Lake (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lake (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lake (TN)
1,649
Total Investors in Lake (TN)
613
Investor Owned SFR in Lake (TN)
563(34.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
578
SFR Owned
518
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
35
SFR Owned
45
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 563 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Lake County with 95.4% ownership, securing deep discounts
Landlords own 563 SFR properties in Lake County, TN, representing 34.1% of the total market, with individuals holding 92.0%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 35.3% of sales, securing a 29.8% discount against homeowners. Both overall landlords and institutional investors are net buyers, with mom-and-pop landlords dominating Q4 acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 563 SFR properties in Lake County, TN, with 92.0% held by individual investors.
Of these holdings, 97.5% (549 properties) are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. Cash purchases dominate financing, with 509 properties acquired with cash versus 54 financed properties. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a significant 16.5-to-1 ratio (578 vs 35 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secure a significant 29.8% discount in Q4, paying $36,781 less than homeowners.
The landlord discount against homeowners has fluctuated wildly throughout 2025, narrowing from 71.3% in Q1 to 29.8% in Q4. Average acquisition prices for landlords have seen a sharp depreciation from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $223,502 to $86,757 in Q4 2025. This quarterly volatility points to a low transaction volume market, where individual deals can heavily sway average prices.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 35.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Lake County, with mom-and-pops leading activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 66.7% of all landlord purchases in Q4, buying 4 properties. The single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active, representing 50.0% of landlord acquisitions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4 2025.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of Lake County's investor market.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 74.0% of all investor-owned SFRs. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.5% of the market. The high concentration in smaller tiers indicates a market driven by individual and small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in Lake County for portfolios exceeding 10 properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the mom-and-pop tiers, holding 93.8% of 2-property portfolios and 100.0% of 3-5 and 6-10 property portfolios. However, this trend reverses in larger portfolios, with companies owning 76.5% of 11-20 property portfolios and 66.7% of 101-1000 property portfolios. There is no pricing data by owner type within tiers available to compare acquisition strategies.
Geographic Distribution
Lake County zip codes 38079 and 38080 show high investor concentration in Tennessee.
TN-Lake-38079 leads with 369 investor-owned properties and the highest investor ownership rate at 36.3%. Closely following is TN-Lake-38080 with 194 investor-owned properties and a 30.6% ownership rate. This indicates a highly concentrated investor market within specific local areas of Lake County.
Historical Transactions
Lake County landlords are net buyers with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, maintaining consistent accumulation.
Landlords in Lake County have consistently been net buyers across all measured timeframes, with 43 buys against 10 sells in Year 2025 (4.3x ratio) and 18 buys against 6 sells in Year 2024 (3.0x ratio). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) also acted as net buyers in Year 2025, with 5 buys compared to 3 sells, though their activity volume is low. This continuous net buying indicates an expanding landlord presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 24.0% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers leading activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 4 of the 6 landlord transactions in Q4, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no transactions. The highest average purchase price of $190,794 was paid by landlords in the Large (101-1000) tier, while the lowest was $44,000 paid by the Two-property (Tier 02) tier. Tier 02 showed the highest inter-landlord trading, with 100.0% of its transactions sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 563 SFR properties in Lake County, TN, with 92.0% held by individual investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lake County, TN, collectively own 563 SFR properties, constituting a substantial 34.1% of the county's entire SFR market, indicating a high level of investor penetration.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned portfolio, holding 518 properties (92.0%) compared to just 45 properties (8.0%) owned by companies, challenging narratives of corporate landlord takeover in this market.

The market is heavily concentrated with individual landlords, with 578 individual entities compared to only 35 company entities, a ratio of 16.5 individual landlords for every company landlord.

A striking 97.5% of landlord-owned properties (549 out of 563) are rented, underscoring a clear and strong focus on generating rental income from their investments in Lake County.

Cash acquisitions are the predominant method for landlords, with 509 properties purchased outright compared to only 54 properties that are financed, suggesting a preference for avoiding debt or a market accessible to cash-ready buyers.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secure a significant 29.8% discount in Q4, paying $36,781 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Lake County paid an average of $86,757 for SFR properties, securing a substantial 29.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $123,538, representing a savings of $36,781 per property.

The landlord discount has shown extreme volatility throughout 2025, from a remarkable 71.3% in Q1 ($39,417 vs $137,225) to 58.2% in Q2, 18.6% in Q3, before settling at 29.8% in Q4, indicating an inconsistent market for acquiring discounted properties.

Landlord acquisition prices have significantly depreciated from the pandemic-era average of $223,502 (2020-2023) to just $90,985 for Year 2025, reflecting a major market correction or shift in property types being acquired by investors in Lake County.

Despite the overall market correction, average landlord acquisition prices for Year 2025 ($90,985) remain consistent with Year 2024 ($89,408), suggesting a stabilization in the current price range after the post-pandemic decline.

The pronounced quarter-over-quarter swings in average acquisition prices and landlord discounts (e.g., Q1 at $39,417 vs Q3 at $129,404) highlight a highly illiquid market with very low transaction volumes, where a few high or low-priced sales can disproportionately impact averages.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 35.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Lake County, with mom-and-pops leading activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords acquired 6 properties in Q4 2025, representing a significant 35.3% of the total 17 SFR purchases in Lake County, demonstrating a robust investor presence in the quarter's buying activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 4 properties, which accounts for 66.7% of all landlord purchases, underscoring their critical role in the local investment market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, with 3 entities purchasing 3 properties, making up 50.0% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter and signaling continued entry of new, smaller investors.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) showed no buying activity in Lake County during Q4 2025, acquiring 0 properties, contrasting with the active participation of smaller landlord tiers.

Beyond the smallest investors, mid-sized and large landlords also contributed to Q4 activity, with one entity each from the 'Small-medium (21-50)' and 'Large (101-1000)' tiers purchasing a single property, indicating diverse investor interest.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of Lake County's investor market.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively control an overwhelming 95.4% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Lake County, totaling 557 properties, solidifying their status as the dominant force in the local rental market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the investor market, alone accounting for 432 properties or 74.0% of the total landlord-owned SFR portfolio, showcasing significant concentration among first-time or minimal-property investors.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share of the market, controlling just 3 properties which represent only 0.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Lake County.

Mid-size landlord tiers (Tiers 05-08) represent a small but significant portion of the market, collectively holding 24 properties (4.1% of the total), indicating some scaling beyond the mom-and-pop segment before reaching institutional size.

The distribution reveals a deeply fragmented market structure dominated by smaller portfolios, with the largest entities having a very limited footprint, dispelling notions of large-scale corporate control in this specific geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in Lake County for portfolios exceeding 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, owning 95.1% of single-property portfolios (Tier 01) and 93.8% of two-property portfolios (Tier 02), illustrating their prevalence at the entry-level of real estate investment.

The pattern of individual dominance continues across the mom-and-pop spectrum, with individual investors holding 100.0% of both 3-5 property (Tier 03) and 6-10 property (Tier 04) portfolios, suggesting that scaling up to ten properties remains largely an individual pursuit.

A clear crossover point emerges at mid-size portfolios, where company ownership becomes the majority, notably in the 11-20 property tier (Small-medium), where companies own 76.5% of the 17 properties, signifying a shift towards corporate structuring for larger portfolios.

This corporate majority extends to even larger portfolios, as companies own 66.7% of properties within the Large (101-1000) tier, holding 2 of the 3 properties in this segment, indicating institutional or professional management for significant property counts.

The data highlights a distinct segmentation of the market by owner type: individuals are the primary force in building small portfolios, while companies step in to manage and grow more substantial property holdings once a certain size threshold is crossed.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Lake County zip codes 38079 and 38080 show high investor concentration in Tennessee.
Detailed Findings

The two primary sub-geographies in Lake County, TN-Lake-38079 and TN-Lake-38080, collectively account for the vast majority of investor-owned properties, demonstrating a strong geographic concentration of investment activity within these specific zip codes.

TN-Lake-38079 emerges as the leading hub for investor-owned properties, with 369 SFR units under landlord control, also boasting the highest investor ownership rate at 36.3% of its total SFR market.

Following closely, TN-Lake-38080 features 194 investor-owned properties, holding a significant 30.6% investor ownership rate, reinforcing the pattern of concentrated investor interest in these specific areas.

The investor ownership rates of 36.3% and 30.6% in these zip codes are remarkably high, suggesting that over a third of the SFR housing stock in these areas is dedicated to the rental market or held by non-occupant owners.

The consistency in both high property counts and high ownership percentages across these two zip codes indicates that these areas are mature or desirable markets for real estate investors, rather than simply having a large overall housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lake County landlords are net buyers with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, maintaining consistent accumulation.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lake County consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025, accumulating 43 properties against 10 sales for a strong buy/sell ratio of 4.3x, signifying a sustained period of portfolio expansion.

In the most recent quarter, Q4 2025, landlords remained net buyers, acquiring 6 properties while selling 3, resulting in a buy/sell ratio of 2.0x and demonstrating continued, albeit lower volume, investment activity.

The annual trend for landlords shows steady growth, with 18 properties bought against 6 sold in Year 2024 (3.0x ratio), followed by a notable increase in acquisition volume in Year 2025 (43 buys), underscoring a consistent appetite for SFR properties.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) mirrored the overall landlord trend by being net buyers in Year 2025, with 5 acquisitions compared to 3 sales, indicating that even larger entities are expanding their holdings, albeit at a very limited scale in this market.

The significant disparity between buy and sell volumes across all landlord segments highlights an overall market sentiment focused on asset accumulation rather than divestment, contributing to the growth of the rental housing supply in Lake County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 24.0% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers leading activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were active in 6 of the 25 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, representing 24.0% of all market activity, a significant share considering the low transaction volume in Lake County.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for the majority of landlord transactions, executing 4 out of 6, reaffirming their dominant role in market liquidity and property turnover compared to larger entities.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by tier, with the Large (101-1000) tier paying the highest at $190,794, while the Two-property (Tier 02) tier secured properties at the lowest average price of $44,000, revealing diverse investment strategies and property values across landlord sizes.

Inter-landlord trading was notably high for the Two-property (Tier 02) tier, where 100.0% of its single transaction was acquired from another landlord, suggesting a fluid exchange of smaller portfolios within the investor ecosystem.

In contrast, the Large (101-1000) tier and Small-medium (21-50) tier made no purchases from other landlords in Q4, indicating they sought properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Holdings
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $86,757 in Q4 2025, a significant 29.8% less than traditional homeowners who paid $123,538, representing a $36,781 discount per property.
Activity
Landlords acquired 6 properties in Q4 2025, representing 35.3% of all SFR purchases, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 66.7% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.5% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios with 11-20 properties (76.5% company-owned) and larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers with a 4.3x buy/sell ratio (43 buys vs 10 sells) for Year 2025, and institutional investors are also net buyers (5 buys vs 3 sells) in Lake County, TN.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Lake County, TN, shows significant investor penetration, with landlords collectively owning 563 SFR properties, which constitutes 34.1% of the total SFR market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 92.0% of all landlord-owned properties, starkly contrasting with the 8.0% held by companies. Small mom-and-pop landlords, owning 1 to 10 properties, control a massive 95.4% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional investors with over 1000 properties hold a negligible 0.5% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 indicates continued accumulation, with landlords purchasing 35.3% of all SFR sales, primarily driven by mom-and-pop segments. Landlords consistently demonstrate a keen ability to acquire properties at significant discounts, securing a 29.8% price reduction ($36,781 per property) compared to traditional homeowners in Q4. Despite this, average acquisition prices for landlords have seen substantial depreciation from the pandemic-era values. Overall, landlords in Lake County have maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2025, indicating an expanding rental market, with even limited institutional activity showing net accumulation.

This market structure points to a deeply localized investment landscape where individual and small-scale investors are the primary drivers of rental housing supply, rather than large corporations. The ability of landlords to secure properties at significant discounts, coupled with their consistent net buying activity, suggests an attractive environment for small-scale real estate investment in Lake County, TN. The high investor ownership rate in specific zip codes also underscores concentrated opportunities or demand within the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:47 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLake (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell