Greene (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Greene (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Greene (TN)
22,363
Total Investors in Greene (TN)
8,361
Investor Owned SFR in Greene (TN)
6,471(28.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,019
SFR Owned
6,110
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
342
SFR Owned
434
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,471 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Greene County Investor Market: Mom-and-Pops Dominate, Securing Deep Discounts Amidst Accumulation
Greene County's real estate investor market is overwhelmingly driven by individual mom-and-pop landlords, who control 98.4% of 6,471 investor-owned SFR properties. Landlords consistently secured a 34.6% discount versus homeowners in Q4 2025, while remaining strong net buyers with a 6.24x buy-to-sell ratio, indicating continued market confidence and accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals hold 94.4% of 6,471 investor-owned SFR properties in Greene County.
Most investor-owned properties are rented, with 6,407 properties classified as such. Cash acquisitions are notably higher than financed ones, totaling 3,999 cash properties versus 2,472 financed properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 34.6% discount in Q4, paying $175,755 versus homeowner's $268,558.
The landlord discount fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter, ranging from 25.4% in Q3 to a peak of 37.9% in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 are $175,755, which is 9.5% lower than the $194,301 average during the 2020-2023 period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 28.2% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases, totaling 69 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominated, making 92.9% (65 properties) of all landlord purchases in Q4. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no purchases in Greene County during this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.4% of Greene County's investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone, owning 85.8% (5,677 properties) of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% (5 properties), demonstrating their minimal presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, controlling 96.4% of those portfolios.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 95.9% of single-property and 90.4% of two-property portfolios. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are predominantly companies, owning all 5 properties in that tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 37743 leads Greene County with 2,423 investor-owned properties, 28.7% of its market.
Zip code 65807 shows an exceptionally high 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating a highly specialized micro-market. The top five zip codes by count collectively hold 5,829 investor-owned properties, signaling strong geographic concentration.
Historical Transactions
Greene County landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.24x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords maintained a consistent net buying position throughout 2025, accumulating 390 properties against 66 sells for the entire year. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were also net buyers in 2025 with 5 buys versus 2 sells, shifting from a balanced position in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 27.0% of all 392 Q4 transactions in Greene County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove Q4 activity with 101 transactions, while institutional investors made no transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) bought 8.5% (7 properties) of their Q4 transactions from other landlords, showing minimal inter-landlord trading in larger tiers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals hold 94.4% of 6,471 investor-owned SFR properties in Greene County.
Detailed Findings

Greene County's real estate investor market is substantial, with landlords owning 6,471 SFR properties, representing 28.9% of the county’s total 22,363 SFR market. This high penetration signifies a significant landlord presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 6,110 SFR properties, which constitutes 94.4% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, companies own just 434 properties, accounting for 6.7% of the total investor portfolio, underscoring the prevalence of small-scale investors.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals, with 6,407 properties classified as rented. This indicates a strong focus on generating rental income from their portfolios, aligning with typical landlord investment strategies.

A significant portion of investor acquisitions are made with cash, accounting for 3,999 properties compared to 2,472 financed properties. This pattern suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or access to substantial capital among Greene County investors.

The sheer number of individual landlords, 8,019, far outweighs company landlords at 342, reinforcing the mom-and-pop foundation of the investment market. The average portfolio size for individual landlords is less than one property (6,110 properties / 8,019 entities), indicating a high number of single-property owners, while companies average 1.27 properties (434 properties / 342 entities), reflecting a more concentrated holding.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 34.6% discount in Q4, paying $175,755 versus homeowner's $268,558.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Greene County consistently secure substantial discounts on SFR properties compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $175,755, a significant $92,803 (34.6%) less than the $268,558 paid by homeowners, highlighting their strategic acquisition advantage.

This pricing advantage has not been consistent throughout the year, demonstrating market volatility. The discount widened dramatically from 25.4% ($78,833) in Q3 2025 to 34.6% ($92,803) in Q4, following an even larger 37.9% ($113,643) discount in Q2, indicating fluctuating market dynamics and landlord opportunities.

Comparing across timeframes, the average landlord acquisition price of $175,755 in Q4 2025 suggests a potential market recalibration, as it stands 9.5% lower than the average $194,301 recorded during the 2020-2023 period. This indicates a notable decline from pandemic-era pricing for investor purchases.

Landlord acquisition prices saw a substantial dip from Q3's $231,191 to Q4's $175,755, representing a 23.9% quarterly decrease. This sharp drop could reflect a shift in property types being acquired, increased negotiating power, or a cooling market.

Across 2025, landlords consistently paid below homeowners, with average discounts never falling below 25.4%. This sustained trend underscores landlords' ability to identify undervalued assets or negotiate more favorable terms across different market conditions in Greene County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 28.2% of Q4 2025 SFR purchases, totaling 69 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in Greene County's Q4 2025 housing market, capturing 28.2% of all SFR purchases. Out of 245 total transactions, 69 properties were acquired by investors, underscoring their active role in shaping local housing inventory.

The market saw a substantial influx of single-property landlords (Tier 01) during Q4, with 82 distinct entities purchasing 48 properties. This highlights the continuous entry of new, small-scale investors into the Greene County rental market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively accounted for 92.9% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 65 properties. This strong activity confirms their status as the primary drivers of investor acquisitions in the county, with only minimal activity from larger tiers.

In stark contrast to the small-scale investor activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4 2025. This absence reinforces the narrative of a market almost entirely shaped by individual and small-to-mid size investors rather than large corporations.

Beyond single-property owners, smaller landlord tiers continued to contribute to acquisition activity: two-property landlords (Tier 02) purchased 9 properties, and 3-5 property landlords (Tier 03) acquired 5 properties, further solidifying the mom-and-pop dominance in recent buying trends.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.4% of Greene County's investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

The structure of Greene County's investor-owned SFR market is overwhelmingly dominated by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, categorized as owning 1-10 properties, control an astounding 98.4% of the total investor-owned housing, with 6,511 properties under their management.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for the vast majority of this dominance, holding 5,677 properties, which represents 85.8% of all investor-owned SFR. This concentration highlights the critical role of first-time and single-asset investors in the local market.

The smallest landlord tiers (01-04) collectively own 6,511 properties, reinforcing that the investment landscape in Greene County is characterized by a high number of small-scale operators. This distribution challenges common perceptions of institutional dominance in the broader housing market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, maintain a virtually non-existent footprint in Greene County, controlling only 5 properties, or a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned market. This demonstrates their minimal influence on the local housing supply.

Even mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a modest share, with portfolios ranging from 11-1000 properties accounting for less than 2% of the total investor-owned SFR. This consistent pattern across all larger tiers solidifies the small landlord ecosystem as the defining feature of Greene County's investment housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, controlling 96.4% of those portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the driving force behind small-scale property ownership in Greene County, dominating the most prevalent tiers. They account for 95.9% of single-property portfolios (5,496 properties) and 90.4% of two-property portfolios (347 properties), clearly establishing their foundational role in the market.

The dynamic shifts significantly in larger portfolio sizes, as companies gain prominence. While individuals still hold 77.8% of 11-20 property portfolios, the crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs at the 21-50 property tier, where they control an overwhelming 96.4% (27 properties).

This distinct shift reveals that while individuals prefer smaller, more manageable portfolios, larger-scale operations involving 21 or more properties are almost exclusively the domain of corporate entities in Greene County.

Even in mid-size tiers like 6-10 properties, company ownership rises notably to 38.3% (44 properties), demonstrating their increasing, albeit not majority, presence in these larger but still non-institutional segments.

The data underscores a clear segmentation: the vast majority of landlords are individuals with 1-5 properties, but the few larger portfolios present in Greene County are predominantly structured under corporate ownership, indicating different operational scales and strategies between owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 37743 leads Greene County with 2,423 investor-owned properties, 28.7% of its market.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Greene County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes. The 37743 zip code stands out as the primary hub, with 2,423 investor-owned properties, representing 28.7% of its total SFR market. This makes it the leading area for investor activity by volume.

Following closely, zip code 37745 also shows substantial investor presence, housing 1,896 investor-owned properties and demonstrating a 30.4% investor ownership rate. Together, these two zip codes account for 4,319 properties, which is 66.7% of all investor-owned SFR in Greene County, highlighting extreme geographic concentration.

While 37743 and 37745 lead in raw property counts, other zip codes exhibit even higher investor ownership rates. Zip code 65807 recorded an exceptional 100.0% investor ownership, suggesting a very small, specialized area completely owned by investors, while 37857 and 37656 follow with 33.3% and 32.8% rates, respectively.

The geographic distribution reveals that regions with high investor property counts often also have high investor ownership rates, such as 37745 (1,896 properties, 30.4% rate) and 37818 (489 properties, 31.0% rate). This indicates that investors are deeply embedded in the housing markets of these sub-geographies.

The top five zip codes by count—37743, 37745, 37641, 37818, and 37616—together comprise a significant majority of Greene County's investor-owned properties. Their investor ownership rates consistently range from 26.1% to 31.0%, reaffirming their status as key areas for landlord activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Greene County landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.24x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Greene County are operating as robust net buyers, significantly expanding their portfolios. In Q4 2025 alone, they executed 106 buy transactions compared to just 17 sells, resulting in a formidable 6.24x buy-to-sell ratio, signaling strong confidence and accumulation in the market.

This net buyer trend is consistent across 2025, with landlords purchasing a total of 390 properties and selling only 66, yielding a substantial net gain of 324 properties for the year. This continued high volume of acquisitions demonstrates sustained investor interest and activity.

Comparing year-over-year, landlord buying activity in 2025 (390 buys) slightly decreased from 2024 (435 buys), yet their net acquisition volume remained high. This suggests a sustained, albeit slightly modulated, growth strategy over the past two years.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier), despite their small market presence, have transitioned to a net buyer position in 2025, with 5 acquisitions versus 2 sales. This marks a shift from their neutral stance in 2024, when they recorded 4 buys and 4 sells, indicating a strategic, albeit minor, accumulation phase.

The consistent net buying behavior across both individual and institutional segments underscores a prevailing market sentiment of growth and investment in Greene County SFR properties. There is no data provided regarding the percentage of transactions that are landlord-to-landlord, limiting analysis of inter-investor trading.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 27.0% of all 392 Q4 transactions in Greene County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active participants in Greene County’s Q4 2025 real estate market, contributing to over a quarter of all transactions. Out of 392 total SFR transactions, 106 involved landlords, underscoring their significant influence on market liquidity and property turnover.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) emerged as the most active segment, responsible for 82 transactions with an average purchase price of $190,629. This reinforces their role as the primary engine of transaction volume among investors.

Average purchase prices exhibited significant variability across different landlord tiers in Q4. While Tier 01 landlords paid $190,629, Tier 02 secured properties at a considerably lower average of $72,029, and Tier 06-10 paid the highest at $259,817, demonstrating diverse pricing strategies and property types targeted by different investor sizes.

Inter-landlord trading appeared limited and concentrated, with only single-property landlords (Tier 01) showing activity, acquiring 7 properties (8.5% of their total transactions) from other landlords. Larger tiers reported no such transactions in the provided Q4 data, suggesting that most sales are to non-landlord buyers or initial entry into the market.

The complete absence of transactional activity from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Q4 further emphasizes the dominance of small to mid-size landlords in Greene County. This pattern indicates that local market dynamics are largely shaped by smaller, localized investment decisions rather than large corporate strategies.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Greene County with 98.4% Market Share, Securing Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 6,471 SFR properties in Greene County, TN, representing 28.9% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 6,110 (94.4%) of these properties, while companies own 434 (6.7%).
Pricing
Landlords paid $175,755 in Q4 2025, securing a notable $92,803 (34.6%) discount compared to traditional homeowners' average price of $268,558.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 69 properties, accounting for 28.2% of all SFR sales, with 82 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) drove 92.9% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.4% of investor-owned SFR housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios up to 20 properties, but companies become the majority owners at the 21-50 property tier, controlling 96.4% of those larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords overall are strong net buyers with a 6.24:1 buy/sell ratio (106 buys vs 17 sells) in Q4, while institutional investors also accumulated properties in 2025 with 5 buys versus 2 sells.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Greene County, Tennessee, is overwhelmingly characterized by the dominance of small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. These individual investors control 6,110 of the total 6,471 investor-owned SFR properties, representing a substantial 94.4% of the market. Across all investor tiers, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) account for a commanding 98.4% of investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a negligible 0.1% share. This distribution establishes a local market where individual investors are the primary force, collectively owning 28.9% of Greene County's entire SFR inventory.

Investor behavior in Greene County reflects a strategic focus on property acquisition, often at significant discounts. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $175,755, securing a considerable 34.6% discount compared to the $268,558 paid by traditional homeowners. This ability to acquire properties below market value is a consistent trend, with discounts fluctuating between 25.4% and 37.9% throughout the year. Landlords remained active in Q4, completing 106 transactions and purchasing 28.2% of all SFR properties for sale. Notably, 82 new single-property landlords entered the market, while mom-and-pop landlords executed 92.9% of all investor purchases, indicating a robust, small-investor-led acquisition drive.

Greene County’s market dynamics signal a strong accumulation phase for landlords. They operated as definitive net buyers in Q4 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.24:1, and maintained this aggressive buying posture throughout 2025, accumulating 324 net properties. Even the few institutional investors present shifted to a net buyer position, accumulating 3 net properties in 2025. This pervasive net buying activity, coupled with deep acquisition discounts, indicates a healthy, growing investor market predominantly shaped by individual and small-scale entities, contributing significantly to the county's housing supply and rental market availability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:34 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGreene (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail