Uintah (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Uintah (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Uintah (UT)
6,200
Total Investors in Uintah (UT)
1,657
Investor Owned SFR in Uintah (UT)
1,198(19.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,473
SFR Owned
1,055
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
184
SFR Owned
194
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,198 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Uintah County Landlords are Net Buyers, Led by Mom-and-Pops, Despite Q4 Price Premium
Landlords in Uintah County, UT own 1,198 SFR properties, representing 19.3% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 98.3% of this portfolio. While landlords were strong net buyers throughout 2025 with an 8.5x buy/sell ratio, Q4 saw a significant shift where they paid a 10.3% premium compared to traditional homeowners, reversing earlier discounts.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Uintah County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio totals 1,198 properties, predominantly held by individual investors.
A significant 98.2% of investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income. Furthermore, 70.7% of landlord properties are cash-owned, suggesting a preference for unfinanced assets, while 29.3% are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 10.3% premium in Q4 2025, a stark reversal from significant discounts earlier in the year.
Landlords shifted from securing an average 27.1% discount in Q1 2025, paying $99,674 less than homeowners, to paying $33,793 more (a 10.3% premium) in Q4. This marks a dramatic change in pricing dynamics, indicating increased competition or altered market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop landlords captured 93.3% of investor purchases in Q4 2025, dominating market entry.
Landlords accounted for 21.4% of all 70 SFR purchases in Uintah County during Q4 2025, acquiring 15 properties. Tier 01 (single-property) landlords were particularly active, representing 93.3% of these investor purchases with 14 properties acquired by 21 distinct entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.3% of Uintah County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 88.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a minimal footprint, owning just 0.5% of the total investor-held properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Uintah County's Small Landlord (6-10 properties) tier.
Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios, holding 87.8% of single-property (Tier 01) SFRs and 81.7% of two-property (Tier 02) SFRs. However, by the 6-10 property tier, companies hold 53.8% of properties (7 properties) compared to individuals at 46.2% (6 properties), marking a significant crossover in ownership type.
Geographic Distribution
UT-Uintah-84078 leads investor-owned property counts, while UT-Uintah-84026 shows the highest investor ownership rate.
UT-Uintah-84078 has the highest count of investor-owned properties at 833 (15.5% ownership rate). Conversely, UT-Uintah-84026 leads in investor ownership rate at 70.7%, indicating a high concentration of rental housing. Zip codes 84035 and 84039 feature prominently in both top count and top percentage rankings, signaling robust investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Uintah County landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025, though institutional activity remains low.
Landlords overall recorded 119 buys against 14 sells in 2025, consistently being net accumulators of SFR properties. In Q4 2025, landlords maintained a net buyer position with 23 buys versus 5 sells. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) also ended 2025 as net buyers with 3 buys and 2 sells, albeit with very limited transaction volume.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 23.5% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors dominating transaction volume and price.
Landlords were involved in 23 of the 98 total Q4 transactions, with single-property (Tier 01) landlords accounting for 21 of these. Tier 01 purchases occurred at an average price of $360,765. Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed a high reliance on inter-landlord transactions, with 50.0% of their 2 transactions bought from other landlords, far exceeding Tier 01's 4.8%.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Uintah County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio totals 1,198 properties, predominantly held by individual investors.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape in Uintah County, owning 1,055 (88.1%) of the 1,198 investor-owned SFR properties, significantly outweighing the 194 (16.2%) properties held by companies. This highlights a market largely driven by smaller-scale, individual investors rather than corporate entities.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 1,177 or 98.2%, are rented, underscoring that these investments are primarily acquired for rental income generation rather than speculative holding or immediate resale. This high non-owner-occupied rate confirms the rental-focused nature of the investor portfolio.

Cash acquisitions are a prominent strategy among Uintah County landlords, with 847 (70.7%) of their properties being cash-owned. This indicates a strong preference for unencumbered assets, potentially signaling financial resilience or a lower reliance on external financing compared to the 351 (29.3%) financed properties.

The entity landscape further reinforces individual investor dominance, with 1,473 individual landlords accounting for 88.9% of all 1,657 landlords in the county. In contrast, company landlords represent a much smaller segment with 184 entities (11.1%), translating to an approximate 8:1 ratio of individual to company landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 10.3% premium in Q4 2025, a stark reversal from significant discounts earlier in the year.
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift, landlords in Uintah County transitioned from consistently securing discounts in earlier quarters to paying a premium in Q4 2025. Landlords paid an average of $360,765, which was $33,793 (10.3%) higher than the traditional homeowner average of $326,972 in Q4.

This Q4 premium represents a significant reversal of previous trends, where landlords had consistently purchased properties at a discount. In Q1 2025, landlords paid $268,749, a substantial $99,674 (27.1%) less than homeowners at $368,423, demonstrating a clear pricing advantage.

The trend of shrinking landlord discounts throughout the year is evident, moving from a 27.1% discount in Q1 to a 22.8% discount in Q3 ($261,621 vs $338,792), then further narrowing to a 17.1% discount in Q2 ($320,170 vs $386,279). The Q4 premium of 10.3% suggests a rapid erosion and reversal of this historical price advantage.

Comparing the Q4 2025 landlord acquisition price of $360,765 to the average price during the 2020-2023 pandemic era of $267,950 reveals a substantial price appreciation of 34.6% ($92,815) for landlord-acquired properties in the county, signaling a robust increase in property values.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords captured 93.3% of investor purchases in Q4 2025, dominating market entry.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Q4 2025 SFR market in Uintah County, making 15 purchases, which accounted for a substantial 21.4% of the total 70 SFR properties transacted. This indicates a consistent investor presence in the local housing market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly drove investor activity in Q4, securing 14 properties and representing 93.3% of all landlord purchases. This highlights their continued dominance in acquiring rental housing compared to larger entities.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounted for the bulk of mom-and-pop activity, acquiring 14 properties. This suggests a healthy inflow of new or expanding small-scale investors, with 21 distinct entities making purchases that fall into this foundational tier.

In contrast to the mom-and-pop segment, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a mere 6.7% of landlord acquisitions. This low volume indicates a limited current acquisition appetite or market presence from large-scale investors in Uintah County.

The significant number of entities (21) involved in single-property (Tier 01) purchases, compared to the 14 properties acquired in that tier, suggests a diverse group of smaller buyers, many potentially entering the market with their first investment property.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.3% of Uintah County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control an overwhelming 98.3% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Uintah County. This concentration solidifies their role as the dominant force in the local rental housing market.

The most foundational segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01), alone accounts for 1,079 properties, representing 88.8% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This demonstrates that first-time and individual property investors are the primary drivers and holders of rental housing in the county.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own a mere 6 properties, constituting only 0.5% of the total investor-owned SFR. This suggests a minimal presence from large-scale corporate entities in the Uintah County market.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after single-property owners, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding 58 properties (4.8%), and small landlords (Tiers 03-04) collectively owning 57 properties (4.7%). This tiered breakdown reinforces the highly fragmented and localized nature of investor ownership.

The observed tier distribution highlights that Uintah County's investor market is overwhelmingly comprised of smaller, individual stakeholders, defying narratives of corporate buyouts often prevalent in larger metropolitan areas.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Uintah County's Small Landlord (6-10 properties) tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers of landlord ownership in Uintah County. In the single-property (Tier 01) segment, individuals own 986 properties (87.8%), significantly outpacing the 137 properties (12.2%) held by companies. This pattern continues into the two-property (Tier 02) segment, where individuals hold 49 properties (81.7%) compared to companies with 11 properties (18.3%).

A critical crossover point occurs within the small landlord segment, specifically at the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies become the majority owners, holding 7 properties (53.8%) compared to individuals who own 6 properties (46.2%). This shift indicates that as portfolios grow slightly larger, corporate structures begin to play a more prominent role.

The pattern of individual dominance in smaller tiers and company growth in mid-sized portfolios is further seen in the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still maintain a majority with 26 properties (56.5%) against companies with 20 properties (43.5%). This tier serves as a transition point before the company majority emerges.

This data reveals distinct strategies between individual and company investors: individuals focus on acquiring single or a few properties, while companies appear to consolidate assets as portfolios expand, beginning to take a leading role from the 6-10 property tier onwards.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
UT-Uintah-84078 leads investor-owned property counts, while UT-Uintah-84026 shows the highest investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Uintah County exhibits distinct patterns of geographic concentration for investor-owned properties. The zip code UT-Uintah-84078 leads by volume, with 833 landlord-owned properties, representing a 15.5% investor ownership rate. This area serves as a significant hub for rental housing within the county.

Conversely, UT-Uintah-84026 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at 70.7%, indicating a market where the majority of SFR properties are landlord-owned. This high percentage suggests that this specific area is a highly attractive or established rental market, even if its total property count isn't explicitly listed here.

Two zip codes, UT-Uintah-84035 and UT-Uintah-84039, demonstrate strong investor appeal as they appear in both the top 5 by investor-owned count and the top 5 by investor ownership percentage. UT-Uintah-84035 has 93 properties at a 62.0% rate, and UT-Uintah-84039 has 111 properties at a 59.7% rate, highlighting areas with both substantial volume and high market penetration.

The data reveals that high property counts do not always correlate with the highest ownership percentages. For example, 84078 has a high count but a moderate percentage, while 84026 has the highest percentage despite its count not being explicitly available. This differentiation helps identify varied market characteristics within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Uintah County landlords are strong net buyers with an 8.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025, though institutional activity remains low.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Uintah County have maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2025, accumulating properties at a rate significantly higher than their divestment. For the full year 2025, landlords bought 119 properties while selling only 14, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 8.5x and a net gain of 105 properties.

This aggressive buying trend was consistent across quarters, with Q4 2025 showing 23 buys against 5 sells, resulting in a net increase of 18 properties for the quarter and a buy/sell ratio of 4.6x. Earlier quarters demonstrated even higher ratios, such as Q2's 37 buys to 1 sell (37x ratio) and Q3's 26 buys to 2 sells (13x ratio).

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed minimal, but still net buyer, activity. For the full year 2025, they completed 3 buys and 2 sells, resulting in a net gain of just 1 property. Their Q4 activity was also limited, with 2 buys and 1 sell, indicating a cautious or very selective presence in the market.

The consistent net buying behavior across 2024 (84 buys vs 15 sells, 5.6x ratio) and 2025 signifies a sustained confidence among landlords in Uintah County's SFR market, despite the notable pricing shifts observed in Q4 2025.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 23.5% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors dominating transaction volume and price.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in Uintah County's Q4 2025 transaction landscape, participating in 23 of the total 98 SFR transactions, representing 23.5% of all market activity. This confirms their active and consistent engagement in property exchanges within the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, accounting for 21 of the 23 landlord transactions. These purchases occurred at an average price of $360,765. This tier's high activity aligns with the overall mom-and-pop dominance observed in ownership and acquisitions.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) contributed only 2 transactions in Q4, signaling their limited engagement in the county's transaction volume. For one of these transactions, the average purchase price is not available, limiting direct price comparisons across tiers.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied significantly by tier in Q4. While single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired only 1 (4.8%) of their 21 properties from other landlords, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired 1 (50.0%) of their 2 properties from other landlords. This suggests that larger investors are more likely to engage in direct exchanges within the investor community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Uintah County's SFR Market Dominated by Mom-and-Pops as Landlords Remain Net Buyers Despite Q4 Price Premium
Holdings
Landlords in Uintah County, UT own 1,198 SFR properties, constituting 19.3% of the total market's 6,200 SFR properties. Individual investors hold 1,055 (88.1%) of these properties, significantly outweighing the 194 (16.2%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $360,765 in Q4 2025, marking a 10.3% premium ($33,793 higher) compared to traditional homeowners at $326,972. This represents a dramatic shift from earlier 2025 quarters where landlords consistently secured significant discounts.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 15 properties, representing 21.4% of the 70 total SFR purchases. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) spearheaded this activity, accounting for 14 (93.3%) of these purchases, with 21 distinct entities making Tier 01 acquisitions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 98.3% of all investor-owned housing in Uintah County, UT, while institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) hold a marginal 0.5%. Single-property landlords alone comprise 88.8% of this portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 87.8% of Tier 01 properties. However, company ownership surpasses individual ownership in the 6-10 property tier, where companies hold 53.8% of properties (7 properties).
Transactions
Uintah County landlords are overall net buyers, with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 8.5x (119 buys vs 14 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were also net buyers with a 2:1 ratio (3 buys vs 2 sells) for the year, albeit with very low transaction volume.
Market Narrative

The Uintah County, UT SFR market is predominantly shaped by a robust base of local, individual investors. With 1,198 SFR properties representing 19.3% of the total market, the vast majority—1,055 properties (88.1%)—are held by individual landlords. This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 98.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, with single-property owners as the backbone, defying narratives of institutional market dominance often seen elsewhere.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showed landlords as active participants, securing 21.4% of all SFR purchases, largely driven by mom-and-pop acquisitions. While landlords were strong net buyers throughout 2025, a significant pricing shift occurred in Q4: landlords paid a 10.3% premium over traditional homeowners, reversing a trend of considerable discounts seen earlier in the year. This suggests increased competition or altered market dynamics, yet their strong net buyer position implies continued confidence in the market, despite this premium.

The market in Uintah County, UT remains fragmented and locally driven, with a clear crossover point where corporate ownership begins to take precedence in portfolios exceeding 5 properties. Geographic analysis highlights distinct zip codes for investor concentration, with some areas showing high rates of investor ownership despite lower overall property counts. The consistent net buying activity across all landlord segments signals a sustained demand for SFR properties, even as pricing strategies adapted dramatically towards the end of 2025, suggesting a dynamic and competitive local market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyUintah (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct