Wasatch (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wasatch (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wasatch (UT)
14,296
Total Investors in Wasatch (UT)
7,038
Investor Owned SFR in Wasatch (UT)
5,378(37.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,953
SFR Owned
3,387
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,085
SFR Owned
2,279
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,378 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Wasatch Landlords Pay Premium, Mom-and-Pops Dominate 94% Ownership with Strong Q4 Buying
Landlords in Wasatch County own 5,378 SFR properties (37.6% of the market), with individual investors holding 63.0% of these. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.9% of investor-owned SFR, while institutional presence is negligible at 0.0%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 44.5% of all SFR purchases and were significant net buyers with a 5.17x buy/sell ratio, notably paying a 17.1% premium over traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords Own 5,378 SFR Properties, Individuals Hold 63.0% Amidst High Rental Focus
Nearly all investor-owned properties, 5,335 (99.2%), are rented, with cash purchases (3,315) outnumbering financed properties (2,063). Individual landlords, totaling 4,953 entities, outnumber company landlords (2,085) by a ratio of 2.38:1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Pay 17.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Q4, Defying Typical Discounts
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $1,024,051, a significant $149,211 more than traditional homeowners. This premium fluctuated throughout 2025, peaking at 23.7% in Q2 ($200,122 difference). Investor prices rose 10.7% from the 2020-2023 average of $925,197 to Q4 2025, reaching $1,024,051.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Secure 44.5% of Q4 Purchases, Mom-and-Pops Dominate 97.7% of Activity
Out of 283 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, landlords acquired 126 properties (44.5%). An overwhelming 97.7% of these landlord purchases came from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with 159 single-property entities entering the market by acquiring 110 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.9% of Ownership; Institutional Share is Near Zero
An overwhelming 93.9% of investor-owned SFR properties are held by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 1 property, representing 0.0% of the total. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 80.4% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners from Tier 3-5; Individuals Dominate Smaller Portfolios
Individual investors retain majority ownership in Tier 01 (67.1%) and Tier 02 (53.9%) portfolios. However, companies gain majority control starting from Tier 03-05 (63.9%) and become highly concentrated in Tier 06-10 (95.1%) and Tier 11-20 (94.4%) portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Codes 84032, 84036, 84049 Lead Investor-Owned Property Counts in Wasatch County
Zip code 84060 has the highest investor ownership rate at 67.0%, despite having a lower property count of 73. Zip code 84032, with the highest count of 3,158 investor-owned properties, has a moderate ownership rate of 32.0%, indicating a broader inventory.
Historical Transactions
Wasatch Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 5.17x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4
Landlords acquired 181 properties while selling 35 in Q4 2025, maintaining a robust net buying position. The buy/sell ratio, while still positive, decreased from 13.13x in Q3 2025 to 5.17x in Q4, signaling a moderation in acquisition intensity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Account for 38.3% of Q4 Transactions; Mom-and-Pops Dominate Activity
Landlords participated in 181 transactions in Q4 2025, representing 38.3% of all SFR transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 161 transactions and paying the highest average price of $915,152, significantly more than institutional buyers at $574,197.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords Own 5,378 SFR Properties, Individuals Hold 63.0% Amidst High Rental Focus
Detailed Findings

In Wasatch County, landlords collectively own a substantial 5,378 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 37.6% of the total SFR market of 14,296 properties. This indicates a significant investor presence within the local housing market.

Individual investors form the backbone of the landlord segment, owning 3,387 properties, which accounts for 63.0% of all investor-owned SFR. Companies, while owning a smaller share, still hold a considerable 2,279 properties (42.4% of investor-owned SFR), indicating a mixed but individual-dominated ownership landscape.

The market shows a strong focus on rental income, as 5,335 properties, or 99.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, are rented, affirming the non-owner-occupied nature of these holdings. This highlights the rental-centric strategy prevalent among landlords in the county.

Cash acquisitions are notably more common than financed deals among investors, with 3,315 properties acquired via cash compared to 2,063 that are financed. This suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or a strong capital base among investors.

The individual landlord entities vastly outnumber company entities, with 4,953 individual landlords representing 70.4% of the total 7,038 landlord entities. This numerical dominance underscores the entrepreneurial and smaller-scale nature of most rental property ownership in Wasatch County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Pay 17.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Q4, Defying Typical Discounts
Detailed Findings

Contrary to national trends, landlords in Wasatch County consistently paid a significant premium over traditional homeowners for SFR properties in 2025. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average of $1,024,051, which is a 17.1% premium, or $149,211 more, than the $874,840 paid by homeowners.

This landlord premium has varied substantially throughout the year, indicating a dynamic market. It was highest in Q2 2025 at 23.7% ($200,122 difference), dipped to 13.0% in Q1, then rose again in Q4 from Q3's 14.7% premium ($137,534 difference), demonstrating an inconsistent pricing advantage for homeowners in this market.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have seen significant appreciation, with average prices in 2025 at $1,017,277 and 2024 at $1,023,387. This represents a 10.7% price increase from the pandemic-era average (2020-2023) of $925,197 to Q4 2025, highlighting substantial market growth over recent years.

The sustained higher prices paid by landlords suggest a strong demand from investors who are willing to pay above market rates compared to traditional buyers. This behavior might be driven by specific investment strategies or a competitive local market where rental income potential justifies higher acquisition costs.

Analyzing the quarterly trends reveals that while the premium fluctuates, landlords have consistently paid more than homeowners throughout 2025, suggesting a unique market dynamic in Wasatch County where investor acquisition is not driven by purchasing at a discount.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Secure 44.5% of Q4 Purchases, Mom-and-Pops Dominate 97.7% of Activity
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a highly active role in the Q4 2025 market, securing 126 SFR properties, which accounts for 44.5% of the total 283 purchases made in the quarter. This demonstrates landlords' substantial influence and buying power in the current market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was overwhelmingly the most active segment, responsible for 110 purchases, representing 85.3% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter. This indicates a robust entry point for new or small-scale investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominated Q4 buying, accounting for 126 properties, which is 97.7% of all landlord purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made a minimal impact, acquiring only 1 property (0.8% of landlord purchases), further highlighting the small-investor driven market.

A notable 159 entities made single-property purchases in Q4, indicating a healthy influx of new or expanding mom-and-pop landlords into the Wasatch County market. This suggests a continued democratization of real estate investment rather than large-scale corporate consolidation.

Beyond single-property owners, Tier 02 (two-property owners) and Tier 03-05 (small landlords) also showed activity, acquiring 7 and 8 properties respectively, showcasing diverse engagement across smaller investor tiers in Q4.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.9% of Ownership; Institutional Share is Near Zero
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Wasatch County is overwhelmingly dominated by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control a vast 93.9% of all investor-owned SFR properties in the county.

This dominance is largely driven by single-property owners (Tier 01), who alone account for 4,423 properties, or 80.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This highlights the widespread presence of individual, small-scale landlords in the market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, owning only 1 property, which translates to 0.0% of the total investor-owned SFR. This significantly refutes any notion of institutional market capture in Wasatch County.

Mid-size landlords, those with 11-100 properties, hold a modest but growing share. Tiers 05-08 collectively own 332 properties (6.1% of the total), suggesting a segment with potential for future expansion as smaller landlords grow their portfolios.

The distribution clearly illustrates that the Wasatch County rental market is primarily sustained by individual and small-scale investors, with virtually no significant presence from large corporate entities, making it a distinctly 'mom-and-pop' driven market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners from Tier 3-5; Individuals Dominate Smaller Portfolios
Detailed Findings

The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Wasatch County occurs relatively early in portfolio growth. Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 67.1% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 53.9% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings.

However, companies quickly establish majority control in mid-sized portfolios. In the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03-05), companies own 63.9% of properties, compared to 36.1% for individuals, marking a clear shift in ownership type.

This trend of corporate dominance intensifies in larger mom-and-pop and small-medium tiers. Companies command an overwhelming 95.1% of holdings in Tier 06-10 and 94.4% in Tier 11-20 portfolios, indicating that once investors expand beyond a few properties, they typically transition to a corporate structure.

Even in the larger Tier 101-1000 category, companies maintain a significant majority, owning 75.0% of properties compared to individuals at 25.0%. This highlights a strategic preference for corporate entities as portfolio size increases.

The data clearly shows a pattern where individual investors are foundational for entering the market with single properties, but company structures are adopted for scaling portfolios, becoming the prevalent owner type for any portfolio exceeding two properties in Wasatch County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Codes 84032, 84036, 84049 Lead Investor-Owned Property Counts in Wasatch County
Detailed Findings

Within Wasatch County, investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes. UT-Wasatch-84032 leads significantly with 3,158 investor-owned properties, followed by UT-Wasatch-84036 with 1,030 properties, and UT-Wasatch-84049 with 968 properties. These three zip codes represent the primary hubs of investor activity by volume.

While some areas show high property counts, other zip codes demonstrate a higher concentration of investor ownership. UT-Wasatch-84060 has the highest investor ownership rate at an impressive 67.0%, indicating that a majority of SFR properties in this area are investor-owned, despite a lower total count of 73 investor-owned properties.

Comparing count and rate reveals distinct market characteristics. Zip code 84032, which has the highest number of investor-owned properties, shows a 32.0% ownership rate, suggesting a large overall housing stock. Conversely, 84060 has fewer investor properties but a much higher rate, indicating a more saturated investor market relative to its size.

Zip codes 84036 and 84049 exhibit both substantial investor property counts (1,030 and 968 respectively) and high ownership rates (57.1% and 44.5%), positioning them as key areas for both volume and penetration of investor activity within Wasatch County.

This geographic analysis highlights that investor activity is not uniformly distributed, with certain areas serving as high-volume centers and others as high-penetration markets, driven by different factors such as total housing stock and investor appeal.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Wasatch Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 5.17x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Wasatch County remain committed net buyers of SFR properties, demonstrating a strong appetite for acquisitions. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 181 properties while selling only 35, resulting in a substantial buy/sell ratio of 5.17x.

This consistent net buying trend is evident throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 821 properties against 98 sells for the entire year, yielding an impressive 8.38x buy/sell ratio. This indicates a sustained period of portfolio expansion rather than divestment.

While still strongly positive, the Q4 2025 buy/sell ratio of 5.17x represents a notable decrease from the peak of 13.13x observed in Q3 2025 (302 buys vs 23 sells). This suggests a slight cooling or strategic adjustment in acquisition intensity, though overall market direction remains accumulation.

Year-over-year comparisons reveal that 2025 activity (821 buys, 98 sells) is largely consistent with 2024 (860 buys, 141 sells), with landlords continuing to be aggressive buyers. The slight reduction in sells for 2025 compared to 2024 (98 vs 141) suggests landlords are holding onto their assets more firmly.

The absence of data for institutional investor transactions (1000+ tier) prevents a comparative analysis, but the overall landlord market clearly reflects a strong, sustained buying pattern driven by smaller-scale investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Account for 38.3% of Q4 Transactions; Mom-and-Pops Dominate Activity
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a dominant force in Q4 2025 transaction activity, participating in 181 transactions, which constitutes 38.3% of the total 473 SFR transactions. This substantial share underscores their critical role in market liquidity and property turnover.

Transaction volume is heavily concentrated among smaller investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) completing the vast majority at 161 transactions. In comparison, institutional investors (Tier 1000+) recorded only 1 transaction, reinforcing the mom-and-pop driven nature of the market.

Average purchase prices in Q4 2025 varied significantly across tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) paying the highest average price of $915,152. In contrast, the institutional investor (Tier 1000+) paid the lowest average price at $574,197, a substantial 37.3% less than Tier 01 buyers, highlighting distinct purchasing strategies and potentially access to different types of inventory or distressed assets.

Inter-landlord trading activity was most prevalent among single-property owners, where 27 transactions (16.8% of their purchases) involved buying from other landlords. This indicates a segment of the market where smaller investors facilitate transactions among themselves.

The transaction data confirms that mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) account for 178 of the 181 landlord transactions (98.3%), maintaining their overwhelming activity in Q4 purchases and solidifying their position as the primary drivers of market dynamics.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Wasatch Landlords Pay Premium, Mom-and-Pops Dominate 94% Ownership with Strong Q4 Buying
Holdings
Landlords in Wasatch County own 5,378 SFR properties (37.6% of the market), with individual investors holding 3,387 (63.0%) and companies owning 2,279 (42.4%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $1,024,051 in Q4 2025, securing a $149,211 (17.1%) premium over traditional homeowners at $874,840, a trend defying typical investor discounts.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords acquire 126 properties (44.5% of all SFR purchases), with 159 single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) drove 97.7% of landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.9% of investor-owned housing in Wasatch County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0% (1 property).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (67.1% of Tier 01), but companies become the majority owners in portfolios from Tier 03-05 upwards, reaching 95.1% in Tier 06-10.
Transactions
Wasatch County landlords are net buyers with a 5.17x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (181 buys vs 35 sells). Institutional investor transaction data is not available for comparison.
Market Narrative

The Wasatch County real estate market presents a distinctive picture dominated by individual and small-scale investors, collectively owning 5,378 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 37.6% of the total market. A striking 63.0% of these properties are held by individual investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 93.9% of all investor-owned housing. This stark concentration of ownership among smaller entities effectively refutes any narrative of large-scale institutional capture, as institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% of the market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signals a highly active and unique market. Landlords acquired 126 properties, accounting for 44.5% of all SFR purchases, indicating their significant influence on market demand. Notably, landlords in Wasatch County consistently pay a premium over traditional homeowners, with Q4 purchases averaging $1,024,051—a 17.1% or $149,211 increase compared to homeowner prices. This unusual trend, coupled with landlords being strong net buyers (5.17x buy/sell ratio), suggests a robust confidence in rental market returns. Single-property landlords are particularly active, comprising the largest segment of both ownership and Q4 purchases, further cementing their market impact.

This data highlights a vibrant, locally driven investor market where smaller landlords are the primary force behind SFR ownership and acquisition. The premium prices paid by investors, alongside sustained net buying, suggest a strong, perhaps unique, investment outlook for rental properties in Wasatch County. The market is characterized by individual entrepreneurship and growth from within, rather than external institutional pressures, with distinct geographic pockets of investor concentration further shaping its local dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWasatch (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail