Duchesne (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Duchesne (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Duchesne (UT)
6,392
Total Investors in Duchesne (UT)
4,059
Investor Owned SFR in Duchesne (UT)
4,014(62.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,297
SFR Owned
3,173
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
762
SFR Owned
861
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,014 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Duchesne County with 100% of holdings, driving robust growth.
Landlords own 4,014 SFR properties (62.8% of the market), with individual investors controlling 79.0% and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 100.0%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 66.7% of all purchases, acting as strong net buyers with a 50.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025, while institutional activity remains absent. Property values have appreciated by 36.9% since 2020-2023.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 4,014 SFR properties, with individuals holding 79.0% of the portfolio.
A significant 86.3% of landlord-owned properties were acquired with cash, signaling low reliance on financing. Nearly all (4,006 of 4,014) investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a strong focus on rental income in Duchesne County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $358,108, with mixed homeowner comparisons.
In Q3 2025, landlords secured a minor $222 discount (0.1%) compared to homeowners, contrasting with significant premiums of 9.1% in Q2 and 9.2% in Q1. Acquisition prices for landlords have steadily risen from $261,405 in 2020-2023 to $358,067 in 2025, indicating a 36.9% appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 66.7% of all Q4 SFR purchases, with single-property investors dominating.
All 4 landlord purchases in Q4 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), representing 100.0% of investor activity. No institutional investors (Tier 09) made purchases this quarter, signaling a market entirely driven by smaller-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control virtually 100.0% of investor-owned SFR properties in Duchesne County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate, holding 88.1% of all investor-owned housing (3,556 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning only 1 property in the entire county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate most tiers, with companies nearing parity only in the 3-5 property tier.
Individuals own 80.8% of single-property portfolios (Tier 01) and 67.2% of two-property portfolios (Tier 02). In the 3-5 property tier, individual ownership drops to 53.2% while company ownership rises to 46.8%, marking a notable shift in ownership balance for larger small landlord portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 84021 and 84066 lead Duchesne County with the most investor-owned SFR properties.
Zip code 84021 also shows a remarkably high investor ownership rate of 88.5%, second only to 84001 at 90.7%. In contrast, 84066, despite having a high property count, shows a lower ownership rate of 37.0%, suggesting a larger overall housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 100 properties while selling only 2.
In 2025, landlords maintained a significant net buyer position with a 50.0x buy/sell ratio (100 buys vs. 2 sells), indicating robust accumulation. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) had no recorded transactions in 2025, confirming their minimal presence and activity in this market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 57.1% of Q4 transactions, primarily driven by single-property investors.
All 4 landlord transactions in Q4 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01), who paid an average of $358,108 per property. No institutional investors participated in Q4 transactions, confirming a market dominated by smaller entities.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 4,014 SFR properties, with individuals holding 79.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Duchesne County own a substantial 4,014 SFR properties, representing a significant 62.8% of the total 6,392 SFR properties in the market, highlighting a high concentration of rental housing.

Individual landlords predominantly shape the market, controlling 79.0% (3,173 properties) of the investor-owned SFR portfolio, while companies hold a smaller 21.4% share (861 properties).

The vast majority of landlord properties, 86.3% (3,464 properties), were acquired with cash, indicating a preference for debt-free investments and robust capital availability among investors in the region.

Almost all investor-owned properties, 4,006 out of 4,014, are rented, underscoring that the primary motivation for landlord activity in this county is generating rental income.

The investor landscape is largely driven by individual entities, with 3,297 individual landlords accounting for 81.2% of all landlord entities, compared to 762 company landlords at 18.8%.

The average portfolio size for individual landlords is approximately 0.96 properties (3,173 properties / 3,297 entities), while company landlords average about 1.13 properties (861 properties / 762 entities), suggesting a market dominated by single-property owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $358,108, with mixed homeowner comparisons.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition prices in Duchesne County averaged $358,108 for the 4 properties purchased in Q4 2025, reflecting continued upward price trends from previous periods.

The price relationship between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated significantly: landlords paid a $30,407 premium (9.2%) in Q1 2025 and a $30,144 premium (9.1%) in Q2 2025, but then secured a $222 discount (0.1%) in Q3 2025 compared to homeowners, indicating varying market dynamics.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have seen substantial appreciation, increasing by 36.9% from an average of $261,405 during the 2020-2023 period to $358,067 in 2025, highlighting robust growth in property values.

The shift from paying significant premiums to a slight discount against homeowners within 2025 suggests an evolving market or a change in landlord acquisition strategies, possibly indicating more selective buying or better deal-sourcing capabilities.

The average price of $358,108 in Q4 2025 maintains the higher price point observed throughout the year, marking a notable increase from the $326,262 average of 2024 acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 66.7% of all Q4 SFR purchases, with single-property investors dominating.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the primary drivers of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Duchesne County, acquiring 4 out of 6 total properties, which accounts for a significant 66.7% of all sales.

The Q4 market saw an exclusive focus on smaller investors, as 100.0% of landlord purchases were attributed to mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), demonstrating their continued activity and market influence.

New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the sole contributors to Q4 investor acquisitions, purchasing all 4 properties, indicating a strong influx of first-time or small-scale investors into the market.

The complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 2025 suggests that larger entities are not actively expanding their portfolios in this market, leaving room for smaller players.

With 4 entities acquiring 4 properties in Tier 01, the average properties per entity for Q4 purchases is exactly one, reinforcing the dominance of new or single-property entrants.

The low overall transaction volume of 6 SFR properties in Q4 highlights a relatively quiet market, making the landlord share of 66.7% even more pronounced in its impact.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control virtually 100.0% of investor-owned SFR properties in Duchesne County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively own an overwhelming 100.0% of the investor-held SFR properties in Duchesne County, demonstrating their absolute market dominance over larger investors.

The market structure is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) comprising the vast majority, owning 3,556 properties, which is 88.1% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio.

The next largest segment, two-property landlords (Tier 02), holds a comparatively small 8.2% share with 330 properties, further emphasizing the extreme fragmentation of investor ownership in this county.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, accounting for just 1 property in the entire market, which effectively translates to 0.0% ownership due to rounding against the large total.

The small-medium tier (11-20 properties) also shows a very limited presence with only 1 property, indicating that even mid-sized regional landlords have not significantly penetrated this market.

This distribution reveals that Duchesne County's rental housing market is almost entirely dependent on individual and small-scale investors for its supply, making it distinct from markets with significant corporate involvement.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate most tiers, with companies nearing parity only in the 3-5 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly lead in the most common tiers, holding 80.8% of single-property portfolios (2,887 properties) and 67.2% of two-property portfolios (223 properties), demonstrating their foundational role in the market.

A significant shift in ownership dynamics occurs within the 3-5 property tier, where company ownership reaches 46.8% (65 properties) compared to individual ownership at 53.2% (74 properties), indicating a near-equal split and a potential crossover point for company expansion in slightly larger portfolios.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individual investors maintain a strong majority, owning 87.5% (7 properties) of properties compared to companies at 12.5% (1 property), highlighting their continued presence even as portfolio size increases.

The data reveals that company presence is strongest in the 3-5 property tier relative to other small tiers, though still short of a majority, suggesting that companies enter the market with slightly larger initial holdings or scale up quickly to this level.

The clear dominance of individual investors in Tiers 01, 02, and 04 solidifies the perception of Duchesne County as a market primarily serving small, independent landlords rather than corporate entities across most portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 84021 and 84066 lead Duchesne County with the most investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Duchesne County is heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with 84021 and 84066 leading by property count, holding 1,065 and 1,050 investor-owned SFR properties respectively.

While 84021 is a top region both by count and rate (88.5% investor-owned), zip code 84001 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at an astonishing 90.7%, indicating nearly all SFR properties there are investor-controlled.

The contrast between count and rate leaders is evident in zip code 84066, which ranks second by investor-owned properties (1,050) but only has a 37.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it has a significantly larger total SFR market than other high-count areas.

Overall, five zip codes in Duchesne County exhibit investor ownership rates exceeding 87.7%, demonstrating extreme penetration and a dominant landlord presence across substantial portions of the county.

This high concentration suggests that investment in SFR properties is a pervasive characteristic of the housing market across multiple communities within Duchesne County, rather than being confined to a few isolated pockets.

The top five regions by count collectively hold 3,114 investor-owned properties, representing 77.6% of the county's total investor-owned portfolio (3,114/4,014), indicating a strong geographic concentration of holdings.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 100 properties while selling only 2.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Duchesne County have consistently acted as strong net buyers, accumulating properties with a remarkable 50.0x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (100 buys vs. 2 sells), indicating aggressive portfolio expansion.

This pattern of net buying is also observed in the previous year, with landlords making 140 purchases against 13 sales in 2024, resulting in a 10.77x buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 127 properties.

The stark difference in buy-to-sell ratios between 2024 (10.77x) and 2025 (50.0x) suggests a further reduction in sales activity by landlords in the current year, intensifying their net acquisition strategy.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded buy or sell transactions in either 2024 or 2025, underscoring their complete inactivity and marginal influence on the market's transaction dynamics in Duchesne County.

The high buy volume relative to negligible sell volume confirms that landlords are primarily holding assets for long-term rental income rather than engaging in frequent speculative trading in this market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 57.1% of Q4 transactions, primarily driven by single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, completing 4 out of 7 total SFR transactions, which accounts for a substantial 57.1% share of the quarter's market activity in Duchesne County.

The entirety of Q4 landlord transactions came from single-property investors (Tier 01), underscoring that new or very small-scale landlords are the predominant transactional force in the current market.

These Tier 01 investors acquired properties at an average price of $358,108 in Q4, indicating that the new entrants are paying similar market rates to the overall landlord average for the quarter.

There was no recorded inter-landlord trading activity for Tier 01 purchases in Q4 (0.0% bought from landlords), suggesting that new landlords are acquiring properties directly from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

The complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) transactions in Q4 further solidifies the picture of a landlord market almost exclusively shaped by mom-and-pop entities, particularly at the entry level.

The low overall transaction volume of 7 properties in Q4 2025 indicates a relatively slow quarter for the SFR market, with landlords still representing the majority of buyers in this subdued environment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Duchesne County with 100% of holdings, driving robust growth.
Holdings
Landlords in Duchesne County own 4,014 SFR properties, representing a significant 62.8% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 3,173 properties (79.0%) and companies owning 861 properties (21.4%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $358,108, continuing an appreciating trend of 36.9% since 2020-2023 ($261,405). While Q3 2025 saw landlords securing a minor $222 discount (0.1%) against homeowners, earlier 2025 quarters showed significant premiums.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 4 properties, accounting for 66.7% of all SFR sales, with all purchases made by 4 new single-property landlords (Tier 01). This highlights a market driven by smaller, entry-level investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties), specifically mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), control 100.0% of investor-owned housing in Duchesne County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence of just 1 property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate most portfolio sizes, particularly single-property holdings at 80.8%, with companies only approaching parity in the 3-5 property tier (46.8% company-owned).
Transactions
Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers in Duchesne County, demonstrating a robust 50.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (100 buys vs. 2 sells), whereas institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions for the year, signaling their complete inactivity.
Market Narrative

The Duchesne County real estate market is profoundly shaped by investor activity, with landlords owning 4,014 SFR properties, a substantial 62.8% of the total SFR inventory across Duchesne County. This dominance is almost exclusively driven by individual investors, who control 79.0% of the portfolio, and specifically by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively hold an overwhelming 100.0% of all investor-owned housing. This market structure signifies an extremely fragmented ownership landscape, with institutional investors having a virtually non-existent footprint of just 1 property.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights this trend, with landlords capturing 66.7% of all SFR purchases, all attributed to new single-property landlords entering the market, paying an average of $358,108. Property values have seen significant appreciation, rising by 36.9% from $261,405 during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era to $358,108 in Q4 2025. Landlords consistently exhibit a strong net buyer position, with a 50.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025, actively accumulating properties while institutional investors remain entirely inactive in transaction volumes, further solidifying the mom-and-pop driven market dynamics.

This data reveals a unique and highly localized housing market in Duchesne County, heavily reliant on individual, small-scale investors for its rental stock. The high investor penetration, coupled with cash-heavy acquisitions (86.3% of properties) and aggressive net buying, suggests a resilient and appealing market for smaller landlords focused on long-term rental income. The almost complete absence of institutional activity positions Duchesne County as a grassroots investor market, insulated from larger corporate influences and trends observed in more urbanized areas, emphasizing community-level ownership.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:51 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDuchesne (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices