Juab (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Juab (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Juab (UT)
3,383
Total Investors in Juab (UT)
1,421
Investor Owned SFR in Juab (UT)
1,308(38.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,102
SFR Owned
1,009
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
319
SFR Owned
410
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,308 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Juab County SFR; Zero Q4 Activity and No Institutional Footprint.
In Juab County, UT, landlords own 1,308 SFR properties, representing 38.7% of the total market, overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors (77.1%) and mom-and-pop portfolios (95.1%). The market saw no investor acquisition or transaction activity in Q4 2025, and there is no pricing data available for analysis, indicating a paused or illiquid market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,308 SFR properties in Juab County, UT, with individuals holding 77.1%.
A striking 1,303 of these properties are rented, representing 99.6% of investor-owned SFR, and all 1,308 properties are held outright for cash, indicating a strong focus on rental income and no leverage. Notably, there are no financed landlord-owned properties recorded in Juab County, UT.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No acquisition pricing data is available for Juab County, UT for analysis.
Due to the absence of acquisition pricing data, it is not possible to analyze price comparisons between landlords and traditional homeowners in Juab County, UT. Trends in pricing gaps and any differences between individual and company investor acquisition costs cannot be assessed.
Current Quarter Purchases
Juab County, UT saw zero SFR purchases by landlords or any buyers in Q4 2025.
With no SFR purchases recorded in Q4 2025, there was no activity from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) or institutional investors (Tier 09). This indicates a complete halt in investor acquisition activity for the quarter in Juab County, UT.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.1% of investor-owned SFR in Juab County, UT.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) constitute the largest segment, owning 83.2% of the total investor portfolio, totaling 1,098 properties. There is no pricing data by tier, nor any institutional investor presence (Tier 09) recorded in Juab County, UT.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No pricing data is available to compare individual versus company buyer costs by tier.
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, company ownership becomes the majority starting at the 3-5 property tier (53.2% company vs 46.8% individual). There are no institutional properties owned by companies in Juab County, UT.
Geographic Distribution
UT-Juab-84645 leads Juab County, UT with 444 investor-owned SFR properties.
The 84083 zip code exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, though representing only 2 properties, while the 84648 zip code has a substantial 371 investor-owned properties but a lower ownership rate of 16.8%. This shows varied market penetration across Juab County, UT zip codes.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available for landlords in Juab County, UT.
Due to the complete absence of historical transaction data, it is not possible to determine landlord buy/sell ratios, analyze inter-landlord trading percentages, or assess any changes in transaction volumes and prices over time in Juab County, UT.
Current Quarter Transactions
Juab County, UT recorded zero total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
With no SFR transactions occurring in Q4 2025, there was no landlord involvement in sales, nor any recorded inter-landlord trading activity. Therefore, no price comparisons between investor tiers can be made for the quarter in Juab County, UT.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,308 SFR properties in Juab County, UT, with individuals holding 77.1%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Juab County, UT currently hold 1,308 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting a significant 38.7% of the total SFR market of 3,383 properties. This indicates a substantial investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 1,009 SFR properties, which accounts for 77.1% of all landlord-owned SFR in Juab County, UT. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties total 410, making up 31.3% of the portfolio, highlighting the prevalence of individual and smaller-scale investors.

The investor landscape is characterized by a high proportion of cash holdings, with all 1,308 landlord-owned properties being acquired through cash. This signals a robust, unleveraged investment strategy among property owners in Juab County, UT, as no financed properties were recorded.

A staggering 99.6% of these investor-owned properties, or 1,303 SFR units, are currently rented, affirming that the vast majority of landlord activity in Juab County, UT is geared towards generating rental income. This strong non-owner-occupied focus aligns with the definition of landlord investment.

Beyond property counts, the landlord base itself is largely individual, with 1,102 individual landlords compared to 319 company landlords out of a total of 1,421 entities. This entity distribution further underscores the mom-and-pop nature of the investor market, with individuals comprising 77.6% of all landlord entities.

The complete absence of financed properties (0) combined with the high rental rate (1,303 properties) reveals a conservative, income-driven investment model where landlords prioritize cash flow and avoid debt, suggesting resilience to interest rate fluctuations in Juab County, UT.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No acquisition pricing data is available for Juab County, UT for analysis.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of landlord acquisition pricing in Juab County, UT is currently not possible due to a complete absence of data across all timeframes. This lack of information prevents any direct comparison with traditional homeowner prices or overall market trends.

Consequently, insights into the landlord-homeowner price gap, including its historical trajectory or current status in Q4 2025, cannot be generated. This limitation impacts the understanding of investor competitiveness in the local market.

The data also prevents an examination of how acquisition prices may vary between individual and company landlords, precluding an assessment of potential strategic pricing differences by ownership type in Juab County, UT.

Without pricing data, it is impossible to determine any acquisition price trends, such as appreciation or decline, from historical periods like 2020-2023 through the current Q4 2025. This creates a significant blind spot in market dynamics.

The total number of properties acquired in each timeframe is also unavailable, which further restricts the ability to understand acquisition velocity and overall investment interest in Juab County, UT.

This critical data gap means that conclusions regarding investor purchasing power, market entry costs, or the perceived value of SFR properties by different buyer segments in Juab County, UT cannot be drawn at this time.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Juab County, UT saw zero SFR purchases by landlords or any buyers in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 in Juab County, UT registered absolutely no SFR purchase activity, with zero total properties acquired by either landlords or traditional homeowners. This marks a complete cessation of market transactions for the period.

Consequently, landlord participation in Q4 2025 purchases stands at 0.0%, reflecting a complete pause in new investor acquisitions in Juab County, UT. This absence of activity suggests a highly illiquid or frozen market during the quarter.

Given the lack of purchases, there were no contributions from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who typically dominate purchase activity, nor from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Juab County, UT.

The absence of Q4 transactions also means no new landlords entered the market in the single-property (Tier 01) category during this period. This contrasts with typical market dynamics where new entrants are often observed.

Without any properties purchased, it is impossible to analyze entity activity per tier or average properties per entity for Q4 2025. The entire acquisition funnel appears to have been static in Juab County, UT.

This zero-activity quarter across all buyer types, including landlords, is a significant finding for Juab County, UT, suggesting external factors may be influencing market liquidity or buyer confidence more broadly.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.1% of investor-owned SFR in Juab County, UT.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), are overwhelmingly dominant in Juab County, UT, controlling 95.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties. This highlights a highly localized and non-institutional market structure.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 1,098 properties, which accounts for a substantial 83.2% of the total landlord-owned portfolio. This demonstrates a strong prevalence of first-time or small-scale investors.

The distribution beyond single-property landlords quickly diminishes; two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold 92 properties (7.0%), while small landlords (3-5 properties) own 53 properties (4.0%). Larger small landlords (6-10 properties) account for only 11 properties (0.8%).

Notably, there are no institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) recorded as owning SFR properties in Juab County, UT, signifying a complete absence of large-scale corporate landlord activity in this market.

The lack of data regarding acquisition prices by tier prevents an analysis of how investment size correlates with property costs. Therefore, whether larger or smaller investors pay more or less in Juab County, UT cannot be determined.

Comparing all-time ownership distribution to recent quarters (if data were available) would indicate shifts in market structure; however, with zero Q4 purchases and no historical pricing, such trends cannot be identified. The current distribution is highly concentrated in the lowest tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No pricing data is available to compare individual versus company buyer costs by tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 78.2% of single-property landlords (Tier 01) and 58.7% of two-property landlords (Tier 02) in Juab County, UT. This highlights the foundational role of individual, smaller-scale investors.

A significant shift occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time. In this tier, companies own 53.2% of properties, while individuals hold 46.8%, indicating a crossover point for corporate influence as portfolio size increases.

For the largest tier explicitly detailed (21-50 properties), the split is not provided, but the trend from the 3-5 tier suggests increasing company presence in larger portfolios, contrasting sharply with the mom-and-pop dominance in the smallest tiers.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09) in Juab County, UT, there are no properties owned by institutional companies. This reinforces the local market's structure as being largely free from large-scale corporate investment.

The lack of pricing data across all tiers and owner types prevents any analysis of whether individual or company landlords secure properties at different price points. Therefore, strategic pricing advantages by ownership type cannot be determined in Juab County, UT.

Similarly, without Q4 acquisition data or historical context for owner type and tier, it is impossible to discern growth patterns for individual versus company investors. The current data reflects a snapshot of existing holdings.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
UT-Juab-84645 leads Juab County, UT with 444 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Juab County, UT, the 84645 zip code stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, holding 444 landlord-owned SFR properties. This represents a significant 71.2% of its total SFR market, indicating a high concentration of investor interest.

Following closely in property count are the 84648 and 84639 zip codes, with 371 and 265 investor-owned properties respectively. While 84639 boasts an impressive 88.6% investor ownership rate, 84648 shows a more moderate 16.8% rate, signaling diverse market dynamics within the county.

The highest investor ownership percentages are seen in smaller markets; the 84083 zip code has a 100.0% investor ownership rate, though it accounts for only 2 properties. This highlights micro-markets fully dominated by investors, albeit with limited total inventory.

Contrasting the highest count and highest percentage areas reveals a varied landscape: areas like 84639 and 84628 combine high property counts (265 and 226) with extremely high investor rates (88.6% and 88.3%), indicating deep penetration within their respective housing stocks.

Conversely, the 84648 zip code, with its 371 investor-owned properties but only a 16.8% ownership rate, suggests a larger overall housing market where investor activity is substantial in volume but less concentrated relative to the total available SFR homes.

The absence of acquisition price data by sub-geography prevents an analysis of how property values or investor purchasing strategies differ across these varied local markets within Juab County, UT, leaving a gap in understanding regional investment attractiveness.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available for landlords in Juab County, UT.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of historical landlord transaction activity in Juab County, UT is currently not possible due to a complete absence of data for buys, sells, and inter-landlord transactions across all timeframes. This impacts understanding market liquidity and investor behavior.

Consequently, the overall net position of landlords—whether they are net buyers or net sellers—cannot be determined. This critical metric, usually derived from buy/sell ratios, is missing for all landlord types in Juab County, UT.

Similarly, without any transaction records, it is impossible to ascertain the percentage of buy or sell transactions that occur between landlords. This prevents insights into the efficiency and internal dynamics of the investor market in Juab County, UT.

The lack of data extends to institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties), meaning their transaction patterns, including their net buying or selling position, cannot be independently assessed for Juab County, UT.

Moreover, the absence of average buy and sell prices means there is no basis to calculate implied profit margins or analyze how pricing strategies might have evolved historically for landlords in Juab County, UT.

Historical trends in transaction volumes, crucial for understanding market momentum and investor confidence over time, also remain undeterminable. This significantly limits a holistic view of the investment landscape in Juab County, UT.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Juab County, UT recorded zero total SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a complete halt in all SFR transactions in Juab County, UT, with zero total transactions recorded. This indicates a frozen market for both landlords and other market participants.

Consequently, landlord share of Q4 transactions stands at 0.0%, reflecting an absolute lack of buying or selling activity by investors during the quarter. This is a critical finding for assessing recent market liquidity.

Without any transactions, it is impossible to analyze how transaction volumes vary across investor tiers or to identify which tiers were most active in Q4 2025 in Juab County, UT.

The absence of data also means that no average purchase prices by tier can be determined for the quarter, making it impossible to compare pricing strategies between different investor sizes in Juab County, UT.

Inter-landlord trading activity, typically measured by properties bought from other landlords, was also non-existent in Q4 2025. This indicates a complete lack of internal market churn among investors in Juab County, UT.

This zero-transaction quarter for all market segments, including landlords, raises significant questions about market health and potential underlying factors that led to such a complete standstill in Juab County, UT.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Juab County SFR; Zero Q4 Activity and No Institutional Footprint.
Holdings
Landlords in Juab County, UT own 1,308 SFR properties, representing 38.7% of the total 3,383 SFR market, with individual investors holding 77.1% and companies 31.3%.
Pricing
No acquisition pricing data is available to compare landlord versus homeowner prices or to analyze any pricing trends in Juab County, UT, leaving a critical gap in market understanding.
Activity
Juab County, UT recorded zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, meaning no landlords, including new single-property investors (Tier 01), acquired properties during the quarter.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 95.1% of investor-owned SFR in Juab County, UT, with single-property investors alone holding 83.2%. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 77.1% of landlord-owned properties in Juab County, UT, maintaining dominance in smaller portfolios, yet companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier (53.2%).
Transactions
Due to the complete absence of transaction data, it is impossible to determine if landlords overall, or institutional investors specifically, were net buyers or sellers in Juab County, UT, with zero transactions recorded in Q4 2025.
Market Narrative

In Juab County, UT, the real estate investment landscape is characterized by a significant landlord presence, with 1,308 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties under investor ownership, representing 38.7% of the total 3,383 SFR market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who collectively own 77.1% of these properties, compared to 31.3% held by companies. Further emphasizing this mom-and-pop structure, landlords with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control 95.1% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded footprint in the county.

Investor behavior in Juab County, UT reveals a remarkably static market in the most recent quarter; Q4 2025 recorded zero SFR purchases by landlords or any other buyer type, indicating a complete halt in acquisition activity. Consequently, an analysis of pricing trends, landlord acquisition advantages over homeowners, or overall net buying/selling positions for investors is precluded by the absence of transaction and pricing data. This lack of activity extends across all investor tiers, suggesting broader market illiquidity or a period of holding rather than active trading.

The data for Juab County, UT paints a picture of a housing market heavily influenced by local, small-scale investors who primarily operate with cash and focus on rental income, as evidenced by 99.6% of properties being rented and zero financed holdings. The complete absence of institutional players and the recent Q4 market freeze suggest a unique and potentially resilient local market, insulated from larger corporate movements and interest rate impacts on new debt. While specific zip codes like 84645 show high investor concentration (444 properties, 71.2% rate), the overall market signals a period of pronounced stasis, with future activity likely to be driven by existing small landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:57 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJuab (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct