Union (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Union (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Union (TN)
5,937
Total Investors in Union (TN)
2,082
Investor Owned SFR in Union (TN)
1,631(27.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,961
SFR Owned
1,526
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
121
SFR Owned
123
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,631 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Union County, TN with 99.2% Ownership, Consistently Net Buyers
Landlords in Union County, TN own 1,631 SFR properties, representing 27.5% of the total market, with individuals holding a commanding 93.6% share. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.2%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 29.1% of all SFR purchases and demonstrated a strong net buyer position with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio for the quarter, though institutional investors were neutral.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors hold 93.6% of Union County's 1,631 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A vast majority, 99.1% of landlord-owned SFR properties, are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. Furthermore, 84.4% of these properties were acquired with cash, reflecting substantial unleveraged investment.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 saw a 25.7% discount versus homeowners in Union County, TN.
Landlord pricing in Union County, TN shows extreme quarter-over-quarter volatility, swinging from a 57.2% discount in Q1 2025 to premiums of 39.2% in Q3 and 24.8% in Q2. Despite no Q4 landlord property acquisitions, the annual average landlord price appreciated by 21.9% from 2020-2023 ($315,281) to 2025 ($384,254).
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 93.8% of Q4 SFR purchases in Union County, TN, securing 29.1% of the overall market.
Of the 55 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 16 transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated new acquisitions, buying 13 properties, representing 81.2% of all landlord purchases, with 19 entities active in this tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Union County, TN.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 1,494 properties or 90.3% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, owning only 4 properties, which is 0.2% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Union County, TN starting at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, controlling 75.0%.
Individual investors dominate the smaller tiers, holding 94.4% of single-property portfolios and 92.9% of two-property portfolios. Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still constitute the majority at 60.0% ownership, indicating their pervasive presence across most landlord tiers.
Geographic Distribution
TN-Union-37807 leads Union County, TN with 757 investor-owned properties, while 37870 has highest penetration at 60.9%.
The zip code 37866 shows strong investor activity, ranking second in properties with 402 and third in ownership rate at 41.2%. High-count areas like 37807 (24.8% rate) do not always correlate with the highest investor penetration rates, as shown by 37870's top rate despite lower total property counts.
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Union County, TN are strong net buyers with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
For the full year 2025, landlords remained net buyers with a 4.75x buy/sell ratio (95 buys vs 20 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) in Q4 2025 were neutral with 1 buy and 1 sell, and also neutral in 2024 (2 buys vs 2 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 25.3% of Q4 2025 transactions in Union County, TN, with single-property buyers dominating.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, involved in 19 transactions with an average purchase price of $307,363. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) executed only 1 transaction, paying $285,000, which is 7.3% less than single-property buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors hold 93.6% of Union County's 1,631 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Union County, TN collectively own 1,631 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a significant 27.5% share of the total 5,937 SFR properties in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 1,526 properties, which accounts for 93.6% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, companies own just 123 properties, or 7.5% of the total landlord portfolio, challenging narratives of corporate dominance in this county.

The rental focus of these investments is clear, with 1,617 properties (99.1% of landlord-owned SFR) classified as rented. This indicates a highly active rental market driven by investor demand.

A substantial 84.4% of landlord properties (1,377 properties) were acquired with cash, signaling a preference for unleveraged investments. Only 15.6% (254 properties) are financed, suggesting a lower reliance on debt compared to many other markets.

In terms of entity counts, individual landlords are 16.2 times more prevalent than company landlords, with 1,961 individual entities compared to just 121 company entities. This high ratio reinforces the mom-and-pop structure of the investor market in Union County, TN.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 saw a 25.7% discount versus homeowners in Union County, TN.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Union County, TN secured a substantial average discount of $98,555, paying $285,011 per property compared to homeowners who paid $383,566. This represents a significant 25.7% price advantage for landlords, though it's important to note this average is based on 0 reported landlord acquisitions in the quarter.

The landlord-homeowner price gap in Union County, TN demonstrated extreme volatility throughout 2025. Landlords experienced a massive 57.2% discount in Q1 (paying $152,801 vs homeowners' $356,971), then paid premiums of 24.8% in Q2 and 39.2% in Q3, before reverting to a discount in Q4.

Despite the quarterly fluctuations in price advantage, the average landlord acquisition price has trended upwards annually, increasing from $315,281 during the 2020-2023 period to $350,211 in 2024, and further to $384,254 in 2025. This indicates a consistent appreciation in property values for investors over the past few years.

The reported average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 stands at $285,011, which is notably lower than the 2025 annual average of $384,254. However, with 0 reported landlord properties purchased in Q4, this specific quarterly average should be interpreted with caution regarding actual market activity.

The inconsistency in landlord pricing relative to homeowners suggests that investor strategies in Union County, TN are highly opportunistic, capitalizing on specific market conditions or distressed properties to achieve significant discounts when available, rather than a consistent pricing strategy across all quarters.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 93.8% of Q4 SFR purchases in Union County, TN, securing 29.1% of the overall market.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Union County, TN were active buyers, securing 16 of the 55 total SFR purchases, which represents a 29.1% share of the market. This indicates a substantial portion of residential sales are transitioning to rental stock.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 15 properties, or 93.8% of all landlord purchases. This high concentration underscores their continued influence as the primary growth engine for the investor-owned market in this county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, responsible for acquiring 13 properties, making up 81.2% of all landlord purchases. This tier also saw 19 distinct entities make purchases, suggesting a healthy influx of new or expanding small-scale investors.

In contrast to the significant mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a minor 6.2% of total landlord acquisitions. This highlights the limited direct large-scale corporate investment in Union County, TN for the quarter.

The combined activity from Tier 02 (two-property owners) and Tier 04 (small landlords with 6-10 properties) each contributed 1 purchase, collectively adding 12.4% to the landlord acquisition volume. This distribution further emphasizes the decentralized, small-investor driven nature of the market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Union County, TN.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), defined as owning 1 to 10 properties, command an overwhelming 99.2% share of all investor-owned SFR properties in Union County, TN, totaling 1,642 properties. This indicates a highly fragmented market structure dominated by small-scale investors.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 1,494 properties, comprising 90.3% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This massive concentration highlights the foundational role of first-time or minimal landlords in the county's rental housing supply.

Following Tier 01, the two-property landlord tier (Tier 02) holds 70 properties (4.2%), and small landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) own 48 properties (2.9%), further solidifying the dominance of smaller portfolios in the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Union County, TN, controlling only 4 properties, which translates to a mere 0.2% of all investor-owned SFR. This significantly contrasts with national trends and media perceptions of institutional buying.

The distribution clearly illustrates that the overwhelming majority of investor-owned SFR housing in Union County, TN is held by individuals and small businesses, providing a localized, decentralized rental market structure.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Union County, TN starting at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, controlling 75.0%.
Detailed Findings

In Union County, TN, individual investors maintain a dominant position in the smaller landlord tiers. They hold 94.4% of single-property portfolios (1,425 properties) and 92.9% of two-property portfolios (65 properties), underscoring the strong presence of individual, small-scale owners at the market's entry points.

The shift towards corporate ownership becomes evident in the mid-size tiers. While individuals still account for 77.1% of properties in the 3-5 property tier and 60.0% in the 6-10 property tier, companies begin to increase their proportional holdings significantly.

The crossover point where companies gain majority control occurs at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier. In this tier, companies own 3 properties (75.0% of the tier's total), while individuals hold only 1 property (25.0%). This marks a critical transition in ownership dynamics by portfolio size.

Companies demonstrate their highest concentration in the Small-medium (11-20) tier at 75.0%, indicating that as portfolios grow beyond 10 properties, corporate structures become the preferred ownership model. This pattern suggests strategic scaling by companies at specific investment thresholds.

Conversely, individual investors show their highest concentration in the single-property tier, where they own 1,425 properties, representing 94.4% of that tier's holdings. This reinforces the idea that the vast majority of 'new' or first-time landlords in Union County, TN are individuals.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-Union-37807 leads Union County, TN with 757 investor-owned properties, while 37870 has highest penetration at 60.9%.
Detailed Findings

Within Union County, TN, the zip code 37807 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 757 SFR units. This sub-geography represents a major hub for landlord activity in the county, even though its investor ownership rate is 24.8%.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is found in zip code 37870, where a remarkable 60.9% of all SFR properties are investor-owned. This indicates an extremely high landlord penetration rate, suggesting a market heavily geared towards rental housing in this specific area.

The zip code 37866 demonstrates significant dual importance, ranking second in investor-owned property count with 402 properties and third in investor ownership rate at 41.2%. This area combines both a substantial volume of investor-owned homes and a high market penetration.

While 37807 has the highest number of investor properties, its 24.8% ownership rate is the lowest among the top five by percentage. Conversely, 37870, with the highest percentage, is only fifth in total investor-owned properties (84), illustrating distinct patterns of investor preference for volume versus market saturation.

These geographic distributions reveal that investor activity in Union County, TN is not uniform. Investors are either targeting areas with a large inventory of properties (e.g., 37807) or areas where they can achieve high market penetration (e.g., 37870 and 37825 with 41.4% investor-owned rate).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords in Union County, TN are strong net buyers with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Union County, TN consistently maintain a strong net buyer position, actively expanding their portfolios. In Q4 2025 alone, they purchased 24 properties while selling only 4, resulting in a robust 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating significant accumulation.

This trend of accumulation is sustained across longer timeframes. For the entire year 2025, landlords bought 95 properties against 20 sells, yielding a 4.75x buy/sell ratio. Year 2024 saw an even higher ratio of 6.06x (103 buys vs 17 sells), demonstrating persistent growth in investor-owned stock.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) show a more balanced transaction pattern. In Q4 2025, they were neutral with 1 buy and 1 sell, signifying neither growth nor divestment. Similarly, in 2024, they were also neutral with 2 buys and 2 sells.

Despite being net buyers for the full year 2025 (5 buys vs 2 sells), institutional activity remains at very low volumes, making their impact on the overall market significantly less than that of smaller, mom-and-pop landlords. Their transaction patterns suggest highly selective or strategic moves rather than broad market accumulation.

The high buy/sell ratios among all landlords, particularly in recent quarters, indicate a confident and growing investor market in Union County, TN, primarily driven by smaller investors, while larger institutional players appear to be largely on the sidelines for active expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 25.3% of Q4 2025 transactions in Union County, TN, with single-property buyers dominating.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Union County, TN were involved in 24 of the 95 total SFR transactions, capturing a substantial 25.3% market share. This highlights the significant role investors play in the local housing market's liquidity and property flow.

The vast majority of landlord transaction activity came from single-property owners (Tier 01), who participated in 19 transactions. These buyers paid an average price of $307,363, demonstrating that smaller landlords are actively acquiring properties at a mid-market price point.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) had minimal transaction activity in Q4 2025, with only 1 reported transaction at an average purchase price of $285,000. This price is 7.3% lower than that paid by single-property landlords, suggesting a potential for higher efficiency or targeting of different property types by larger entities.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied significantly by tier. Two-property landlords (Tier 02) showed the highest reliance on buying from other landlords, with 100.0% of their 1 transaction originating from another investor. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) sourced 2 out of their 19 transactions (10.5%) from other landlords.

The wide price spread between tiers is notable; the highest average purchase price was $307,363 for Tier 01, while the lowest was $37,500 for Tier 04 (6-10 properties). This suggests diverse acquisition strategies and property types targeted by different investor sizes, with smaller landlords potentially entering at higher price points.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Union County, TN Market, Holding 99.2% of Investor Homes
Holdings
Landlords in Union County, TN own 1,631 SFR properties, representing 27.5% of the market. Individual investors hold 1,526 properties (93.6%), while companies own 123 properties (7.5%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $285,011 in Q4 2025, securing a 25.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $383,566. However, landlord acquisition prices saw extreme quarterly volatility, with significant swings between discounts and premiums throughout 2025.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 16 properties, comprising 29.1% of all SFR sales in Union County, TN. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, representing 81.2% of these purchases with 19 entities involved.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned housing in Union County, TN. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 94.4% of single-property homes. However, companies gain majority control in portfolios of 11-20 properties, where they own 75.0% of properties.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are robust net buyers in Union County, TN, with a 6.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (24 buys vs 4 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier), however, showed a neutral position in Q4 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Union County, TN is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These individual and small entity investors collectively own 1,631 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 27.5% of the county's total SFR market. A staggering 93.6% of these landlord-owned properties are held by individuals, while companies account for a mere 7.5%. Specifically, mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) control an immense 99.2% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone holding 90.3% of the portfolio. This highly fragmented ownership structure clearly indicates that the local rental market is primarily sustained by individual investors, not large corporations.

Investor behavior in Union County, TN demonstrates a strong appetite for property acquisition, with landlords acting as consistent net buyers over the past two years. In Q4 2025, landlords secured 29.1% of all SFR purchases, and for the entire year 2025, they maintained a substantial 4.75x buy/sell ratio (95 buys vs 20 sells). While landlords secured a 25.7% discount compared to homeowners in Q4, pricing trends have been highly volatile, swinging from significant discounts to large premiums quarter-over-quarter. Institutional investors, however, show a more cautious approach, exhibiting neutral buy/sell activity in Q4 2025 and often throughout the year, suggesting they are not actively expanding their very limited footprint in this market.

The findings underscore that the Union County, TN SFR rental market is profoundly shaped by local, independent investors. Their continuous net buying activity, coupled with their commanding market share, ensures a steady supply of rental housing within the county. The minimal presence and transactional activity of institutional players suggest that Union County remains a stronghold for the traditional, small-portfolio landlord, defying national narratives of corporate residential real estate takeovers. This dynamic creates a distinct market environment, where local factors and individual investment strategies likely hold more sway than large-scale institutional movements.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:12 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyUnion (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison