Frio (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Frio (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Frio (TX)
2,812
Total Investors in Frio (TX)
801
Investor Owned SFR in Frio (TX)
796(28.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
714
SFR Owned
646
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
87
SFR Owned
171
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 796 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Frio County with 91.2% Ownership, Consistently Securing Property Discounts.
Landlords in Frio County, TX, own 796 SFR properties, representing 28.3% of the market, with individuals holding 81.2%. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 91.2% of this portfolio, while institutional investors hold just 0.2%. In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at a 7.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, contributing to their 40.9% share of all SFR purchases in the county, with overall landlords remaining strong net buyers for 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 81.2% of Frio County's 796 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
A significant 96.7% of investor-owned properties in Frio County are rented, demonstrating a strong rental focus. Furthermore, 90.3% of these properties are cash purchases, totaling 719 properties, indicating a preference for unfinanced acquisitions.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured a 7.1% Discount on Q4 Acquisitions, Paying $10,804 Less Than Homeowners.
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $141,370, while traditional homeowners paid $152,174. The landlord discount fluctuated significantly throughout 2025, from a substantial 57.0% in Q2 ($111,582 discount) to 11.2% in Q1 ($11,542 discount).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 40.9% of Frio County's Q4 SFR Purchases, Driven by Mom-and-Pop Activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 activity, making 88.9% of all landlord purchases, totaling 8 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchases in the quarter, signaling a focus on smaller-scale investment in the county.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 91.2% of Frio County's Investor-Owned Housing.
The 737 properties held by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) significantly overshadow the 2 properties controlled by institutional investors (Tier 09), which represent just 0.2% of the investor-owned market. Single-property owners (Tier 01) alone command 66.6% of the total landlord-owned SFR properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Landlords Maintain Dominance Across All Tiers Up to 10 Properties in Frio County.
Even in the largest available tier (6-10 properties), individual owners still hold 52.9% of properties (9 properties) compared to companies at 47.1% (8 properties). The crossover point where companies become majority owners is not observed within the available tier data, suggesting individual investors maintain control in smaller to mid-size portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
TX-Frio-78017 Leads Frio County with a 28.8% Investor Ownership Rate.
TX-Frio-78061 has the highest count of investor-owned properties at 587, alongside a 28.2% investor ownership rate. TX-Frio-78057 and TX-Frio-78061 both share the second-highest ownership rate at 28.2%, highlighting concentrated investor activity across multiple zip codes.
Historical Transactions
Frio County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with an 8.25x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025.
For the entirety of 2025, landlords collectively purchased 33 properties while selling only 4, signaling significant market accumulation. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a net buyer position in 2025 with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio (2 buys vs 1 sell), but were net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs 1 sell with a 'net seller' designation).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Drove 37.0% of All Q4 Frio County Transactions, With Mom-and-Pops Dominating.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 9 of the 10 landlord transactions. None of the Q4 transactions from Tiers 01 or 03-05 involved buying from other landlords, suggesting a market focused on acquiring properties from traditional sellers. Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average price at $147,316.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 81.2% of Frio County's 796 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Detailed Findings

Frio County's real estate market features 796 investor-owned SFR properties, which constitutes 28.3% of the total 2,812 SFR properties in the county, highlighting a notable landlord presence.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 646 (81.2%) of the investor-owned SFR properties, significantly outpacing company investors who hold 171 properties (21.5%).

The landlord base reflects this individual dominance, with 714 individual landlords making up 89.1% of the 801 total landlords in the county, while company landlords number only 87 (10.9%).

A strong rental market focus is evident as 770 properties (96.7%) of the landlord-owned portfolio are rented, indicating that nearly all investor-held SFR properties are deployed as rental units.

Frio County landlords show a strong preference for cash acquisitions, with 719 properties (90.3%) purchased outright, suggesting a highly liquid and financially stable investor base; only 77 properties (9.7%) are financed.

The substantial cash ownership (719 properties) versus a smaller number of financed properties (77) reveals a market where landlords are less reliant on debt for their portfolio expansion and maintenance.

Despite companies owning 21.5% of properties, they only represent 10.9% of entities, suggesting that the average company portfolio is larger than that of an individual, though individuals still hold the vast majority of properties.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured a 7.1% Discount on Q4 Acquisitions, Paying $10,804 Less Than Homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Frio County demonstrated a clear pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $141,370, which is $10,804 (7.1%) less than the average $152,174 paid by traditional homeowners.

The landlord pricing advantage in Frio County has shown considerable volatility throughout 2025; after securing an impressive $111,582 (57.0%) discount in Q2 2025, the discount narrowed to $10,804 (7.1%) by Q4 2025.

Comparing Q1 2025, where landlords paid $91,293 (an 11.2% discount), to Q4 2025, the average landlord purchase price increased by 54.8% to $141,370, while the percentage discount against homeowners slightly decreased, indicating a more competitive market.

Year-to-date in 2025, the overall average acquisition price for landlords stands at $109,710 across 33 properties, suggesting a sustained buying strategy across varying market conditions.

The average homeowner acquisition prices also varied significantly, from a high of $195,634 in Q2 to a low of $102,835 in Q1, reflecting dynamic market shifts that both landlords and homeowners navigated.

The substantial $111,582 discount observed in Q2 2025 for landlords ($84,052 vs $195,634 for homeowners) suggests opportunistic buying during a period where homeowner prices were significantly higher.

Despite quarter-over-quarter price increases for landlords, they consistently maintained a lower average purchase price compared to traditional homeowners in Frio County for all quarters with available data in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 40.9% of Frio County's Q4 SFR Purchases, Driven by Mom-and-Pop Activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in Frio County's Q4 2025 housing market, purchasing 9 of the 22 total SFR properties, which represents 40.9% of all quarterly SFR acquisitions.

The vast majority of landlord purchasing activity stemmed from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 8 properties or 88.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 8 distinct entities acquiring 7 properties, demonstrating a strong entry point for new or very small-scale investors into the market.

In contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) recorded no purchases in Q4 2025, indicating their limited or absent involvement in the county's recent acquisition landscape.

The average properties per entity in Tier 01 for Q4 2025 stands at 0.875 (7 properties by 8 entities), suggesting that some new landlords may be making their initial entry into the market.

Small landlords (Tier 03-05) contributed modestly to Q4 purchases, with 1 entity acquiring 1 property, further solidifying the trend of smaller investors driving the county's landlord market.

The overall Q4 purchase activity highlights a market where local, smaller-scale investors are the primary drivers of landlord acquisitions, far outstripping any institutional presence in Frio County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 91.2% of Frio County's Investor-Owned Housing.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, exert overwhelming control over Frio County's investor-owned SFR market, holding 737 properties, which equates to 91.2% of the total 808 landlord-owned properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 538 properties and representing a substantial 66.6% of all landlord-held SFR properties in the county.

Despite media attention often focusing on large entities, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint in Frio County, controlling only 2 properties, which accounts for a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market.

The combined share of the smallest investor tiers (Tier 01 and Tier 02, holding 1-2 properties) totals 608 properties, representing 75.3% of the total landlord-owned SFRs, underscoring the dominance of small-scale ownership.

A notable gap exists between mom-and-pop (1-10 properties) and mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties), with only minor representation in Tiers 05-06, indicating fewer growth-oriented local investors in these segments.

The largest mid-size tier, Medium-large (51-100 properties), holds 67 properties (8.3%), making it the most significant segment after the mom-and-pop tiers, suggesting a few larger regional players alongside the many small investors.

Overall, the distribution highlights a highly fragmented landlord market in Frio County, predominantly shaped by small, individual investors, with negligible institutional penetration.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Maintain Dominance Across All Tiers Up to 10 Properties in Frio County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Frio County, owning 88.4% of single-property portfolios (Tier 01) and 88.6% of two-property portfolios (Tier 02).

Even within the small landlord tiers (3-5 properties), individuals account for 83.1% of ownership, holding 98 properties compared to companies' 20 properties (16.9%).

The data reveals that individual investors retain majority ownership even in the larger 'small landlord' tier (6-10 properties), controlling 9 properties (52.9%) against companies' 8 properties (47.1%).

The absence of data for individual vs. company splits in tiers above 10 properties prevents identifying an exact crossover point, but the current data indicates a strong individual presence even as portfolio size increases within the mom-and-pop range.

Company ownership, while significantly smaller than individual ownership in all reported tiers, shows a gradual increase in percentage share as portfolio size grows, rising from 11.6% in Tier 01 to 47.1% in Tier 06-10.

The high concentration of individual ownership across Tiers 01-10 suggests that smaller, non-corporate entities are the primary drivers of investment in Frio County's SFR market.

This ownership structure defies common perceptions of corporate investor dominance, illustrating a market firmly rooted in local individual ownership for smaller to medium-sized portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TX-Frio-78017 Leads Frio County with a 28.8% Investor Ownership Rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Frio County, the zip code TX-Frio-78017 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at 28.8% of its SFR properties, indicating a significant landlord presence in that specific sub-geography.

Despite not having the highest *rate*, TX-Frio-78061 exhibits the largest concentration of investor-owned properties by count, with 587 landlord-owned SFRs, making it a key hub for investor activity in the county.

The top four zip codes by investor-owned property count – TX-Frio-78061 (587), TX-Frio-78017 (165), TX-Frio-78057 (37), and TX-Frio-78005 (7) – collectively represent the vast majority of investor holdings within Frio County.

A strong correlation exists between areas with high investor-owned property counts and high investor ownership rates within Frio County, as the top three zip codes by count also rank highly in percentage ownership (TX-Frio-78061, TX-Frio-78017, TX-Frio-78057).

All listed zip codes in Frio County maintain investor ownership rates above 26.0%, with TX-Frio-78005 at 26.9%, demonstrating a consistently high level of landlord presence across the county's habitable areas.

The concentration of investor-owned properties suggests that specific areas within Frio County are more attractive to landlords, potentially due to factors such as rental demand, property values, or market liquidity.

The data from these top sub-geographies highlights localized investment hotbeds, indicating that Frio County's overall investor activity is not uniformly distributed but rather concentrated in specific communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Frio County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with an 8.25x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Frio County landlords are unequivocally net buyers, demonstrating a substantial accumulation of properties with 33 purchases against only 4 sales in 2025, resulting in an impressive 8.25x buy/sell ratio.

This strong net buying trend for all landlords is consistent, as they also showed a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in 2024, purchasing 42 properties against 7 sales, affirming a sustained growth-oriented strategy.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited a more nuanced transaction pattern; while they were net buyers in 2025 with 2 purchases and 1 sale, they were designated as net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs 1 sell, net 0).

The difference in buy/sell ratios between all landlords (8.25x) and institutional investors (2.0x) indicates that smaller, mom-and-pop landlords are driving the vast majority of net acquisitions in the county.

Although specific landlord-to-landlord transaction percentages are not provided, the high buy volume across all landlords suggests active market participation and continued demand for SFR properties.

The consistent net buying behavior across 2024 and 2025 for all landlords points to a resilient investor market in Frio County, maintaining confidence in long-term property values and rental demand.

The contrasting activity of institutional investors, moving from net neutral/seller to net buyer, suggests a cautious re-entry or tactical adjustments, but their volume remains minimal compared to the overall landlord activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Drove 37.0% of All Q4 Frio County Transactions, With Mom-and-Pops Dominating.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active participants in Frio County's real estate market, accounting for 10 of the 27 total SFR transactions, which represents a significant 37.0% share of all quarterly activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly led this transaction volume, completing 9 of the 10 landlord transactions, further emphasizing their primary role in the county's investor market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded 8 transactions at an average purchase price of $147,316, indicating that new or small investors are actively buying and are willing to pay competitive prices in the market.

Intriguingly, none of the Q4 transactions by single-property (Tier 01) or small landlords (Tier 03-05) were sourced from other landlords, suggesting that new acquisitions are primarily coming from non-landlord sellers.

The average purchase price for Tier 01 landlords at $147,316 was notably higher than that for Tier 03-05 landlords, who paid an average of $99,750, indicating potential differences in property types or buying strategies.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transaction activity in Q4 2025, reinforcing their minimal presence and the decentralized nature of the Frio County investor market.

The significant transaction share and diverse pricing across tiers for mom-and-pop landlords highlight a dynamic and accessible market for smaller investors, with little reliance on inter-landlord trading for new properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Frio County's Growing Investor Market with Over 91% Ownership.
Holdings
Landlords in Frio County, TX, collectively own 796 SFR properties, representing 28.3% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding the vast majority at 646 properties (81.2%) compared to companies at 171 properties (21.5%).
Pricing
Landlords consistently acquired properties at a discount compared to traditional homeowners in Frio County, securing an average of $10,804 (7.1%) less per property in Q4 2025 ($141,370 vs $152,174).
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, accounting for 9 purchases (40.9% of all SFR sales), predominantly driven by 8 new entities in the single-property (Tier 01) segment, underscoring ongoing market entry by small investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 91.2% of investor-owned SFR housing in Frio County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers up to 10 properties in Frio County, with companies' ownership share gradually increasing but not surpassing individuals in any reported tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Frio County are strong net buyers with an 8.25x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (33 buys vs 4 sells), while institutional investors also ended 2025 as net buyers with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Frio County, TX, is predominantly shaped by small, individual landlords who collectively own 796 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting a substantial 28.3% of the county's total SFR market. Within this segment, individual investors hold 646 properties (81.2%), dwarfing the 171 properties (21.5%) owned by companies. This market structure is further emphasized by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords, operating with 1 to 10 properties, command an overwhelming 91.2% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a marginal 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Frio County showcases a strategic advantage in pricing and a sustained accumulation of properties. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $141,370 per property, securing a 7.1% discount or $10,804 less than traditional homeowners. This pricing edge has fluctuated, with a remarkable 57.0% discount observed in Q2 2025. Landlords were highly active in Q4, representing 40.9% of all SFR purchases, primarily driven by mom-and-pop investors, including 8 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Overall, Frio County landlords demonstrate a strong net buying position, recording 33 purchases against just 4 sales in 2025, yielding an impressive 8.25x buy/sell ratio.

This data reveals a vibrant, fragmented investor market in Frio County, where local, smaller-scale landlords are the dominant force, actively acquiring properties from non-landlord sellers and consistently securing advantageous pricing. The minimal presence and activity of institutional investors underscore the local, community-driven nature of the rental market. This trend signals a healthy, accessible market for new and growing individual investors, fostering a diverse ownership base within the county's SFR sector.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 02:13 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFrio (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail