Stewart (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stewart (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stewart (TN)
3,917
Total Investors in Stewart (TN)
1,457
Investor Owned SFR in Stewart (TN)
1,122(28.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,384
SFR Owned
1,057
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
73
SFR Owned
78
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,122 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Stewart County: Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Growth, Secure Deep Q4 Price Discounts
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords dominate Stewart County's SFR market, controlling 99.3% of 1,122 investor-owned properties. In Q4, these landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 34.1% of all SFR sales at an impressive 34.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling strong local accumulation and a distinct lack of institutional influence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Dominate Stewart County, Holding 94.2% of 1,122 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
A substantial 98.5% of investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a strong focus on rental income. The majority (84.5%) of properties are held outright in cash, with only 15.5% being financed, indicating low reliance on debt.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secure 34.7% Discount in Q4, Paying $95,096 Less Than Homeowners
Landlord discounts varied significantly in 2025, from a low of 20.8% in Q2 to a high of 51.8% in Q3. Overall, acquisition prices have appreciated 13.3% from the 2020-2023 average of $169,677 to the Year 2025 average of $192,272.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Drive 34.1% of Q4 SFR Purchases; Single-Property Investors Dominate
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4, securing 15 properties. There was no institutional investor (Tier 09) activity recorded in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.3% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Stewart County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 82.4% of all investor-owned SFR. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, controlling just 0.1%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers; Company Ownership Peaks at 50% in Mid-Size Portfolios
Individual investors hold 95.1% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios and 95.9% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios. The closest point to company majority is a 50/50 split with individuals in the small-medium (Tier 21-50) category.
Geographic Distribution
Stewart County's Investor Activity Concentrated in Five Zip Codes, Led by 37058 in Count
TN-Stewart-37058 leads in investor-owned property count with 663 properties (29.7% ownership rate). However, TN-Stewart-37028 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 38.9%, for its 111 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Stewart County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 20.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Overall, landlords increased their net buying position from Year 2024 (3.67x) to Year 2025 (9.89x). Data on institutional investor transactions and inter-landlord trading is not available for this period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Account for 30.3% of Q4 Transactions; Mom-and-Pops Dominate Activity
All 20 landlord transactions in Q4 were from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with single-property (Tier 01) investors paying the highest average price at $186,375. There was no inter-landlord trading activity recorded in Q4.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate Stewart County, Holding 94.2% of 1,122 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market in Stewart County, possessing 1,057 properties, which constitutes 94.2% of the total 1,122 investor-owned SFR properties. This contrasts sharply with company-owned properties, which account for only 78 properties (7.0%).

The prevalence of individual landlords extends to entity counts, with 1,384 individual landlords making up 95.0% of the total 1,457 landlords in the county, versus just 73 company landlords (5.0%). This highlights the grassroots nature of property investment here.

Landlord portfolios are primarily focused on generating rental income, with 1,105 properties (98.5% of investor-owned) currently rented. This signals that virtually all investor-owned SFR in Stewart County serves as rental housing.

A significant majority of investor holdings are acquired without debt, as 948 properties (84.5% of investor-owned) are cash purchases. This suggests a highly capitalized investor base and a potential resilience to interest rate fluctuations compared to markets with heavier reliance on financing.

Conversely, only 174 properties (15.5% of investor-owned) are financed, indicating that Stewart County landlords largely prefer unencumbered assets or possess the capital to avoid mortgage debt for their investments.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secure 34.7% Discount in Q4, Paying $95,096 Less Than Homeowners
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at a significant advantage, paying an average of $179,033. This represents a substantial $95,096 discount, or 34.7% less, compared to traditional homeowners who paid an average of $274,129 for SFR properties.

The price advantage for landlords was highly volatile throughout 2025, peaking at a 51.8% discount ($152,728 less) in Q3 ($141,979 vs $294,707). This was followed by Q4's 34.7% discount, and a narrower 20.8% discount in Q2 ($57,728 less, at $220,181 vs $277,909).

Despite quarterly fluctuations, landlord acquisition prices have shown a notable upward trend since the pandemic era. The average price for properties acquired in Year 2025 stands at $192,272, marking a 13.3% increase from the $169,677 average observed during 2020-2023.

The consistent ability of landlords to purchase properties at a lower price point than traditional homeowners suggests a strategic advantage, likely due to market expertise, cash offers, or targeting of specific property types not typically pursued by owner-occupants.

The lack of purchase data for 2024-Q4 indicates a significant lull in landlord acquisitions during that specific quarter, despite a higher average acquisition price of $246,063 for the properties that were acquired.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Drive 34.1% of Q4 SFR Purchases; Single-Property Investors Dominate
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly impacted the Q4 2025 market in Stewart County, responsible for 15 (34.1%) of the total 44 SFR properties purchased. This indicates that over a third of all SFR sales in the quarter were investor-driven.

The Q4 purchasing activity was exclusively dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively acquired all 15 landlord-owned properties. This demonstrates a robust local investor base driving market transactions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, contributing 12 properties (80.0%) to the landlord purchase total, involving 17 distinct entities. This suggests a vibrant entry point or modest expansion for smaller investors in the market.

Mid-size mom-and-pop landlords also saw activity, with those holding 3-5 properties purchasing 2 properties (13.3%), and landlords with 6-10 properties acquiring 1 property (6.7%). These smaller tiers collectively form the entire purchasing landscape for investors in Q4.

Notably, there was a complete absence of purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09), reinforcing the local and small-scale nature of the investor market in Stewart County for the current quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.3% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Stewart County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the SFR investment landscape in Stewart County, controlling an immense 99.3% of all investor-owned properties. This highlights the market's reliance on smaller, local investors.

The distribution of ownership is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) holding 965 properties, representing a substantial 82.4% of the total landlord-owned SFR.

Two-property landlords (Tier 02) follow with 97 properties (8.3%), and small landlords (Tiers 03-05) own 91 properties (7.8%), further cementing the concentration of ownership within the mom-and-pop segment.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 1 property, which translates to a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in the county.

The data clearly demonstrates that Stewart County's investor-owned housing market is almost entirely composed of small-scale investors, challenging any narrative of widespread corporate landlord dominance in this region.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers; Company Ownership Peaks at 50% in Mid-Size Portfolios
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a commanding presence across all reported tiers in Stewart County, consistently holding the majority share of properties. In the single-property (Tier 01) segment, individuals own 924 properties (95.1%), while companies account for only 48 properties (4.9%).

This individual dominance continues into slightly larger portfolios, with individuals owning 93 properties (95.9%) in the two-property (Tier 02) tier, and 73 properties (80.2%) in the small landlord (Tier 3-5) category, compared to 4 (4.1%) and 18 (19.8%) for companies, respectively.

The share of company ownership gradually increases with tier size, reaching 30.0% (3 properties) in the small landlord (Tier 6-10) category, where individuals still own a majority of 7 properties (70.0%).

The closest a company's share comes to surpassing individual ownership in the provided data is in the small-medium (Tier 21-50) segment, where it reaches a 50.0% split, with 1 individual-owned property and 1 company-owned property.

Even in the medium-large (Tier 51-100) category, individual investors still hold 100.0% of the properties (1 property), indicating that larger-scale company operations are either non-existent or not represented in the available data for these specific tiers in Stewart County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Stewart County's Investor Activity Concentrated in Five Zip Codes, Led by 37058 in Count
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Stewart County are heavily concentrated within a few key zip codes, with TN-Stewart-37058 leading significantly by count, harboring 663 investor-owned SFR properties. This zip code also maintains a robust investor ownership rate of 29.7%.

While TN-Stewart-37058 holds the largest volume of investor properties, TN-Stewart-37028 demonstrates the highest investor penetration rate, with 38.9% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, totaling 111 properties. This highlights areas of strong landlord market share.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned count collectively represent the vast majority of investment activity in the county. These include TN-Stewart-37058 (663 properties), TN-Stewart-37079 (117 properties), TN-Stewart-37028 (111 properties), TN-Stewart-37023 (91 properties), and TN-Stewart-37050 (89 properties).

Examining investor ownership rates reveals other highly penetrated areas beyond just raw counts. TN-Stewart-37050 stands out with a 34.1% investor-owned rate for its 89 properties, and TN-Stewart-37175 shows a 30.6% rate, indicating these are prime areas for rental demand or investor appeal.

The pattern suggests that specific localities within Stewart County are significantly more attractive to landlords, whether for their higher rental yields, affordability, or potential for appreciation, leading to distinct geographical concentrations of investor activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Stewart County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 20.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Stewart County exhibited a highly aggressive net buying posture in Q4 2025, recording 20 purchases against only 1 sale, resulting in an exceptionally high buy-to-sell ratio of 20.0x. This signifies a strong period of portfolio expansion.

Looking at the entire year, landlords maintained a robust net buyer position in Year 2025, with 89 purchases versus 9 sales, yielding a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.89x. This represents a significant increase in acquisition intensity compared to the prior year.

The trend of net buying has strengthened year-over-year, as landlords were also net buyers in Year 2024, but with a lower buy-to-sell ratio of 3.67x (66 buys vs 18 sells). This indicates an accelerated accumulation strategy over time.

Throughout 2025, landlord purchases consistently outstripped sales, with Q3 showing 21 buys vs 2 sells, and Q2 recording 23 buys vs 3 sells, maintaining a strong positive net acquisition trend across all quarters.

Information regarding institutional (1000+ tier) transactions and the percentage of purchases from other landlords is not available in the provided data, preventing a comprehensive analysis of these specific market segments.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Account for 30.3% of Q4 Transactions; Mom-and-Pops Dominate Activity
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Q4 2025 transaction landscape in Stewart County, participating in 20 transactions, which accounts for 30.3% of the total 66 SFR transactions during the quarter. This highlights their considerable market presence.

Transaction activity was entirely concentrated within the mom-and-pop landlord segment (Tiers 01-04), which executed all 20 landlord transactions. This reinforces the pattern of small-scale investors driving market dynamics, with no institutional activity observed.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 17 transactions at an average purchase price of $186,375. This suggests that smaller investors are readily entering the market or expanding their portfolios with individual properties.

Interestingly, single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price among active tiers in Q4 at $186,375. This contrasts with small landlords (Tier 03-05) who paid $134,812 and Tier 06-10 landlords who paid $150,000, indicating a premium paid for entry-level investments.

A notable finding is the complete absence of inter-landlord trading, as 0.0% of purchases in Q4 were acquired from other landlords across all active tiers. This suggests that Q4 landlord acquisitions were primarily sourced from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Stewart County: Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel Strong Growth, Secure Major Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,122 SFR properties in Stewart County, representing 28.6% of the total SFR market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, owning 1,057 properties (94.2% of investor-owned SFR), while companies hold a significantly smaller share of 78 properties (7.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $179,033 in Q4, securing a substantial $95,096 discount (34.7% less) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $274,129. Overall, landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 13.3% from the 2020-2023 average to the Year 2025 average of $192,272.
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 15 properties, accounting for 34.1% of all SFR sales. This activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords, with 17 entities active in the single-property (Tier 01) segment, signaling strong new entry and small-scale expansion.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an immense 99.3% of all investor-owned housing in Stewart County. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 0.1% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all tiers, dominating up to the mid-size landlord segments. The closest point to company parity is a 50.0% tie with individuals in the small-medium (Tier 21-50) portfolio category.
Transactions
Landlords in Stewart County are strong net buyers with a 20.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (20 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no recorded transaction activity in the available data, indicating their absence from the market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Stewart County, Tennessee, is overwhelmingly characterized by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 99.3% of the 1,122 investor-owned SFR properties. This significant portfolio represents 28.6% of the total SFR market of 3,917 properties, underscoring the strong local presence of small-scale investors. Individual landlords alone own 1,057 properties (94.2%), demonstrating a grassroots market where large institutional players have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of investor-held housing.

In Q4 2025, these mom-and-pop investors were highly active, responsible for 34.1% of all SFR purchases in the county, acquiring 15 properties. They exhibited a strategic advantage in pricing, securing properties at an average of $179,033, which is a notable 34.7% discount compared to the $274,129 paid by traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers, evidenced by a 20.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (20 purchases against 1 sale) and a 9.89x ratio for Year 2025, signaling a sustained period of portfolio expansion exclusively by smaller investors.

This data indicates a robust and locally-driven investment market in Stewart County, where individual investors are actively expanding their portfolios, often benefiting from substantial price advantages. The complete absence of institutional activity in Q4 purchases and transactions, combined with the clear dominance of individual investors even in mid-sized tiers, suggests that the local housing market is largely insulated from large corporate influence. This trend points towards a strengthening of localized, owner-operated rental housing, potentially fostering community-centric landlord-tenant relationships.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:11 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyStewart (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct