Cocke (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cocke (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cocke (TN)
9,476
Total Investors in Cocke (TN)
3,550
Investor Owned SFR in Cocke (TN)
2,876(30.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,391
SFR Owned
2,690
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
159
SFR Owned
198
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,876 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Cocke County Market as Landlords Secure Deep Discounts
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 98.6% of the 2,876 investor-owned SFR properties in Cocke County, representing 30.4% of the total market. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 32.9% of all SFR purchases, consistently paying 30.8% less than traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords are net buyers, indicating continued market accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Control 93.5% of Cocke County's 2,876 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
A vast majority of landlord properties, 2,856, are rented, signifying a strong focus on the rental market. Additionally, 2,380 properties (82.7% of the portfolio) were acquired with cash, highlighting a preference for unleveraged investments.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secured 30.8% Discount on Q4 2025 Acquisitions Compared to Homeowners
The landlord discount, though substantial, fluctuated quarter-over-quarter, dipping to 18.4% in Q2 2025 but recovering to 30.8% in Q4 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 8.2% from the pandemic era (2020-2023 average of $177,587) to Q4 2025 ($192,130).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 32.9% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Cocke County
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions, making 89.3% of landlord purchases (25 properties), compared to institutional investors (Tier 09) who acquired only 10.7% (3 properties). Twenty new entities entered the market as single-property landlords in Q4, signaling robust new investor interest.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 98.6% of Investor-Owned SFR in Cocke County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, holding 84.8% (2,502 properties) of the entire investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) control a negligible 0.1% (4 properties), challenging perceptions of corporate dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Landlord Tiers in Cocke County, with No Company Majority Observed
Individual ownership remains strong, even in mid-sized portfolios, peaking at 95.5% in the single-property tier. Company presence is highest in the 6-10 property tier at 37.9% but still constitutes a minority.
Geographic Distribution
TN-Cocke-37722 Leads Investor-Owned Properties in Cocke County with 642 Homes
TN-Cocke-37753 shows the highest investor penetration rate at 44.4%, while TN-Cocke-37727 follows closely with a 42.7% investor ownership rate. There is a strong correlation between sub-geographies with high investor property counts and high investor ownership percentages, indicating concentrated market activity.
Historical Transactions
Cocke County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 3.6x More Properties Than They Sold in Q4 2025
Landlords ended 2025 as net buyers of 128 properties (158 buys vs 30 sells), maintaining consistent net buying patterns throughout the year. Institutional investors, however, showed a balanced transaction pattern in 2024 (2 buys vs 2 sells), diverging from the overall landlord trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 25.9% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Cocke County
Institutional investors paid $215,399, which is 3.6% less than the $223,368 average paid by single-property landlords in Q4. Only 5.6% of overall landlord transactions were from other landlords, though institutional investors sourced 33.3% of their Q4 transactions from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Control 93.5% of Cocke County's 2,876 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape in Cocke County, owning 2,690 SFR properties, which accounts for 93.5% of all investor-owned housing. This contrasts sharply with company ownership, which stands at only 198 properties or 6.9%.

The total landlord-owned SFR portfolio in Cocke County comprises 2,876 properties, representing a significant 30.4% of the county's total SFR market of 9,476 properties. This indicates a substantial investor presence within the local housing stock.

Landlord holdings reveal a strong focus on rental income, with 2,856 properties identified as rented, representing 99.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This underscores the primary business model of landlords in the area.

A notable pattern in investment strategy is the high prevalence of cash acquisitions; 2,380 properties (82.7%) were purchased without financing, compared to only 496 financed properties (17.2%). This preference for cash suggests a market favored by investors with significant capital or a desire to avoid debt.

By entity count, individual landlords number 3,391, dwarfing the 159 company landlords, establishing an individual-to-company ratio of approximately 21:1. This further emphasizes the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the investor market in Cocke County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secured 30.8% Discount on Q4 2025 Acquisitions Compared to Homeowners
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Cocke County paid an average of $192,130 for SFR properties, securing a substantial $85,470 discount, or 30.8% less, than the $277,600 paid by traditional homeowners. This highlights a significant pricing advantage for investor buyers.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown quarterly volatility, ranging from a 32.5% discount in Q1 2025 to a narrower 18.4% in Q2 2025, before expanding again to 31.3% in Q3 2025 and 30.8% in Q4 2025. This fluctuation suggests varying market conditions or negotiation opportunities throughout the year.

Landlord acquisition prices have seen consistent appreciation, rising from an average of $177,587 during the 2020-2023 period to $193,154 in 2024, and further to $204,972 for the full year 2025. This trend indicates a growing value in investor-held assets.

Comparing Q4 2025 acquisition prices ($192,130) to the pandemic-era average (2020-2023) of $177,587, there has been an 8.2% price appreciation. This illustrates the sustained growth in property values since the boom period, offering an implied return for long-term holders.

The persistent discount observed for landlords, particularly the over 30% gap in Q1, Q3, and Q4 2025, suggests that investors possess either superior market insight, better negotiation leverage, or are targeting distressed properties not typically pursued by owner-occupants.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 32.9% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Cocke County
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Cocke County purchased 28 SFR properties, capturing a significant 32.9% share of the total 85 SFR purchases made during the quarter. This indicates a substantial and active presence in the current market.

The market continues to be driven by smaller investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) responsible for 25 purchases, or 89.3% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors (Tier 09), who only acquired 3 properties, representing a minimal 10.7% of landlord purchases.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, acquiring 15 properties, which constitutes 53.6% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This high concentration highlights the importance of new and small-scale investors in the market's activity.

A total of 20 entities made single-property purchases in Q4, indicating a healthy influx of new landlords or existing landlords expanding their portfolios in the smallest tier. This suggests continued accessibility and attractiveness of the market for individual investors.

The combined purchasing activity of Tiers 01, 02, and 03-05 accounts for 25 properties, reinforcing the overwhelming dominance of smaller landlords in recent acquisition trends. These tiers are clearly the primary drivers of investor-driven market demand in Cocke County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 98.6% of Investor-Owned SFR in Cocke County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, collectively control an overwhelming 98.6% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Cocke County, totaling 2,909 properties. This demonstrates that the vast majority of rental housing in the area is managed by small, independent investors.

The market is heavily concentrated in the smallest tier, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 2,502 properties, representing 84.8% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This highlights the crucial role of first-time or minimal-portfolio investors.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.1% of the investor-owned market, with just 4 properties. This finding significantly deflates common narratives about large corporations monopolizing the rental housing supply in this region.

Looking at the distribution, the ownership drastically tapers off after the smallest tiers. Tiers 02 (5.9%), 03-05 (5.9%), and 06-10 (2.0%) together comprise a modest fraction compared to Tier 01, further emphasizing the granular nature of investor ownership.

The data clearly illustrates that Cocke County's investor market structure is profoundly decentralized, with minimal influence from large-scale, institutional players. This indicates a more accessible market for individual entrepreneurs seeking to invest in residential real estate.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Landlord Tiers in Cocke County, with No Company Majority Observed
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a dominant position across all specified portfolio tiers in Cocke County, with no observed crossover point where companies become the majority owners. For example, in the single-property tier (Tier 01), individuals account for 95.5% of properties (2,400) compared to companies at 4.5% (113).

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found in the single-property tier (Tier 01) at 95.5%, but this strong majority persists even in larger mom-and-pop segments, such as Tier 03-05 (90.9% individual) and Tier 02 (86.8% individual).

While companies do not achieve majority in any visible tier, their highest percentage concentration occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where they hold 37.9% of properties (22). However, individual investors still retain a significant 62.1% share in this mid-size segment.

Even in the small-medium tier (11-20 properties), individual investors continue to hold the vast majority, owning 84.2% of properties (16) compared to companies at 15.8% (3). This consistent individual dominance across all listed tiers is a defining characteristic of the Cocke County market.

This distribution pattern challenges the notion of significant corporate infiltration into even moderately sized landlord portfolios in Cocke County, reaffirming the market's strong reliance on individual-led investment and management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-Cocke-37722 Leads Investor-Owned Properties in Cocke County with 642 Homes
Detailed Findings

Within Cocke County, the zip code TN-Cocke-37722 exhibits the highest concentration of investor-owned properties, totaling 642 SFR homes. This sub-geography represents 40.0% of its total SFR inventory, making it the primary hub for investment activity by volume.

Following TN-Cocke-37722, the zip code TN-Cocke-37727 is another significant area for investors, with 280 properties under landlord ownership and a substantial investor ownership rate of 42.7%. These areas form the core of the investor landscape in the county.

TN-Cocke-37753, despite having fewer investor-owned properties at 103, boasts the highest investor ownership rate in the county at 44.4%. This signifies that nearly half of the SFR housing in this zip code is held by landlords, indicating deep market penetration.

A clear correlation exists where sub-geographies with the highest counts of investor-owned properties also exhibit high investor ownership percentages. For example, TN-Cocke-37722, TN-Cocke-37727, and TN-Cocke-37753 appear in the top rankings for both metrics, indicating areas of intense, concentrated investment.

The calculated total SFR inventory for these top areas reveals varying market sizes, with TN-Cocke-37722 having approximately 1,605 SFR properties and TN-Cocke-37753 having around 232 SFR properties. This shows that high investor rates can exist in both larger and smaller sub-markets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Cocke County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 3.6x More Properties Than They Sold in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Cocke County are definitively net buyers, acquiring 36 properties while selling only 10 in Q4 2025, resulting in a net increase of 26 properties to their portfolios. This represents a robust buy/sell ratio of 3.6x, indicating active accumulation.

The trend of net buying remained consistent throughout 2025, with landlords purchasing a total of 158 properties against 30 sales, for a net gain of 128 properties for the year. This consistent activity underscores continued confidence and expansion by investors in the market.

Quarter-over-quarter, the buy/sell ratio for all landlords fluctuated but consistently signaled net purchasing; from 6.1x in Q3 2025 (49 buys/8 sells) to 5.0x in Q2 2025 (40 buys/8 sells), and then settling at 3.6x in Q4 2025. This shows a sustained period of portfolio growth.

In contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (1000+ tier) demonstrated a balanced transaction pattern in 2024, purchasing 2 properties and selling 2. This suggests a different strategic approach from larger entities, possibly focusing on portfolio rebalancing rather than aggressive accumulation in this specific market.

The sustained net buying across all landlords indicates a healthy demand for investment properties in Cocke County, signaling a market where investors are actively growing their presence rather than divesting assets. This behavior is a key indicator of market strength from an investor perspective.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 25.9% of All Q4 2025 Transactions in Cocke County
Detailed Findings

Landlords actively participated in 36 transactions during Q4 2025, representing a significant 25.9% share of the total 139 SFR transactions in Cocke County. This illustrates their active role in the quarterly market dynamics.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, engaging in 20 transactions, followed by two-property (Tier 02) and small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 6 transactions each. This distribution aligns with the overall dominance of smaller investors in the market.

Average purchase prices varied considerably by tier in Q4; medium-large landlords (Tier 51-100) paid the highest at $275,000 for their single transaction, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) secured properties at the lowest average price of $114,167.

Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) paid an average of $215,399, notably 3.6% less than the $223,368 average price paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01). This suggests a potential pricing advantage or different property targeting strategy for larger investors.

Inter-landlord trading was relatively low overall, with only 2 out of 36 landlord transactions (5.6%) involving purchases from other landlords. However, institutional investors relied more heavily on these trades, with 1 of their 3 transactions (33.3%) being sourced from another landlord in Q4.

The wide price spread of $160,833 between the highest ($275,000 by Tier 51-100) and lowest ($114,167 by Tier 02) average purchase prices indicates diverse property types, locations, or strategic buying patterns across different investor tiers in Q4.

The high transaction volume from Tier 01 (20 transactions) in Q4 compared to its overall ownership distribution (84.8% of properties) suggests a dynamic entry point for new investors and continued activity from the smallest portfolio holders in the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominance: Cocke County Landlords Are Net Buyers Securing Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords in Cocke County own 2,876 SFR properties, representing 30.4% of the county’s market. Individual investors hold 2,690 properties (93.5%), while companies own 198 properties (6.9%).
Pricing
Landlords consistently paid 30.8% less than traditional homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $85,470 per property ($192,130 vs $277,600). Average landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 8.2% since the 2020-2023 period.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 28 properties, accounting for 32.9% of all SFR sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were most active, with 20 new entities entering this tier, while mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 89.3% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned housing in Cocke County, whereas institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.1% of the portfolio. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone comprise 84.8% of total holdings.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold a commanding majority across all landlord tiers observed, peaking at 95.5% in the single-property tier, with companies never achieving majority control in any tier. Company ownership is highest in the 6-10 property tier at 37.9%.
Transactions
Overall, landlords in Cocke County are strong net buyers, with a 3.6x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (36 buys vs 10 sells). In contrast, institutional investors showed a balanced transaction pattern in 2024 (2 buys vs 2 sells), indicating a different strategy.
Market Narrative

Cocke County's residential investment market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 98.6% of the 2,876 investor-owned SFR properties. These small-scale investors, particularly those holding just a single property (Tier 01), account for 84.8% of the entire investor portfolio, starkly contrasting the minimal 0.1% share held by institutional investors. This structure signifies a decentralized market where individual entities, rather than large corporations, are the primary owners and operators of rental housing, further evidenced by individual landlords representing 93.5% of all investor property owners in Cocke County.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 indicates continued market accumulation, with landlords purchasing 32.9% of all SFR properties sold and maintaining a consistent net-buyer status throughout the year. They demonstrate a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $192,130 in Q4, which is 30.8% less than the average $277,600 paid by traditional homeowners. This ability to secure deep discounts, alongside a steady 8.2% price appreciation since the pandemic era, underscores a lucrative environment for investors. Notably, institutional investors paid 3.6% less than single-property landlords in Q4, indicating differing acquisition strategies across investor sizes.

The market in Cocke County is characterized by robust activity from smaller investors and a relatively low footprint from institutional players, both in terms of ownership and transaction volume. The continuous influx of new single-property landlords (20 entities in Q4) combined with consistent net buying signals a healthy and accessible market for individual investors. This localized dynamic, where mom-and-pops dictate market structure and activity, suggests that the vast majority of rental housing decisions are made by individuals deeply rooted in the Cocke County community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:27 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCocke (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions