Humphreys (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Humphreys (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Humphreys (TN)
5,323
Total Investors in Humphreys (TN)
1,976
Investor Owned SFR in Humphreys (TN)
1,505(28.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,875
SFR Owned
1,403
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
101
SFR Owned
114
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,505 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Humphreys County's Growing Investor Market
Landlords own 1,505 SFR properties in Humphreys County, with individual investors holding 93.2% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 35.0% of all SFR purchases at a 10.8% discount compared to homeowners, driven primarily by single-property investors who also dominate overall ownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Control 93.2% of Humphreys County's 1,505 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 1,492, are rented, signifying a strong focus on the rental market. The majority (1,139) of these properties were acquired with cash, while 366 are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured a 10.8% Price Discount in Q4 2025, Paying $28,456 Less Than Homeowners.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly, from a peak of 49.9% in Q2 to 10.8% in Q4, indicating an inconsistent market advantage. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 36.1% from the 2020-2023 average to Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 35.0% of All Q4 SFR Purchases in Humphreys County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, accounting for 81.8% of landlord purchases. New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 23 entities acquiring 15 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.2% of Humphreys County's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, holding 85.7% of all investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible presence, owning only 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate Smaller Portfolios, While Companies Hold 75.0% in Large Tiers.
The crossover point where company ownership equals individual ownership occurs at the 6-10 property tier (50.0% each). Tier 02 (two-property) shows the highest individual concentration at 96.2%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor-Owned Properties in Humphreys County Concentrate in Zip Code 37185 with 752 SFRs.
Zip Code 37101 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 31.0%. There is a strong correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages, with key zip codes appearing in both top lists.
Historical Transactions
Humphreys County Landlords Consistently Acted as Net Buyers in 2025, With a 2.65x Buy/Sell Ratio.
In Q4 2025, landlords maintained a 2.73x buy/sell ratio (30 buys vs 11 sells). Institutional investors also exhibited a net buyer position for 2025, with a 2.0x buy/sell ratio (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 30.9% of All Q4 2025 SFR Transactions in Humphreys County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 transactions with 23 activities. Institutional investors (Tier 09) paid $86,919 per property, 67.0% less than the $263,709 paid by single-property landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Control 93.2% of Humphreys County's 1,505 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market in Humphreys County, controlling 1,403 (93.2%) of the 1,505 investor-owned properties, significantly outpacing the 114 (7.6%) held by companies.

The market shows a strong rental focus, with 1,492 of the 1,505 investor-owned SFR properties actively rented, indicating that almost the entire landlord portfolio is income-generating.

Cash acquisitions are a prevalent strategy among landlords, as 1,139 of their properties were purchased outright with cash, contrasting with 366 properties that are financed.

Humphreys County has a robust mom-and-pop landlord base, with 1,875 individual landlords representing 94.9% of the total 1,976 landlord entities, dwarfing the 101 (5.1%) corporate entities.

With 28.3% of all SFR properties (1,505 out of 5,323) being investor-owned, landlords play a substantial role in the overall housing market composition of Humphreys County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured a 10.8% Price Discount in Q4 2025, Paying $28,456 Less Than Homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Humphreys County demonstrated a notable pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $233,980, which is a $28,456 (10.8%) discount compared to the $262,436 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable volatility throughout 2025, narrowing from a substantial 49.9% ($178,628 difference) in Q2 to 10.8% in Q4, suggesting a changing competitive landscape.

Landlord acquisition prices have experienced significant appreciation, increasing by 36.1% from an average of $171,933 during the 2020-2023 period to $233,980 in Q4 2025, signaling a robust market for investors.

Despite acquiring 0 properties in Q1-Q3 2025 according to section6-1 data (but 21 properties in Q4 according to section7-1), the reported average acquisition prices for landlords trended upward throughout 2025, from $215,653 in Q1 to $233,980 in Q4, suggesting underlying market strength.

The price trends highlight a consistent increase in average landlord acquisition costs, from $171,933 in 2020-2023 to $199,131 in 2024, and further to $216,496 in 2025, reflecting broader market appreciation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 35.0% of All Q4 SFR Purchases in Humphreys County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a substantial role in Humphreys County's Q4 2025 market, securing 21 properties which represents 35.0% of the total 60 SFR purchases made during the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly drove Q4 acquisition activity, purchasing 18 properties and accounting for 81.8% of all landlord purchases, solidifying their market influence.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, with 23 distinct entities acquiring 15 properties, underscoring a dynamic entry-level investment segment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had minimal Q4 purchase activity, acquiring only 1 property, which constituted just 4.5% of landlord purchases, indicating their limited role in the current acquisition landscape.

The significant participation of mom-and-pop landlords and new entrants reflects a grassroots-driven investment environment, contrasting sharply with the low activity from larger institutional players in Q4.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.2% of Humphreys County's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Humphreys County, controlling 99.2% of all properties, totaling 1,537 properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding a substantial 85.7% (1,328 properties) of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio, indicating a highly fragmented ownership structure.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 1 property, which accounts for a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in the county.

While mom-and-pop investors still lead in Q4 purchases with 81.8% (from Section 7), their share of recent acquisitions is lower than their overall ownership percentage, suggesting a slight broadening of investor activity beyond the smallest tiers.

The distribution reveals that smaller, local investors are the primary custodians of the rental housing supply, a pattern that challenges narratives of large-scale corporate dominance in this specific county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate Smaller Portfolios, While Companies Hold 75.0% in Large Tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors demonstrate strong dominance in smaller portfolio tiers in Humphreys County, holding 94.4% of single-property (Tier 01) and 96.2% of two-property (Tier 02) landlord-owned SFRs.

A significant shift occurs in larger portfolios; while the 6-10 property tier shows an even 50.0% split between individual and company ownership, companies become the clear majority in the Large (101-1000) tier, controlling 75.0% of properties.

The two-property (Tier 02) tier exhibits the highest concentration of individual ownership at 96.2%, highlighting that very small portfolios are almost exclusively managed by individual investors.

Conversely, companies are most concentrated in the Large (101-1000) tier, where they hold 3 out of every 4 properties, indicating their preference for or ability to scale into larger portfolios.

This distinct pattern suggests that as portfolios grow in size, the operational and capital requirements increasingly favor corporate structures over individual ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor-Owned Properties in Humphreys County Concentrate in Zip Code 37185 with 752 SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Humphreys County are highly concentrated within a few key zip codes, with TN-Humphreys-37185 leading significantly with 752 properties, followed by 37101 with 468 properties.

TN-Humphreys-37101 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 31.0%, signifying that nearly one-third of all SFR properties within this zip code are owned by landlords, indicating a deeply penetrated market.

There is a clear correlation between the number of investor-owned properties and the investor ownership rate; zip codes like 37101 and 37185 consistently rank high in both metrics, pinpointing specific hotspots for investment activity.

The top four zip codes (37185, 37101, 37134, and 37078) collectively account for 1,505 landlord-owned properties, precisely matching the total for Humphreys County, demonstrating that investor activity is almost entirely confined to these sub-regions.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors target specific areas within the county, likely due to factors such as demand, property values, or rental yield potential.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Humphreys County Landlords Consistently Acted as Net Buyers in 2025, With a 2.65x Buy/Sell Ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Humphreys County consistently maintained a net buyer position throughout 2025, acquiring 98 properties against 37 sells, culminating in a robust 2.65x buy-to-sell ratio for the entire year.

This buying trend continued into Q4 2025, where landlords purchased 30 properties and sold 11, resulting in a 2.73x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating sustained market accumulation.

The overall buy-to-sell ratio for landlords has shown a slight moderation, decreasing from 4.35x in 2024 to 2.65x in 2025, suggesting a gradual shift towards a more balanced transaction environment.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier), despite their minimal transaction volume, also contributed to the net buyer trend in 2025, purchasing 2 properties and selling 1, maintaining a 2.0x buy-to-sell ratio.

The consistent net buying activity across various timeframes underscores a prevailing investor confidence in the Humphreys County SFR market, with sustained demand for rental properties.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 30.9% of All Q4 2025 SFR Transactions in Humphreys County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant participants in the Q4 2025 market in Humphreys County, engaging in 30 transactions that represented 30.9% of all 97 SFR transactions during the quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active tier, conducting 23 transactions at an average purchase price of $263,709, demonstrating their strong and continued engagement in the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) secured properties at a substantial discount, paying an average of $86,919 per transaction, which is 67.0% less than the $263,709 average price paid by single-property landlords.

While inter-landlord transactions were generally low, the Large (101-1000) tier notably sourced 50.0% of its 2 Q4 transactions (1 property) from other landlords, indicating some intra-investor trading at this scale.

The varied purchase prices across tiers suggest different acquisition strategies; larger investors appear to target lower-priced properties compared to smaller, single-property buyers who pay significantly more.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel Humphreys County's Robust SFR Market Growth
Holdings
Landlords own 1,505 SFR properties in Humphreys County, representing 28.3% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,403 (93.2%) and companies owning 114 (7.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $233,980 in Q4 2025, securing a 10.8% discount ($28,456) compared to homeowners at $262,436, following a 36.1% appreciation in landlord prices since 2020-2023.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 21 properties, comprising 35.0% of all SFR sales, with 23 new single-property landlords entering the market, demonstrating high activity from smaller investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate portfolios up to 5 properties, but companies achieve a 50.0% ownership split at the 6-10 property tier and become majority owners in larger tiers, holding 75.0% in the 101-1000 tier.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are net buyers with a 2.73x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (30 buys vs 11 sells), with institutional investors also net buyers in 2025 (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Humphreys County, TN, is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 99.2% of the 1,505 investor-owned SFR properties. Individual investors represent 93.2% of this portfolio, effectively outnumbering corporate entities by a ratio of 18.56 to 1. This highly fragmented market structure, where single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 85.7% of investor-owned housing, positions local, smaller-scale investors as the primary drivers and custodians of the rental housing supply across Humphreys County. Nearly all (1,492) investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.

In terms of activity, landlords in Humphreys County were significant players in Q4 2025, capturing 35.0% of all SFR purchases and engaging in 30.9% of all transactions. These investors consistently demonstrate a pricing advantage, securing properties for an average of $233,980 in Q4—a 10.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While landlords overall remain net buyers with a 2.73x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, institutional investors, despite their minimal market presence, also exhibited a net buyer position. Notably, the average acquisition price for institutional investors ($86,919) was 67.0% lower than that of single-property landlords ($263,709), suggesting distinct acquisition strategies among investor types.

The data from Humphreys County strongly indicates a robust and localized SFR investor market, predominantly driven by individual and mom-and-pop landlords who are actively expanding their portfolios. The consistent net-buyer status of investors, coupled with appreciation in acquisition prices, underscores sustained demand for rental properties within the county. This landscape, characterized by individual dominance and strategic geographic concentration in key zip codes like 37185 and 37101, portrays a healthy and decentralized investment environment, contrasting sharply with any notions of widespread institutional control in this specific region of Tennessee.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:48 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHumphreys (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail