Moore (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Moore (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Moore (TX)
5,310
Total Investors in Moore (TX)
1,149
Investor Owned SFR in Moore (TX)
1,316(24.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,069
SFR Owned
1,187
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
80
SFR Owned
131
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,316 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Moore County Investor Market: Dominated by Small Landlords and Cash, but Frozen in Q4
Investors own 1,316 SFR properties in Moore County, representing 24.8% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (96.0%) and individual owners (90.2%). The market saw a complete halt in investor activity in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or transactions recorded.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,316 SFRs, with individuals owning 90.2% of the portfolio.
The entire investor portfolio of 1,316 properties was acquired with cash, with zero properties showing financing. A vast majority, 1,220 properties (92.7%), are classified as rentals (non-owner-occupied).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord acquisition activity was recorded in recent timeframes, preventing price analysis.
The complete absence of landlord purchases from 2020 through Q4 2025 means no pricing data is available. It is not possible to compare landlord vs. homeowner prices or analyze price gap trends.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
With no acquisitions, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both accounted for 0.0% of purchases. No new single-property landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 50.3% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No recent purchasing activity occurred, preventing a price comparison between individuals and companies.
Individual investors are the dominant owners in every portfolio tier, including 91.5% of single-property portfolios and 72.1% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. A crossover to company-majority ownership does not occur.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 79029, with 988 properties.
While 79029 has the highest count, zip code 79086 has the highest investor penetration rate at 44.3%. Zip code 79013 also shows significant concentration, with a 35.7% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buy/sell ratios.
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for landlords or institutional investors in any historical timeframe. This makes it impossible to determine net buyer/seller status or compare transaction prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of the zero total market transactions in Q4 2025.
With no transactions, it's impossible to compare pricing or inter-landlord trading activity across tiers. Both mom-and-pop and institutional investors recorded zero transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,316 SFRs, with individuals owning 90.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 24.8% share of the single-family residential market in Moore County, with a total of 1,316 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,187 properties, or 90.2% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 131 properties (10.0%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is its reliance on all-cash acquisitions; every single one of the 1,316 investor-owned properties is held without financing.

The focus on rental income is clear, with 1,220 properties (92.7% of the portfolio) actively rented out, confirming the non-owner-occupied strategy of these landlords.

The entity count further underscores individual dominance, with 1,069 individual landlords making up 93.0% of all investors, compared to only 80 company entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord acquisition activity was recorded in recent timeframes, preventing price analysis.
Detailed Findings

A critical finding for Moore County is the complete lack of landlord acquisition activity in any recent timeframe, including Q4 2025, the full year of 2024, and the 2020-2023 period.

Due to zero recorded purchases by investors, there is no average acquisition price data available for these periods.

Consequently, a price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners cannot be performed, and trends in the landlord discount or premium cannot be analyzed.

This absence of data is itself an insight, pointing to a market that has been dormant for investor acquisitions for an extended period.

The market appears to be one of long-term holds rather than active trading, with no fresh pricing benchmarks being set by the investor community.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Moore County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero of the zero total SFR properties sold.

This halt in activity means investors accounted for 0.0% of all market purchases during the quarter.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes, from the smallest mom-and-pop landlords (0 properties) to the largest institutional firms (0 properties).

Reflecting this inactivity, no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the Moore County market in Q4 2025.

The data points to a complete pause in investor-led housing demand, a significant trend for a market where investors already own nearly a quarter of the SFR stock.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Moore County is defined by small-scale owners, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 96.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-investment landlords are the largest segment, with 697 properties held in single-property portfolios, representing 50.3% of the total.

The ownership concentration rapidly declines with scale; mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) collectively own just 4.0% of the investor portfolio.

This market structure stands in stark contrast to national narratives, as large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09) have no footprint in Moore County, holding 0.0% of the properties.

Due to the lack of recent purchasing activity, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
No recent purchasing activity occurred, preventing a price comparison between individuals and companies.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords form the backbone of the investor market across all tiers in Moore County. They own 91.5% of single-property portfolios and maintain a strong majority even as portfolio sizes grow.

In the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), individuals own 308 of 314 properties, a near-total dominance of 98.1%.

Even in the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, individual ownership remains high at 72.1%, demonstrating that corporate ownership does not become the majority at any significant scale in this market.

The data shows a clear pattern: while company ownership percentage increases slightly with portfolio size—from 8.5% in Tier 01 to 27.9% in the 11-20 tier—it never surpasses individual ownership.

As no acquisitions were recorded, a comparison of purchase prices between individual and company investors within these tiers is not possible.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 79029, with 988 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Moore County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 79029 is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 988 investor-owned SFR properties.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. In zip code 79086, investors own 44.3% of the 275 SFR properties, making it the most saturated area by rate.

This highlights a key geographic pattern: the area with the largest number of investor properties (79029, at a 21.9% rate) is not the one with the highest ownership density.

Other areas of high concentration include 79013, where investors own 35.7% of the housing stock, and 79036, with a 21.2% rate.

This data reveals distinct sub-markets within the county, some attracting a high volume of investors and others seeing a deeper saturation of existing housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buy/sell ratios.
Detailed Findings

There is no available historical transaction data for landlords in Moore County, indicating a highly illiquid market or data limitations.

Without buy and sell transaction counts, it is not possible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

Similarly, the degree of inter-landlord trading cannot be measured, as the percentage of purchases from other landlords is unknown.

Analysis of implied margins is also not possible, as there are no average buy and sell prices to compare across timeframes.

This absence of transaction history suggests that the investor market in Moore County is characterized by long-term holds with very infrequent asset turnover.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of the zero total market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market for investors in Moore County was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero landlord-involved transactions recorded.

This lack of activity was uniform across all investor tiers; no transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords or any mid-to-large-sized investors.

As a result, the average purchase price for all tiers was effectively $0, and no analysis of pricing strategies between different investor sizes can be made.

Inter-landlord trading activity was also nonexistent, with 0% of transactions originating from other landlords.

The data paints a picture of a market in a holding pattern during Q4 2025, with no buying, selling, or trading among the existing investor base.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Moore County's investor market, dominated by small cash-buyers, hit a standstill with zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,316 SFR properties, representing 24.8% of the market in Moore County, TX. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (90.2%) versus companies (10.0%).
Pricing
No landlord purchase activity was recorded in Q4, making a price comparison against homeowners impossible and indicating a frozen acquisitions market.
Activity
Investors made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period of complete inactivity.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control with 96.0% of investor housing, while institutional investors have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio-size tier, and a crossover to company-majority ownership is never reached.
Transactions
With zero recorded transactions in Q4, the net buyer or seller status for landlords cannot be determined; the market was entirely static.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Moore County, TX, is a distinct ecosystem defined by local, small-scale capital. Investors hold 1,316 SFR properties, a significant 24.8% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly shaped by individuals, who own 90.2% of these homes, and dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 96.0% of the investor-owned inventory. A striking feature is the complete absence of institutional ownership and the fact that 100% of the portfolio is owned outright with cash.

Investor behavior in the recent quarter signals a market at a complete standstill. There were zero purchases and zero transactions by landlords in Q4 2025. This halt in activity means no new landlords entered the market, and no pricing data is available to compare against homeowners, a departure from typical market dynamics. This inactivity suggests a mature, stable market where existing landlords are holding assets long-term rather than actively trading.

The key takeaway for Moore County is that it represents a closed-loop, self-financed rental market resistant to the influence of large corporate investors. The recent freeze in activity could indicate satisfaction with current holdings, a lack of desirable inventory, or a cautious response to broader economic conditions. For the foreseeable future, the market's trajectory will be dictated by the decisions of its established base of individual, cash-heavy landlords, not by outside capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 03:06 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMoore (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price