DeKalb (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the DeKalb (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in DeKalb (TN)
7,412
Total Investors in DeKalb (TN)
2,977
Investor Owned SFR in DeKalb (TN)
2,438(32.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,722
SFR Owned
2,134
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
255
SFR Owned
350
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,438 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate DeKalb County SFR Market While Landlords Secure Significant Q4 Discounts
Landlords own 2,438 SFR properties, comprising 32.9% of DeKalb County's market, with 87.5% held by individual investors. Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 93.4% of investor-owned housing. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a significant 27.6% discount compared to homeowners and remained strong net buyers with a 4.44x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Dominate DeKalb County's 2,438 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Individual investors hold 87.5% of investor-owned properties, significantly outpacing companies at 14.4%. Nearly all landlord holdings (99.5%) are rented, with 82.7% acquired using cash, indicating a strong focus on cash-flow and long-term rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secure 27.6% Discount in Q4, Outperforming Homeowners by $96,096
The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced high volatility this year, swinging from an 18.3% premium in Q1 to a 27.6% discount in Q4. Average landlord acquisition prices have shown appreciation, rising from $301,983 (2020-2023 average) to $324,469 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Acquire 29.5% of Q4 SFR Purchases, Driven by Single-Property Investors
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 79.3% of all landlord purchases in Q4. A significant 30 entities, predominantly single-property landlords, entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.4% of Investor SFR, Institutional Share is Negligible at 0.1%
Single-property landlords alone hold 80.8% of all investor-owned properties in DeKalb County. This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and locally-driven market, with institutional investors owning only 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate Most Tiers, But Companies Lead in 11-20 Property Portfolios
Companies own 89.1% of properties in the 11-20 tier, marking a significant presence in mid-size portfolios. However, individual investors still maintain a majority in the 21-50 property tier at 55.6%, indicating a nuanced market structure. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own 2 properties in DeKalb County, TN.
Geographic Distribution
TN-DeKalb-37166 Leads with 1,558 Investor Properties, 64% of County's Total
TN-DeKalb-38569 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 62.5%, indicating deep market penetration despite not being the largest by count. Overall, the top 5 zip codes by count account for 87.4% of all investor-owned properties, revealing significant geographic concentration across DeKalb County, TN.
Historical Transactions
Landlords Remain Strong Net Buyers with 4.44x Buy/Sell Ratio; Institutional Activity is Balanced
All landlords in DeKalb County consistently acquired significantly more properties than they sold throughout 2024 and 2025, maintaining a 2025 annual buy/sell ratio of 4.91. Institutional investors shifted from being net sellers in 2024 to a balanced transaction position in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Account for 26.7% of Q4 Transactions, Led by Single-Property Investors
Single-property landlords averaged $263,584 per transaction, slightly more than institutional buyers at $259,560. Notably, the single institutional transaction in Q4 was 100% sourced from another landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate DeKalb County's 2,438 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County, TN, collectively own 2,438 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 32.9% of the entire SFR market in the county, highlighting a substantial investor presence.

Individual landlords are the predominant owners, controlling 2,134 properties (87.5% of investor-owned SFR), compared to companies which own 350 properties (14.4%). This signifies that local, individual investors form the backbone of the rental market rather than large corporate entities.

The ownership structure by entity count reinforces individual dominance, with 2,722 individual landlords far outnumbering the 255 company landlords, representing 91.4% of all landlords in DeKalb County, TN.

An overwhelming 99.5% of all investor-owned properties are rented, totaling 2,426 properties, underscoring that the vast majority of these holdings are non-owner-occupied and actively serving the rental market.

A significant 82.7% of investor-owned properties, or 2,016 properties, were acquired with cash, while only 422 properties (17.3%) are financed. This indicates a preference for cash acquisitions, potentially signaling strong balance sheets or a strategy to minimize debt.

The ratio of individual to company landlords stands at approximately 10.7:1 (2,722 individual landlords vs. 255 company landlords), confirming that the market is highly fragmented and driven by a large number of smaller, independent investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secure 27.6% Discount in Q4, Outperforming Homeowners by $96,096
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a significant purchasing advantage in DeKalb County, TN, acquiring properties at an average price of $252,519 – a substantial $96,096 (27.6%) less than traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $348,615.

The price differential between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated wildly throughout 2025. Landlords paid an 18.3% premium ($418,040 vs $353,448) in Q1, then secured a 24.6% discount ($260,684 vs $345,862) in Q2, before returning to a minor 0.2% premium ($338,988 vs $338,259) in Q3.

Despite the recent Q4 dip, landlord acquisition prices have shown a general upward trend since the pandemic era, with average prices increasing from $301,983 in 2020-2023 to $317,454 in 2024, and further to $324,469 in 2025.

The notable Q4 discount of 27.6% suggests a strategic shift or opportunistic buying by landlords, potentially leveraging unique market conditions or seller motivations that are not available to the broader homeowner market.

The inconsistency of the landlord discount quarter-over-quarter indicates a dynamic market where price advantages are not constant, requiring agile acquisition strategies from investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Acquire 29.5% of Q4 SFR Purchases, Driven by Single-Property Investors
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County, TN, accounted for a substantial 29.5% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 28 out of 95 total properties, showcasing their active role in the market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of this activity, purchasing 21 properties, representing 72.4% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4. This highlights the ongoing importance of small-scale investors in the housing market.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord purchases came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who acquired 23 properties, constituting an overwhelming 79.3% of all landlord purchases. This underscores their market dominance over larger entities.

A notable 30 entities, primarily single-property landlords, made purchases in Q4, indicating a healthy influx of new or expanding small investors into the market, despite only 21 properties being added to Tier 01 portfolios.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, accounting for a marginal 3.4% of landlord acquisitions, revealing their minimal direct participation in this quarter's buying in DeKalb County.

The average property acquisition per entity in Tier 01 for Q4 stands at 0.7 properties (21 properties by 30 entities), suggesting a significant number of new or existing small landlords were active in the market without necessarily increasing their portfolio count beyond one property, or that some entities made purchases that fell into Tier 01 but were not their first property.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 93.4% of Investor SFR, Institutional Share is Negligible at 0.1%
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in DeKalb County, TN, is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively control 93.4% of all investor-held properties across Tiers 01-04.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 2,028 properties, which accounts for a substantial 80.8% of the total investor-owned housing, cementing their role as the bedrock of the rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share of only 0.1% of the market, representing just 2 properties. This defies common narratives about widespread corporate takeover of single-family rentals.

The distribution shows a steep decline in property counts as portfolio size increases; for example, Tier 01 (80.8%) is dramatically larger than Tier 02 (6.3%), indicating that most landlords remain small-scale operators.

The presence of 52 properties owned by individual investors in the Large (101-1000) tier (100% individual) further highlights that even larger portfolios within DeKalb County are predominantly managed by individuals rather than companies, outside of the institutional definition.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate Most Tiers, But Companies Lead in 11-20 Property Portfolios
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in DeKalb County, TN, owning 91.0% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 79.4% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings, demonstrating their foundational role in the market.

A notable shift occurs in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 41 properties (89.1%) compared to only 5 properties (10.9%) owned by individuals.

Despite this crossover, the dominance of companies is not linear; in the next tier, small-medium (21-50 properties), individual investors surprisingly reclaim the majority, owning 55.6% of properties (5 properties vs 4 for companies).

Individual investors maintain 100% ownership in the large (101-1000 properties) tier, controlling all 52 properties in this segment, showcasing that even larger, but not institutional, portfolios are exclusively managed by individuals.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found in the Large (101-1000) tier at 100%, while the highest company concentration occurs in the Small-medium (11-20) tier at 89.1%, highlighting specific niches for different owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-DeKalb-37166 Leads with 1,558 Investor Properties, 64% of County's Total
Detailed Findings

The zip code TN-DeKalb-37166 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity in DeKalb County, TN, holding 1,558 investor-owned properties, which alone represents 64% of the county's total investor-owned SFR.

This market exhibits high geographic concentration, with the top 5 zip codes by investor-owned property count (TN-DeKalb-37166, 37059, 38583, 38582, and 37012) collectively accounting for 2,132 properties, or 87.4% of all investor-owned properties in the county.

While TN-DeKalb-37166 leads by sheer volume, TN-DeKalb-38569 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 62.5%, suggesting a smaller overall market where a majority of SFR are investor-owned, indicating high market penetration.

Two zip codes, TN-DeKalb-38583 and TN-DeKalb-38582, appear on both the top 5 list by count and by percentage (37.0% and 57.7% respectively), demonstrating a dual significance of high volume and high investor penetration within these regions.

The diversity between areas with high property counts versus high ownership percentages indicates varied market dynamics, where some regions attract a high volume of investors, while others are characterized by a higher proportion of investor-owned properties within a smaller inventory.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords Remain Strong Net Buyers with 4.44x Buy/Sell Ratio; Institutional Activity is Balanced
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County, TN, consistently demonstrate a strong net buyer position, with 40 buy transactions against only 9 sell transactions in Q4 2025, resulting in a robust 4.44x buy/sell ratio.

This persistent accumulation trend is evident throughout the year, with total buy transactions for 2025 reaching 167 compared to 34 sells, yielding an annual buy/sell ratio of 4.91, indicating strong demand for new acquisitions.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) presented a balanced transaction profile in Q4 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell, leading to a net position of 0 for the quarter and for the entire year 2025 (2 buys, 2 sells).

In contrast to their balanced activity in 2025, institutional investors were net sellers in 2024, with 1 buy and 2 sells, indicating a shift from divestment to a more stable holding or rebalancing strategy.

The sustained high buy-to-sell ratios for all landlords suggest a market where investor confidence remains high, and properties are being accumulated at a much faster rate than they are being divested, potentially tightening available inventory.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Account for 26.7% of Q4 Transactions, Led by Single-Property Investors
Detailed Findings

Landlords in DeKalb County, TN, played a significant role in Q4 2025, participating in 40 of the total 150 SFR transactions, which accounts for 26.7% of the quarter's market activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated transaction volumes, conducting 31 transactions, comprising 77.5% of all landlord-involved transactions in Q4, highlighting their critical role in market liquidity and activity.

The average purchase price varied across tiers in Q4, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) paying the highest average at $263,584 among the actively purchasing mom-and-pop tiers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had minimal transaction activity, with only 1 transaction in Q4 2025, which was notably sourced 100% from another landlord, suggesting a targeted, internal market transaction.

The average purchase price for institutional investors in Q4 was $259,560, which is approximately 1.5% less than the average price paid by single-property landlords ($263,584), indicating a slight price advantage for larger entities.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively executed 34 transactions in Q4, solidifying their position as the most active and influential segment of the investor market in DeKalb County, TN.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate DeKalb County SFR Market While Institutions Remain Balanced
Holdings
Landlords own 2,438 SFR properties, representing 32.9% of the total SFR market in DeKalb County, TN. Individual investors hold 87.5% of these properties, while companies own 14.4%.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured a substantial 27.6% discount, paying $96,096 less than traditional homeowners ($252,519 vs $348,615). This marked a significant shift from earlier quarters, which saw a wide fluctuation in landlord pricing advantage.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 29.5% of all Q4 SFR purchases in DeKalb County, TN, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) driving 72.4% of these acquisitions. A notable 30 entities entered the market as new single-property landlords in Q4.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.4% of investor-owned housing in DeKalb County. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% of the market.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate most tiers in DeKalb County, TN, companies achieve majority ownership in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, holding 89.1% of properties in that segment. However, individuals still hold a majority in the 21-50 tier, demonstrating a nuanced market structure.
Transactions
Overall, landlords in DeKalb County, TN, are strong net buyers with a 4.44x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (40 buys vs 9 sells). Institutional investors, however, maintained a balanced transaction position in Q4 (1 buy vs 1 sell) and for the full year 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in DeKalb County, TN, is profoundly shaped by small-scale operators. Landlords collectively own 2,438 SFR properties, constituting 32.9% of the entire SFR market. This extensive portfolio is predominantly held by individual investors, who account for 87.5% of investor-owned properties, far outweighing the 14.4% held by companies. This structure positions mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) as the market's backbone, controlling an overwhelming 93.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased strategic purchasing, with landlords accounting for 29.5% of all SFR purchases and securing a significant 27.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This pricing advantage, however, was highly volatile throughout the year, fluctuating dramatically from a premium to a substantial discount. Transaction data reveals landlords as consistent net buyers, maintaining a robust 4.44x buy/sell ratio in Q4, indicating active accumulation. In contrast, institutional investors, after being net sellers in 2024, exhibited a balanced transaction position in 2025, suggesting a shift towards holding rather than aggressive expansion or divestment.

These trends underscore a highly fragmented yet active investor market in DeKalb County, TN, where local, individual landlords are the primary drivers of ownership and market activity. The continued influx of new single-property landlords and their price-conscious purchasing power signal a resilient and accessible market for small investors. While institutional players have a minimal footprint, the dynamic pricing environment and consistent accumulation by smaller landlords will likely continue to influence housing inventory and rental market stability across DeKalb County, TN.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:29 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDeKalb (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail