Crockett (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crockett (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crockett (TN)
4,491
Total Investors in Crockett (TN)
1,868
Investor Owned SFR in Crockett (TN)
1,528(34.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,765
SFR Owned
1,412
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
103
SFR Owned
134
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,528 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Crockett County TN, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts Amidst Scant Institutional Activity
Landlords own 1,528 SFR properties, representing 34.0% of Crockett County's market, with individual investors holding 92.4% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 11 properties, securing a substantial 50.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors showed no purchasing activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Crockett County landlords own 1,528 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 92.4% share.
A significant 87.8% (1,328 properties) of landlord holdings are cash-owned, vastly outnumbering financed properties (200). Virtually all investor-owned properties, 1,510 out of 1,528, are non-owner-occupied and designated as rented, confirming a strong rental market focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 Crockett County landlords secured a 50.6% discount, paying $97,500 compared to homeowner's $197,293.
The landlord discount has fluctuated significantly, from a 56.5% discount in Q3 2025 to a surprising 8.4% premium paid in Q1 2025. Data indicates 0 properties purchased by landlords in 2024 and 2025 aggregates in Section 6-1, suggesting very low activity, yet specific Q4 data for landlords is available in Section 6-2.
Current Quarter Purchases
Mom-and-pop landlords drove Q4 purchases in Crockett County, accounting for 83.3% of 11 landlord acquisitions.
Landlords captured 23.4% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Crockett County. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 8 properties (66.7% of landlord purchases), while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.5% of all investor-owned SFR in Crockett County, while institutions hold 0%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, owning 79.1% of all investor-owned properties. Pricing data by tier is unavailable, preventing analysis of acquisition cost differences based on investor size or type in this section. Institutional investor presence remains at zero properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
In Crockett County, companies become majority owners only in larger portfolios (Tier 21-50+), while individuals dominate smaller tiers.
Individual investors hold over 90% of properties in the 1-2 property tiers, but their share drops to 50.8% in the 6-10 property tier. Companies own 7 properties (87.5%) in the 21-50 property tier, indicating their concentration in larger portfolios. No pricing data is available to compare individual vs company acquisition prices within tiers.
Geographic Distribution
TN-Crockett-38034 leads Crockett County with a 46.0% investor ownership rate and 330 properties.
Zip codes TN-Crockett-38001 and TN-Crockett-38006 show the highest investor-owned property counts at 497 and 437, respectively. The smaller zip codes of 38021 and 38050 exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates of 100.0% and 85.7%, respectively, indicating complete or near-complete investor control in those micro-markets.
Historical Transactions
Crockett County landlords are consistently net buyers, with 15 purchases versus 8 sells in Q4 2025.
All landlords have been net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025, with 84 buys and 35 sells in Year 2025, accumulating 49 net properties. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) show no transaction activity, indicating their complete absence from market movements in Crockett County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 21.1% of Q4 transactions in Crockett County, with single-property investors driving activity.
Out of 71 total Q4 transactions, landlords were involved in 15. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) averaged a purchase price of $89,000 and accounted for 11 transactions. Institutional investors made no transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Crockett County landlords own 1,528 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 92.4% share.
Detailed Findings

In Crockett County, TN, landlords collectively own 1,528 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, comprising 34.0% of the total SFR market, indicating a substantial investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, holding 1,412 properties (92.4% of the investor-owned portfolio), significantly outweighing company-owned properties which account for only 134 units (8.8%).

The ownership structure by entity count further reinforces individual dominance, with 1,765 individual landlords compared to just 103 company landlords, representing 94.5% of all landlord entities.

A striking 87.8% of landlord holdings (1,328 properties) are cash-owned, indicating a strong preference for unencumbered assets or significant capital reserves, while only 200 properties (13.1%) are financed.

Nearly all investor-owned properties, 1,510 out of 1,528 (98.8%), are rented and non-owner-occupied, underscoring that the vast majority of these holdings are actively utilized as rental income-generating assets.

Individual landlords predominantly own cash-purchased properties (1,328 total cash properties, mostly individual), while companies, although a minority, are also engaged in rental operations as evidenced by the high percentage of rented properties across the board.

The high proportion of rented properties across both individual and company owners highlights a market driven by long-term rental income strategies rather than short-term flips or speculative holding.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 Crockett County landlords secured a 50.6% discount, paying $97,500 compared to homeowner's $197,293.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Crockett County, TN, demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $97,500 – a substantial $99,793 discount, or 50.6% less, than the average $197,293 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown considerable volatility quarter-over-quarter; while landlords enjoyed a 56.5% discount in Q3 2025 and a 47.8% discount in Q2 2025, they surprisingly paid an 8.4% premium in Q1 2025, indicating shifting market dynamics.

Despite reported average acquisition prices, current quarter data from Section 6-1 indicates 0 distinct SFR properties were purchased by landlords across all 2025 quarters and 2024, signaling extremely low recent landlord buying volume, making the Q4 price comparison from Section 6-2 particularly noteworthy.

The sharp swing from paying an 8.4% premium in Q1 2025 ($204,119 vs $188,223 for homeowners) to securing deep discounts in subsequent quarters (Q2, Q3, Q4) suggests a significant shift in landlord buying strategies or market conditions in Crockett County.

While no specific breakdown for individual vs. company landlord acquisition prices is available, the overall trend points to landlords, as a group, exhibiting superior negotiation or access to properties at lower price points in the latter half of 2025.

The listed average acquisition price for years 2020-2023 was $103,166, which is higher than the Q4 2025 landlord average of $97,500, suggesting a slight price decline for investor acquisitions post-pandemic boom, contrary to general appreciation trends in some markets.

The consistency of landlords paying less than homeowners (with the exception of Q1 2025) across Q2-Q4 2025, despite very low purchase volume, reveals a strong ability to identify undervalued assets or secure off-market deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords drove Q4 purchases in Crockett County, accounting for 83.3% of 11 landlord acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Crockett County, TN, made 11 SFR purchases, capturing a notable 23.4% share of the 47 total SFR properties transacted in the market, indicating significant investor engagement in the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 purchasing activity, acquiring 10 properties, which represents 83.3% of all landlord purchases, solidifying their role as the primary drivers of investor activity.

The most active segment was single-property landlords (Tier 01), who purchased 8 distinct properties, accounting for 66.7% of all landlord acquisitions and indicating a strong entry or expansion by smaller-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Q4 2025, with 0 properties acquired, highlighting a complete absence of large-scale corporate investment in Crockett County during this period.

A total of 11 entities were active in the single-property tier during Q4, suggesting a healthy influx of new or expanding small landlords, outnumbering the 8 properties acquired, implying some entities might have made initial purchases to become Tier 01 landlords.

Mid-size landlords (Tier 11-20) also showed some activity, acquiring 2 properties, representing 16.7% of landlord purchases, indicating that not all activity was concentrated in the smallest tier.

The high concentration of purchases by smaller tiers underscores that the Crockett County market is predominantly influenced by individual and small-scale investors rather than large institutional players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.5% of all investor-owned SFR in Crockett County, while institutions hold 0%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Crockett County, TN, controlling a combined 98.5% of all investor properties, totaling 1,563 properties.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for 1,256 properties, representing a substantial 79.1% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio, making first-time or minimal landlords the largest segment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Crockett County, owning 0 properties, which starkly contrasts with narratives of large corporations buying up housing nationwide.

The distribution reveals a highly fragmented and localized investor market, with the next largest tier being small landlords (3-5 properties) holding 137 properties (8.6%), and two-property landlords (Tier 02) owning 111 properties (7.0%).

Given the absence of pricing data by tier in this section, it is not possible to determine if larger investors historically paid more or less per property, but the dominance of smaller landlords suggests local market knowledge is key.

The overall market structure in Crockett County heavily relies on small-scale investors, with portfolios of 50 or fewer properties accounting for virtually all (99.1%) of the investor-owned housing stock, based on tiers 01-08.

The complete lack of institutional ownership in Crockett County indicates that this market is not currently a target for large-scale corporate investment strategies, leaving the field open for local and individual landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
In Crockett County, companies become majority owners only in larger portfolios (Tier 21-50+), while individuals dominate smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Crockett County, TN, holding 94.6% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings with 1,198 properties and 90.1% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings with 100 properties.

A clear crossover point occurs in the mid-size tiers, where companies become the majority owners; in the small-medium (Tier 21-50) segment, companies own 7 properties (87.5%) compared to just 1 property (12.5%) for individuals.

In the small landlord (Tier 6-10) category, individual ownership still maintains a slight edge at 50.8% (30 properties) compared to companies at 49.2% (29 properties), showing a near equal split before companies take over in larger tiers.

The Large (Tier 101-1000) segment shows an even split, with both individuals and companies owning 1 property each (50.0%), suggesting that even at higher property counts, individual investors can still compete or coexist with corporate entities.

This distribution indicates that while individual investors form the broad base of the market, company investment becomes more pronounced and eventually dominant as portfolio sizes grow beyond the 10-property threshold in Crockett County.

The significant presence of individual investors even in tiers like 6-10 (30 properties) and 11-20 (11 properties) defies the perception that larger portfolios are exclusively the domain of corporations, although companies clearly start to gain leverage in higher tiers.

Without specific pricing data for individual versus company acquisition within each tier, it's not possible to discern if one owner type consistently pays more or less for properties of similar portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-Crockett-38034 leads Crockett County with a 46.0% investor ownership rate and 330 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Crockett County, TN, the zip code TN-Crockett-38034 exhibits a strong concentration of investor activity, leading by percentage with 46.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, totaling 330 properties.

Zip codes TN-Crockett-38001 and TN-Crockett-38006 report the highest absolute counts of investor-owned properties, with 497 and 437 properties respectively, demonstrating significant market share in these areas within the county.

Notably, two smaller zip codes, TN-Crockett-38021 and TN-Crockett-38050, reveal extreme investor saturation with 100.0% and 85.7% of their SFR properties being investor-owned, respectively, indicating these are niche markets almost entirely controlled by landlords.

The average acquisition prices across these top sub-geographies are not provided in this section, preventing analysis of how pricing strategies or market values vary regionally within Crockett County.

There is a clear correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages in regions like TN-Crockett-38034, which is prominent on both the top-by-count and top-by-percentage lists, signaling a highly attractive market for investors.

The total SFR inventory in these top regions shows where the bulk of the county's investor-owned housing stock resides, with TN-Crockett-38001 and 38006 collectively accounting for 934 properties.

The varying investor ownership rates, from 24.3% in TN-Crockett-38343 to 100.0% in TN-Crockett-38021, indicate diverse market penetration levels across different sub-geographies within Crockett County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Crockett County landlords are consistently net buyers, with 15 purchases versus 8 sells in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Crockett County, TN, consistently operated as net buyers throughout Q4 2025, recording 15 buy transactions against 8 sell transactions, resulting in a net increase of 7 properties in their portfolios for the quarter.

This net buyer trend is sustained annually, with landlords making 84 purchases and 35 sales in Year 2025, resulting in a net acquisition of 49 properties, following a strong net gain of 66 properties in Year 2024 (94 buys vs 28 sells).

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) displayed no transaction activity across any timeframe provided, making 0 buys and 0 sells, which indicates their complete disengagement from direct market transactions in Crockett County.

The average buy price for all landlords in Q4 2025 was $97,500, while the average sell price was $157,000, suggesting a significant implied margin of $59,500 per property if selling properties previously acquired at the Q4 average buy price.

While the overall buy/sell ratio for 2025 stands at 2.4x (84 buys / 35 sells), highlighting aggressive accumulation, the Q4 ratio is 1.88x (15 buys / 8 sells), indicating continued but slightly moderated buying intensity.

The absence of institutional transaction data means all market activity observed, including the consistent net buying, is driven by smaller-scale individual and mid-size company landlords.

The increasing buy volume from Q4 2024 (15 buys) to Q2 2025 (25 buys), followed by a slight moderation in Q3 (20 buys) and Q4 (15 buys), shows fluctuating but persistent landlord interest in acquiring properties in Crockett County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 21.1% of Q4 transactions in Crockett County, with single-property investors driving activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 15 of the 71 total SFR transactions in Crockett County, TN, during Q4 2025, representing a 21.1% share of the overall market activity for the quarter.

Transaction volume was predominantly driven by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who participated in 11 transactions, making them the most active segment in Q4.

The average purchase price for single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4 was $89,000, which is a key indicator of entry-level investment costs for new or expanding small landlords.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal in Q4 2025, with only 2 out of 11 (18.2%) transactions for single-property landlords involving properties bought from other landlords, suggesting most acquisitions were from non-investor sellers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions in Q4 2025, further confirming their complete absence from purchasing or selling activities in Crockett County.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for the vast majority of landlord transactions, with 13 transactions, reinforcing their dominant role in the local real estate market.

The price spread between the highest and lowest tier activity in Q4 shows that single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchased at an average of $89,000, while small-medium (Tier 11-20) landlords paid slightly more at $120,000 on average.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Crockett County's Rental Market: Mom-and-Pops Dominate with 98.5% Ownership, Securing Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,528 SFR properties in Crockett County, TN, representing 34.0% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding a commanding 1,412 properties (92.4%) compared to companies at 134 properties (8.8%).
Pricing
Landlords in Crockett County paid $97,500 in Q4 2025, securing a substantial $99,793 discount (50.6%) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $197,293, demonstrating a significant pricing advantage in the quarter.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 11 properties, representing 23.4% of all SFR sales. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were the most active, accounting for 10 of these purchases, while no new institutional landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned housing in Crockett County, TN, with institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+) holding no properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the small portfolio tiers (e.g., 94.6% of single-property holdings), with companies becoming majority owners only in larger portfolios starting at the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Crockett County are consistently net buyers, with 15 purchases versus 8 sells in Q4 2025, yielding a 1.88x buy/sell ratio, while institutional investors show no transaction activity across all timeframes.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Crockett County, TN, is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, individual investors, often referred to as mom-and-pop landlords. These entities collectively control 1,563 SFR properties, representing a staggering 98.5% of all investor-owned housing in the county. In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have no presence in this market, owning 0 properties, which significantly challenges the popular narrative of large corporations monopolizing housing. The overall landlord-owned portfolio of 1,528 SFR properties constitutes a substantial 34.0% of the county's total SFR market, highlighting the critical role these individual investors play in providing rental housing.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 in Crockett County reveals a market where landlords are actively acquiring properties, securing significant pricing advantages. Landlords purchased 11 properties in the quarter, capturing 23.4% of all SFR sales, and notably paid an average of $97,500 – a substantial 50.6% discount compared to the $197,293 paid by traditional homeowners. This ability to secure properties at significantly lower prices underscores a strong aptitude for finding undervalued assets or off-market deals. Landlords have consistently been net buyers throughout 2024 and 2025, accumulating 49 net properties in 2025, with institutional entities remaining completely absent from all transactional activity, further solidifying the local, small-investor driven market.

This data indicates a robust and localized rental market in Crockett County, TN, heavily reliant on the operational and investment activities of individual landlords. The absence of institutional players suggests this market's dynamics are largely insulated from broader corporate investment strategies, potentially offering greater stability or unique opportunities for local investors. The deep discounts secured by landlords in Q4 2025, coupled with sustained net buying, signal continued confidence and strategic acquisition by small-scale investors, ensuring a steady supply of rental housing in the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:28 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCrockett (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail