Franklin (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (TN)
15,476
Total Investors in Franklin (TN)
5,481
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (TN)
4,237(27.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,105
SFR Owned
3,839
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
376
SFR Owned
449
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,237 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Franklin County, Securing Q4 Discounts While Institutions Remain Minimal
Landlords own 4,237 SFR properties, representing 27.4% of Franklin County's market, with individual investors holding an overwhelming 90.6%. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 36.1% of sales, often at a significant 10.1% discount compared to homeowners. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 98.0% of the market and are net buyers, while institutional activity remains almost negligible and net neutral.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 90.6% of Franklin County's 4,237 SFR Properties, Signaling Widespread Ownership
A vast 98.8% of landlord-owned properties (4,188) are rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income. Cash purchases significantly outweigh financed acquisitions, accounting for 3,265 properties versus 972 financed units. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of 13.57:1, with 5,105 individual entities compared to 376 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured a Significant 10.1% Discount on SFR Acquisitions in Q4 2025 Compared to Homeowners
The pricing gap showed high volatility, swinging from landlords paying a 29.4% premium in Q3 2025 ($470,362 vs $363,498) to receiving a 10.1% discount in Q4 2025 ($307,413 vs $341,989). Landlord average acquisition prices in Q4 2025 ($307,413) notably declined compared to the 2020-2023 average of $389,388, suggesting a market adjustment or more strategic purchasing. Data for individual versus company acquisition prices was not available in this section.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 36.1% of All SFR Purchases in Q4 2025, Signaling Strong Market Activity
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for an overwhelming 95.7% of all landlord purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 66 properties. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors (Tier 09) who bought only 1 property (1.4%) during the same period. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 79 new entities acquiring 49 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.0% of Franklin County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.1% share of the market, owning just 4 properties, vastly underrepresented compared to media narratives. The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the market, controlling 80.9% of all investor-owned SFR properties. Average acquisition prices by tier are available for Q4 transactions in Section 12, but not for overall holdings here.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Consistently Dominate All Landlord Tiers in Franklin County, Even in Larger Portfolios
There is no tier where companies hold a majority of properties; individual investors remain the primary owners across all listed portfolio sizes. The highest concentration of company ownership is found in the Small Landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where companies account for 40.7% of properties (57 out of 140). Individual investors maintain their strongest presence in the Single-property (92.3%) and Small-medium (21-50 properties) (92.6%) tiers. Data on individual vs company acquisition prices by tier or comparative growth patterns was not available in this section.
Geographic Distribution
Franklin County's 37330 Zip Code Leads in Investor-Owned Properties, While 37356 Shows Highest Penetration Rate
Zip code 37330 has the most investor-owned SFR properties at 659, but its investor ownership rate is 25.2%. In contrast, 37356 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 51.2%, despite having a potentially smaller total property count (count not provided). There is a clear distinction between regions with high property counts and those with high investor penetration rates, as 37356, 37375 (44.8%), and 37352 (37.5%) all show high rates but are not among the top property counts. Acquisition price variations across these sub-geographies are not provided.
Historical Transactions
Franklin County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers with a 5.37x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed minimal activity in Q4 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in a net neutral position. Overall landlord buy transactions increased to 390 in 2025 from 326 in 2024, demonstrating consistent and growing acquisition efforts. Data on the percentage of landlord purchases from other landlords or average buy/sell prices was not available in this section.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 35.1% of Q4 2025 SFR Transactions, Primarily Driven by Single-Property Buyers
Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) paid a significantly lower average price of $88,400 in Q4 2025, a substantial 68.7% less than single-property landlords (Tier 01) who averaged $282,373. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal, with only 17.7% of single-property landlord purchases originating from other landlords, and no such transactions for any other tiers. Single-property landlords dominated transaction volumes, conducting 79 out of 102 total landlord transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 90.6% of Franklin County's 4,237 SFR Properties, Signaling Widespread Ownership
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate Franklin County's SFR rental market, owning 3,839 properties which constitute 90.6% of all landlord-held SFR units. This significantly dwarfs company ownership, which stands at just 449 properties (10.6%), reinforcing the prevalence of smaller-scale investors.

The landlord portfolio in Franklin County is almost entirely rental-focused, with 4,188 properties classified as rented, representing 98.8% of all investor-owned SFR. This high percentage underscores that investors in the county are primarily active landlords rather than holding properties vacant or for other non-rental purposes.

A striking trend in landlord acquisitions is the strong preference for cash purchases over financed deals. Cash-owned properties total 3,265, more than 3.3 times the 972 properties that are financed, suggesting a high level of capital liquidity or a preference for avoiding debt among Franklin County landlords.

The sheer number of individual landlords, totaling 5,105 entities, far surpasses the 376 company landlords, indicating that the vast majority of rental property providers are individuals or small partnerships. This 13.57:1 ratio of individual to company entities challenges perceptions of corporate dominance in the local rental market.

The minimal proportion of company-owned SFR properties (10.6%) despite a notable number of overall investor properties (4,237) highlights that Franklin County's investor landscape is predominantly driven by local, individual endeavors rather than large corporate strategies.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured a Significant 10.1% Discount on SFR Acquisitions in Q4 2025 Compared to Homeowners
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift, landlords in Franklin County secured a substantial 10.1% discount on SFR properties in Q4 2025, paying an average of $307,413 compared to homeowners' $341,989. This $34,576 price difference signals a strong advantage for investors in the recent quarter.

The acquisition price differential between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile throughout 2025. After landlords paid premiums of 4.2% ($15,438) in Q1 and 4.5% ($17,303) in Q2, and an even higher 29.4% ($106,864) premium in Q3, the sharp reversal to a 10.1% discount in Q4 highlights dynamic market conditions and shifting leverage.

Landlord average acquisition prices in Q4 2025 ($307,413) mark a significant decrease compared to both the full year 2025 average of $388,719 and the 2020-2023 period average of $389,388. This indicates a downward trend in acquisition costs for landlords, potentially reflecting a more favorable buying environment or a focus on lower-priced properties.

The swing from landlords paying substantial premiums in earlier 2025 quarters to a notable discount in Q4 suggests either a more disciplined investment strategy, or increased market distress creating opportunities for investor buyers. The $106,864 premium in Q3 stands as the highest recorded for the year, making the subsequent Q4 discount particularly impactful.

Despite the lack of explicit data on the number of landlord acquisitions for specific prior quarters, the consistent reporting of average prices for landlords vs. homeowners throughout 2025 provides clear insights into the evolving pricing dynamics within Franklin County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 36.1% of All SFR Purchases in Q4 2025, Signaling Strong Market Activity
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County accounted for a significant portion of Q4 2025 SFR purchases, acquiring 66 properties, which represents 36.1% of the total 183 SFR properties sold in the quarter. This strong market share demonstrates landlords' continued influence in the local housing market.

The vast majority of landlord purchasing activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who bought 66 properties, comprising an impressive 95.7% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025. This indicates that small-scale investors are the primary force behind current investor purchasing trends.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only a single purchase in Q4 2025, representing a mere 1.4% of total landlord acquisitions. This minimal activity suggests a limited or cautious presence of large-scale corporate buyers in Franklin County.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was particularly vibrant in Q4, with 79 distinct entities acquiring 49 properties. This high number of new, small-scale investors signals continued entry into the rental market and underscores the fragmented nature of local investor activity.

Looking at the average properties per entity for Q4 purchases, Tier 11-20 shows the highest buying intensity with 1 entity acquiring 2 properties, while Tier 01 (0.62 properties per entity) reflects individual new entrants. Overall, the Q4 purchase landscape is heavily skewed towards smaller investors, with little to no impact from institutional players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.0% of Franklin County's Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those owning 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control a commanding 98.0% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Franklin County. This overwhelming concentration highlights their foundational role in the local rental housing market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 80.9% of all investor-owned SFR, totaling 3,533 properties. This demonstrates that first-time and smallest-scale investors are not just numerous but are the dominant owners of rental housing.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a nearly non-existent footprint, owning only 4 properties which constitutes a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in the county. This figure significantly counters any perception of large corporate takeover in the Franklin County market.

The distribution reveals a steep drop-off in ownership share as portfolio size increases. After Tier 01, Tier 03-05 is the next largest segment at 7.4% (324 properties), followed by Tier 02 at 6.5% (286 properties). This signifies that while there are some landlords with a few properties, the market quickly becomes diluted beyond the single-property owner.

While specific 'All Time' acquisition prices by tier are not available within this section, the dominant ownership by mom-and-pop landlords suggests that local dynamics and smaller investment strategies drive the majority of the market's value and activity.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Consistently Dominate All Landlord Tiers in Franklin County, Even in Larger Portfolios
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently maintain majority ownership across all reported landlord tiers in Franklin County, defying any notion of corporate takeover within specific portfolio sizes. Even in the 'Small landlord (6-10 properties)' tier, individuals own 59.3% of properties (83 out of 140), showing their pervasive market presence.

The dominance of individual investors is particularly pronounced in the smallest tier, where they own 3,300 properties, representing 92.3% of the 'Single-property' (Tier 01) segment. This underscores the fragmented and individual-driven nature of new market entrants and small-scale landlords.

Although individual investors dominate, company ownership does see its highest relative concentration in the 'Small landlord (6-10 properties)' tier, where they account for 57 properties or 40.7% of that segment. This tier represents the closest point of competition for ownership types.

Beyond the 6-10 property tier, individual investor dominance strengthens again, notably in the 'Small-medium (11-20)' tier where they hold 63.8% of properties (30 out of 47), and in the 'Small-medium (21-50)' tier, where they control an even higher 92.6% (25 out of 27 properties).

The data clearly indicates that for Franklin County, the narrative of individual investors as the backbone of the rental market holds true across the spectrum of portfolio sizes, with no discernible 'crossover point' where companies become the majority owners in any given tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Franklin County's 37330 Zip Code Leads in Investor-Owned Properties, While 37356 Shows Highest Penetration Rate
Detailed Findings

Within Franklin County, the 37330 zip code stands out as having the highest concentration of investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 659 units, which represents 25.2% of its total SFR market. This makes it the primary hub for investor activity by volume.

While 37330 leads in sheer numbers, the 37356 zip code demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate at an impressive 51.2%, indicating that over half of the SFR properties in this area are landlord-owned. This high penetration suggests a highly attractive or accessible market for investors, despite not being a leader in total property count.

The geographic distribution reveals distinct patterns: zip codes with the most investor-owned properties (e.g., 37330, 37324) do not necessarily have the highest investor ownership rates. For instance, 37324 ranks second in properties (454) but fifth in rate (27.5%), demonstrating different market structures.

Zip codes like 37375 (44.8% investor-owned) and 37352 (37.5% investor-owned) also show significant investor penetration rates, suggesting that smaller markets within the county can be highly attractive to landlords, potentially due to specific local market conditions or property characteristics.

The contrast between leading regions by count and by percentage highlights the importance of analyzing both metrics to understand local market dynamics. Some areas attract a large volume of investor properties, while others demonstrate a higher saturation of investor ownership within their existing housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Franklin County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers with a 5.37x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County are firmly in a net buying position, actively accumulating properties with a robust 5.37x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025, where they purchased 102 properties while selling only 19. This aggressive acquisition trend signals strong confidence or opportunity in the market.

The overall net buying trend for landlords is consistent, with 390 properties bought versus 91 sold in Year 2025 (a 4.29x ratio), and 326 bought versus 79 sold in Year 2024 (a 4.13x ratio). This sustained pattern indicates a long-term strategy of portfolio expansion among local investors.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibited very limited transaction volume. In Q4 2025, they completed 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in a net neutral position, reinforcing their minimal direct market impact in this specific geography.

The quarterly buy/sell ratios demonstrate a dynamic market. While Q4 2025 shows aggressive buying, Q3 2025 was even more intense with a 5.67x buy/sell ratio (102 buys vs 18 sells), indicating periods of accelerated acquisition. Q2 2025 had a lower but still strong 3.03x ratio (103 buys vs 34 sells).

Despite the lack of detailed inter-landlord transaction percentages and average buy/sell prices within this section, the clear pattern of continuous net buying by the broad landlord community, coupled with the minimal institutional presence, paints a picture of a market driven by smaller, growing portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 35.1% of Q4 2025 SFR Transactions, Primarily Driven by Single-Property Buyers
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County were involved in a notable 35.1% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 102 transactions out of 291. This robust activity confirms their significant role in market liquidity and property turnover.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord transactions were attributed to single-property investors (Tier 01), who completed 79 transactions, representing 77.5% of all landlord-involved deals. This highlights their continued dominance not just in ownership but also in market activity.

A striking pricing pattern emerged: institutional investors (Tier 1000+) paid an average purchase price of just $88,400, a dramatic 68.7% less than the $282,373 average paid by single-property landlords. This suggests institutional buyers are targeting significantly different and much lower-priced segments of the market.

Inter-landlord trading activity was very low; only 14 of the 79 transactions by single-property landlords (17.7%) involved buying from another landlord, while all other tiers reported 0% of their purchases from fellow landlords. This indicates that most landlord acquisitions are from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

While Tier 02 landlords paid the highest average price at $382,056 in Q4, the overall price distribution shows smaller landlords (Tiers 03-10) paying less, in the range of $202,000 to $210,629. This varied pricing strategy across tiers signals diverse investment objectives and property targets within the landlord community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Franklin County's SFR Market, Securing Q4 Discounts as Institutions Remain Minimal
Holdings
Landlords own 4,237 SFR properties, constituting 27.4% of Franklin County's total SFR market. Individual investors hold an overwhelming 3,839 properties (90.6%), with companies owning only 449 (10.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 10.1% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average discount of $34,576 per property ($307,413 vs $341,989), a sharp reversal from premiums seen earlier in the year.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 66 properties, representing 36.1% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords, with 79 new entities, were the primary drivers, acquiring 49 properties and dominating the quarter's activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an impressive 98.0% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.1% (4 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain majority control across all portfolio tiers in Franklin County, with no crossover point where companies become the dominant owners. The highest company concentration is observed in the 6-10 property tier (40.7% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.37x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (102 buys vs 19 sells). Institutional investors, however, were net neutral in Q4, with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

Franklin County's single-family residential (SFR) housing market is significantly influenced by landlords, who collectively own 4,237 properties, representing 27.4% of the total SFR stock. This investor presence is overwhelmingly driven by individual landlords, who control an impressive 90.6% of these holdings (3,839 properties), contrasting sharply with the 10.6% held by company-owned entities. This robust individual ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) commanding 98.0% of the investor-owned market, firmly establishes them as the primary force shaping the local rental landscape, with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.1% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 reflects a strategic positioning within the market. Landlords purchased 36.1% of all SFR sales, often securing properties at a notable 10.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, averaging $307,413 versus $341,989. This discount represents a significant shift from earlier 2025 quarters where landlords often paid premiums. Transactional data reveals landlords are strong net buyers, with 102 acquisitions against 19 sales in Q4, indicating continued portfolio expansion. New single-property landlords were highly active, with 79 entities entering the market and dominating transaction volumes, while institutional activity remained minimal and net neutral.

These trends underscore a resilient and actively expanding mom-and-pop landlord segment in Franklin County, TN, characterized by individual ownership, cash-heavy purchases, and a clear focus on rental income generation. The market shows a high degree of local, small-scale investment rather than large corporate influence. The notable Q4 pricing discount for landlords suggests a period of favorable acquisition opportunities, potentially signaling a competitive edge or access to different market segments compared to traditional buyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFranklin (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership