Jim Hogg (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jim Hogg (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jim Hogg (TX)
1,723
Total Investors in Jim Hogg (TX)
545
Investor Owned SFR in Jim Hogg (TX)
535(31.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
491
SFR Owned
467
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
54
SFR Owned
72
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 535 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 96.7% of Investor Market, Securing Significant Discounts
Jim Hogg County's real estate investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual, mom-and-pop landlords who own 96.7% of the 535 investor-owned SFR properties. These landlords demonstrated strong purchasing power in 2025-Q3, acquiring properties at a 20.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Despite this, Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in landlord acquisition activity, while overall landlords remain strong net buyers in the county, accumulating properties at a 10.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors hold an overwhelming 87.3% share of Jim Hogg County's 535 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A significant 521 of these properties are rented, with 497 being cash-purchased, indicating a strong focus on rental income. Individual landlords heavily outnumber companies by a ratio of 9:1, with 491 individual entities compared to 54 company entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Jim Hogg County secured a substantial 20.8% discount in 2025-Q3, paying $174,635 compared to homeowners' $220,373.
The pricing dynamics were volatile, as landlords shifted from paying a $3,972 premium in 2025-Q2 ($148,756 vs $144,784) to a significant discount in Q3. Average landlord acquisition prices have surged by 54.6%, from $106,235 during 2020-2023 to $164,283 in 2025, reflecting substantial market appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords in Jim Hogg County made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, resulting in a complete halt in acquisition activity for the quarter.
Neither mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) nor institutional (Tier 09) landlords recorded any purchases, signifying a 0.0% share of total SFR purchases. This lack of activity prevented any new landlords from entering the market via purchases in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.7% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Jim Hogg County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, owning 390 properties or 70.7% of the total. Institutional investors (Tier 09) are entirely absent, holding 0.0% of the market, which challenges typical narratives about large corporate ownership.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate up to the 6-10 property tier; however, companies become majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 73.3% of properties in this segment.
Individual landlords comprise 90.6% of single-property portfolios and 93.8% of 6-10 property portfolios, demonstrating their strong presence in smaller-to-mid-size holdings. This significant shift at the 11-20 tier highlights the point where corporate strategy begins to outweigh individual investment for portfolio expansion.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 78361 within Jim Hogg County commands the vast majority of investor-owned properties, totaling 534 SFR units.
Zip code 78361 also exhibits a high investor ownership rate of 31.0%. While zip code 78360 shows a slightly higher investor ownership rate at 33.3%, it accounts for only 1 investor-owned property, highlighting the highly concentrated nature of landlord activity in 78361.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jim Hogg County are strong net buyers, accumulating properties with a 10.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 and a 6.0x ratio in 2024.
Overall landlord activity saw 10 buys against 1 sell in 2025, and 24 buys against 4 sells in 2024, demonstrating consistent portfolio expansion. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) registered no transactions in either year, confirming their non-participation in this market.
Current Quarter Transactions
No SFR transactions involving landlords were recorded in Q4 2025, indicating a complete absence of buying and selling activity for the quarter.
This lack of activity meant no transactions from mom-and-pop or institutional investors, with no average purchase prices by tier available. Consequently, landlords made a 0.0% share of total Q4 transactions, halting market liquidity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors hold an overwhelming 87.3% share of Jim Hogg County's 535 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jim Hogg County own a substantial portfolio of 535 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 31.1% of the total 1,723 SFR properties in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord market, holding 467 properties (87.3%) compared to companies which own 72 properties (13.5%), reinforcing the mom-and-pop nature of the local rental market.

The investor landscape is characterized by a high number of individual landlords, with 491 distinct entities, significantly outnumbering the 54 company landlords, translating to a powerful 9.09:1 individual-to-company landlord ratio.

The portfolio demonstrates a strong rental focus, with 521 properties identified as rented, indicating that the vast majority of investor-owned properties are income-generating assets rather than speculative holdings.

Cash acquisitions are a prominent strategy, with 497 properties purchased via cash, suggesting that a large portion of the landlord market operates with strong liquidity or avoids traditional financing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Jim Hogg County secured a substantial 20.8% discount in 2025-Q3, paying $174,635 compared to homeowners' $220,373.
Detailed Findings

In a fluctuating market, Jim Hogg County landlords demonstrated shrewd buying, securing an average acquisition price of $174,635 in 2025-Q3, a notable $45,738 (20.8%) less than the $220,373 paid by traditional homeowners.

This quarter-over-quarter price gap reveals a shift from 2025-Q2, where landlords paid a slight premium of $3,972 (2.7%) at $148,756 compared to homeowners at $144,784, indicating a dynamic pricing environment.

Landlord acquisition prices have experienced substantial appreciation, increasing by 54.6% from an average of $106,235 during the 2020-2023 period to $164,283 in 2025, highlighting robust market value growth.

The absence of any landlord acquisitions in Q1 2025 and Q4 2025 suggests periods of market inactivity or selective purchasing strategies, making Q3's discounted acquisitions particularly significant.

Despite the lack of Q4 activity, the overall trend for 2025 showed landlords paying an average of $164,283, a 49.5% increase over the 2024 average acquisition price of $109,883, demonstrating strong year-over-year price growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords in Jim Hogg County made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, resulting in a complete halt in acquisition activity for the quarter.
Detailed Findings

Jim Hogg County experienced a complete pause in landlord acquisition activity during Q4 2025, with no distinct SFR properties purchased by investors, leading to a 0.0% share of the market.

The absence of Q4 landlord purchases means there were no new mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) entering the market, nor any activity from institutional investors (Tier 09) within this timeframe.

This lack of purchasing activity from both individual and larger investor tiers suggests a potential market slowdown or a highly cautious approach to acquisitions in the current quarter.

Without any recorded Q4 purchases, the market did not see any shifts in investor tier activity or average properties per entity for this specific period.

The zero purchases from landlords means that non-landlord buyers also registered zero acquisitions in Q4 2025, indicating a broader market freeze in property transactions for the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 96.7% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Jim Hogg County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04, hold a dominant 96.7% share of the investor-owned SFR properties in Jim Hogg County, totaling 534 properties out of 552 distributed across tiers.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant segment, owning 390 properties, which alone represents 70.7% of all landlord-held SFR, underscoring the prevalence of small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in this market, controlling 0.0% of investor-owned SFR properties.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after the smallest tiers; for example, Tiers 01-04 cumulatively hold 534 properties, while Tiers 05-08 account for only 18 properties (3.2%) combined, further emphasizing small investor concentration.

The largest active tier is 'Small-medium' (11-20 properties) with 15 properties (2.7%) and 'Small-medium' (21-50 properties) with 3 properties (0.5%), highlighting that even the larger landlords in this county operate at a relatively modest scale.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate up to the 6-10 property tier; however, companies become majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 73.3% of properties in this segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly lead in smaller portfolios, accounting for 357 properties (90.6%) in the single-property tier and 51 properties (87.9%) in the two-property tier.

The individual investor dominance extends up to portfolios of 10 properties, where they still own 15 properties (93.8%) in the 6-10 property tier, while companies hold only 1 property (6.2%).

A notable shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where company ownership takes the majority, with 11 properties (73.3%) compared to individual investors holding just 4 properties (26.7%), marking the crossover point for ownership type by portfolio size.

Despite companies taking majority in the 11-20 tier, their overall presence in the largest available tiers (11-50 properties) remains relatively small in terms of total property count for the county, with only 12 properties combined.

This distribution pattern reveals that individual investors are the primary engine for initiating and maintaining small-to-medium sized rental portfolios in Jim Hogg County, whereas companies, while fewer, tend to manage more properties once they engage in larger-scale investing.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 78361 within Jim Hogg County commands the vast majority of investor-owned properties, totaling 534 SFR units.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Jim Hogg County are highly concentrated within a single zip code, with TX-Jim Hogg-78361 accounting for 534 properties, which is almost all of the county's landlord-owned inventory.

The 78361 zip code also has a significant investor ownership rate of 31.0%, indicating that nearly one-third of all SFR properties in this area are held by landlords.

Despite TX-Jim Hogg-78360 having a slightly higher investor ownership rate at 33.3%, its impact on the overall market is minimal, as it only contains 1 investor-owned property.

This geographic concentration suggests that market dynamics for investors in Jim Hogg County are almost entirely dictated by activity within the 78361 zip code.

The absence of other zip codes in the top rankings further emphasizes the localized nature of the investor market, with virtually no significant landlord presence outside of these two highlighted areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Jim Hogg County are strong net buyers, accumulating properties with a 10.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 and a 6.0x ratio in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Jim Hogg County landlords maintained a robust net buyer position in both 2025 and 2024, signaling continued expansion of their property portfolios.

In 2025, landlords purchased 10 properties while selling only 1, resulting in a strong 10.0x buy-to-sell ratio and a net accumulation of 9 properties for the year.

Similarly, in 2024, landlords acquired 24 properties and sold 4, achieving a 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio and adding 20 properties to their holdings.

The consistent net buying over these two years indicates a healthy appetite for acquisition and long-term investment strategies among landlords in the region.

In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) reported no buy or sell transactions in either 2024 or 2025, confirming their complete absence from the transaction activity in Jim Hogg County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No SFR transactions involving landlords were recorded in Q4 2025, indicating a complete absence of buying and selling activity for the quarter.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 market for SFR transactions in Jim Hogg County showed a complete freeze, with landlords recording zero transactions, effectively making their market share 0.0%.

This comprehensive halt in activity means that no properties were purchased or sold by any investor tier, including mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09).

With no transactions, there is no data to assess average purchase prices by tier, precluding any insights into pricing strategies or market value for Q4 2025 acquisitions.

The absence of landlord transactions implies a broader market slowdown, as total Q4 SFR transactions were also zero, affecting all potential buyers and sellers.

This stagnant quarter contrasts with prior periods where landlords were active net buyers, suggesting a temporary pause or a highly selective investment environment in the county.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Jim Hogg Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords, Zero Institutional Presence, Despite Strong Discounts
Holdings
Landlords in Jim Hogg County own 535 SFR properties, which constitutes 31.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 467 properties (87.3%), while companies own 72 properties (13.5%).
Pricing
Landlords secured a significant 20.8% discount in 2025-Q3, paying $174,635 on average compared to homeowners' $220,373, a savings of $45,738 per property. Overall average landlord acquisition prices have surged by 54.6% from the 2020-2023 period ($106,235) to $164,283 in 2025.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete cessation of landlord purchase activity, with zero properties acquired by investors, leading to a 0.0% share of total SFR purchases. This means no new landlords (Tier 01) entered the market via purchases in Q4.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 96.7% of all investor-owned SFR housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% share, indicating their complete absence from Jim Hogg County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors comprise the majority of landlords across most tiers, however, company ownership surpasses individuals at the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 73.3% of properties. Companies tend to enter at larger scales, while individuals drive smaller portfolio growth.
Transactions
Landlords in Jim Hogg County are strong net buyers overall, with a 10.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (10 buys vs 1 sell). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions in 2025, confirming their non-participation in the county's transaction market.
Market Narrative

Jim Hogg County's real estate investor market is profoundly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control an overwhelming 96.7% of the 535 investor-owned SFR properties, representing 31.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors alone own 467 properties (87.3%), dwarfing the 72 properties (13.5%) held by companies. This market structure is further emphasized by the complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties), who hold a 0.0% share, highlighting a local market largely insulated from large-scale corporate investment.

Despite this mom-and-pop dominance, landlord acquisition behavior in Jim Hogg County has been dynamic. While Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in purchases, 2025-Q3 revealed landlords securing a substantial 20.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, acquiring properties for $174,635 versus $220,373. This ability to secure advantageous pricing contributes to the overall trend of landlords being consistent net buyers, with a robust 10.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (10 buys vs 1 sell), indicating a steady expansion of their portfolios. The average acquisition price for landlords has significantly appreciated, rising 54.6% from the 2020-2023 period to 2025.

The data from Jim Hogg County paints a picture of a resilient, locally-driven investor market where individual landlords are the primary actors. The absence of institutional players and the strong net buying position of smaller landlords signal a healthy, community-focused rental housing sector. While the Q4 transaction freeze points to potential seasonal or short-term market adjustments, the overall trends of significant market penetration by small landlords and their strategic purchasing behavior suggest continued stability and growth within this unique local real estate landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 02:37 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJim Hogg (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords