Crosby (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crosby (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crosby (TX)
1,797
Total Investors in Crosby (TX)
727
Investor Owned SFR in Crosby (TX)
596(33.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
683
SFR Owned
560
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
44
SFR Owned
46
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 596 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Crosby County, TX, Acquiring 52.4% of Q4 SFR Purchases
Landlords own 596 SFR properties, representing 33.2% of the market in Crosby County, TX, with individual investors holding 94.0% of these. Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.5% of investor-owned housing, while institutional activity remains negligible. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 52.4% of all SFR purchases, often at significant discounts to homeowners, with the market demonstrating net buyer sentiment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 94.0% of the 596 landlord-owned SFR properties in Crosby County, TX.
A vast majority of landlord properties, 98.5%, are rented, and 85.2% were acquired with cash. Individual landlords account for 683 of the 727 total landlord entities, underlining their overwhelming presence.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at a 44.1% discount, paying $90,512 compared to homeowners' $162,057.
Landlord pricing swung from a 2.5% premium in Q3 to a substantial 44.1% discount in Q4, with highly volatile quarter-over-quarter gaps. Average landlord acquisition prices notably appreciated by 73.2% from $53,677 during 2020-2023 to $92,982 in 2025, indicating significant market value growth.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 52.4% of all SFR purchases in Crosby County, TX, during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 90.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4, while institutional investors (Tier 09) had no purchasing activity. Single-property landlords, representing new entrants, bought 81.8% of the landlord-acquired properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.5% of investor-owned SFR in Crosby County, TX.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no investor-owned SFR in the county, emphasizing the market's local investor base. The single-property tier alone accounts for 80.9% of all investor-owned properties, signaling the backbone of the local rental market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in the 11-20 property tier in Crosby County, TX, holding 85.7% of properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, owning 93.2% of single-property holdings and 100.0% of two-property portfolios. Even a medium-large tier (51-100 properties) is entirely individual-owned, showing a fragmented company presence.
Geographic Distribution
TX-Crosby-79357 leads Crosby County, TX, with 243 investor-owned properties.
The zip code TX-Crosby-79235 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, albeit for only 1 property. TX-Crosby-79370 is a notable hotspot with 98 investor-owned properties and a significant 58.3% ownership rate, indicating strong market penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Crosby County, TX, are strong net buyers with a 7.86x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
All landlords collectively purchased 55 properties against 7 sells in 2025, continuing a trend from 2024 (41 buys vs 8 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded transaction activity in any timeframe.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 53.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Crosby County, TX.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) conducted 14 of the 15 landlord transactions, with single-property buyers paying an average of $77,692. A small 7.7% of single-property transactions were inter-landlord trades, signaling a market mostly driven by acquisitions from non-investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 94.0% of the 596 landlord-owned SFR properties in Crosby County, TX.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, individual investors are the predominant force in the SFR rental market, holding 560 properties, which accounts for 94.0% of the 596 investor-owned SFR properties. Companies, in contrast, own only 46 properties, representing a mere 7.7% of the total investor portfolio, challenging common narratives about corporate dominance.

Landlord-owned SFR properties constitute 33.2% of all 1,797 SFR properties in the county, indicating a significant investor presence in the local housing market. This substantial share highlights the role of landlords in providing rental housing within the community.

The portfolio composition reveals a strong rental-focused strategy, with 587 properties (98.5% of investor-owned SFR) identified as rented. This signifies that almost all investor acquisitions are geared towards generating rental income rather than short-term flipping or personal use.

Furthermore, cash transactions are a dominant method of acquisition for landlords in Crosby County, TX, with 508 properties (85.2% of the total portfolio) acquired without financing. This high percentage suggests financial stability or strategic cash deployment by investors, distinguishing them from traditional homeowners who typically rely on mortgages.

The landscape of landlords is heavily skewed towards individual ownership, with 683 out of 727 total landlord entities being individuals (93.9%). This indicates that the investor market is primarily driven by smaller, local players rather than large corporate entities, with a 15.5:1 ratio of individual to company landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at a 44.1% discount, paying $90,512 compared to homeowners' $162,057.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Crosby County, TX, demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $90,512 – a substantial $71,545 (44.1%) discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $162,057. This suggests strategic purchasing or access to distress sales by investors.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable volatility quarter-over-quarter. After paying a 2.5% premium in Q3 2025 ($115,458 vs $112,607) and a 13.4% premium in Q2 2025 ($137,983 vs $121,652), landlords reversed course dramatically to achieve a significant discount in Q4 2025.

Looking at annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price surged from $40,715 in 2024 to $92,982 in 2025, representing a 128.4% increase. This steep rise in average prices indicates a rapidly appreciating market or a shift towards higher-value property acquisitions by landlords.

Comparing the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average acquisition price of $53,677 for landlords to the 2025 average of $92,982 reveals a substantial 73.2% price appreciation over this period. This trend underscores the strong growth in property values, making landlord investments more lucrative.

Despite the lack of recorded distinct property purchases for landlords in Q4 2025, the calculated average acquisition price indicates that the few transactions that did occur were highly favorable for investors, capturing properties at significantly lower price points than homeowners in the same period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 52.4% of all SFR purchases in Crosby County, TX, during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in the Crosby County, TX, housing market during Q4 2025, acquiring 11 out of 21 total SFR properties sold, which accounts for a dominant 52.4% share of all purchases. This indicates a robust investor appetite and a significant portion of market activity driven by rental property acquisition.

The Q4 purchasing activity was overwhelmingly concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who were responsible for 10 properties, or 90.9% of all landlord purchases. This highlights the crucial role smaller-scale investors play in the county's real estate market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, purchasing 9 properties (81.8% of all landlord buys) across 13 distinct entities in Q4 2025. This suggests a notable entry of new or expanding small-scale investors into the market, often acquiring their first or second rental property.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity in Crosby County, TX, during Q4 2025, acquiring 0 properties. This emphasizes the market's reliance on smaller, local investors rather than large corporate entities.

Beyond single-property buyers, two-property landlords (Tier 02) purchased 1 property (9.1% of landlord buys) by 1 entity, and large landlords (Tier 101-1000) also acquired 1 property (9.1%) by 1 entity. This diversified activity within the mom-and-pop and mid-size categories further illustrates the varied landscape of local investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.5% of investor-owned SFR in Crosby County, TX.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the investor-owned SFR market, controlling 597 properties, which represents an overwhelming 98.5% of the total 606 landlord-owned properties. This distribution clearly indicates that smaller-scale investors are the primary drivers of the rental housing supply in the county.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) category alone accounts for the vast majority of investor-owned properties, totaling 490 homes or 80.9% of all landlord-held SFR. This highlights the foundational role of first-time and single-property investors in the local market, often seen as entry points into real estate investment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), defined as owning 1000+ properties, hold 0 properties in Crosby County, TX, representing 0.0% of the investor-owned market. This absence of large-scale corporate players underscores the localized and fragmented nature of the county's SFR rental market.

Beyond single-property owners, smaller portfolio landlords (Tiers 02-04) contribute significantly: two-property landlords hold 44 properties (7.3%), while landlords owning 3-5 properties control 54 homes (8.9%), and those with 6-10 properties own 9 homes (1.5%). These tiers further solidify the mom-and-pop dominance.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) also have a minimal presence, with the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier holding 7 properties (1.2%) and the medium-large (51-100 properties) tier owning just 1 property (0.2%). The distribution across all tiers firmly establishes Crosby County, TX, as a market almost exclusively shaped by smaller investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in the 11-20 property tier in Crosby County, TX, holding 85.7% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, individual investors predominantly own smaller portfolios, controlling 93.2% of single-property holdings and 100.0% of two-property portfolios. This demonstrates that entry-level and small-scale real estate investment is almost exclusively the domain of individuals.

The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs within the 'Small-medium' tier (11-20 properties). In this tier, companies own 6 properties (85.7%), while individuals hold just 1 property (14.3%), signaling where corporate structures begin to gain a foothold in larger portfolios.

Despite the general individual dominance, companies maintain a presence even in smaller tiers, owning 34 properties (6.8%) in the single-property tier and 2 properties (22.2%) in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier. This suggests some corporate entities are active in building smaller portfolios.

Conversely, individual investors are not entirely absent from larger portfolio sizes. The medium-large (51-100 properties) tier is 100.0% individually owned, with 1 property, indicating that a select few individual investors manage significantly larger portfolios without incorporating as companies.

Overall, the ownership structure by tier in Crosby County, TX, reveals a clear progression: individuals establish initial and small portfolios, companies become dominant in the mid-size (11-20 properties) segment, and institutional presence remains negligible across all tiers, reinforcing a market driven by diverse local players.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TX-Crosby-79357 leads Crosby County, TX, with 243 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, the zip code 79357 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting 243 landlord-owned SFR properties. This represents a 35.5% investor ownership rate within that specific area, indicating a significant concentration of rental housing.

Following closely, zip code 79322 also demonstrates a substantial investor presence with 155 landlord-owned properties, making up 25.7% of its SFR market. These two zip codes collectively form the core of the investor-owned housing supply in the county by sheer volume.

While having fewer properties by count, TX-Crosby-79370 exhibits an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 58.3%, with 98 landlord-owned properties. This particular zip code is a market hotspot where a majority of SFR properties are investor-held, signaling a mature rental market.

The zip code TX-Crosby-79235 registers the highest investor ownership percentage at 100.0%, though this is based on a single investor-owned property. This extreme percentage, while statistically significant for that area, does not reflect a large-scale concentration of properties.

The distribution reveals that the top 5 sub-geographies by property count (79357, 79322, 79343, 79370, 79235) largely overlap with the top 5 by percentage. This indicates that areas with high investor penetration also tend to be the areas with the most investor-owned properties, showing clear geographic concentration within Crosby County, TX.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Crosby County, TX, are strong net buyers with a 7.86x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, landlords have consistently demonstrated a strong net buyer position, significantly expanding their portfolios. In 2025, they purchased 55 properties while selling only 7, resulting in an impressive buy/sell ratio of 7.86x, indicating aggressive acquisition.

This buying trend continued from the previous year, with 2024 seeing landlords acquire 41 properties against 8 sales, yielding a 5.13x buy/sell ratio. The sustained high ratio across both years underscores a market where investors are actively accumulating SFR assets.

Quarterly transaction data further confirms this trend, with landlords buying 15 properties and selling 2 in Q4 2025, maintaining a net buyer status. This consistent activity across recent quarters signals continued confidence in the local real estate market by investors.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no recorded buy or sell transactions in any provided timeframe, including Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q2 2025, Year 2025, or Year 2024. This highlights their complete absence or insignificance in transaction volumes within Crosby County, TX.

The historical transaction patterns reveal that the Crosby County, TX, market is predominantly influenced by smaller and mid-size landlords who are focused on growing their holdings, with no observable impact from large institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 53.6% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Crosby County, TX.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Crosby County, TX, were central to the Q4 2025 housing market, participating in 15 out of 28 total SFR transactions, which accounts for a significant 53.6% share. This high participation rate indicates that investor activity is a primary driver of market liquidity and property turnover.

The transaction volume was heavily concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who were responsible for 14 of the 15 landlord transactions in Q4 2025. This underscores their vital role in shaping the quarter's market dynamics, contrasting sharply with the absence of institutional activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 13 transactions at an average purchase price of $77,692. This highlights that smaller-scale investors are not only active in acquiring properties but are also securing them at competitive price points.

Interestingly, a single transaction by a large landlord (Tier 101-1000) occurred at a significantly higher average purchase price of $167,429. This suggests that while large investors are rare in this county, their purchases, when they occur, might involve higher-value properties compared to the typical mom-and-pop acquisition.

Inter-landlord trading remained minimal in Q4 2025; only 1 out of 13 single-property transactions (7.7%) involved buying from another landlord. This low percentage indicates that most landlord acquisitions are from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers, rather than properties circulating within the investor pool.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Crosby County, TX: Mom-and-pops dominate 98.5% of SFR, securing 52.4% of Q4 buys
Holdings
Landlords own 596 SFR properties, representing 33.2% of the total SFR market in Crosby County, TX, with individual investors holding 560 properties (94.0%) and companies owning 46 properties (7.7%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $90,512 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial $71,545 (44.1%) discount compared to traditional homeowners at $162,057. Average landlord acquisition prices significantly appreciated by 73.2% from $53,677 during 2020-2023 to $92,982 in 2025.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 11 properties, capturing 52.4% of all SFR sales in Crosby County, TX. This activity was led by single-property landlords, with 13 entities entering the market and acquiring 9 properties.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned housing in Crosby County, TX, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding no observed properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (94.0% of holdings overall), with companies taking majority control primarily in the 11-20 property tier (85.7% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords in Crosby County, TX, are strong net buyers with a 7.86x buy/sell ratio (55 buys vs 7 sells) in 2025, but institutional investors show no recorded transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Crosby County, TX, is significantly shaped by landlord activity, with investors owning 596 SFR properties, representing 33.2% of the county's total SFR market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who collectively hold 560 properties (94.0% of investor-owned SFR), while companies account for a modest 46 properties (7.7%). The vast majority of these holdings are concentrated in mom-and-pop portfolios, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a commanding 98.5% of all investor-owned housing, underscoring the fragmented and locally-driven nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior in Crosby County, TX, demonstrates a clear focus on acquisition and value. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 52.4% of all SFR purchases, often at substantial discounts, paying $90,512—a 44.1% reduction from the $162,057 paid by traditional homeowners. This ability to acquire at lower price points highlights strategic buying. The market has also seen significant price appreciation, with average landlord acquisition prices climbing 73.2% from 2020-2023 to 2025. Landlords are net buyers across all timeframes, demonstrating a consistent growth strategy with a 7.86x buy/sell ratio in 2025, predominantly by mom-and-pop investors who represent 90.9% of Q4 landlord purchases.

This data reveals a resilient and locally-driven investor market in Crosby County, TX, where individual and small-scale landlords are actively expanding their portfolios, securing properties at favorable prices, and contributing significantly to the rental housing supply. The complete absence of institutional investor activity underscores that the market dynamics are fundamentally shaped by the accumulation strategies of mom-and-pop landlords, pointing to continued local influence in the county's housing landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 01:56 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCrosby (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail