Campbell (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Campbell (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Campbell (SD)
441
Total Investors in Campbell (SD)
446
Investor Owned SFR in Campbell (SD)
309(70.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
432
SFR Owned
297
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
14
SFR Owned
15
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 309 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Campbell (SD) market entirely dominated by mom-and-pop landlords with no recent SFR activity
Landlords own 309 SFR properties, representing 70.1% of the market in Campbell (SD), with a staggering 96.1% held by individual investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100.0% of all investor-owned housing by tier. There was no recorded SFR purchase or transaction activity in Q4 2025, suggesting a paused or illiquid market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords own 96.1% of 309 investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell (SD)
A unique market pattern shows 100.0% of landlord-owned SFR properties are cash-purchased, with none financed. Nearly all (308 out of 309) landlord-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No SFR acquisition data available for landlords or homeowners in recent periods
There were no recorded SFR properties purchased by landlords in Q4 2025, Q1 2025, or any specified timeframe within 2020-2025, preventing any price analysis. Consequently, no comparison of landlord vs. homeowner acquisition prices is possible for these periods in Campbell (SD).
Current Quarter Purchases
No Q4 2025 SFR purchase activity recorded for landlords or other buyers
With 0 total SFR purchases in Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 0.0% of the market, reflecting a complete halt in recorded buying activity. This means there were no new mom-and-pop or institutional landlord purchases this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 100.0% of 322 investor-owned SFR properties by tier
The market is heavily concentrated in single-property owners (Tier 01), who hold 267 properties, accounting for 82.9% of all tiered investor-owned SFR. No institutional investors (Tier 09) are present, making Campbell (SD) an exclusively small-investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all tiers, holding 95.2% of single-property SFRs
In Campbell (SD), individual investors constitute 100.0% of the 3-5 property tier and over 95.0% in both the single-property (95.2%) and two-property (95.1%) tiers. There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners, reflecting an individual-centric market.
Geographic Distribution
SD-Campbell-57648 leads with 141 investor-owned properties and 81.0% ownership rate
Investor ownership is highly concentrated within Campbell (SD), with two zip codes, 57648 and 57437, both ranking high in property count and exceeding 73% investor ownership rates. SD-Campbell-57452 also exhibits a strong 75.0% investor ownership rate despite not being a top region by count.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data available for landlords in Campbell (SD)
The absence of buy and sell transaction counts for all landlords, including institutional investors, prevents any analysis of net buyer/seller status or market liquidity. No insights can be drawn regarding inter-landlord trading percentages or implied profit margins from buy/sell prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
No Q4 2025 SFR transactions recorded for landlords or other buyers
With 0 total Q4 transactions, landlords had 0 activity, meaning no analysis of transaction volumes, prices by tier, or inter-landlord trading is possible. Tier 01 and Tier 09 investors showed no Q4 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords own 96.1% of 309 investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell (SD)
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Campbell (SD) County own 309 SFR properties, representing a substantial 70.1% of the total 441 SFR properties in the market, indicating high investor penetration.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 297 properties (96.1%) compared to just 15 properties (4.9%) owned by companies. This disparity is further highlighted by 432 individual landlords versus only 14 company landlords, a ratio of over 30 to 1.

A notable characteristic of this market is the complete absence of financed properties; all 309 investor-owned SFRs were acquired with cash. This suggests either a highly liquid market for cash buyers or a unique local financing environment.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties (308 out of 309) are rented, confirming that investors in Campbell (SD) are highly focused on generating rental income rather than owner-occupancy or holding vacant properties.

The pronounced dominance of individual owners coupled with 100.0% cash acquisitions and a strong rental focus paints a picture of a mature, individual-investor-driven rental market in Campbell (SD) County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No SFR acquisition data available for landlords or homeowners in recent periods
Detailed Findings

A critical data gap exists for SFR property acquisitions in Campbell (SD) County, with 0 properties recorded as purchased by landlords in Q4 2025, Q1 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, and even the preceding boom years of 2020-2023.

Due to the complete absence of acquisition data for landlords, it is impossible to establish current or historical average acquisition prices for investors in this geography.

Similarly, the lack of recorded purchase activity means no comparative analysis can be performed between landlord acquisition prices and those paid by traditional homeowners for Q4 2025 or any other recent timeframe.

The sparse data indicates an extremely low volume of recorded SFR transactions for investors within Campbell (SD) County across these periods, or potential data collection limitations for this specific region.

Without recent acquisition volume or pricing data, any trends regarding landlord pricing strategies or their competitive position against homeowners cannot be determined for Campbell (SD).

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 SFR purchase activity recorded for landlords or other buyers
Detailed Findings

Campbell (SD) County experienced a complete absence of recorded SFR purchase activity in Q4 2025, with 0 total SFR purchases across all buyer types.

Consequently, landlords made 0 purchases, representing 0.0% of the market share for Q4 2025, indicating a complete pause in new investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Due to the lack of any purchases, no activity was registered for mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) or institutional investors (Tier 09), both showing 0.0% of landlord purchases.

This stark absence of Q4 purchase data prevents any analysis of which investor tiers were most active or the number of new landlords entering the market this quarter.

The zero purchase volume suggests either a highly illiquid market with no transactions or significant data limitations for Q4 2025 in this specific geography.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 100.0% of 322 investor-owned SFR properties by tier
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing portfolios of 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert absolute control over Campbell (SD)'s investor-owned SFR market, owning 100.0% of the 322 properties distributed by tier.

This market exhibits an extreme concentration in single-property owners (Tier 01), who hold a substantial 267 properties, representing 82.9% of all tiered investor-owned SFRs. Two-property landlords (Tier 02) follow with 41 properties (12.7%), and small landlords (3-5 properties) own 14 properties (4.3%).

The complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) underscores the unique structure of Campbell (SD), where the market is entirely driven by smaller, individual investors.

The current data does not provide specific acquisition prices for different tiers, preventing an analysis of whether larger mom-and-pop investors pay more or less than smaller ones.

This highly fragmented ownership structure, with individuals holding virtually all investor-owned properties, signals a market predominantly serving local, small-scale landlords rather than large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all tiers, holding 95.2% of single-property SFRs
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across all reported tiers in Campbell (SD) County, with no tier showing a majority held by company owners.

Specifically, individual investors own 100.0% of properties within the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, controlling all 14 properties. This tier shows a complete absence of company ownership.

In the Single-property (Tier 01) segment, individual investors hold 257 properties, accounting for 95.2% of the tier, while companies own a minor share of 13 properties (4.8%).

Similarly, for Two-property landlords (Tier 02), individuals own 39 properties (95.1%), with companies holding just 2 properties (4.9%). This consistent pattern across tiers reinforces individual investor supremacy.

Given these figures, there is no discernible crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership, firmly establishing Campbell (SD) as a market shaped by individual investors across all portfolio sizes.

The data does not provide acquisition prices broken down by owner type within each tier, precluding an analysis of pricing strategies between individual and company buyers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
SD-Campbell-57648 leads with 141 investor-owned properties and 81.0% ownership rate
Detailed Findings

Within Campbell (SD) County, investor-owned properties are highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with SD-Campbell-57648 leading significantly with 141 landlord SFR properties and an 81.0% investor ownership rate.

Other key sub-geographies by property count include SD-Campbell-57632 with 76 properties (59.4% rate) and SD-Campbell-57646 with 54 properties (69.2% rate), showing a clear geographic clustering of investor activity.

Examining investor ownership rates reveals high penetration in several zip codes: SD-Campbell-57648 at 81.0%, SD-Campbell-57452 at 75.0%, and SD-Campbell-57437 at 73.7%. These rates indicate that investors hold the majority of SFR properties in these areas.

There is a strong correlation between zip codes with high investor property counts and those with high investor ownership percentages, as seen with SD-Campbell-57648 and SD-Campbell-57437 appearing in both top 5 lists, signifying concentrated market appeal.

The data does not provide average acquisition prices for these sub-geographies, preventing a comparative analysis of pricing trends or investment attractiveness across different zip codes within Campbell (SD).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data available for landlords in Campbell (SD)
Detailed Findings

There is a complete absence of historical transaction data for all landlords in Campbell (SD) County, preventing any analysis of buy versus sell activity over time.

The lack of data means it is impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers in this market, or to calculate any buy/sell ratios.

Similarly, no transaction information is available for institutional investors (1000+ tier), precluding insights into their historical accumulation or divestment patterns.

Without transaction counts, it is not possible to determine the percentage of purchases made from other landlords or sales made to other landlords, which typically indicates market liquidity and investor churn.

Furthermore, the absence of historical average buy and sell prices prevents any analysis of potential implied profit margins for investors over different timeframes.

This significant data gap limits understanding of long-term investor behavior and market dynamics in Campbell (SD) beyond current holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 SFR transactions recorded for landlords or other buyers
Detailed Findings

Campbell (SD) County recorded no SFR transactions in Q4 2025, with a total of 0 transactions across all buyer types, indicating a static or unrecorded market for the quarter.

Consequently, landlords were not involved in any Q4 transactions, accounting for 0.0% of the total, which aligns with the complete absence of purchase activity noted in Section 7.

Due to this lack of activity, it is impossible to assess how transaction volumes varied across different investor tiers or to determine the average purchase prices for each tier in Q4 2025.

There was no recorded inter-landlord trading activity for Q4 2025, precluding any insights into market liquidity from landlord-to-landlord transactions.

Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions, with average purchase prices of $0, reinforcing the conclusion of no Q4 market activity.

The absence of Q4 transaction data for all segments severely limits the ability to analyze recent investor behavior or market health in Campbell (SD).

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Campbell (SD) market entirely dominated by mom-and-pop landlords with no recent SFR activity
Holdings
Landlords own 309 SFR properties in Campbell County, SD, comprising 70.1% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 297 properties (96.1%) and companies just 15 (4.9%).
Pricing
There were no recorded SFR acquisitions by landlords or homeowners in Q4 2025, preventing any current price comparisons or trend analysis for Campbell County, SD.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw 0 SFR purchases by landlords, making up 0.0% of all sales, indicating a complete halt in recorded buying activity across all investor tiers in Campbell County, SD.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100.0% of the 322 tiered investor-owned SFR properties in Campbell County, SD, with no institutional investor presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors maintain an overwhelming majority across all observed tiers in Campbell County, SD, with no crossover point where companies achieve majority ownership, showcasing an individual-driven market.
Transactions
There were no Q4 2025 or historical transaction data available, meaning landlord net buyer/seller status cannot be determined for Campbell County, SD.
Market Narrative

The Campbell County, SD SFR market is profoundly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively own 309 properties, representing a substantial 70.1% of the total 441 SFR properties in the market. This market exhibits an extreme concentration in individual ownership, with 297 properties (96.1%) held by individuals compared to a mere 15 (4.9%) by companies. Furthermore, mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) account for 100.0% of the 322 tiered investor-owned properties, entirely excluding institutional players from this local market.

Despite this significant investor presence, Campbell County, SD experienced a notable absence of recorded activity in Q4 2025. There were 0 SFR purchases by landlords, leading to a 0.0% market share for the quarter, and no new landlords were identified entering the market. Historically, acquisition data for landlords is also absent, preventing any analysis of pricing trends or competitive positioning against homeowners. The striking lack of recent transaction data suggests either a period of extreme market illiquidity or significant data limitations within Campbell County, SD.

This unique market structure, characterized by pervasive individual ownership, 100.0% cash acquisitions for investor properties, and no recent transactional activity, signals a highly specialized local real estate environment. Without an active market in Q4 2025, understanding current investor sentiment or future trends in Campbell County, SD remains challenging, though the established dominance of small-scale, local investors is unequivocal.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 04:42 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCampbell (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct