Hemphill (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hemphill (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hemphill (TX)
858
Total Investors in Hemphill (TX)
184
Investor Owned SFR in Hemphill (TX)
186(21.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
167
SFR Owned
163
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
17
SFR Owned
23
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 186 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 99.5% of Holdings Amidst Stagnant Q4 Investor Activity
Landlords in Hemphill County, TX own 186 SFR properties, representing 21.7% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (87.6%) and mom-and-pop landlords (99.5%), with no institutional presence. Despite landlords securing a 45.3% discount in Q2 2025, there were no recorded landlord acquisitions or transactions in Q4 2025, signaling a pause in recent investor activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 87.6% of Hemphill County's 186 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A significant 96.8% of investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong rental focus, with 87.6% acquired through cash purchases. Individual landlords constitute 90.8% of all landlord entities in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 landlord acquisition prices recorded; Q2 2025 landlords secured a significant 45.3% discount.
Landlords in Q2 2025 paid an average of $106,250, a substantial $88,076 less than the average homeowner price of $194,326. This contrasts sharply with Q1 2025, where landlords paid a 100.0% premium, averaging $131,250 compared to homeowner prices of $65,625.
Current Quarter Purchases
Zero landlord purchases recorded in Hemphill County, TX for Q4 2025.
With only 1 total SFR purchase recorded in Hemphill County for Q4 2025 and no landlord involvement, both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers show 0 properties purchased for the quarter. This indicates a complete absence of new landlord market entry or expansion during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of investor-owned SFR in Hemphill County, TX.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 67.0% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every tier in Hemphill County, TX, showing no company crossover.
For single-property landlords (Tier 01), individuals comprise 93.0% of ownership. Even in the largest present tier (6-10 properties), individuals still hold 90.0% of properties, with companies accounting for only 10.0%.
Geographic Distribution
The 79014 zip code in Hemphill County, TX shows 21.7% investor-owned SFR properties.
With 186 investor-owned properties, the 79014 zip code accounts for the entirety of the top geographic concentration within Hemphill County, TX for investor activity. This also positions it as having the highest investor ownership rate at 21.7% in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Hemphill County, TX are consistent net buyers, with 11 purchases vs 1 sale in Year 2025.
In Q3 2025, landlords bought 5 properties and sold 1, maintaining a net buyer position. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded transaction activity across all timeframes.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero landlord transactions recorded in Hemphill County, TX for Q4 2025.
With only 2 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 0.0% of market activity. Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recorded 0 transactions, indicating no purchase or sale activity by investor entities this quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 87.6% of Hemphill County's 186 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hemphill County, TX own 186 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 21.7% of the total 858 SFR properties in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 163 SFR properties, which accounts for 87.6% of all investor-owned SFR in the county. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 23, or 12.4%.

This individual dominance extends to the entity count, with 167 individual landlords comprising 90.8% of the total 184 landlord entities, leaving only 17 (9.2%) as company landlords.

A strong focus on rental income is evident, as 180 of the 186 investor-owned properties are currently rented, translating to 96.8% of the landlord portfolio dedicated to leasing.

The prevalence of cash purchases is striking, with 163 properties (87.6%) being acquired through cash. Only 23 properties (12.4%) are financed, suggesting a preference for debt-free holdings among landlords in Hemphill County, TX.

When comparing individual to company portfolios, individual investors mirror the county trend with 87.6% cash acquisitions, while company portfolios show the remaining 12.4% are financed, indicating a slight difference in capital deployment strategies.

The high percentage of individual landlords and their cash-heavy, rental-focused portfolios challenge the narrative of corporate dominance, portraying a market driven by smaller, local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 landlord acquisition prices recorded; Q2 2025 landlords secured a significant 45.3% discount.
Detailed Findings

No landlord acquisition prices were recorded for Q4 2025 due to zero recorded landlord purchases in Hemphill County, TX, indicating a complete halt in landlord buying activity for the quarter.

Examining prior quarters reveals significant pricing fluctuations for landlords. In Q2 2025, landlords demonstrated a strong advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $106,250, which was $88,076 or 45.3% less than the average homeowner price of $194,326.

However, this trend was reversed in Q1 2025, where landlords paid a notable premium, averaging $131,250. This price was $65,625, or 100.0%, higher than the average homeowner price of $65,625 for the same period.

Looking at annual trends for any recorded activity, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 was $118,750, following a higher average of $174,938 in Year 2024. This suggests a slight decrease in average acquisition costs for landlords year-over-year where purchases did occur.

Comparing current trends to the pandemic era, landlord acquisitions in Years 2020-2023 averaged $65,000. This indicates a significant price appreciation for properties acquired by landlords, with Q2 2025 prices representing an 63.5% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $65,000 (from $106,250).

The sporadic nature of landlord purchases in recent quarters, with 0 properties in Q3 and Q4 2025, makes drawing consistent trend lines difficult, but prior quarters demonstrate both significant discounts and premiums for investors.

The dramatic swing from a 45.3% discount in Q2 2025 to a 100.0% premium in Q1 2025 highlights the volatile pricing landscape and specific deal-making dynamics for landlords in Hemphill County, TX.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Zero landlord purchases recorded in Hemphill County, TX for Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, there were no recorded landlord purchases in Hemphill County, TX. This means landlords accounted for 0.0% of the total 1 SFR property purchased in the quarter.

The lack of landlord activity is comprehensive, with both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recording 0 purchases for Q4 2025.

This complete halt in landlord acquisitions suggests either a lack of suitable inventory, a pause in investment strategies, or market conditions that deterred new purchases by investor entities in Hemphill County, TX.

Given the zero purchase activity, there were no new landlords (single-property, Tier 01) entering the market in Q4 2025, nor any expansion by existing entities.

The single SFR purchase in Q4 2025 was made by a non-landlord buyer, indicating that any minimal market activity bypassed the investor segment entirely during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of investor-owned SFR in Hemphill County, TX.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Hemphill County, TX, controlling 99.5% of all investor-held properties.

The distribution highlights a highly fragmented market, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone holding 128 properties, accounting for 67.0% of the total investor portfolio.

Adding to the mom-and-pop strength, two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 15 properties (7.9%), and small landlords (Tiers 03-05) collectively account for 47 properties (24.6% - 37 in 3-5, 10 in 6-10).

There is no institutional investor presence (Tier 09) recorded in Hemphill County, TX, with 0.0% of investor-owned properties held by entities with 1000+ properties, starkly contrasting national narratives.

The largest non-mom-and-pop tier present is small-medium (Tier 21-50), owning just 1 property, which represents a negligible 0.5% of the total investor-owned SFR.

With 184 landlord entities identified, and 186 distinct SFR properties owned by these landlords, the average portfolio size per landlord is approximately 1.01 properties, further emphasizing the mom-and-pop nature of the market.

Due to the absence of recorded tier prices for Hemphill County, TX, direct comparisons of acquisition costs across different investor tiers cannot be made from the provided data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every tier in Hemphill County, TX, showing no company crossover.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a dominant position across all observed portfolio tiers in Hemphill County, TX, with no tier showing companies as the majority owner.

In the single-property tier (Tier 01), individual owners hold 119 properties (93.0%), vastly outweighing the 9 properties (7.0%) owned by companies.

This pattern of individual dominance persists even as portfolio size increases; in the two-property tier (Tier 02), individuals own 80.0% of properties, and in the 3-5 property tier, they hold 73.0%.

Even within the largest present tier (6-10 properties), individual investors still own 9 properties (90.0%), with companies owning only 1 property (10.0%), indicating that companies have not achieved majority control in any tier in this market.

The data suggests that the landlord market in Hemphill County, TX is fundamentally structured around individual ownership, challenging the notion of corporate concentration even in larger, though still small, portfolios.

Given the absence of pricing data specific to owner type by tier, a comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within each tier is not possible for Hemphill County, TX.

The consistent individual dominance across all tiers, from 93.0% in Tier 01 to 90.0% in Tier 06-10, highlights a stable market structure heavily reliant on local, individual investment rather than corporate expansion.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 79014 zip code in Hemphill County, TX shows 21.7% investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

The 79014 zip code within Hemphill County, TX, stands out as the primary hub of investor activity, recording 186 landlord-owned SFR properties.

This translates to an investor ownership rate of 21.7% within the 79014 zip code, indicating a significant portion of its housing stock is held by landlords.

As the sole sub-geography provided in the data for Hemphill County, TX, the 79014 zip code represents both the highest concentration by count and the highest investor ownership percentage within the county's analyzed sub-regions.

Given that all 186 investor-owned properties in the county are attributed to this specific zip code, it suggests a highly localized concentration of landlord activity in Hemphill County, TX.

Without comparative data for other zip codes or sub-geographies within Hemphill County, TX, it's not possible to analyze variation in acquisition prices or compare landlord density across different regional segments within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Hemphill County, TX are consistent net buyers, with 11 purchases vs 1 sale in Year 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hemphill County, TX consistently maintain a net buyer position, with 11 purchases against just 1 sale in Year 2025, resulting in a net gain of 10 properties.

This trend of accumulation is also evident in Q3 2025, where landlords completed 5 buy transactions versus 1 sell transaction, marking them as net buyers for the quarter.

Looking at the previous year, landlords in Year 2024 also exhibited net buying behavior, with 8 properties purchased and 3 sold, leading to a net increase of 5 properties.

Notably, there is no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1000+ tier) across any timeframe in Hemphill County, TX, indicating their absence from the transaction landscape.

The data does not provide details on the percentage of buy or sell transactions originating from other landlords (inter-landlord), limiting insights into market liquidity and trading patterns.

Without average buy and sell prices across timeframes in the provided data, an implied margin analysis for historical transactions cannot be conducted.

The consistent net buying behavior by all landlords, particularly in contrast to the complete absence of institutional activity, underscores the dominance of smaller, accumulating investors in this local market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero landlord transactions recorded in Hemphill County, TX for Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Hemphill County, TX experienced a complete absence of landlord transaction activity in Q4 2025, with zero recorded landlord buys or sells despite 2 total SFR transactions in the market.

This means landlords represented 0.0% of the market's transaction volume for the quarter, signaling a significant slowdown or pause in investor engagement.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded 0 transactions for Q4 2025, indicating that no tier of investor was active in buying or selling properties.

Given the zero transaction volume, analysis of average purchase prices by tier, inter-landlord trading activity, or price spreads between tiers for Q4 2025 is not possible.

The lack of landlord transactions in Q4 2025 suggests either a scarcity of available inventory, market uncertainty, or a strategic hold by current owners, effectively freezing investor-driven market movement.

The overall market activity in Q4 2025 was minimal, with only 2 SFR properties changing hands, neither involving a landlord.

Comparing this quarter's inactivity to the overall ownership distribution (where mom-and-pops control 99.5% of investor properties) suggests a market where existing landlords are not actively trading their assets.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.5% of SFR, Amidst Stagnant Q4 Investor Activity in Hemphill County, TX
Holdings
Landlords in Hemphill County, TX own 186 SFR properties, representing 21.7% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 163 (87.6%) of these properties, significantly outweighing the 23 (12.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No landlord acquisition prices were recorded for Q4 2025. The most recent landlord buying activity in Q2 2025 showed landlords securing an average $88,076 discount, paying $106,250—a 45.3% reduction compared to homeowners’ $194,326.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw zero landlord purchases in Hemphill County, TX, even as 1 total SFR property was bought. Consequently, there was no new landlord formation (Tier 01 entities) or any activity from dominant investor tiers during this quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of investor-owned SFR housing in Hemphill County, TX. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all portfolio tiers in Hemphill County, TX, with no observed crossover point where companies become majority owners. Even in larger portfolios (6-10 properties), individuals own 90.0% of properties.
Transactions
Landlords in Hemphill County, TX are net buyers with an 11:1 buy/sell ratio for Year 2025 (11 buys vs 1 sell). However, institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity, signaling their complete absence from market movements.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Hemphill County, TX is overwhelmingly dominated by individual and mom-and-pop landlords. These smaller investors control 186 SFR properties, representing 21.7% of the total SFR market within the county. A striking 87.6% of these properties are owned by individual investors, with companies holding a mere 12.4%, challenging the prevalent narrative of corporate investment dominance. The market is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) collectively holding 99.5% of all investor-owned SFR, and no institutional investor presence recorded in the county.

Despite this strong, localized ownership base, Hemphill County, TX experienced a notable pause in investor activity during Q4 2025, with zero recorded landlord acquisitions or transactions. This follows a period of sporadic but sometimes advantageous pricing for landlords; in Q2 2025, landlords secured an average acquisition price of $106,250, representing a significant 45.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. However, this contrasts with Q1 2025 where landlords paid a 100.0% premium. Historical trends show landlords as consistent net buyers over the past two years, yet the recent Q4 inactivity points to a market facing either scarcity of inventory or a strategic holding pattern among investors.

The current market dynamics in Hemphill County, TX highlight a resilient, individually-driven investment sector characterized by a strong rental focus (96.8% of properties are rented) and a preference for cash acquisitions. The complete absence of institutional activity, coupled with the overwhelming mom-and-pop presence, suggests that local factors and smaller-scale investors are the primary drivers of the rental market. This structure could offer greater stability against large-scale market shifts but also points to slower transaction volumes in periods of uncertainty, as seen in the quiet Q4 2025.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 02:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHemphill (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords