbell County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Campbell County consistently acquire SFR properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $243,714, which is $52,051 (17.6%) less than the average homeowner price of $295,765.

This price advantage demonstrates landlords' ability to secure favorable deals, whether through negotiation, identifying distressed properties, or purchasing properties not typically targeted by owner-occupants. The consistent discount suggests a strategic advantage in acquisition.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated throughout 2025, with Q1 showing the largest difference at $66,463 (28.0% discount for landlords). This indicates that market conditions or specific property types may offer varying levels of discounts across quarters.

While the average landlord acquisition price was $243,714 in Q4, the provided data indicates 0 properties were recorded as purchased for landlords across all timeframes in the section 6-1 summary. However, other sections (like Section 7) confirm landlord purchases, suggesting a data reconciliation is needed; for pricing analysis, we rely on the comparative data in Section 6-2.

Comparing across the quarters of 2025, the landlord discount has shown variability: from 28.0% in Q1, narrowing to 9.2% in Q2, and then expanding again to 15.9% in Q3 and 17.6% in Q4. This fluctuating trend highlights dynamic market conditions affecting pricing strategies and opportunities.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 33.5% of all SFR purchases in Campbell County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Campbell County demonstrated significant purchasing activity in Q4 2025, acquiring 67 out of 200 total SFR properties sold. This represents a substantial 33.5% share of the entire market's purchases, showcasing their continued influence in property acquisitions.

The market for investor purchases in Q4 was heavily driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who together purchased 59 properties, accounting for 86.8% of all landlord acquisitions. This highlights the foundational role of smaller investors in the local market.

New entrants, specifically single-property landlords (Tier 01), showed robust activity, acquiring 45 properties. This tier also saw 60 distinct entities making purchases, indicating a steady stream of new individual investors entering the rental market in Campbell County.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a mere 1.5% of landlord acquisitions. This minimal activity from larger players reinforces the dominance of smaller investors in recent purchasing trends.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively acquired 9 properties, accounting for 13.2% of landlord purchases. Specifically, Tiers 05-08 include Small-medium (11-20 properties) with 2 purchases by 2 entities, Small-medium (21-50 properties) with 2 purchases by 1 entity, and Medium-large (51-100 properties) with 4 purchases by 2 entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell County.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell County is overwhelmingly skewed towards smaller portfolios. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 93.6% of all investor-owned housing, cementing their position as the primary force in the local rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 65.8% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 3,148 properties. This high concentration underscores the prevalent trend of individual investors holding one or a few rental units.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09), defined by portfolios of 1000+ properties, hold a negligible share of the market, controlling only 7 properties, which represents a mere 0.1% of all landlord-owned SFR. This significantly challenges any perception of large corporate dominance in Campbell County.

The remaining tiers, representing mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08), collectively own 6.2% of investor-held properties (160 + 116 + 16 + 6 = 298 properties). This indicates a gradual tapering of ownership concentration as portfolio size increases.

Due to missing data for 'Tier Prices' in the provided summary, we cannot analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier. However, the sheer volume of properties held by mom-and-pop investors suggests their significant role in price setting and market liquidity for smaller portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Tiers 06-10 portfolios in Campbell County, shifting from individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of individual versus company ownership in Campbell County shows a clear shift across portfolio tiers. Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio sizes, controlling 87.4% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings, 76.7% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings, and 71.9% of small landlord (3-5 properties) holdings.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs within the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 64.5% of properties compared to individuals at 35.5%. This indicates that as portfolio size increases, corporate structures become the preferred ownership model.

Beyond the crossover point, company ownership intensifies dramatically. In the 11-20 property tier, companies hold 63.8% of properties, and in the 21-50 property tier, their dominance peaks at 99.1% (115 out of 116 properties), signaling a clear strategy for larger investors to operate as companies.

This pattern suggests that individual investors primarily engage in smaller-scale landlord activities, likely as 'mom-and-pop' operations, while those aiming for or achieving larger portfolios tend to organize as companies, potentially for liability, tax, or operational efficiency.

Due to missing data for 'Tier + Type Pricing', we cannot analyze how acquisition prices differ between individual and company buyers within each tier. However, the distinct ownership patterns highlight divergent strategies between these owner types based on portfolio scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
VA-Campbell-24588 leads with 758 investor-owned properties, driving county-level concentration.
Detailed Findings

Within Campbell County, investor-owned properties are concentrated in specific zip codes. VA-Campbell-24588 emerges as the leader by count, holding 758 investor-owned properties, followed closely by VA-Campbell-24502 with 694 properties, indicating primary hotspots for investor activity.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned property count in Campbell County are 24588 (758 properties), 24502 (694 properties), 24550 (546 properties), and 24517 (513 properties). These regions represent the core areas where landlords have established significant portfolios.

When examining investor ownership rates, VA-Campbell-24569 leads significantly with 42.9% of its SFR properties investor-owned, showcasing an exceptionally high penetration. Other notable high-rate areas include 24528 (35.7%) and 24571 (34.1%), indicating markets where a substantial portion of the housing stock is investor-held.

There's a distinction between regions with the highest absolute count of investor properties and those with the highest percentage rate. While some areas like 24517 appear in both top lists (513 properties and 26.6% rate), others like 24569 (42.9% rate) show high penetration despite potentially lower overall property counts, signaling highly attractive sub-markets for investors.

The variation in acquisition prices across geographic regions within Campbell County cannot be analyzed due to missing price data in the `section10.csv` summary. However, these differing concentrations by count and percentage suggest varied market dynamics and investment opportunities at the zip code level.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Campbell County are strong net buyers with a 4.35x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Campbell County are firmly positioned as net buyers, consistently adding to their portfolios across recent timeframes. In Q4 2025, they purchased 87 properties while selling only 20, resulting in a net gain of 67 properties and a strong buy/sell ratio of 4.35x.

This trend of net buying is not isolated to Q4 but is a consistent pattern throughout 2025. Landlords bought 314 properties and sold 85 properties for the entire year, resulting in a net acquisition of 229 properties, signaling robust expansion activity.

Comparing 2025 to 2024, landlord buying activity has remained strong, with 314 purchases in 2025 slightly below 322 in 2024, but with fewer sells (85 vs 114), suggesting potentially tighter holding strategies or lower supply of investor-held properties in 2025.

Unfortunately, data for institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions is not available in the provided summary, precluding a direct comparison of their net position or transaction patterns against the overall landlord market. This gap limits a complete understanding of large-scale investor behavior.

The absence of average buy prices versus average sell prices for all landlords prevents an analysis of implied profit margins or pricing strategies over time. However, the consistent net buying indicates a positive outlook on the long-term value of SFR properties in Campbell County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 30.0% of all Q4 transactions in Campbell County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in Q4 2025 transactions in Campbell County, participating in 87 of the 290 total transactions. This represents a substantial 30.0% share of all SFR transactions during the quarter, highlighting their active market presence.

Transaction volumes varied across investor tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) being the most active, accounting for 61 transactions. Small landlord tiers (Tiers 01-04) collectively drove 78 transactions, dwarfing the single transaction by institutional investors (Tier 09).

A notable pricing disparity emerged by tier: mom-and-pop single-property buyers (Tier 01) paid an average of $222,020, which was significantly higher than the $137,727 paid by institutional investors (Tier 09). This indicates institutional buyers secured properties at a 38.0% discount compared to the smallest landlords.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing 14.8% (9 properties) of their acquisitions from other landlords. In contrast, medium-sized investors (Tier 02) showed higher inter-landlord reliance, with 50.0% (2 properties) of their acquisitions coming from other landlords, suggesting different sourcing strategies.

The wide price spread, from $465,175 for small landlords (3-5 properties) to $51,000 for medium-large (51-100 properties) buyers in Q4, suggests that larger, more sophisticated investors may be targeting different types of properties or distressed assets at lower price points than smaller, individual buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominance Drives Campbell County's Active Landlord Market
Holdings
Landlords in Campbell County own 4,598 SFR properties, constituting 23.8% of the local SFR market, with individual investors holding 3,576 properties (77.8%) and companies 1,067 properties (23.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $243,714 in Q4 2025, securing a significant 17.6% discount ($52,051) compared to traditional homeowners at $295,765.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords acquire 67 properties, representing 33.5% of all SFR purchases in Campbell County, with 60 single-property entities entering the market and mom-and-pop landlords dominating acquisitions (86.8%).
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.6% of investor-owned housing in Campbell County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the majority of smaller portfolios (up to 5 properties), but companies become the dominant owners, controlling 64.5% of properties, starting from the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers in Campbell County with a 4.35x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (87 buys vs 20 sells), demonstrating strong accumulation, though institutional transaction data is unavailable.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Campbell County, VA, is fundamentally shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control an overwhelming 93.6% of the 4,598 investor-owned SFR properties. These 3,576 individual investors represent 77.8% of the total landlord-owned portfolio, demonstrating their foundational role compared to the 1,067 properties (23.2%) owned by companies. This substantial investor presence accounts for 23.8% of the county's entire SFR market, indicating a significant and active rental sector.

Landlord behavior in Campbell County is characterized by consistent net buying and strategic acquisition. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 67 properties, capturing 33.5% of all SFR purchases, while consistently securing prices 17.6% ($52,051) lower than traditional homeowners. This discount, which reached 28.0% in Q1 2025, highlights their advantageous market position. Transaction data reveals landlords are firm net buyers, with 87 purchases against 20 sales in Q4, yielding a robust 4.35x buy/sell ratio, signalling strong market confidence and continued portfolio expansion.

The market's structural composition, with mom-and-pop landlords at the forefront and institutional investors holding a minimal 0.1% share, underscores a decentralized and accessible investment environment within Campbell County. This trend, coupled with the consistent entry of new single-property landlords (60 entities in Q4 alone), suggests a dynamic market that continues to attract individual investment. Specific zip codes, such as VA-Campbell-24588 (758 properties) and VA-Campbell-24569 (42.9% investor-owned), highlight regional concentrations where investor activity is particularly strong, shaping local housing dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:14 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCampbell (VA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth