Beaver (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Beaver (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Beaver (UT)
1,743
Total Investors in Beaver (UT)
2,215
Investor Owned SFR in Beaver (UT)
1,479(84.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,123
SFR Owned
1,401
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
92
SFR Owned
112
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,479 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop investors dominate Beaver County's 85% landlord-owned SFR market
Landlords control 1,479 SFR properties (84.9% of the market) in Beaver County, UT, with individuals holding 94.7%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 69.0% of SFRs, paying a rare 11.7% premium over homeowner prices. Mom-and-pop landlords account for 100% of all investor-owned properties and are strong net buyers with a 7.75x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,479 SFR properties (84.9% of market), with individuals holding 94.7%
All 1,479 investor-owned SFR properties are rented. Cash purchases slightly exceed financed properties, with 783 (53.0%) acquired with cash. Individual landlords outnumber company landlords by more than 23 to 1 (2,123 vs 92 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $352,065 in Q4 2025, an 11.7% premium over homeowner prices
This Q4 premium of $36,945 sharply contrasts with previous quarters in 2025, where landlords secured significant discounts ranging from 8.1% to 30.2% per property. Landlord average acquisition prices have generally risen from $307,845 in Q1 to $352,065 in Q4. No data is available for individual versus company acquisition prices, preventing a direct comparison in Beaver County, UT.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired a significant 69.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025 in Beaver County, UT
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025, with no institutional activity recorded. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated buying activity, acquiring 17 properties (85.0% of landlord purchases). A notable 26 new entities entered the market as single-property landlords in Q4 2025.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 100.0% of investor-owned SFR in Beaver County, UT
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 88.9% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 1,350 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded ownership in Beaver County, UT. No tier-specific pricing data is available, preventing price comparisons across investor sizes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Beaver County, UT, controlling 94.5% of single-property portfolios
Individual ownership remains strong even in the 3-5 property tier, holding 63.8% of properties, with no tier showing company majority among the provided data. Company ownership steadily increases as portfolio size grows, rising from 5.5% in Tier 01 to 36.2% in Tier 03. The data does not provide acquisition prices broken down by individual vs. company owner type within tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 84713 leads investor activity in Beaver County, UT, with 884 properties at an 85.5% ownership rate
The top three zip codes (84713, 84751, 84752) collectively account for 98.6% of the county's total landlord-owned properties (1,459 out of 1,479). All top regions by count are also the top regions by investor ownership percentage, signifying both high volume and high penetration. Investor ownership rates are exceptionally high across Beaver County, UT, with all listed zip codes exceeding 74.1% investor-owned SFR.
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Beaver County, UT, are strong net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 7.75x
In Q4 2025, landlords maintained a robust net buyer position with 32 buys against 4 sells, reflecting continued accumulation. Institutional investors (Tier 1000+), though minimally active, were also net buyers in 2024 (2 buys vs 1 sell). The data does not provide information on the percentage of landlord-to-landlord transactions or average buy/sell price comparisons.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 61.5% of all SFR transactions in Beaver County, UT, during Q4 2025
All Q4 landlord transactions (32) were attributed to mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), with no institutional activity recorded. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were most active, completing 26 transactions at an average price of $322,790. Only 23.1% of single-property landlord transactions were sourced from other landlords, suggesting a broad market supply from non-investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,479 SFR properties (84.9% of market), with individuals holding 94.7%
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Beaver County, UT, exhibit an exceptionally high market penetration, owning 1,479 SFR properties that represent a commanding 84.9% of the total SFR market of 1,743 properties.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor landscape, holding 1,401 (94.7%) of the investor-owned SFR properties, significantly overshadowing the 112 (7.6%) properties owned by companies.

The prevalence of individual investors is further highlighted by entity counts, with 2,123 individual landlords compared to just 92 company landlords, indicating a deeply fragmented and non-corporate market structure.

All 1,479 investor-owned SFR properties are actively rented, confirming a highly rental-focused market in Beaver County where investor holdings are entirely dedicated to rental income.

Cash acquisitions are the primary method of purchase for these rental properties, with 783 (53.0%) properties acquired with cash compared to 696 (47.0%) properties that are financed, suggesting a preference for debt-free assets or strong access to capital among local investors.

With 2,123 individual landlords owning 1,401 properties, the average individual landlord holds less than one property (0.66 properties per entity), suggesting a large number of very small-scale or aspiring individual owners. In contrast, 92 companies own 112 properties, averaging 1.22 properties per company, indicating a slightly larger, but still modest, average portfolio size for corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $352,065 in Q4 2025, an 11.7% premium over homeowner prices
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift, landlords in Beaver County, UT, paid an average of $352,065 for properties in Q4 2025, representing a $36,945 (11.7%) premium compared to the average traditional homeowner acquisition price of $315,120. This reverses the typical trend of landlords securing discounts.

The Q4 premium signifies a sharp deviation from earlier in 2025, where landlords consistently paid less than homeowners; for instance, they enjoyed a substantial $133,463 (30.2%) discount in Q1 2025 ($307,845 vs $441,308) and a $60,293 (15.9%) discount in Q3 2025 ($318,278 vs $378,571).

Despite the fluctuating price gap against homeowners, average landlord acquisition prices have shown a general upward trend throughout 2025, appreciating from $307,845 in Q1 to $352,065 in Q4, indicating overall market price growth for investor purchases.

The Q4 2025 premium for landlords is a unique market anomaly, potentially driven by limited inventory, specific property types sought by investors, or increased competition for available properties in this particular quarter.

While 20 landlord properties were purchased in Q4 2025 (according to Section 7), the '0 properties' reported for landlord acquisitions by timeframe in `section6-1.csv` for this small market likely indicates data aggregation nuances for specific acquisition price calculations within that table, while the comparative pricing data in `section6-2.csv` offers the direct comparison.

Looking historically, average landlord acquisition prices have seen a significant appreciation from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $217,257 to the Q4 2025 average of $352,065, reflecting substantial market value growth over the last few years in Beaver County, UT.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired a significant 69.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025 in Beaver County, UT
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Beaver County, UT, were highly active in the SFR market, capturing a substantial 69.0% of all purchases by acquiring 20 out of 29 total properties sold.

The entire landlord purchasing activity in Q4 2025 was exclusively attributed to mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of the 20 landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) demonstrated significant new market entry, with 26 entities acquiring 17 properties, indicating a strong influx of first-time or very small-scale landlords into Beaver County, UT, this quarter.

The overwhelming majority of Q4 landlord purchases were concentrated in the smallest tiers, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) buying 85.0% (17 properties) and two-property landlords (Tier 02) acquiring the remaining 15.0% (3 properties).

Among the most active tier, single-property landlords (Tier 01) had 26 entities purchasing 17 properties, implying an average of 0.65 properties per entity. This suggests some entities are listed as new landlords without completing a purchase, or purchases are by existing entities, indicating a broader base of small-scale investors.

The overall low volume of 29 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025 underscores the limited market activity in Beaver County, UT, emphasizing the high percentage share of landlords despite the small absolute numbers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 100.0% of investor-owned SFR in Beaver County, UT
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) exert complete control over the investor-owned SFR market in Beaver County, UT, holding an astounding 100.0% of all such properties, signaling a market entirely composed of smaller investors.

The smallest investors, those owning a single property (Tier 01), form the vast majority of the market, controlling 1,350 properties or 88.9% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, making them the backbone of the rental supply.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR properties in Beaver County, UT, signifying a complete absence of large-scale corporate landlord activity in this geography, a stark contrast to national trends.

The distribution of ownership is heavily skewed towards the smallest tiers; Tier 01 (1 property) and Tier 02 (2 properties) combined account for 96.6% of investor-owned properties (1,350 + 117 = 1,467 out of 1,518 total properties across tiers), underscoring extreme concentration among micro-landlords.

Even within the mom-and-pop segment, mid-size landlords (Tiers 03-04) represent a marginal share, with Tier 03 owning 2.9% (44 properties) and Tier 04 owning just 0.5% (7 properties), further solidifying the dominance of the smallest property owners.

The absence of tier-specific acquisition price data prevents an analysis of whether larger or smaller landlords pay different amounts for properties in Beaver County, UT, or if pricing strategies vary by portfolio size.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Beaver County, UT, controlling 94.5% of single-property portfolios
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a strong majority across all reported tiers in Beaver County, UT, unequivocally dominating the market by owning 94.5% of single-property portfolios (1,301 properties) and 89.1% of two-property portfolios (106 properties).

While still a minority, company ownership's share gradually increases with portfolio size, growing from a minimal 5.5% in the single-property tier to 10.9% in the two-property tier, and reaching 36.2% in the 3-5 property tier, indicating a preference for slightly larger portfolios among corporate entities.

Within the available data for Beaver County, UT, no tier shows company ownership surpassing individual ownership, reinforcing the individual-driven nature of the investor market and challenging assumptions about corporate landlord dominance in this area.

The vast majority of properties owned by individuals are concentrated in the smallest tiers, with 1,301 individual properties in Tier 01 and 106 in Tier 02, collectively comprising 93.6% of all listed individual properties across these tiers, highlighting their foundational role.

Companies, though few in number, show a slightly higher propensity for larger portfolios within the mom-and-pop segment, with their ownership share increasing from 5.5% in Tier 01 to 36.2% in Tier 03, suggesting a more strategic approach to portfolio building.

The absence of data on average acquisition prices for individual versus company owners within each tier prevents an analysis of potential pricing strategies or competitive advantages based on owner type in Beaver County, UT.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 84713 leads investor activity in Beaver County, UT, with 884 properties at an 85.5% ownership rate
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Beaver County, UT, are extremely geographically concentrated, with the top three zip codes (84713, 84751, and 84752) accounting for 1,459 landlord-owned properties, which represents a dominant 98.6% of the county's total of 1,479 investor-owned SFR properties.

Zip code 84713 demonstrates dual leadership, not only having the highest volume of investor-owned properties at 884 SFR properties but also exhibiting the highest investor ownership rate within the county at 85.5%.

Across all identified sub-geographies within Beaver County, UT, landlord ownership rates are remarkably high, ranging from 74.1% in 84731 to 85.5% in 84713, indicating a market where SFR properties are predominantly held by investors.

The consistency between top regions by raw property count and top regions by ownership percentage (all four listed zip codes appear in both top lists) signals that high investor activity translates directly into high market penetration and a highly rental-centric housing stock in Beaver County, UT.

The data highlights a relatively small number of active sub-geographies, with only four zip codes listed, underscoring the geographically confined nature of the Beaver County real estate market for investors and indicating concentrated demand.

The current dataset does not provide acquisition price variations across these specific zip codes, limiting analysis of how pricing strategies or market values might differ regionally within Beaver County, UT, for investor acquisitions.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
All landlords in Beaver County, UT, are strong net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 7.75x
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Beaver County, UT, consistently demonstrate a strong net buyer position across all reported timeframes, accumulating properties at a significant rate. In 2025, they bought 93 properties while selling only 12, resulting in an impressive buy/sell ratio of 7.75x.

This trend of accumulation continued robustly into Q4 2025, with landlords executing 32 buy transactions against just 4 sell transactions, reflecting a net gain of 28 properties for the quarter, indicating sustained confidence in the market.

Landlord purchasing activity in 2025 (93 buys) remains substantial, closely following a slightly higher volume of 106 buys in 2024, indicating consistent and sustained investor interest in the Beaver County market over the past two years.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier), while representing a negligible portion of the market, also registered as net buyers in 2024 with 2 buys against 1 sell, although no institutional activity is recorded for 2025 in Beaver County, UT.

The high buy-to-sell ratios across all landlord segments signal an expanding investor footprint in Beaver County, UT, with significantly more properties entering rental portfolios than leaving them, contributing to a growing rental stock.

The data does not provide insights into the percentage of transactions occurring between landlords (inter-landlord sales), nor the average buy vs. sell prices, which limits the understanding of internal market liquidity and implied profit margins for investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 61.5% of all SFR transactions in Beaver County, UT, during Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords drove the majority of SFR transaction activity in Q4 2025 in Beaver County, UT, participating in 32 out of 52 total transactions, representing a significant 61.5% market share and underscoring their influence on the local housing market.

The entirety of Q4 landlord transaction activity was concentrated within the mom-and-pop tiers (01-04), which conducted all 32 transactions, further emphasizing the complete absence of institutional presence in the quarterly transaction landscape.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 26 transactions at an average purchase price of $322,790, which is notably lower than the $542,352 average price paid by two-property landlords (Tier 02).

Only 6 out of 26 transactions (23.1%) by single-property landlords originated from other landlords, indicating that the majority of their acquisitions are coming from non-investor sources, suggesting a healthy supply from traditional sellers rather than inter-investor trading.

A notable price disparity exists even within the mom-and-pop segment, as two-property landlords paid significantly more at $542,352 per property compared to the $322,790 paid by single-property landlords, suggesting differences in property preferences or acquisition strategies.

The complete absence of institutional transactions (0 for Tier 09) in Q4 2025 underscores that the transaction landscape in Beaver County, UT, is entirely driven by smaller, local investors, reinforcing the highly localized nature of this market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop landlords own 100% of Beaver County's SFR, dominating market activity
Holdings
Landlords own 1,479 SFR properties (84.9% of total SFR market in Beaver County, UT), with individual investors holding 1,401 (94.7%) and companies owning 112 (7.6%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $352,065 in Beaver County, UT, representing an 11.7% premium over traditional homeowners ($315,120), a stark reversal from previous quarters' consistent discounts.
Activity
Landlords acquired 69.0% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Beaver County, UT, with 26 new single-property landlords entering the market, and mom-and-pop tiers capturing 100.0% of these purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 100.0% of investor-owned housing in Beaver County, UT, while institutional investors (1000+) hold 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers in Beaver County, UT, owning 94.7% of all landlord-held SFR properties, with no tier showing majority company ownership.
Transactions
Landlords in Beaver County, UT, are strong net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 7.75x (93 buys vs 12 sells), while institutional investors are negligibly active net buyers in 2024 (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Beaver County, UT, exhibits an exceptionally high degree of landlord penetration, with investors owning 1,479 SFR properties, accounting for a dominant 84.9% of the total SFR market. This market is almost exclusively driven by individual investors, who hold 1,401 (94.7%) of these properties, significantly outweighing the 112 (7.6%) owned by companies. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties, control a remarkable 100.0% of the investor-owned housing, effectively sidelining institutional players from this geography.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 reveals landlords capturing 69.0% of all SFR purchases in Beaver County, UT, totaling 20 properties. Unusually, landlords paid an 11.7% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $352,065 compared to $315,120, a stark reversal from the discounts observed in prior quarters. The market saw 26 new single-property landlords entering this quarter, underscoring ongoing grassroots investment. Overall, landlords are robust net buyers in Beaver County, UT, evidenced by a 7.75x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (93 buys versus 12 sells), signaling a continued expansion of investor portfolios.

This data highlights a unique and highly localized investor market in Beaver County, UT, characterized by pervasive mom-and-pop ownership and minimal institutional involvement. The high landlord ownership rate across all zip codes signals a mature rental market, where nearly all SFR properties are investor-held. The Q4 pricing anomaly where landlords paid a premium warrants further investigation, suggesting competitive buying or specific property attributes. This concentration of small-scale investors points to a stable, community-driven rental housing supply, less susceptible to large corporate fluctuations but highly dependent on local individual investment trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 11:50 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBeaver (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions