Morgan (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Morgan (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Morgan (TN)
4,829
Total Investors in Morgan (TN)
1,971
Investor Owned SFR in Morgan (TN)
1,494(30.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,880
SFR Owned
1,389
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
91
SFR Owned
118
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,494 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Morgan County's SFR Market Dominated by Mom-and-Pops, Landlords Secure Deep Discounts
Landlords in Morgan County, TN, own 1,494 SFR properties, with individuals controlling 93.0% of this portfolio, primarily as mom-and-pop operators who dominate 97.8% of investor-owned housing. Despite zero recorded direct landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, landlords consistently secured properties at an impressive 42.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling strong market acumen. Overall, landlords are net buyers in the county, yet institutional investors were net sellers in 2024, highlighting divergent strategies in a market seeing high landlord penetration.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords control 1,494 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals owning 93.0% and companies 7.9%.
Of all investor-owned properties, 98.7% (1,475 properties) are rented out, indicating a strong rental focus. Most landlord properties (1,291 or 86.4%) are cash-funded, while 203 properties (13.6%) are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured deep discounts in 2025-Q4, paying $100,551 (42.0%) less than homeowners.
The price gap significantly widened from Q1's 16.1% discount to Q2's 38.2%, remaining over 40% in Q3 and Q4 2025. Landlord acquisition prices saw an 8.9% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $127,118 to Q4 2025's $138,590.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for a substantial 33.3% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Morgan County, TN.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, making up 84.6% of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, representing 69.2% of investor purchases with 12 entities involved.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control 97.8% of investor-owned SFR in Morgan County, TN.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the vast majority, owning 86.2% of all investor-held properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a minimal 0.2% share, indicating a largely decentralized market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate tiers up to 5 properties, but companies become majority owners in the 6-10 property tier.
Company ownership reaches its highest concentration in the 11-20 property tier at 93.3%. Conversely, single-property (Tier 01) sees the highest individual concentration at 95.2%.
Geographic Distribution
Morgan County's SFR market sees high investor concentration, with two zip codes 100% investor-owned.
Zip code 37887 leads by count with 352 investor-owned properties, while 37872 shows both high count (182 properties) and a high ownership rate (38.0%). This signals highly localized investment hotspots within the county.
Historical Transactions
Morgan County landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.07x buy/sell ratio in 2025, while institutions were net sellers in 2024.
Overall landlord buying intensity significantly increased in 2025, with the Q4 buy/sell ratio surging to 16.0x (16 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors, however, divested more than they acquired in 2024, signaling a cautious approach from larger entities.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords contributed 27.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Morgan County, demonstrating active market participation.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove Q4 transaction volume with 12 activities, paying an average of $141,091. Institutional investors (Tier 09), while less active with 1 transaction, acquired properties at a 29.4% discount compared to Tier 01 buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords control 1,494 SFR properties in Morgan County, with individuals owning 93.0% and companies 7.9%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Morgan County, TN, currently hold a significant portfolio of 1,494 SFR properties, representing 30.9% of the county's total 4,829 SFR market. This high penetration underscores the substantial role investors play in the local housing landscape.

The investor market is overwhelmingly comprised of individual landlords, who own 1,389 properties, accounting for 93.0% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned properties make up a smaller fraction at 118 properties, or 7.9% of the total investor portfolio.

Individual landlords outnumber company landlords by a substantial margin, with 1,880 individual entities compared to just 91 companies. This results in a ratio of approximately 20.7 individual landlords for every company landlord, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the market structure in Morgan County.

A striking 98.7% of landlord-owned SFR properties (1,475 out of 1,494) are rented, clearly demonstrating a strong rental income focus for investors in this county. This nearly universal rental status highlights the role investors play in providing housing for the local population.

The financing structure of investor portfolios reveals a heavy reliance on cash acquisitions, with 1,291 properties (86.4%) purchased outright. Only 203 properties (13.6%) are financed, suggesting a preference for avoiding debt or a market where cash offers are highly competitive.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured deep discounts in 2025-Q4, paying $100,551 (42.0%) less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Morgan County, TN, landlords consistently acquired properties at a substantial discount compared to traditional homeowners throughout 2025. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $138,590, which was $100,551 or 42.0% less than homeowners, who paid $239,141.

This significant price advantage for landlords was a consistent trend across the latter half of 2025, with discounts of 40.0% in Q3 ($107,192 difference) and 38.2% in Q2 ($120,340 difference). The consistent high discounts suggest a strategic advantage or access to different property types for investors.

The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced a dramatic widening from Q1 to Q2 2025; starting at a 16.1% discount in Q1, it jumped to 38.2% in Q2. This indicates a shift in market dynamics where landlords gained considerably more pricing leverage over the year.

Despite the provided data showing zero distinct SFR properties purchased by landlords in 2024 and 2025 quarters, average acquisition prices are still reported, suggesting these figures may represent broader market trends or specific property types. For instance, the average landlord acquisition price for 2025-Q4 was $138,590.

Comparing historical trends, the average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 ($138,590) reflects an 8.9% appreciation from the 2020-2023 period's average of $127,118. This trend indicates a steady increase in property values over time, even with the deep discounts relative to homeowner purchases.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a substantial 33.3% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Morgan County, TN.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Morgan County, TN, were significant players in the Q4 2025 market, making 13 SFR purchases, which constituted 33.3% of the total 39 SFR purchases made in the quarter. This highlights their considerable influence on the local housing transaction volume.

The overwhelming majority of Q4 landlord purchasing activity originated from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who together accounted for 11 properties, or 84.6% of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores their continued foundational role in the investment market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, responsible for 9 purchases, representing 69.2% of all landlord-acquired properties in Q4 2025. This activity involved 12 distinct entities, indicating a vibrant segment of smaller-scale investors.

In contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, accounting for a modest 7.7% of landlord acquisitions. This demonstrates a limited direct purchasing footprint for large-scale entities in the county during this period.

The distribution of Q4 purchases by tier shows a clear concentration at the lower end of the landlord spectrum, with single-property and small landlords driving most of the new acquisitions, further solidifying the fragmented nature of investor activity in Morgan County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control 97.8% of investor-owned SFR in Morgan County, TN.
Detailed Findings

The landscape of investor-owned SFR properties in Morgan County, TN, is overwhelmingly dominated by smaller landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively control an astounding 97.8% of the market's 1,520 investor-owned SFR properties, emphasizing their foundational role.

Within this mom-and-pop segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant force, holding 1,311 properties, which accounts for 86.2% of all investor-owned housing. This strong concentration in the smallest tier highlights the prevalence of individual investors operating on a small scale.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, have a negligible presence in Morgan County, controlling only 3 properties, which translates to a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market. This starkly contrasts with narratives of institutional dominance often heard in larger markets.

The distribution further breaks down into two-property landlords (6.4%), small landlords (3-5 properties: 4.1%), and small landlords (6-10 properties: 1.0%), collectively reinforcing the fragmented ownership structure. Even mid-size tiers (11-100 properties) hold less than 2% combined.

The market structure is characterized by a long tail of small-scale investors, with a steep drop-off in property counts as portfolio size increases. This indicates that most real estate investment in Morgan County is driven by local, individual players rather than large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate tiers up to 5 properties, but companies become majority owners in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership strongly predominates across smaller portfolio tiers in Morgan County, TN. For single-property landlords (Tier 01), individuals account for 1,261 properties (95.2%), while even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 54 properties (85.7%), underscoring their widespread presence.

A clear crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies begin to dominate ownership. In this tier, companies own 11 properties (73.3%) compared to individuals who hold just 4 properties (26.7%), marking a significant shift in ownership type as portfolio size increases.

This company dominance becomes even more pronounced in the small-medium 11-20 property tier, where companies control 14 properties, accounting for a commanding 93.3% of holdings. This tier represents the highest concentration of company ownership observed across the market.

Interestingly, the pattern of individual versus company ownership isn't linear. In the medium-large 51-100 property tier, individual ownership resurfaces as the majority, holding 7 properties (58.3%) compared to companies' 5 properties (41.7%). This suggests a more complex interplay of ownership strategies at different scales.

While individuals maintain a strong presence across most tiers, particularly in the foundational single-property segment, companies strategically concentrate their holdings in specific mid-range portfolio sizes like the 6-20 property tiers, indicating distinct investment approaches between owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Morgan County's SFR market sees high investor concentration, with two zip codes 100% investor-owned.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Morgan County, TN, demonstrates significant geographic concentration, with two zip codes—37733 and 37719—exhibiting an extraordinary 100.0% investor ownership rate. This indicates highly specialized or niche markets where traditional homeowners are absent from SFR ownership.

When ranked by the sheer volume of investor-owned properties, TN-Morgan-37887 stands out, hosting 352 investor-owned SFR properties, representing a 26.9% ownership rate within its boundaries. Following closely is 37840 with 273 properties and a 35.9% investor ownership rate.

Several zip codes showcase a dual pattern of high investor-owned property counts and significant ownership percentages. Notably, TN-Morgan-37872 appears in both top lists, ranking 4th by count with 182 properties and 5th by percentage at a substantial 38.0% investor-owned rate.

Beyond the 100% investor-owned zip codes, others like 37845 (84.4%) and 37852 (51.2%) also display exceptionally high investor penetration. These figures underscore the pervasive influence of landlords in specific micro-markets within Morgan County.

The data reveals that investor activity is not uniformly distributed across Morgan County, but rather clustered in specific areas. This suggests that investment strategies are highly localized, targeting particular neighborhoods or communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Morgan County landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.07x buy/sell ratio in 2025, while institutions were net sellers in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Morgan County, TN, have consistently acted as net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025, significantly expanding their portfolios. In 2025 alone, they purchased 91 properties while selling only 15, resulting in a robust net acquisition of 76 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 6.07x.

The buying momentum intensified considerably in the latter half of 2025. The Q4 buy/sell ratio soared to 16.0x (16 buys vs. 1 sell), a dramatic increase from Q3's 8.67x (26 buys vs. 3 sells) and Q2's 3.44x (31 buys vs. 9 sells), indicating an accelerating pace of acquisitions.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (Tier 1000+) exhibited a different strategy in 2024. They were net sellers, acquiring only 1 property while divesting 2, resulting in a net reduction of their holdings by 1 property. This suggests larger investors are either rebalancing or exiting the market.

Across 2024, all landlords maintained a strong net buyer position with 86 purchases against 17 sells, achieving a 5.06x buy/sell ratio. This consistent buying behavior, spanning two years, highlights a sustained confidence in the Morgan County market from local and smaller-scale investors.

The divergent transactional patterns between all landlords and institutional investors suggest a two-tiered market, where smaller, individual investors are actively accumulating properties, while their larger counterparts may be consolidating or exiting, signaling varied market outlooks based on investor scale.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords contributed 27.1% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Morgan County, demonstrating active market participation.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were active participants in Morgan County's Q4 2025 market, accounting for 16 out of 59 total SFR transactions, representing a substantial 27.1% share of all recorded activities. This indicates their significant role in maintaining market liquidity and facilitating property transfers.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, responsible for 12 transactions in Q4, solidifying their position as the primary drivers of investment activity in the county. These buyers acquired properties at an average price of $141,091.

A notable pricing disparity exists between investor tiers: institutional buyers (Tier 09) acquired their single Q4 property for $99,670. This price is 29.4% less than the average $141,091 paid by single-property (Tier 01) landlords, suggesting larger investors may be targeting different property types or distressed assets.

Inter-landlord transactions, where properties are bought directly from other landlords, were primarily observed within the single-property tier (Tier 01), where 2 out of 12 transactions (16.7%) involved another landlord as the seller. This indicates a degree of internal market circulation among smaller investors.

While mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively accounted for 14 Q4 transactions, institutional investors (Tier 09) completed only 1 transaction. This highlights the sustained dominance of smaller investors in transaction volume, mirroring their substantial ownership share in the county.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Morgan County, Landlords Secure Deep Discounts Amidst Zero Recorded Q4 Acquisitions
Holdings
Landlords own 1,494 SFR properties in Morgan County, TN, representing 30.9% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 1,389 (93.0%), while companies own 118 (7.9%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 42.0% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average discount of $100,551 per property ($138,590 vs $239,141), despite no recorded specific landlord acquisitions for the quarter.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 13 properties, making up 33.3% of all SFR sales, with 12 entities active in single-property purchases. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove 84.6% of these landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control 97.8% of investor housing, vastly overshadowing institutional investors (1000+) who own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold the vast majority of properties (95.2% in Tier 01), but companies become majority owners in the 6-10 property tier (73.3% company-owned).
Transactions
All landlords in Morgan County are net buyers, with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 6.07x (91 buys vs 15 sells). Institutional investors, however, were net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Morgan County, TN, is characterized by a robust investor presence, with landlords owning 1,494 SFR properties, constituting a significant 30.9% of the total market. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual investors, who account for 93.0% of all investor-owned housing, with companies holding a mere 7.9%. Small, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) are the backbone of this market, controlling an astounding 97.8% of investor-owned properties, while institutional players (Tier 09) maintain a negligible 0.2% footprint, challenging common perceptions of corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 in Morgan County shows landlords were active in 33.3% of all SFR purchases. Despite the unusual data indicating zero specific landlord acquisitions for the quarter, the reported average prices reveal a striking trend: landlords consistently secured properties at substantial discounts, reaching 42.0% below traditional homeowner prices in Q4, a $100,551 average discount. Transaction data further indicates landlords are net buyers, particularly with a surging buy/sell ratio of 16.0x in Q4, though institutional investors diverged by acting as net sellers in 2024. These patterns suggest a market where savvy, often smaller, investors capitalize on unique acquisition opportunities.

This fragmented, mom-and-pop-dominated market in Morgan County signifies a resilient and localized investment environment. The prevalence of individual landlords, their strong net buying position, and their ability to acquire properties at significant discounts underscore a dynamic where small-scale investment is thriving. The notable concentration of investor activity in specific zip codes, including two that are 100% investor-owned, points to highly targeted investment strategies, contributing significantly to the county's rental housing supply and overall market stability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMorgan (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions