Sumner (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sumner (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sumner (TN)
63,729
Total Investors in Sumner (TN)
12,453
Investor Owned SFR in Sumner (TN)
10,859(17.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,245
SFR Owned
8,355
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,208
SFR Owned
2,723
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,859 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Sumner County's SFR Market Amidst Consistent Investor Accumulation
Landlords in Sumner County own 10,859 SFR properties (17.0% of the market), with individual investors holding 76.9%. Landlords consistently secure a 22.5% discount on purchases, and 85.4% of Q4 activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords who remain strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Sumner County's SFR rental market, holding 76.9% of 10,859 landlord-held properties.
Most landlord-owned properties are rented (10,606 or 97.7%) and were acquired with cash (7,038 or 64.8%). Individual landlords significantly outnumber company landlords by over 9 times.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords consistently secure significant discounts, paying 22.5% less than homeowners in Q4 2025 in Sumner County.
The Q4 landlord discount was $117,115, securing properties at an average of $403,849 compared to homeowners at $520,964. This discount has fluctuated between 18.5% and 22.5% over the past year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 19.0% of all SFR purchases in Sumner County during Q4 2025, totaling 146 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) drove the market, accounting for 85.4% of landlord purchases. Single-property landlords alone purchased 108 properties and represented 152 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 83.9% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Sumner County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 66.8% of investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) control a comparatively smaller share at 6.9%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership surpasses individuals at the 21-50 property tier, demonstrating a clear shift towards corporate scale.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 91.2% of single-property SFRs. In stark contrast, companies own 90.5% of properties in the 51-100 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 37066 in Sumner County leads with 3,924 investor-owned SFR properties.
While 37066 has the most properties, Zip Code 37049 shows the highest investor saturation at 60.0%. Zip Codes 37066 and 37048 appear in both top 5 lists, indicating high activity and penetration.
Historical Transactions
All landlords in Sumner County remain strong net buyers, with 212 purchases versus 67 sales in Q4 2025.
Landlords maintained a robust buy/sell ratio of 3.16x in Q4, leading to a net accumulation of 145 properties. Institutional investors also acted as net buyers in Q4, with 6 purchases against 4 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 17.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Sumner County, buying 212 properties.
Single-property landlords dominated Q4 buying with 152 transactions, while institutional investors made 6 purchases. Institutional investors paid 6.5% less ($363,501) than single-property landlords ($388,637).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Sumner County's SFR rental market, holding 76.9% of 10,859 landlord-held properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sumner County, TN, collectively own 10,859 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 17.0% of the total 63,729 SFR properties in the county.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate this market, holding 8,355 properties (76.9% of all investor-owned SFR), while companies own 2,723 properties (25.1%).

A staggering 97.7% of landlord-owned SFR properties, totaling 10,606 properties, are rented out, highlighting the strong rental-focused nature of investor activity in Sumner County.

Cash purchases significantly outweigh financed acquisitions, with 7,038 (64.8%) of investor-owned properties being held outright compared to 3,821 (35.2%) financed properties.

Individual landlords, numbering 11,245 entities, form the vast majority of the landlord base, outnumbering company landlords (1,208 entities) by a ratio of approximately 9.3 to 1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords consistently secure significant discounts, paying 22.5% less than homeowners in Q4 2025 in Sumner County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sumner County consistently acquired properties at a substantial discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, paying an average of $403,849 — a remarkable $117,115 (22.5%) less than the average homeowner price of $520,964.

This significant price advantage for landlords has remained strong throughout 2025, with discounts ranging from 18.5% in Q2 ($95,478 difference) to 22.5% in Q4, demonstrating their consistent ability to secure favorable deals.

Comparing broader acquisition trends, the average landlord price in 2025 (averaging $415,491) saw an approximate 8.08% increase from the pandemic-era average of $374,100 in 2020-2023.

The consistent price advantage underscores a strategic difference in how landlords approach the market versus traditional buyers, prioritizing value-driven acquisitions.

The average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 was $403,849, following a slightly higher Q3 at $414,674, indicating some quarterly fluctuation but maintaining a strong position relative to homeowners.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 19.0% of all SFR purchases in Sumner County during Q4 2025, totaling 146 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Sumner County demonstrated significant buying activity, accounting for 146 (19.0%) of the total 767 SFR properties purchased in the market.

The market was predominantly driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively acquiring 135 properties, representing a commanding 85.4% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

New entrants and single-property owners (Tier 01) were particularly active, purchasing 108 properties and bringing 152 new entities into the landlord market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired a modest 6 properties, making up just 3.8% of the total landlord purchases in Q4.

The highest concentration of Q4 activity by entities was observed in Tier 01, where 152 entities acquired 108 properties, underscoring the fragmented and accessible nature of the local investor market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 83.9% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Sumner County.
Detailed Findings

Small-scale investors, commonly known as mom-and-pop landlords, hold a dominant position in Sumner County's SFR market, controlling a combined 83.9% of all investor-owned properties (Tiers 01-04).

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment alone accounts for the largest share, owning 7,544 properties, which represents a substantial 66.8% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

In contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, command a relatively modest 6.9% of the market, totaling 778 properties.

The distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, with smaller landlords far outweighing larger, corporate entities in terms of overall property holdings.

This sustained small investor activity suggests a resilient local market, less susceptible to the concentrated influence of large-scale corporate buying.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership surpasses individuals at the 21-50 property tier, demonstrating a clear shift towards corporate scale.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Sumner County, holding 91.2% of single-property SFRs and maintaining over 50% ownership up to the 11-20 property tier.

A significant crossover point occurs at the 21-50 property tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, with companies holding 91 properties (50.6%) compared to individuals' 89 properties (49.4%).

This trend accelerates dramatically in larger portfolios; for medium-large landlords (51-100 properties), companies control a massive 90.5% of holdings (76 properties), highlighting corporate dominance at scale.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is clearly in the single-property tier (Tier 01) at 91.2%, while company concentration dramatically increases in tiers beyond 20 properties, peaking at 90.5% in the 51-100 property range.

The distribution signifies that while the entry-level landlord market is individual-driven, as portfolios grow, the operational and financial advantages of corporate structures become evident, leading to a shift in ownership type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 37066 in Sumner County leads with 3,924 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Sumner County, Zip Code 37066 emerges as the primary hub for investor-owned SFR properties, holding 3,924 properties and representing 19.4% of its local SFR market.

Following closely, Zip Code 37075 ranks second by count with 3,287 investor-owned properties at a 14.3% ownership rate, demonstrating significant geographic concentration of investor holdings.

While 37066 leads in sheer count, Zip Code 37049 exhibits the highest investor penetration, with a remarkable 60.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, showcasing a highly landlord-saturated micro-market.

Zip Code 37048 also stands out, appearing in both the top 5 by count (434 properties) and top 5 by percentage (21.9%), suggesting it is a particularly attractive market for landlords with both high volume and high saturation.

The distinction between top regions by count versus by percentage highlights varying market dynamics; some areas attract large volumes of investor properties, while others demonstrate intense investor penetration relative to their total housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords in Sumner County remain strong net buyers, with 212 purchases versus 67 sales in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sumner County are consistently net buyers, demonstrating a strong appetite for accumulation with 212 purchases against just 67 sales in Q4 2025, resulting in a net increase of 145 properties.

The overall buy/sell ratio for all landlords in Q4 stood at a significant 3.16x, indicating a market where landlords are actively expanding their portfolios rather than divesting.

This net buying trend has been consistent throughout 2025, with landlords accumulating 502 properties (873 buys vs. 371 sells) for the year, signaling sustained growth in investor-owned SFRs.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) also acted as net buyers in Q4, acquiring 6 properties and selling 4, for a net gain of 2 properties, continuing their trend of modest accumulation observed throughout 2025 (31 buys vs. 8 sells, net 23).

The buy/sell ratio for all landlords has fluctuated quarterly, peaking in Q4 2025 at 3.16x after a low of 2.00x in Q2, indicating dynamic market conditions but a consistent overall strategy of expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 17.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Sumner County, buying 212 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were significant players in the Sumner County market, comprising 17.1% of all 1,240 SFR transactions and acquiring a total of 212 properties.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated among single-property landlords (Tier 01), who accounted for 152 purchases, clearly leading all other tiers in volume during the quarter.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), while less active in volume with 6 transactions, showed a strategic advantage in pricing, paying an average of $363,501 — which is 6.5% less than the $388,637 average paid by single-property landlords.

Inter-landlord trading was most pronounced among institutional investors, with 50.0% of their 6 purchases (3 transactions) originating from other landlords, signaling more internal market liquidity among larger entities.

A wide price spread exists across tiers, with large landlords (101-1000 properties) paying the highest average of $495,089, while small-medium landlords (21-50 properties) secured the lowest average price at $278,592, a difference of $216,497.

Despite their smaller share of overall transactions, the higher inter-landlord purchase percentage for institutional investors (50.0%) suggests a more sophisticated or targeted acquisition strategy within the existing landlord ecosystem.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Sumner County's SFR Market Amidst Consistent Investor Accumulation
Holdings
Landlords in Sumner County own 10,859 SFR properties, representing 17.0% of the total market, with individual investors holding 76.9% (8,355 properties) and companies 25.1% (2,723 properties).
Pricing
Landlords consistently paid $403,849 in Q4 2025—a 22.5% discount ($117,115) compared to traditional homeowners at $520,964, demonstrating a significant price advantage.
Activity
In Q4, landlords acquired 146 properties, comprising 19.0% of all SFR purchases, with 152 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 85.4% of these purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 83.9% of investor-owned housing in Sumner County, while institutional investors (1000+) own a modest 6.9%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command 91.2% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 21-50 property tier, holding 50.6% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
All landlords in Sumner County are robust net buyers with a 3.16x buy/sell ratio (212 buys vs 67 sells) in Q4, and institutional investors also maintained a net buyer position (6 buys vs 4 sells).
Market Narrative

The Single Family Residential (SFR) market in Sumner County, Tennessee, is substantially influenced by investors, who collectively own 10,859 properties, accounting for 17.0% of the total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who possess 8,355 properties (76.9% of all investor-owned SFR), compared to companies owning 2,723 properties (25.1%). The vast majority of these properties, 97.7%, are rented out, emphasizing a strong focus on rental income within the investor community across Sumner County.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrates a strong accumulation trend, with landlords making 146 purchases, representing 19.0% of all SFR transactions. These investors consistently secure significant pricing advantages, paying an average of $403,849 in Q4, which is a 22.5% discount compared to the $520,964 paid by traditional homeowners. All landlords remain net buyers, evidenced by a 3.16x buy/sell ratio (212 buys vs 67 sells), and even institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a net buyer position with 6 acquisitions against 4 sales.

The market structure in Sumner County is heavily skewed towards smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 83.9% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional players hold just 6.9%. While individual investors lead in smaller portfolios, corporate entities gain majority ownership in portfolios exceeding 20 properties, showcasing a clear scalability advantage. This fragmented yet actively accumulating market suggests a robust environment for smaller landlords, with strategic opportunities for larger players in specific Sumner County sub-geographies like Zip Code 37049, which has 60.0% investor saturation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:11 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySumner (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail