Hancock (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hancock (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hancock (TN)
1,519
Total Investors in Hancock (TN)
727
Investor Owned SFR in Hancock (TN)
533(35.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
708
SFR Owned
514
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
19
SFR Owned
20
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 533 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hancock County Amidst Stagnant Institutional Activity
Individual landlords overwhelmingly control 96.4% of the 533 investor-owned SFR properties in Hancock County, TN, representing 35.1% of the total market. Q4 2025 saw landlords account for 77.8% of purchases, all driven by mom-and-pop investors, with no institutional acquisitions. Despite a recorded average price significantly below homeowners, landlords made no actual purchases in Q4, signaling a cautious market for active investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own an overwhelming 96.4% of Hancock County's 533 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Cash acquisitions are the predominant method for landlords, accounting for 86.3% of properties, while 13.7% are financed. Nearly all investor-owned properties, 529 out of 533, are identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisitions were zero in Q4 2025, despite recorded prices being 72.7% lower than homeowner purchases.
The recorded average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 was $88,544, a substantial $235,456 discount compared to homeowners at $324,000. However, landlords made zero purchases in Q4, making direct price trend comparisons for active buyers challenging.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 77.8% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Hancock County, all driven by mom-and-pop investors.
All 7 landlord purchases in Q4 2025 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no acquisitions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 7 entities acquiring 5 properties in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 99.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Hancock County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone dominate the market, holding 91.7% of investor-owned properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence in the county's SFR market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, reaching 50% parity with companies only in Tier 6-10 portfolios.
Single-property (Tier 01) and two-property (Tier 02) landlords are almost exclusively individual owners, at 98.2% and 95.0% respectively. Companies increase their presence in larger portfolios, reaching 50.0% in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier.
Geographic Distribution
Hancock County's 37731 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 63.8%, despite lower property count.
TN-Hancock-37869 leads by total investor-owned property count with 381 properties (34.4% ownership rate). Four zip codes (37731, 37752, 37765, 37869) exhibit investor ownership rates exceeding 30%.
Historical Transactions
Hancock County landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, but institutional activity is minimal.
Landlords bought 9 properties and sold 1 in Q4, continuing a net buyer trend seen throughout 2025 (23 buys, 4 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed minimal activity, being net buyers of only 1 property in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 69.2% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers dominating activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were most active, involved in 7 transactions at an average price of $83,571. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with Tier 01 and 02 having 0% of transactions sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own an overwhelming 96.4% of Hancock County's 533 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Hancock County's SFR rental market, owning 514 (96.4%) of the 533 landlord-owned properties. This strongly contrasts with company ownership, which accounts for only 20 properties (3.8%).

The prevalence of individual ownership extends to landlord entities, with 708 (97.4%) of the 727 distinct landlords being individuals, creating a ratio of approximately 37 individual landlords for every company landlord.

A striking 86.3% of investor-owned properties in Hancock County, totaling 460 properties, were acquired with cash, indicating a strong preference for unfinanced acquisitions among landlords.

Conversely, only 73 (13.7%) of investor-owned properties are financed, revealing a market where leverage is less common for landlords compared to outright cash purchases.

The vast majority of landlord-owned SFR properties, 529 out of 533 (99.2%), are rented, underscoring the strong rental focus of investors in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisitions were zero in Q4 2025, despite recorded prices being 72.7% lower than homeowner purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity in Hancock County was notably absent in Q4 2025, with 0 properties purchased. This lack of recent buying makes it challenging to establish current market trends for landlord-driven pricing.

Despite the zero acquisitions, the recorded average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 stood at $88,544. This price is a significant 72.7% ($235,456) lower than the average homeowner purchase price of $324,000 in the same quarter.

Similarly, Q3 2025 also saw 0 landlord purchases, with an average recorded price of $87,000, which was 62.7% ($146,387) less than the average homeowner price of $233,387.

Looking back to Q1 2025, when landlords also made 0 purchases, the recorded average price of $186,900 was an unusual 158.9% ($114,700) premium compared to the homeowner price of $72,200, highlighting inconsistent market dynamics without active landlord participation.

The consistent reporting of '0 properties' for landlord acquisitions across Q1-Q4 2025, Year 2024, and Years 2020-2023, indicates a prolonged period of extremely low or non-existent direct purchasing activity from classified landlords in Hancock County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 77.8% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Hancock County, all driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly influenced the Q4 2025 SFR market in Hancock County, securing 7 out of 9 total purchases, representing a dominant 77.8% market share.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all landlord acquisitions in Q4, purchasing 7 properties and demonstrating a strong foothold in the current market activity.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity in Q4 2025, further emphasizing the dominance of smaller, local investors in this county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) accounted for the majority of activity, with 7 entities entering or growing their portfolios by acquiring 5 properties in Q4, signifying ongoing grassroots investment.

The next most active tiers were two-property (Tier 02) and small landlord (Tier 03-05), each with 1 property purchased by a single entity, demonstrating diverse but still small-scale landlord engagement.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 99.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Hancock County.
Detailed Findings

Hancock County's investor-owned SFR market is almost entirely composed of mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who collectively control 99.1% of all properties.

The vast majority of this ownership resides with single-property landlords (Tier 01), who account for 497 distinct properties, representing 91.7% of the total landlord-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no properties in Hancock County, highlighting a market structure entirely devoid of large-scale corporate ownership.

Beyond single-property owners, smaller portfolio tiers such as two-property landlords (3.7% with 20 properties) and small landlords (3-5 properties, 3.3% with 18 properties) make up the remaining significant shares.

The distribution clearly shows a highly fragmented and locally-driven investor market, with no concentration among larger or institutional entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, reaching 50% parity with companies only in Tier 6-10 portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a near-total grip on the smallest landlord portfolios, owning 98.2% of single-property (Tier 01) and 95.0% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings.

The presence of company ownership gradually increases with portfolio size, growing from just 1.8% in Tier 01 to 5.0% in Tier 02, and then to 27.8% in the 3-5 property tier.

A significant shift occurs at the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where individual and company ownership reaches parity, with each owning 1 property, representing 50.0% of the tier's holdings.

This indicates that while individuals are the foundational owners, companies begin to hold a more substantial, albeit still not majority, share as portfolio sizes expand within the mid-range tiers.

The current data does not show a tier where company ownership surpasses 50%, suggesting that individuals remain the predominant owner type even in the larger available tiers within Hancock County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Hancock County's 37731 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 63.8%, despite lower property count.
Detailed Findings

Within Hancock County, the 37731 zip code demonstrates the highest investor penetration, with a significant 63.8% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, even though it accounts for 30 total investor properties.

The zip code TN-Hancock-37869 holds the largest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 381, which represents a 34.4% investor ownership rate within that specific area.

A notable concentration of investor activity is observed across several zip codes, with TN-Hancock-37752 having a 60.0% investor ownership rate, and TN-Hancock-37765 showing 37 properties at a 36.3% rate.

This distinct pattern reveals that while some areas attract a high volume of investor properties, other, potentially smaller sub-markets, exhibit exceptionally high investor ownership rates.

The top five regions by investor-owned count all maintain ownership rates above 29%, signaling a consistent presence of landlords across key areas of Hancock County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Hancock County landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, but institutional activity is minimal.
Detailed Findings

Hancock County landlords are clearly operating as strong net buyers, evidenced by a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025, with 9 properties purchased compared to only 1 sold.

This trend of accumulation is consistent throughout 2025, where landlords acquired 23 properties while selling only 4, resulting in a substantial net gain of 19 properties for the year.

Looking further back, Year 2024 also saw robust net buying, with landlords purchasing 31 properties against 4 sells, adding 27 properties to their portfolios.

In contrast to the active smaller landlords, institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited very limited transaction volume, being net buyers of only 1 property (2 buys vs 1 sell) in Year 2024, with no recorded activity in 2025.

The overall market for landlord transactions in Hancock County thus appears to be one of steady growth, predominantly driven by non-institutional investors who are consistently expanding their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 69.2% of all Q4 2025 SFR transactions, with mom-and-pop tiers dominating activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 market, accounting for 9 out of 13 total SFR transactions, translating to a 69.2% share of all recorded activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all 9 landlord transactions in Q4, reinforcing their dominance in the county's investment landscape, while institutional investors showed no activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of transaction volume, participating in 7 of the 9 landlord transactions, with an average purchase price of $83,571.

Inter-landlord trading was extremely low for the most active tiers, with Tier 01 and Tier 02 showing 0.0% of their Q4 transactions being purchased from other landlords, suggesting properties are mostly acquired from traditional sellers.

Interestingly, the single transaction by a small landlord (Tier 03-05) was 100.0% bought from another landlord, at an average price of $81,900, hinting at internal market dynamics for slightly larger portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Hancock County: Mom-and-Pop Investors Own 99.1% Amidst Zero Institutional Activity and Cautious Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 533 SFR properties in Hancock County, TN, representing 35.1% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 514 (96.4%) and companies owning 20 (3.8%).
Pricing
Despite a recorded average acquisition price of $88,544 for landlords in Q4 2025, which represents a 72.7% discount compared to homeowner prices of $324,000, landlords made zero actual purchases during this period.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords account for 7 (77.8%) of total SFR purchases in Hancock County, with all acquisitions driven by mom-and-pop landlords; 7 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entered the market, acquiring 5 properties.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) control an overwhelming 99.1% of investor housing in Hancock County, while institutional investors (Tier 09) hold no properties, indicating a highly localized market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the SFR market in Hancock County, holding 98.2% of single-property portfolios, with companies only reaching 50.0% parity in the 6-10 properties tier and not achieving majority in any tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Hancock County are net buyers with a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (9 buys vs 1 sell), a trend consistent throughout 2025, while institutional investors showed no Q4 activity and were modest net buyers in 2024.
Market Narrative

Hancock County, TN, presents a unique and highly localized real estate investment landscape, characterized by the overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop landlords. These smaller, individual investors control an astonishing 99.1% of the 533 investor-owned SFR properties, which collectively represent 35.1% of the county's total SFR market. Individual owners specifically hold 96.4% of these properties, significantly outpacing company ownership, which accounts for a mere 3.8%. Notably, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence in the county, challenging narratives of large-scale corporate takeovers in this market.

Despite landlords accounting for a substantial 77.8% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, all 7 of these acquisitions were by mom-and-pop investors, with no institutional buying activity. This highlights a cautious market, as landlords made zero actual purchases in Q4 2025, even though the recorded average landlord acquisition price of $88,544 was a considerable 72.7% less than the average homeowner price of $324,000. Landlords have consistently been net buyers throughout 2025, achieving a 9.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, but this accumulation is primarily driven by smaller entities and not new acquisition volume from active buyers in the current quarter.

This data reveals a resilient, grassroots-driven investor market in Hancock County where local individual landlords are steadily accumulating properties, primarily through cash transactions (86.3% of holdings), without significant competition or activity from larger corporate players. The high concentration of ownership among small landlords, coupled with minimal recent purchasing from classified landlords in Q4, suggests a mature market undergoing internal shifts rather than rapid expansion, with local zip codes exhibiting strong investor penetration rates above 60%.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:40 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHancock (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail