Bledsoe (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bledsoe (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bledsoe (TN)
2,939
Total Investors in Bledsoe (TN)
1,261
Investor Owned SFR in Bledsoe (TN)
963(32.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,206
SFR Owned
919
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
55
SFR Owned
55
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 963 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate TN-Bledsoe with 99.4% ownership, driving local market activity.
Landlords in TN-Bledsoe County own 963 SFR properties (32.8% of the market), with individual investors holding 95.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a 30.0% discount on acquisitions compared to homeowners, and they remain strong net buyers with a 7.08x buy/sell ratio for 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 95.4% of TN-Bledsoe's 963 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A significant 84.4% of landlord properties are cash-owned (813 properties), with only 15.6% financed. Almost all landlord-owned properties, 99.6% (959 properties), are utilized for rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a substantial 30.0% discount in Q4, paying $77,269 less than homeowners.
The landlord price advantage fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter, narrowing to an 8.6% discount in Q3 before widening to 30.0% in Q4. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated by 11.1% since the 2020-2023 pandemic era, from $162,639 to $180,681 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 44.1% of Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 15 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) dominated Q4 purchasing, accounting for 93.3% (14 properties) of all landlord acquisitions. Only 1 institutional investor (Tier 09) purchased a property, representing a mere 6.7% of landlord activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate with 99.4% of investor-owned SFR, while institutions hold just 0.1%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone represent 86.9% of all investor-owned properties identified in this tier analysis, totaling 857 properties. In Q4, institutional investors (Tier 09) paid $315,188, a 57.9% premium over single-property landlords (Tier 01) who paid $199,570.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, with no tier showing company majority.
Individual investors hold 95.4% of single-property portfolios and 96.9% of two-property portfolios, signifying their strong presence in the smallest tiers. The highest company concentration observed is 16.7% within the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier.
Geographic Distribution
TN-Bledsoe-37367 dominates with 708 investor-owned properties at a 33.9% ownership rate.
TN-Bledsoe-37332 exhibits the highest investor penetration, with 44.4% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. Three zip codes appear on both top-5 lists by count and percentage, indicating concentrated investor activity where both volume and market share are high.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 7.08x buy/sell ratio for Year 2025.
Overall landlord activity shows consistent net acquisition, with 85 properties purchased against 12 sold in 2025. The quarterly buy/sell ratio indicates sustained purchasing momentum, peaking at 5.8x in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 40.0% of all Q4 transactions, reflecting significant market presence.
Institutional investors (Tier 09) paid the highest average price in Q4 at $315,188, a 57.9% premium over single-property landlords (Tier 01) who paid $199,570. All Q4 landlord transactions were from non-landlord sellers, with 0.0% indicating inter-landlord trades.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 95.4% of TN-Bledsoe's 963 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in TN-Bledsoe County collectively own 963 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a substantial 32.8% penetration of the total 2,939 SFR properties in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, holding 919 properties (95.4%) compared to just 55 properties (5.7%) owned by companies. This pattern is also reflected in entity counts, with 1,206 individual landlords (95.6%) versus 55 company landlords (4.4%).

The portfolio demonstrates a strong rental-centric focus, with 959 out of 963 investor-owned properties (99.6%) being rented, confirming their primary role in providing housing for tenants.

A notable preference for cash purchases is evident, as 813 properties (84.4%) are owned outright with cash, while only 150 properties (15.6%) are financed. This suggests a low-leverage investment strategy among local landlords.

Comparing owner types, all 55 company-owned properties are rented and were acquired with cash, indicating a focused, debt-free investment approach. Individual landlords also show a high proportion of cash ownership (758 properties, 82.5%) and rental activity (904 properties, 98.4%), while carrying all 150 financed properties.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a substantial 30.0% discount in Q4, paying $77,269 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in TN-Bledsoe County paid an average of $180,681 for SFR properties, securing a notable $77,269 discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $257,950. This represents a significant 30.0% price advantage for investors.

The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced considerable volatility throughout the year. The discount widened from 47.8% in Q1 to 41.0% in Q2, then sharply narrowed to 8.6% in Q3, before expanding again to 30.0% in Q4, indicating dynamic market conditions or shifting buying strategies.

Comparing current prices to the pandemic era, landlord average acquisition prices have risen by $18,042, from $162,639 during 2020-2023 to $180,681 in Q4 2025, marking an 11.1% appreciation.

Landlords consistently acquire properties at lower prices than traditional homeowners, suggesting effective negotiation, targeted purchasing of distressed or off-market properties, or a focus on different property segments.

The dramatic fluctuations in the percentage discount quarter-over-quarter indicate that market conditions and competitive pressures for investor acquisitions are not static, requiring adaptive strategies to maintain favorable pricing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 44.1% of Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 15 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a highly active role in the Q4 2025 market for Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, acquiring 15 out of 34 total purchases, which equates to a significant 44.1% market share in TN-Bledsoe County.

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), were the driving force behind this activity, responsible for 14 purchases, or 93.3% of all landlord acquisitions in the quarter.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed minimal presence, with only 1 property purchased, accounting for a negligible 6.7% of landlord purchases.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) was particularly vibrant, with 10 properties purchased by 14 entities. This suggests a healthy influx of new landlords or existing small-scale investors expanding their portfolios by one property.

The disproportionate activity of mom-and-pop landlords in Q4 reinforces their foundational role in the local real estate investment market, overshadowing the transactional volume of larger institutional players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate with 99.4% of investor-owned SFR, while institutions hold just 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) collectively control an overwhelming 99.4% of the investor-owned SFR properties identified in this tier analysis in TN-Bledsoe County, totaling 980 properties.

This dominance is largely driven by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 86.9% of the properties, holding 857 units. This segment forms the undisputed backbone of the local investment market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a marginal share of just 0.1%, owning a single property. This challenges narratives of large-scale corporate ownership in this specific market.

While historical tier pricing data is not provided, Q4 2025 transaction data reveals significant price variations by tier. Institutional investors (Tier 09) paid the highest average price at $315,188, suggesting a focus on higher-value properties.

The institutional acquisition price of $315,188 represents a 57.9% premium over the average price paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01) in Q4, which was $199,570, indicating different investment strategies and target properties between investor sizes.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers, with no tier showing company majority.
Detailed Findings

Across all detailed tiers, individual investors maintain overwhelming majority ownership, from single-property portfolios to small landlord segments. For instance, individuals own 95.4% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 96.9% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios.

In TN-Bledsoe County, there is no discernible crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership within any of the detailed tiers provided. This reinforces the grassroots nature of the local real estate investment market.

The highest concentration of company ownership within a tier is found in the small landlord (3-5 properties) segment, where companies hold 7 properties, accounting for 16.7% of that tier, still a minority position.

This consistent individual investor dominance across various portfolio sizes underscores that personal capital and individual decision-making are primary drivers of real estate investment in this region, rather than corporate strategies.

Without specific pricing data comparing individual and company acquisitions by tier, it is challenging to infer differences in their buying strategies. However, the ownership distribution clearly indicates that individuals are the foundational owner type across the market structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
TN-Bledsoe-37367 dominates with 708 investor-owned properties at a 33.9% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in TN-Bledsoe County show significant geographic concentration, with zip code 37367 leading by a considerable margin. This area accounts for 708 investor-owned properties and has an investor ownership rate of 33.9%.

While 37367 leads in sheer volume, TN-Bledsoe-37332 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate within the county, with a striking 44.4% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating intense market penetration in this specific micro-market.

A strong correlation exists between high property counts and high ownership rates, as seen with 37367 (708 properties, 33.9% rate) and 37381 (83 properties, 35.5% rate), which appear on both top lists. This suggests investors are focusing on areas with both substantial inventory and high rental demand.

Other areas, such as 38572, while having fewer investor-owned properties (23 properties), still exhibit a very high ownership rate of 41.8%, highlighting targeted investment in smaller, high-penetration zones.

The varied distribution of investor-owned properties and their corresponding market penetration rates across the county's zip codes underscore the diverse appeal and localized dynamics influencing real estate investment decisions within TN-Bledsoe.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 7.08x buy/sell ratio for Year 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in TN-Bledsoe County are decisively net buyers, consistently expanding their portfolios. For the entirety of 2025, they purchased 85 properties while selling only 12, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 7.08x.

This trend of net acquisition has been consistent across recent quarters, with Q3 2025 showing 29 buys against 5 sells (a 5.8x ratio), and Q2 2025 recording 22 buys against 5 sells (a 4.4x ratio).

The sustained high buy/sell ratios over the past year (6.6x in 2024 and 7.08x in 2025) demonstrate a strong accumulation phase by landlords in the region, rather than a period of market churn or divestment.

Without specific data on institutional investor transactions, it is not possible to determine if this net buying trend applies uniformly across all investor sizes or if larger entities are behaving differently from the overall landlord market.

The absence of data regarding inter-landlord transactions or average buy/sell prices limits insights into potential profit margins or internal market liquidity, but the overall picture clearly points to a market where landlords are actively growing their holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 40.0% of all Q4 transactions, reflecting significant market presence.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the TN-Bledsoe County SFR market in Q4 2025, involved in 20 out of 50 total transactions, representing a substantial 40.0% share of all activity.

Transaction volumes were heavily concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 19 of the 20 landlord transactions, further emphasizing their dominant role in the local market dynamics.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by investor tier; institutional investors (Tier 09) paid the highest at $315,188, while two-property landlords (Tier 02) secured properties at the lowest average price of $80,000.

Notably, institutional investors paid a significant premium, with their average Q4 purchase price of $315,188 being 57.9% higher than the $199,570 average paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01).

The complete absence of inter-landlord trading (0.0% of transactions bought from landlords) across all tiers suggests that landlords are primarily acquiring properties directly from non-investor sellers, rather than exchanging properties within the investor community.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, recording 14 transactions, which aligns with its prominent share in overall landlord ownership, indicating that the largest segment by holdings is also the most transactionally active.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate TN-Bledsoe with 99.4% ownership, driving local market expansion.
Holdings
In TN-Bledsoe County, landlords own 963 SFR properties, representing 32.8% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (919 properties, 95.4%) compared to companies (55 properties, 5.7%).
Pricing
Landlords in TN-Bledsoe County paid an average of $180,681 in Q4 2025, securing a notable 30.0% discount ($77,269) compared to traditional homeowners at $257,950.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 15 properties, accounting for 44.1% of all SFR sales, with 10 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove 93.3% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tier 01-04) control 99.4% of investor-owned housing in TN-Bledsoe County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) own just 0.1%. Single-property landlords alone hold 86.9% of these properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers of landlord ownership, with no tier exhibiting a majority for companies. The highest company concentration observed is 16.7% within the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.08x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (85 buys vs 12 sells). Institutional investor transaction data was not provided to assess their separate net position.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in TN-Bledsoe County is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, small-scale landlords, challenging the broader narrative of institutional dominance. Landlords collectively own 963 SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 32.8% of the county's total SFR market of 2,939 properties. This substantial portfolio is held by individual investors (919 properties, 95.4%) rather than companies (55 properties, 5.7%). Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control an immense 99.4% of the investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone representing 86.9%, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 0.1%.

Investor behavior in TN-Bledsoe County reflects strong acquisition and a significant pricing advantage. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 15 properties, securing 44.1% of all SFR purchases, signaling a highly active market presence. They consistently achieved a notable pricing advantage, paying an average of $180,681, which is 30.0% less than traditional homeowners at $257,950. Landlords are also robust net buyers, demonstrated by a 7.08x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (85 buys vs 12 sells), indicating a sustained phase of portfolio expansion. Institutional buyers, though minimal in volume, paid a premium in Q4, averaging $315,188, 57.9% more than single-property buyers.

This data points to a highly localized and grassroots-driven housing market in TN-Bledsoe County, largely insulated from large-scale corporate investor influence. The significant market penetration and consistent net buying activity by mom-and-pop landlords suggest a healthy and stable rental market. Geographic analysis reveals concentrated investor activity in specific zip codes, such as 37367 and 37332, where investor ownership rates can reach up to 44.4%, indicating targeted local investment strategies. This trend implies a resilient rental housing supply underpinned by local ownership, potentially offering stable long-term investment opportunities for individual landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:22 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBledsoe (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords