Fentress (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fentress (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fentress (TN)
6,261
Total Investors in Fentress (TN)
2,838
Investor Owned SFR in Fentress (TN)
2,055(32.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,667
SFR Owned
1,885
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
171
SFR Owned
194
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,055 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Fentress County: Mom-and-pop landlords dominate with 98.4% ownership as investors drive high market penetration
Investors own 2,055 SFR properties, representing 32.8% of the Fentress County SFR market, with individuals holding 91.7% of these. In Q4, landlords secured an average 24.0% discount compared to homeowners, driving a strong net buying position overall, even as institutional investors shifted to net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Fentress County landlords own 2,055 SFR properties, with individual investors holding 91.7%.
The vast majority of landlord holdings are rented (2,044 properties), indicating a strong rental focus. Most investor-owned properties are acquired with cash, totaling 1,614 compared to 441 financed properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Fentress County paid $194,923 in Q4, a 24.0% discount of $61,522 compared to homeowners' $256,445.
The landlord-homeowner price gap exhibited significant volatility quarter-over-quarter, shifting from a 27.3% discount in Q1 to a 13.2% premium in Q3, then back to a substantial 24.0% discount in Q4. This fluctuating trend suggests opportunistic buying patterns rather than a consistent pricing advantage.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords comprised 34.2% of all 73 SFR purchases in Fentress County during Q4, acquiring 25 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 96.2% of all landlord purchases in Q4, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases. The market saw 28 new entities, primarily single-property investors, enter in Q4, indicating continued small-scale growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Fentress County, far outpacing institutional investors at 0.1%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone represent 89.2% of all investor-owned properties, owning 1,855 units. This highlights that the vast majority of investor-owned housing is held by small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Fentress County for portfolios of 11-20 properties (Tier 05), controlling 95.8%.
Individual investors dominate smaller tiers, holding 92.9% of single-property (Tier 01) and 85.4% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios. Companies show a significant presence in Tier 03-05 (3-20 properties), suggesting a strategic shift from individual to corporate investment as portfolio size grows.
Geographic Distribution
TN-Fentress-38556 leads Fentress County with 1,527 investor-owned SFR properties (34.3% ownership rate).
TN-Fentress-38549 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 55.6%, followed by TN-Fentress-38554 at 50.0%. TN-Fentress-38504 appears in both top lists, indicating both high volume (113 properties) and high penetration (38.3%) of investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Fentress County landlords are net buyers with a 5.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (33 buys vs 6 sells), while institutions are net sellers in 2025.
Overall landlords maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2024 and 2025, with yearly buy/sell ratios of 6.46x and 4.09x respectively. Institutional investors shifted from being net buyers in 2024 to net sellers in 2025, signaling a strategic divestment trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 28.2% of Q4 Fentress County transactions, participating in 33 of 117 total SFR transactions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) conducted virtually all Q4 landlord transactions (32), with no activity from institutional investors. Only a small portion of transactions involved buying from other landlords; Tier 02 saw 33.3% of its 3 transactions come from landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Fentress County landlords own 2,055 SFR properties, with individual investors holding 91.7%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fentress County, TN, collectively own a significant portfolio of 2,055 Single Family Residential properties, representing 32.8% of the total 6,261 SFR properties in the market. This high investor penetration underscores the county's appeal to rental property owners.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 1,885 properties (91.7%) compared to companies which own 194 properties (9.4%). This signals a market heavily reliant on local, non-institutional investors.

The Fentress County market features a striking prevalence of individual landlords, with 2,667 individual entities comprising 94.0% of all 2,838 landlords. This highlights the widespread participation of smaller-scale investors in the local rental housing market.

A substantial majority of landlord-owned properties are designated as rented, totaling 2,044 properties out of 2,055, indicating that almost all investor holdings are non-owner-occupied and actively contributing to the rental housing supply. This confirms a clear rental-focused investment strategy.

Cash purchases are the preferred method for Fentress County landlords, with 1,614 properties acquired via cash compared to 441 properties that are financed. This strong preference for cash transactions may suggest a market with lower financing barriers or a strategic move to minimize interest rate exposure.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Fentress County paid $194,923 in Q4, a 24.0% discount of $61,522 compared to homeowners' $256,445.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fentress County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in 2025-Q4, acquiring properties at an average of $194,923, which is $61,522 (24.0%) less than the average traditional homeowner price of $256,445. This substantial discount points to landlords' ability to secure properties below market rates.

The price differential between landlords and homeowners has been highly inconsistent throughout 2025. Following a remarkable 27.3% discount in Q1 ($82,756 difference), landlords paid a premium of 13.2% in Q3 ($38,430 more), before returning to a notable discount in Q4. This suggests a dynamic market where pricing advantages are not sustained quarter-to-quarter.

The average acquisition price for landlords has shown variability across recent periods, with 2025 seeing an average of $251,914, slightly higher than the $204,809 average in 2024. This trend indicates some price appreciation, but also a responsive market where investor prices adjust significantly between quarters.

Comparing average prices from the pandemic-era (2020-2023 average of $171,469) to the current year (2025 average of $251,914), landlords have experienced substantial price appreciation. This represents an increase of $80,445 (46.9%) in average acquisition costs, highlighting a significant market value growth since the boom period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords comprised 34.2% of all 73 SFR purchases in Fentress County during Q4, acquiring 25 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in the Q4 2025 Fentress County market, accounting for 25 of the total 73 SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 34.2% market share. This indicates a robust level of investor activity within the county.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 purchases, securing all 25 landlord acquisitions and representing 96.2% of the landlord purchase volume. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded no purchases, reinforcing the small-investor driven nature of the county's market.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active in Q4, with 21 properties acquired by 28 distinct entities. This suggests a strong influx of new, first-time landlords entering the market, forming the backbone of current investor growth.

The concentration of Q4 buying activity heavily skewed towards smaller investors; Tier 01 (single-property) accounted for 80.8% of all landlord purchases. This is followed by Tier 02 (two-property) with 11.5% (3 properties) and Tier 05-08 (11-20 properties) with 3.8% (1 property), showing a clear small-investor market.

Across the buying tiers, the average properties per entity remained low, consistent with a mom-and-pop market. For example, Tier 01 saw 21 properties acquired by 28 entities, demonstrating many single-property buyers, while Tier 02 saw 3 properties by 3 entities, representing one-off investments by existing small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Fentress County, far outpacing institutional investors at 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

Fentress County's investor-owned SFR market is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively controlling 98.4% of all 2,055 investor-owned properties. This distribution firmly establishes the market as small-investor driven.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 1,855 properties, which accounts for a massive 89.2% of all investor-owned SFR. This indicates that most investor activity in the county originates from individuals owning just one rental property.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, controlling only 2 properties, or 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR in Fentress County. This demonstrates a limited presence of large corporate landlords.

The ownership concentration across tiers shows a steep drop-off after the smallest investors. While Tier 01 accounts for 89.2% of properties, Tier 02 (two-property owners) holds 6.2% (128 properties), and Tier 03 (3-5 properties) accounts for 2.7% (57 properties), confirming a pyramid structure heavily weighted towards the base.

The distribution of properties among landlords clearly indicates that Fentress County's rental market structure remains largely untouched by large-scale corporate ownership, with the vast majority of rental housing stock held by local, smaller-portfolio investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Fentress County for portfolios of 11-20 properties (Tier 05), controlling 95.8%.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest property tiers in Fentress County, owning 1,742 (92.9%) of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 111 (85.4%) of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios. This reinforces the individual-driven nature of the foundational rental market.

A notable crossover point occurs in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where company ownership becomes dominant, controlling 23 properties (95.8%) compared to only 1 property (4.2%) held by individuals. This illustrates where larger-scale investment shifts from individual to corporate structures in Fentress County.

Even in slightly larger mom-and-pop tiers, individual investors maintain a strong majority. For instance, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 44 properties (77.2%) compared to companies with 13 properties (22.8%), showcasing sustained individual presence even as portfolios grow.

The tier distribution by owner type indicates that companies, while fewer in number, tend to accumulate properties more rapidly once they begin investing. This is evidenced by their near-complete dominance in the 11-20 property tier, a sharp contrast to their minimal presence in the single-property tier.

The data reveals a clear segmentation: smaller portfolio growth is almost exclusively driven by individuals, while companies begin to consolidate properties more effectively once they move beyond very small portfolios. This implies different strategic approaches and capabilities between individual and corporate investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-Fentress-38556 leads Fentress County with 1,527 investor-owned SFR properties (34.3% ownership rate).
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Fentress County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes, with TN-Fentress-38556 leading significantly with 1,527 properties. This sub-geography alone accounts for a substantial portion of the county's investor activity.

Beyond raw counts, certain zip codes demonstrate exceptionally high investor ownership rates, indicating deep market penetration. TN-Fentress-38549 stands out with 55.6% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, followed closely by TN-Fentress-38554 at 50.0%.

The zip code TN-Fentress-38504 is unique in featuring prominently in both top investor-owned property count (113 properties) and ownership percentage (38.3%) lists. This suggests a particularly active and dense investor market within this specific area.

The distribution of investor properties reveals a pattern where a few zip codes act as primary hubs for investment, absorbing a disproportionately large share of landlord activity. For example, the top two by count (38556 and 38553) collectively hold 1,690 investor properties.

While some areas like 38556 boast both high counts and solid penetration (34.3%), other areas like 38549 show an even higher rate of investor ownership, suggesting that even smaller sub-markets can be heavily influenced by landlords.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Fentress County landlords are net buyers with a 5.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (33 buys vs 6 sells), while institutions are net sellers in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Fentress County landlords demonstrated a robust net buyer position in 2025-Q4, acquiring 33 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a significant buy/sell ratio of 5.5x. This strong buying momentum indicates continued investor confidence in the market.

Across the entire year, landlords maintained a substantial net buyer status in 2025, with 139 purchases against 34 sells, achieving a buy/sell ratio of 4.09x. This follows an even stronger net buyer performance in 2024, where 155 buys against 24 sells yielded a 6.46x ratio, highlighting consistent accumulation.

In contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (1000+ tier) shifted from being net buyers in 2024 (4 buys vs 3 sells) to net sellers in 2025 (4 buys vs 7 sells, a net reduction of 3 properties). This suggests a strategic change in institutional activity, moving towards divestment in Fentress County.

The consistent net buying behavior of all landlords, particularly over the past two years, implies an underlying belief in long-term appreciation or rental income stability within the Fentress County market. The volume of purchases far outweighs sales, expanding the total landlord-owned inventory.

The diverging trends between all landlords (net buyers) and institutional investors (net sellers in 2025) suggest that the market dynamics for smaller, local investors are distinct from those of larger, more remote entities, possibly due to different investment horizons or capital allocation strategies.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 28.2% of Q4 Fentress County transactions, participating in 33 of 117 total SFR transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for a significant portion of Q4 2025 transactions in Fentress County, participating in 33 out of 117 total SFR transactions, representing a 28.2% market share. This indicates active engagement by investors in the county's property market.

Transaction volumes were heavily concentrated in the smaller investor tiers, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 32 of the 33 landlord transactions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions during Q4, further underscoring their minimal presence in current market activity.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by tier in Q4; single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $212,211, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) secured properties at a considerably lower average of $109,450. This large price differential suggests different acquisition strategies or property types targeted by these tiers.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal in Q4 2025, with only 1 transaction out of 33 coming from another landlord (for Tier 02 buyers). This indicates that the majority of landlord acquisitions originated from non-landlord sellers, suggesting fresh inventory entering the investor pool rather than portfolio reshuffling among existing investors.

The highest purchase price among active tiers was observed in Tier 01 at $212,211, while the lowest was Tier 03-05 at $55,000. This wide price spread of $157,211 across tiers highlights the diverse range of property values and investment strategies active in the Q4 Fentress County market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Fentress County: Mom-and-pop landlords dominate with 98.4% ownership as investors drive high market penetration
Holdings
Landlords own 2,055 SFR properties in Fentress County, representing 32.8% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,885 (91.7%) and companies owning 194 (9.4%).
Pricing
Fentress County landlords paid an average of $194,923 in Q4, securing a notable 24.0% discount of $61,522 compared to traditional homeowners' average of $256,445, though pricing has been highly volatile quarterly.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 25 properties, representing 34.2% of all SFR sales, with 28 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 96.2% of these acquisitions, demonstrating their market dominance.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Fentress County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold 91.7% of landlord-owned properties, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 properties tier, controlling 95.8% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Fentress County landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (33 buys vs 6 sells), accumulating properties. However, institutional investors are net sellers in 2025 (4 buys vs 7 sells), diverging from overall market trends.
Market Narrative

Fentress County, Tennessee, exhibits a robust and predominantly small-scale investor market, with landlords collectively owning 2,055 Single Family Residential properties, which constitutes a significant 32.8% of the county's total SFR market. This market structure is overwhelmingly driven by individual investors, who account for 1,885 (91.7%) of all landlord-owned properties and represent 2,667 (94.0%) of all landlord entities. The vast majority of these holdings, specifically 98.4%, are controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintaining a negligible presence of just 0.1% of the investor-owned portfolio.

Investor behavior in Fentress County during Q4 2025 demonstrated strong acquisition momentum, with landlords completing 34.2% of all SFR purchases. These investors, particularly mom-and-pops, showed opportunistic buying strategies, securing properties at an average of $194,923, a substantial 24.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average price of $256,445. Despite this significant Q4 discount, quarterly pricing has shown considerable volatility, reflecting a responsive and dynamic market. Overall, landlords are net buyers with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 5.5x, actively expanding their portfolios, although institutional investors diverged by becoming net sellers in 2025.

The Fentress County market's reliance on small-scale, individual investors signals a highly accessible and localized investment landscape, largely insulated from large corporate influence. The high percentage of investor-owned properties, coupled with strong net buying activity from individuals, suggests ongoing confidence in the county's rental market stability and potential for appreciation. This dynamic creates a robust local rental housing supply, primarily sustained by local residents and small businesses rather than external institutional capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFentress (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4