Union (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Union (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Union (SD)
4,449
Total Investors in Union (SD)
620
Investor Owned SFR in Union (SD)
428(9.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
589
SFR Owned
409
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
31
SFR Owned
29
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 428 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors overwhelmingly dominate Union County, with no institutional presence or recent acquisitions.
Individual investors hold 95.6% of the 428 landlord-owned SFR properties in Union County, South Dakota, representing 9.6% of the market. Despite historical net buying, Q4 2025 saw no landlord purchase or transaction activity, suggesting a market pause for investors. Landlord acquisition pricing has shown extreme variance, from a 74.0% discount in Q3 2025 to a 14.5% premium in Q1 2025, though these periods reported 0 properties purchased.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate in Union County, holding 95.6% of 428 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A substantial 97.4% of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented (417 properties), underscoring a strong rental focus in Union County, South Dakota. Cash purchases are significantly prevalent, accounting for 345 properties compared to just 83 financed holdings.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing in Union County varied significantly in 2025, from a 74.0% discount in Q3 to a 14.5% premium in Q1.
Landlord acquisition activity has been minimal recently, with 0 properties purchased across all provided timeframes from 2020-2025. Despite this, recorded Q3 2025 landlord prices averaged $100,000, a $285,321 (74.0%) discount compared to homeowner prices of $385,321, while Q1 2025 showed a $45,801 (14.5%) premium for landlords at $361,500 versus homeowners' $315,699.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord acquisition activity was absent in Union County's Q4 2025, with 0 properties purchased by all investor tiers.
Out of 12 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, specific landlord purchase counts are not available, indicating a lack of significant investor buying activity in Union County, South Dakota. Both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) landlords recorded 0 purchases for the quarter, signifying no new entrants or expansions from these groups.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate in Union County, controlling 99.3% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this dominance, owning 408 properties or 94.9% of the total investor-owned SFR in Union County, South Dakota. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold 0.0% of the market, indicating no presence from large-scale entities.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords dominate all tiers in Union County, with a 50/50 split observed only in the 6-10 property tier.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are overwhelmingly individual-owned, comprising 393 properties (94.0%), compared to 25 properties (6.0%) owned by companies. Individual investors exclusively own the 2-property tier (100.0%, 8 properties), showcasing their widespread presence in Union County, South Dakota.
Geographic Distribution
SD-Union-57025 and SD-Union-57001 lead Union County with the highest investor-owned property counts and ownership rates.
Within Union County, South Dakota, the SD-Union-57025 sub-geography has 183 investor-owned properties (21.6% rate), closely followed by SD-Union-57001 with 92 properties (22.3% rate). These two regions collectively account for a significant portion of the county's investor activity, demonstrating concentrated investment hotbeds.
Historical Transactions
Union County landlords are net buyers, with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025, an increase from 2.25x in 2024.
In 2025, Union County landlords bought 4 properties and sold 1, resulting in a net acquisition of 3 properties. This trend follows 2024, where 18 properties were bought and 8 sold, adding 10 properties to investor portfolios. No institutional transaction data is available for comparison.
Current Quarter Transactions
Q4 2025 saw no landlord transaction activity in Union County, with all investor tiers reporting 0 purchases and sales.
Out of 19 total SFR transactions in Q4, landlord-specific transaction counts are not available, but no properties were recorded as bought by mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) investors in Union County, South Dakota. The average purchase price for Tier 01 and Tier 09 landlords was $0, reflecting this complete absence of activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate in Union County, holding 95.6% of 428 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Union County, South Dakota, collectively own 428 SFR properties, representing 9.6% of the total 4,449 SFR properties in the market.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 409 properties (95.6% of landlord-owned SFR), while company investors hold a significantly smaller share of 29 properties (6.8%).

The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 417 out of 428, are designated as rented, indicating that 97.4% of these holdings serve as non-owner-occupied rental units and highlight the primary income strategy for landlords in Union County.

Cash acquisitions are substantially more common than financed deals among Union County landlords, with 345 properties acquired by cash compared to just 83 properties that are financed.

The landlord landscape in Union County is highly individual-centric, with 589 individual landlords outweighing 31 company landlords, forming a ratio of approximately 19 individual landlords for every company landlord.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing in Union County varied significantly in 2025, from a 74.0% discount in Q3 to a 14.5% premium in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity in Union County, South Dakota, has been extremely limited across recent timeframes, with 0 distinct SFR properties purchased in Q3 2025, Q1 2025, Q4 2024, and across the entire years of 2024 and 2025, as well as the 2020-2023 period.

Despite the negligible purchase volume, the provided average prices show a dramatic shift: in Q3 2025, landlords recorded an average price of $100,000, representing a substantial 74.0% discount ($285,321) compared to traditional homeowners' average of $385,321.

Conversely, in Q1 2025, landlords showed an average acquisition price of $361,500, marking a 14.5% premium (an extra $45,801) over traditional homeowners who paid an average of $315,699 in Union County.

The extreme volatility and reversal in price comparison between Q3 and Q1 2025, from a significant landlord discount to a premium, suggest highly opportunistic or infrequent transactions rather than consistent market trends, explicitly noting the stated zero property purchases in these periods.

The consistent report of 0 properties purchased for landlords across all provided timeframes (2020-2025) indicates a significant slowdown or complete halt in landlord-initiated SFR acquisitions in Union County over the past several years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition activity was absent in Union County's Q4 2025, with 0 properties purchased by all investor tiers.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 real estate market in Union County, South Dakota, saw 12 total SFR properties purchased, yet specific data for landlord purchases during this period is not available, hindering a direct comparison of market share.

Crucially, there was no reported purchasing activity from any landlord tier in Q4 2025; both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 new acquisitions.

The absence of landlord purchases across all tiers, including 0.0% from mom-and-pop and 0.0% from institutional investors, suggests a complete pause or minimal engagement from the investor segment in the current quarter in Union County.

With no recorded purchases by Tier 01 landlords, there is no evidence of new single-property landlords entering the Union County market during Q4 2025.

The lack of purchasing data across all investor tiers in Q4 2025 means that insights into the most active tiers or average properties per entity for this period cannot be determined from the available information.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate in Union County, controlling 99.3% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert near-total control over the investor-owned SFR market in Union County, South Dakota, holding a commanding 99.3% of all such properties.

The foundation of this market is firmly rooted in single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 408 properties, representing 94.9% of the entire landlord-owned SFR portfolio.

Smaller portfolio sizes (Tiers 02, 03, 04) contribute an additional 19 properties, encompassing 1.9% (Tier 02), 2.1% (Tier 03), and 0.5% (Tier 04) respectively, reinforcing the highly fragmented ownership structure in Union County.

Larger investor tiers, specifically small-medium landlords (11-20 properties) and large landlords (101-1000 properties), collectively own a minimal share of just 3 properties, or 0.7% of the investor market in Union County.

Notably, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Union County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR properties, which counters common narratives about large corporate dominance.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate all tiers in Union County, with a 50/50 split observed only in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a dominant presence across most landlord tiers in Union County, South Dakota, representing 94.0% of properties in the single-property tier (393 properties) and an exclusive 100.0% in the two-property tier (8 properties).

Companies begin to establish a notable presence in the small landlord tiers, holding 11.1% (1 property) in the 3-5 property tier and achieving a 50.0% split (1 property each) with individuals in the 6-10 property tier.

The 6-10 property tier represents the closest point to a "crossover" where company ownership reaches parity with individual ownership (1 property each), but companies do not achieve a majority in any of the disclosed tiers in Union County.

The highest concentration of company-owned properties within a tier is observed in the 6-10 property tier (50.0%), though this still only represents a single property.

Conversely, the 2-property tier exhibits the highest individual concentration, with 100.0% of its 8 properties owned by individuals, underscoring the strong individual-investor foundation in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
SD-Union-57025 and SD-Union-57001 lead Union County with the highest investor-owned property counts and ownership rates.
Detailed Findings

Within Union County, South Dakota, the sub-geography identified as SD-Union-57025 stands out with the highest concentration of investor-owned properties, totaling 183 properties and an investor ownership rate of 21.6%.

SD-Union-57001 closely follows as a key investor hotspot, boasting the highest investor ownership rate at 22.3% for its 92 landlord-owned SFR properties, showcasing a dense landlord presence in that specific area.

The top two sub-geographies, SD-Union-57025 and SD-Union-57001, consistently rank highest for both the sheer count of investor-owned properties and the percentage of properties owned by landlords, indicating significant investor interest and market penetration in these specific areas.

Other notable sub-geographies include SD-Union-57038 with 62 investor-owned properties (11.9% rate) and SD-Union-57049 with 54 properties (2.7% rate), demonstrating a varied distribution of investor activity across Union County.

The data reveals a strong correlation between high property counts and high investor ownership percentages for the top regions, suggesting that investors are concentrating their portfolios in areas that already have a significant landlord presence.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Union County landlords are net buyers, with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025, an increase from 2.25x in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Union County, South Dakota, have consistently been net buyers in recent years, acquiring more properties than they sold; in 2025, they bought 4 SFR properties against 1 sale, resulting in a net gain of 3 properties.

This net buying trend shows an intensified buy/sell ratio, increasing from 2.25x in 2024 (18 buys vs. 8 sells) to 4.0x in 2025 (4 buys vs. 1 sell), indicating a stronger inclination to acquire properties compared to divesting, despite lower overall transaction volume.

While landlord activity has been positive, the overall transaction volume is low, with a total of 5 transactions (4 buys, 1 sell) in 2025, and 26 transactions (18 buys, 8 sells) in 2024, reflecting a modest pace of market movement.

Detailed transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) is not available, preventing a direct comparison of their historical buying and selling patterns against the overall landlord market in Union County.

The consistent net buyer status for landlords over the past two years, even with low volumes, signals a long-term accumulation strategy within Union County's investor market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Q4 2025 saw no landlord transaction activity in Union County, with all investor tiers reporting 0 purchases and sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, Union County recorded 19 total SFR transactions, but specific data for landlord-involved transactions is not available, making their overall market share for the quarter indeterminable.

Crucially, there was no reported transaction activity from any landlord tier in Q4 2025; both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions, indicating a complete halt in investor trading activity.

The average purchase prices for both single-property landlords (Tier 01) and institutional investors (Tier 09) were reported as $0, directly reflecting the absence of any recorded acquisitions by these segments in Union County during Q4 2025.

With 0 transactions across all landlord tiers, there was no inter-landlord trading activity observed or reported in Q4 2025 for Union County, South Dakota.

The complete lack of landlord transaction volume in Q4 2025 stands in stark contrast to the existing substantial landlord-owned portfolio, suggesting either a period of holding or a market unappealing for recent investor entry or exit.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Union County, with no institutional presence or recent acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords in Union County, South Dakota, own 428 SFR properties, constituting 9.6% of the total 4,449 SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 409 properties (95.6%), while companies own 29 properties (6.8%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition prices in Union County exhibited extreme fluctuations in 2025; Q3 showed a 74.0% discount ($100,000 vs $385,321 homeowner price) while Q1 saw a 14.5% premium ($361,500 vs $315,699 homeowner price), with both quarters reporting 0 properties purchased by landlords.
Activity
Q4 2025 recorded no landlord purchase activity across any tier in Union County, South Dakota, with all mom-and-pop and institutional landlords reporting 0 acquisitions. Out of 12 total SFR purchases, landlord-specific data is absent, indicating a market pause for investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.3% of investor-owned housing in Union County, with single-property owners alone holding 94.9% (408 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a 0.0% share of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios in Union County, South Dakota, representing 94.0% of properties in the single-property tier. Companies only achieve a 50.0% ownership split in the 6-10 property tier, never gaining a majority in any disclosed segment.
Transactions
Union County landlords were net buyers in 2025 with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio (4 buys vs 1 sell), continuing a trend from 2024 (2.25x ratio). However, there is no transaction data available for institutional investors, and Q4 2025 saw 0 landlord transactions overall.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Union County, South Dakota, is overwhelmingly characterized by individual and mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 99.3% of the 428 investor-owned SFR properties. These properties represent 9.6% of the county's total SFR market of 4,449 units. Single-property landlords alone own 94.9% of the investor-owned housing, with individual investors holding 95.6% of all landlord-owned SFR, while company ownership is minimal at 6.8%.

Recent investor behavior in Union County shows a significant pause, with Q4 2025 registering no landlord purchase or transaction activity across any tier, including mom-and-pop and institutional investors. Historical data indicates landlords were net buyers in 2024 and 2025, with buy/sell ratios of 2.25x and 4.0x respectively, despite low overall volumes. Landlord acquisition pricing, though based on periods of 0 properties purchased, showed extreme swings, from a substantial 74.0% discount in Q3 2025 to a 14.5% premium in Q1 2025 compared to homeowner prices.

This market environment in Union County, South Dakota, underscores a highly localized and fragmented investor base, strongly favoring individual landlords over larger corporate entities. The complete absence of institutional investment and recent acquisition activity suggests that Union County may not be an attractive market for large-scale investor deployment. The stability of existing mom-and-pop holdings, coupled with a recent lack of transaction volume, implies a market currently in a holding pattern for its investor segment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:15 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyUnion (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords