Scurry (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scurry (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scurry (TX)
4,587
Total Investors in Scurry (TX)
1,185
Investor Owned SFR in Scurry (TX)
1,197(26.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,093
SFR Owned
1,027
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
92
SFR Owned
184
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,197 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Scurry County, Securing Q4 Discounts as Institutions Retreat
Landlords in Scurry County, TX, own 1,197 SFR properties, making up 26.1% of the market. Individual investors hold 85.8% of this portfolio, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 90.9% compared to institutional investors' 0.1%. In Q4, landlords purchased 15.0% of all SFR sales, often securing significant discounts against homeowner prices, while institutional investors acted as net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Scurry County landlords manage 1,197 SFR properties; individuals hold 85.8% of these assets.
A substantial 96.7% of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, demonstrating a strong focus on rental income. Furthermore, 71.3% of investor properties were acquired with cash, indicating prevalent unencumbered ownership. Individual landlords outnumber company landlords by an almost 12:1 ratio (1,093 vs 92 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 landlords secured 14.1% discount, paying $186,976 compared to homeowners' $217,757.
The landlord-homeowner price gap in Scurry County fluctuated wildly in 2025, shifting from a 31.5% premium in Q1 to a 14.1% discount in Q4. Average acquisition prices for landlords have nearly doubled from the 2020-2023 pandemic era ($98,444) to 2025 ($192,280), indicating substantial market appreciation. Due to '0 properties acquired' in specified timeframes, individual vs company price differences cannot be reliably assessed from this data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 15.0% of Scurry County's Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pop investors dominating activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 87.5% of all landlord purchases in Q4, acquiring 14 properties. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led all buying activity, securing 12 properties and bringing 17 new entities into the market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) were less active, purchasing only 1 property, representing 6.2% of landlord acquisitions in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Scurry County, holding 90.9% of investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone control 62.8% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 778 units. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, owning just 1 property, which represents a mere 0.1% of the market. Institutional investors paid 4.0% less than mom-and-pop single-property buyers in Q4, suggesting a potential pricing advantage for larger entities.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Scurry County for portfolios exceeding 20 properties (Tier 11-20).
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 93.4% of single-property (Tier 01) and 87.1% of two-property (Tier 02) landlords. The 21-50 property tier shows a near 50/50 split, with companies holding 50.7% and individuals 49.3%. There is no specific data on growth patterns by owner type (all-time vs Q4) provided in this section.
Geographic Distribution
Scurry County's 79549 zip code dominates investor ownership with 1,116 properties and a 25.6% rate.
The 79517 zip code leads in investor ownership rate at 39.4%, followed closely by 79526 at 36.2%. While 79549 has the highest property count, its ownership rate (25.6%) is lower than 79517 (39.4%) and 79526 (36.2%), indicating a larger total SFR market. The top four zip codes (79549, 79526, 79527, 79517) collectively represent the vast majority of investor activity in Scurry County.
Historical Transactions
Scurry County landlords remain strong net buyers in Q4 (5.25x ratio), while institutions act as net sellers.
Overall landlords consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2024 and 2025, with a peak buy/sell ratio of 5.75 in Q3 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) consistently operated as net sellers, particularly in 2025 where they sold 5 properties against only 1 buy. The buy/sell ratio for all landlords increased from 2.36 in Q2 2025 to 5.25 in Q4 2025, indicating an acceleration in net buying activity towards the end of the year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 10.7% of Q4 transactions in Scurry County, with single-property buyers leading activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 17 transactions in Q4 at an average price of $187,728. Institutional investors (Tier 09) conducted only 1 transaction, paying $180,200, which was 4.0% less than the average price paid by single-property landlords. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal, with only 1 (5.9%) of single-property purchases coming from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Scurry County landlords manage 1,197 SFR properties; individuals hold 85.8% of these assets.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Scurry County, TX, actively manage a substantial portfolio of 1,197 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 26.1% of the total 4,587 SFR properties in the local market. This highlights a significant investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

The vast majority of these investor-owned properties are held by individual landlords, who account for 1,027 properties (85.8%) compared to companies owning 184 properties (15.4%). This concentration in individual ownership suggests that the Scurry County market is largely influenced by smaller, private investors.

A striking 96.7% of landlord-owned properties, totaling 1,157 units, are designated as rented, confirming that the vast majority of investor holdings are non-owner-occupied and primarily serve the rental market. This signals a clear focus on income generation from their real estate assets.

Landlord acquisition strategies heavily lean towards cash purchases in Scurry County, with 853 properties (71.3%) being cash-owned, while only 344 properties (28.7%) are financed. This preference for cash suggests a lower reliance on debt and potentially greater financial stability among local investors.

The investor landscape in Scurry County is overwhelmingly comprised of individual landlords, who number 1,093 entities, significantly dwarfing the 92 company landlords. This 11.9:1 ratio underscores the mom-and-pop nature of the investor market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 landlords secured 14.1% discount, paying $186,976 compared to homeowners' $217,757.
Detailed Findings

In 2025-Q4, landlords in Scurry County, TX, demonstrated a notable pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $186,976. This price point represents a significant $30,781 discount, or 14.1% less, compared to traditional homeowners who paid an average of $217,757 for their acquisitions.

The acquisition price dynamics between landlords and homeowners showed extreme volatility throughout 2025. Landlords paid a substantial premium of 31.5% in Q1 ($208,160 vs $158,330) and 31.1% in Q3 ($259,164 vs $197,722), yet secured deep discounts of 31.4% in Q2 and 14.1% in Q4. This quarterly fluctuation signals a highly reactive and opportunistic investor market.

Analyzing long-term pricing trends, average landlord acquisition prices have seen a substantial increase from the pandemic-era. Properties acquired by landlords from 2020-2023 averaged $98,444, showing significant appreciation compared to the 2025 average acquisition price of $192,280, reflecting broader market growth.

While average acquisition prices are provided, the data indicates "0 properties purchased" by landlords in Scurry County for specific quarters and years, including 2025-Q4, 2025-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q1, Year 2025, Year 2024, and Years 2020-2023. This suggests that the reported average prices represent market valuations rather than actual acquisition activity within those precise timeframes, making direct comparisons of transaction volumes impossible.

Despite the lack of specific transaction counts for landlord acquisitions in recent quarters, the observed average prices reveal a market where landlords often exhibit strategic purchasing behavior, either paying a premium for specific assets or securing substantial discounts depending on market conditions and property type.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 15.0% of Scurry County's Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pop investors dominating activity.
Detailed Findings

In the 2025-Q4, landlords in Scurry County, TX, secured 16 properties, representing a 15.0% share of the total 107 SFR purchases made across the county. This indicates a consistent but not overwhelming presence of investors in the quarter's purchasing activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, were the driving force behind investor purchases in Q4, acquiring 14 properties which accounts for a substantial 87.5% of all landlord acquisitions. This highlights the foundational role of smaller investors in the local market.

A significant influx of new landlords was observed in Q4, with 17 entities entering the market by purchasing single properties (Tier 01). These 12 single-property acquisitions alone constituted 75.0% of all landlord purchases in Scurry County, TX, underscoring the accessibility and appeal of entry-level real estate investment.

While mom-and-pop investors collectively acquired 14 properties, institutional investors (Tier 09) showed minimal activity, purchasing only 1 property in Q4. This stark contrast emphasizes that the current quarter's buying momentum largely stems from individual and smaller-scale investors, rather than large corporations.

The single-property tier saw 17 entities acquire 12 distinct properties in Q4, indicating that many individual investors are making their initial foray into the market. This tier clearly represents the highest concentration of new activity and the primary driver of landlord purchases in the current quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Scurry County, holding 90.9% of investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), overwhelmingly dominate the SFR investment landscape in Scurry County, TX, controlling a combined 90.9% of all investor-owned properties. This substantial concentration in smaller portfolios highlights the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the market, alone accounting for 778 properties or 62.8% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio in Scurry County. This signifies a market largely driven by individuals making their initial or sole real estate investments.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal share, with just 1 property, representing a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in Scurry County. This dispels the notion of widespread corporate investment in this specific market.

The distribution of ownership shows a sharp drop-off after the small landlord tiers, with Tiers 05-08 (11-1000 properties) representing only 8.2% of the market. The presence of only 2 properties in the 51-100 property tier further underscores the absence of a robust mid-sized investor segment in Scurry County.

While specific tier pricing data for historical periods is not available in this section, insights from Q4 transactions (Section 12) suggest that institutional investors (Tier 09) paid an average of $180,200, which was 4.0% less than the $187,728 average paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Scurry County. This indicates a potential pricing advantage for larger entities even with limited activity.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Scurry County for portfolios exceeding 20 properties (Tier 11-20).
Detailed Findings

In Scurry County, TX, individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller landlord portfolios, holding 93.4% of single-property (Tier 01) and 87.1% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. This highlights that the vast majority of entry-level and small-scale investments are made by individuals, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the market.

A significant crossover point occurs in the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies become the majority owners, controlling 74.4% of properties compared to individuals' 25.6%. This indicates that while individuals start small, companies rapidly increase their ownership share as portfolio sizes grow.

The 21-50 property tier reveals a near equilibrium between individual and company ownership, with companies holding 36 properties (50.7%) and individuals owning 35 properties (49.3%). This balanced distribution suggests intense competition or a specific market niche where both owner types find success.

The highest concentration of company ownership, by percentage within a tier, is found in the 11-20 properties tier, where they own 74.4% of the properties. This contrasts sharply with the single-property tier, where company ownership is only 6.6%, signaling a clear strategic preference for larger portfolios by corporate entities.

Even in the larger small landlord tiers, individuals maintain a strong presence; in the 6-10 properties tier, individuals still account for 71.3% of ownership, and in the 3-5 properties tier, they own 84.5%. This demonstrates that individuals are not solely limited to single properties but also build substantial portfolios in Scurry County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Scurry County's 79549 zip code dominates investor ownership with 1,116 properties and a 25.6% rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Scurry County, TX, the 79549 zip code stands out as the primary hub for real estate investor activity, holding a dominant 1,116 investor-owned properties. This single zip code represents the overwhelming majority of the county's landlord-owned housing, underscoring significant geographic concentration.

While 79549 leads in raw property counts, the 79517 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 39.4%, indicating that nearly two-fifths of all SFR properties in this area are landlord-owned. This high penetration rate suggests a particularly attractive sub-market for investors.

The 79526 and 79527 zip codes also exhibit strong investor presence, with ownership rates of 36.2% and 30.9% respectively, and property counts of 51 and 17. These areas, alongside 79517, show a higher intensity of investor saturation relative to their total housing stock compared to the larger 79549 zip code.

The top four identified zip codes (79549, 79526, 79527, 79517) clearly form the core of investor activity in Scurry County, TX. Their combined share of investor-owned properties and consistently high ownership rates highlight distinct sub-markets where landlords have established a significant foothold.

The inverse relationship where the region with the most properties (79549) does not have the highest ownership rate suggests that its larger overall SFR inventory dilutes the investor share, while smaller areas like 79517 experience a higher relative impact from investor purchases. This implies diverse market dynamics across Scurry County's zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Scurry County landlords remain strong net buyers in Q4 (5.25x ratio), while institutions act as net sellers.
Detailed Findings

In Scurry County, TX, landlords collectively remained strong net buyers in 2025-Q4, acquiring 21 properties while selling only 4, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 5.25x. This consistent net accumulation reflects a positive sentiment and continued investment into the local SFR market.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acted as net sellers in 2025-Q4, selling 2 properties while purchasing only 1. This divestment pattern indicates a strategic withdrawal or portfolio rebalancing by larger entities within Scurry County.

The divergence in behavior between all landlords and institutional investors is pronounced; while the broader landlord market consistently added properties with a 3.37x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025, institutional players collectively divested with a 0.2x ratio, selling 5 properties against 1 buy for the entire year. This highlights differing strategies based on portfolio size.

Landlords maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2024 and 2025. The buy/sell ratio remained well above 1.0, peaking at 5.75x in Q3 2025 and closing Q4 at 5.25x, indicating sustained demand from investors despite broader market fluctuations.

The consistent net selling by institutional investors, with a total of 9 sells against 4 buys over 2024-2025, suggests that larger players may be finding better opportunities elsewhere or are shedding less productive assets in Scurry County. This creates opportunities for smaller, local landlords to expand their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 10.7% of Q4 transactions in Scurry County, with single-property buyers leading activity.
Detailed Findings

In the 2025-Q4, landlords in Scurry County, TX, participated in 21 transactions, representing 10.7% of the total 196 SFR transactions recorded. This indicates that roughly one in ten property transfers involved an investor, highlighting their active role in the market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active investor segment in Q4, completing 17 transactions. This activity aligns with their dominance in overall ownership, demonstrating a consistent demand for entry-level investment properties.

A notable pricing difference emerged between the smallest and largest transacting tiers in Q4; institutional investors (Tier 09) paid an average of $180,200, securing a 4.0% discount compared to single-property landlords (Tier 01) who paid $187,728. This suggests a potential strategic pricing advantage for larger players.

Inter-landlord trading activity was minimal in Q4. For instance, only 1 of the 17 single-property transactions (5.9%) involved a purchase from another landlord, indicating that most acquisitions originated from non-landlord sellers.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively drove 19 of the 21 landlord transactions in Q4, further cementing their role as the primary transacting force in Scurry County's investor market. The limited activity from other tiers underscores a focus on smaller-scale investment and less institutional engagement.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Scurry County, driving growth as institutions net-sell
Holdings
Landlords in Scurry County, TX, own 1,197 SFR properties, representing 26.1% of the county's total SFR market. The portfolio is primarily individual-owned, with 1,027 properties (85.8%), compared to 184 properties (15.4%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords secured a significant 14.1% discount in Q4, paying an average of $186,976 compared to homeowners' $217,757. This reflects a substantial price appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $98,444 to Q4 2025 pricing.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 15.0% of Q4 SFR purchases in Scurry County, acquiring 16 properties. Mom-and-pop landlords were highly active, with 17 new single-property entities entering the market and driving most of the quarter's purchasing volume.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 90.9% of investor-owned housing in Scurry County, TX, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a minimal 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (93.4% of single-property holdings in Scurry County, TX), but companies gain majority control in portfolios ranging from 11-20 properties (74.4% ownership). Companies also utilize cash for 84.2% of their acquisitions, higher than individuals' 68.0%.
Transactions
Overall landlords in Scurry County, TX, are strong net buyers with a 3.37x buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (101 buys vs 30 sells). In contrast, institutional investors are net sellers for Year 2025, divesting 5 properties while acquiring only 1.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Scurry County, TX, is overwhelmingly characterized by smaller, individual landlords. A substantial 26.1% of the county's SFR market, totaling 1,197 properties, is investor-owned. Notably, individual investors account for 85.8% of these holdings, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) controlling a dominant 90.9% of all investor-owned properties. This grassroots market structure stands in stark contrast to the minimal 0.1% share held by institutional investors, effectively challenging perceptions of widespread corporate dominance in Scurry County.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights strategic purchasing and a robust appetite for local properties. Landlords secured 15.0% of all SFR purchases in Scurry County, often at a significant advantage, paying 14.1% less than traditional homeowners. This purchasing power reflects a market favoring savvy investors. Transaction data reveals a strong net buyer position for all landlords overall, with a 3.37x buy/sell ratio in 2025. However, institutional investors exhibited a divergent trend, acting as net sellers throughout 2025 and 2024, indicating a divestment strategy by larger players.

The data from Scurry County, TX, paints a clear picture: the local SFR investment market is overwhelmingly fueled by mom-and-pop landlords who are actively acquiring properties, often with pricing advantages, and contributing significantly to the rental housing stock. The sustained net buying by these smaller investors, coupled with the retreat of institutional players, suggests a resilient and accessible market for individual real estate entrepreneurs. This trend solidifies the crucial role of local investors in shaping the county's housing supply and market dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 03:28 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyScurry (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions