Millard (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Millard (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Millard (UT)
3,050
Total Investors in Millard (UT)
1,968
Investor Owned SFR in Millard (UT)
1,282(42.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,708
SFR Owned
1,136
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
260
SFR Owned
187
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,282 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Millard County's SFR market as strong net buyers, securing deep Q4 discounts.
Individual investors own 1,136 SFR properties, representing 88.6% of the 1,282 landlord-owned SFR properties, which comprise 42.0% of the total SFR market in Millard County. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned housing. Landlords acquired 9 properties in Q4 2025, accounting for 40.9% of all SFR purchases, while securing an average discount of 32.8% against homeowner prices. Landlords are net buyers with an 8.0 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025, and no institutional transaction activity was observed.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Millard County's SFR portfolio, owning 1,136 properties or 88.6% of landlord-owned SFR.
A significant 99.4% (1,274 properties) of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental income focus. Cash purchases fund 65.9% (845 properties) of these holdings, compared to 34.1% (437 properties) that are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Millard County secured a substantial 32.8% discount on properties in Q4 2025, paying $257,980 compared to homeowners' $383,759.
This discount represents a significant $125,779 savings per property for landlords in Q4. The landlord price advantage has fluctuated wildly over the past year, from a low of 7.1% in Q2 2025 to its peak in Q4 2025. Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 were $257,980, a 14.3% decrease from the 2020-2023 average of $301,110.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 40.9% of all SFR purchases in Millard County during Q4 2025, acquiring 9 properties out of 22 total.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 purchases, representing 88.9% (8 properties) of all landlord acquisitions. New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were highly active, responsible for 6 properties and representing 10 distinct entities entering the market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate SFR ownership in Millard County, controlling 99.6% of all investor-owned properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 90.5% (1,189 properties) of investor-owned SFR housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible share at just 0.3% (4 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Millard County, accounting for at least 83.7% of properties in each reported tier.
The closest to a crossover point occurs in the Small-medium tier (11-20 properties), where individual and company ownership is equally split at 50.0% for the 2 properties. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) show 86.8% individual ownership (1,062 properties) versus 13.2% company ownership (162 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 84631 and 84624 lead Millard County with the highest counts of investor-owned properties, holding 368 and 337 SFRs respectively.
Zip code 84728 exhibits the highest investor penetration at 100.0% ownership, indicating complete landlord control in that specific area. Zip code 84649 shows both high concentration (85 properties) and a significant ownership rate of 91.4%. Geographic regions 84637 and 84649 appear in both the top 5 by count and by percentage, revealing areas with both high volume and high investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Millard County are strong net buyers, with an 8.0 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (80 purchases vs 10 sales) and no institutional transaction activity.
This consistent net buying trend shows a sustained accumulation over the past two years, with 70 net purchases in 2025 and 71 in 2024. The buy/sell ratio has remained high, reaching 7.0 in Q3 2025 (28 purchases vs 4 sales) and 4.0 in Q2 2025 (20 purchases vs 5 sales). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed no reported transactions in any timeframe, signifying their complete absence from this market's buying and selling activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 40.0% of all SFR transactions in Millard County during Q4 2025, with 16 total transactions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove almost all landlord activity, completing 15 transactions or 93.8% of the total. No inter-landlord transactions occurred in Q4, with all purchases coming from non-landlord sellers. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no transactions in Q4 2025.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Millard County's SFR portfolio, owning 1,136 properties or 88.6% of landlord-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Millard County's landlord-owned SFR portfolio totals 1,282 properties, representing 42.0% of the total SFR market. This indicates a highly active investor presence within the county's housing market.

Individual investors are the backbone of the SFR rental market, holding 1,136 properties, which accounts for an overwhelming 88.6% of all landlord-owned SFR. Companies, in contrast, own 187 properties, making up 14.6% of the market.

The investor landscape is primarily driven by individuals, with 1,708 individual landlords compared to 260 company landlords, resulting in a ratio of 6.6 individual landlords for every company landlord.

Almost all landlord-owned properties are utilized as rentals, with 1,274 properties (99.4%) classified as rented. This highlights a clear focus on rental income generation across the investor spectrum.

A notable 65.9% of investor-owned properties (845 properties) were acquired with cash, signifying a strong prevalence of cash buyers in Millard County. The remaining 34.1% (437 properties) are financed, indicating a preference for debt-free or low-leverage investments.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Millard County secured a substantial 32.8% discount on properties in Q4 2025, paying $257,980 compared to homeowners' $383,759.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Millard County demonstrated exceptional pricing power in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $257,980. This represents a substantial 32.8% discount compared to the $383,759 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $125,779 savings per property.

The landlord pricing advantage has been highly volatile throughout 2025, swinging from a 24.3% discount ($76,549) in Q1 to 7.1% ($24,607) in Q2, then to 9.2% ($35,406) in Q3, before surging to 32.8% in Q4. This indicates opportunistic buying behavior rather than a consistent, steady discount.

Despite the recent Q4 discount, overall landlord acquisition prices have seen a decline from pandemic-era levels. The average price in Q4 2025 ($257,980) is $43,130 lower than the 2020-2023 average of $301,110, marking a 14.3% decrease in investor purchase prices.

The lack of reported property purchases by landlords for specific annual timeframes in section6-1.csv suggests data aggregation nuances, yet the Q4 data confirms active acquisition and significant price discrepancies from homeowners.

The inconsistent quarterly price gaps signal that market conditions, negotiation strategies, or property types acquired by landlords can significantly impact their buying advantage at any given time in Millard County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 40.9% of all SFR purchases in Millard County during Q4 2025, acquiring 9 properties out of 22 total.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Millard County made a significant impact on the Q4 2025 housing market, capturing 40.9% of all SFR purchases by acquiring 9 properties out of a total of 22 transactions. This demonstrates a strong investor appetite in the current quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the primary drivers of Q4 purchasing activity, responsible for 88.9% (8 properties) of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores the fragmented and individual-driven nature of investment in Millard County.

The entry of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) was particularly notable, with 10 entities collectively purchasing 6 properties. This influx suggests continued interest from smaller-scale, potentially first-time, investors in the SFR market.

Mid-size landlords also contributed to Q4 activity, with Tier 02 (two-property owners) and Tier 03 (three-to-five property owners) each acquiring 1 property, representing 11.1% each of total landlord purchases. A single 'Small-medium' landlord (Tier 05, 11-20 properties) also added 1 property to their portfolio, showcasing activity beyond the smallest tiers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely inactive in Q4 2025, with 0 reported purchases. This further reinforces the dominance of smaller, local investors in the Millard County SFR market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate SFR ownership in Millard County, controlling 99.6% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned SFR properties in Millard County reveals a heavily concentrated market at the small end of the investor spectrum. Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), collectively own a commanding 99.6% of all investor-held SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the vast majority of the market, controlling 1,189 properties, which represents 90.5% of the total investor-owned SFR. This highlights their fundamental role in the county's rental housing supply.

Smaller multi-property landlords also play a significant, though smaller, role; two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold 84 properties (6.4%), and small landlords (Tier 03, 3-5 properties) own 31 properties (2.4%).

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop segment, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence in Millard County, owning only 4 properties, which accounts for a mere 0.3% of the total investor-owned SFR. This indicates a largely retail-driven rather than institutional-driven market.

The small-medium tier (Tier 05, 11-20 properties) also has a minor footprint, with 2 properties representing 0.2% of investor ownership. Overall, the data underscores that Millard County's investment landscape is fundamentally built upon the portfolios of individual and smaller-scale investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Millard County, accounting for at least 83.7% of properties in each reported tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain strong dominance across all reported landlord tiers in Millard County, challenging common perceptions of corporate control. In the Single-property tier (Tier 01), individuals own 1,062 properties (86.8%), significantly outpacing company-owned properties at 162 (13.2%).

This individual investor prevalence continues into larger tiers; for two-property landlords (Tier 02), individuals hold 72 properties (83.7%) compared to 14 (16.3%) by companies. Similarly, in the small landlord tier (Tier 03, 3-5 properties), individuals own 27 properties (87.1%) while companies hold 4 (12.9%).

The Small-medium tier (Tier 05, 11-20 properties) represents the closest to a balanced split, with individual and company investors each owning 1 property, resulting in a 50.0% share for both. This suggests a potential shift towards greater corporate involvement as portfolio size increases, though it's not a majority yet.

The data clearly indicates that there is no 'crossover point' where companies become majority owners in any of the listed tiers; individual ownership remains the majority throughout. This solidifies the narrative of a predominantly individual investor-driven market structure in Millard County.

The consistent high concentration of individual ownership across these tiers highlights that even as investors expand their portfolios, they often do so as individuals rather than incorporating, underscoring the mom-and-pop nature of the market's growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 84631 and 84624 lead Millard County with the highest counts of investor-owned properties, holding 368 and 337 SFRs respectively.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties in Millard County is highly localized, with zip code 84631 leading the county by count with 368 investor-owned properties, representing a 43.3% ownership rate. This highlights significant investment concentration in specific sub-geographies.

Following closely, zip code 84624 holds 337 investor-owned properties, with a 22.8% ownership rate, positioning it as another major hub for real estate investors by volume within Millard County.

While counts show volume, investor ownership rates reveal market saturation. Zip code 84728 stands out with 100.0% investor-owned properties, indicating a complete absence of traditional homeowners in its SFR market. This signals an exceptionally high degree of investor control in niche areas.

The correlation between high counts and high percentages is evident in areas like zip code 84637, which ranks third by count with 138 properties and fourth by rate at 88.5%, demonstrating both substantial volume and high market penetration.

Similarly, zip code 84649 ranks fifth by count with 85 properties, but second by ownership percentage at 91.4%. This suggests a smaller sub-market that is heavily dominated by investor activity, showcasing diverse patterns of geographic concentration.

Other highly penetrated areas include 84638 (91.1% investor-owned) and 84636 (88.1% investor-owned), reinforcing the pattern of robust investor activity in specific Millard County zip codes.

The varying ownership rates, from 22.8% to 100.0%, across these top regions suggest a nuanced market where some areas have become entirely investor-driven, while others maintain a more mixed ownership profile despite high landlord property counts.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Millard County are strong net buyers, with an 8.0 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (80 purchases vs 10 sales) and no institutional transaction activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Millard County are decisively net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell across all reported timeframes. For Year 2025, landlords purchased 80 properties while selling only 10, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 8.0 and a net gain of 70 properties.

This aggressive accumulation strategy is not new; in Year 2024, landlords recorded 90 purchases against 19 sales, yielding a buy/sell ratio of 4.74 and 71 net acquisitions. The sustained high ratios over two years highlight a market favoring investor growth.

Quarterly data reinforces this trend, with Q3 2025 showing 28 purchases against 4 sales (a 7.0 buy/sell ratio) and Q2 2025 reporting 20 purchases against 5 sales (a 4.0 buy/sell ratio). These figures demonstrate active and continuous portfolio expansion by landlords.

A critical finding is the complete absence of institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions in Millard County for any reported timeframe. This signals that large-scale corporate players are not active in this market, leaving it to smaller, likely individual, investors.

The consistent net buying behavior across multiple periods, coupled with the lack of institutional involvement, underscores that Millard County's SFR market is characterized by ongoing, retail-driven accumulation rather than large-scale, corporate-led investment or divestment strategies.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 40.0% of all SFR transactions in Millard County during Q4 2025, with 16 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in Millard County's Q4 2025 transaction activity, participating in 16 of the 40 total SFR transactions, representing a 40.0% market share. This indicates a significant portion of the quarter's market movement involved investor properties.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were the primary movers, accounting for 15 transactions, which is 93.8% of all landlord transactions in Q4. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active with 12 transactions, showcasing their continued market engagement.

The average purchase prices varied significantly by tier in Q4. Small landlords (Tier 03, 3-5 properties) paid the highest average price at $365,750, while small-medium landlords (Tier 05, 11-20 properties) secured properties at the lowest average of $119,500, a difference of $246,250. Single-property landlords paid an average of $279,521.

Notably, there was no reported inter-landlord trading activity in Q4; 0.0% of transactions were 'bought from landlords' across all tiers. This suggests landlords are primarily acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers in Millard County.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely absent from Q4 transaction activity, with 0 reported transactions. This reinforces the finding that the Millard County SFR market is predominantly driven by smaller, individual investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Millard County's SFR market is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, showing strong net buying and deep Q4 discounts.
Holdings
Landlords in Millard County own 1,282 SFR properties, comprising 42.0% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 1,136 properties (88.6%), while companies own 187 properties (14.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 32.8% less than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average discount of $125,779 per property ($257,980 vs $383,759).
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 9 properties, representing 40.9% of all SFR sales, with 10 new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were responsible for 88.9% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned housing in Millard County, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers, with companies reaching their highest concentration (50.0%) in the Small-medium tier (11-20 properties).
Transactions
Landlords are decisive net buyers with an 8.0 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (80 buys vs 10 sells). Institutional investors showed no transaction activity, remaining net neutral.
Market Narrative

Millard County's single-family residential (SFR) investment market is overwhelmingly characterized by the dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, with large institutional players largely absent. Landlords collectively own 1,282 SFR properties, representing a substantial 42.0% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 1,136 properties (88.6% of landlord-owned SFR), while mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 99.6% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Investor behavior in Millard County indicates robust activity, with landlords comprising 40.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 9 properties. This activity is coupled with a significant pricing advantage, as landlords secured a 32.8% discount, saving $125,779 per property compared to homeowners' prices. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers, demonstrated by an 8.0 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (80 purchases vs 10 sales), signaling continuous portfolio expansion. Mom-and-pop landlords drive this accumulation, responsible for 88.9% of Q4 landlord purchases, with institutional investors showing no transaction activity.

The data clearly illustrates a highly localized, retail-driven investment landscape in Millard County, where individual investors actively accumulate SFR properties, often at significant discounts. The high market penetration and sustained net buying by smaller landlords suggest a mature rental market primarily supported by local, private capital. The absence of institutional engagement allows mom-and-pop investors to remain the primary shapers of the SFR market dynamics in the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:56 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMillard (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions