Fairfield (SC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fairfield (SC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fairfield (SC)
6,551
Total Investors in Fairfield (SC)
2,838
Investor Owned SFR in Fairfield (SC)
2,455(37.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,497
SFR Owned
2,056
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
341
SFR Owned
431
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,455 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Fairfield County's SFR Market, Dominating Holdings and Q4 Activity
In Fairfield County, SC, landlords own 2,455 SFR properties, representing 37.5% of the market, overwhelmingly dominated by individual and mom-and-pop investors. Landlords secured 56.8% of Q4 SFR purchases, often at prices comparable to or below traditional homeowners, exhibiting strong net buying activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Total 2,455 SFR properties in Fairfield County are landlord-owned, with individuals holding 83.7%.
Nearly all investor properties (98.9%) are rented, with 87.0% owned outright by cash. Individual landlords outnumber companies by over 7-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $210,577 in Q4 2025, a slight $782 premium (0.4%) compared to homeowners.
The landlord-homeowner price gap was highly volatile in 2025, fluctuating from a 35.8% discount in Q3 to a 9.5% premium in Q2. Average landlord acquisition prices for 2025 ($238,379) show an 18.0% decline from the 2020-2023 average ($290,809).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 56.8% of all SFR purchases in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, acquiring 25 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 activity, responsible for 92.3% (24 properties) of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 23 entities acquiring 17 properties this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.9% of all investor-owned SFR in Fairfield County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 78.9% (1,974 properties) of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09) maintain a negligible presence, owning only 0.2% (4 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become majority owners from Tier 06-10 in Fairfield County.
Single-property portfolios are overwhelmingly individual-owned (86.6%), whereas companies hold 60.9% of properties in the 11-20 tier. For example, in Tier 06-10, companies own 31 properties (56.4%) compared to individuals' 24 properties (43.6%).
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 29180 leads Fairfield County with 1,374 investor-owned SFR properties.
Zip Code 29928 shows extreme investor penetration at 90.9% of its SFR market, despite a smaller overall property count. Four of the top five zip codes by property count also feature among the top five by investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Fairfield County are strong net buyers, with Q4 showing a 17.0x buy/sell ratio (34 buys vs 2 sells).
The landlord buy/sell ratio has significantly increased throughout 2025, from 5.67x in Q2 to 17.0x in Q4, signaling growing acquisition activity. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs 2 sells) and show no recorded transaction activity for 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 52.3% of all SFR transactions in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, totaling 34 transactions.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, accounting for 70.6% (24 transactions) of all landlord transactions, paying the highest average price at $253,740. Inter-landlord transactions remained minimal, with Tier 02 showing the highest share at 16.7% (1 transaction).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Total 2,455 SFR properties in Fairfield County are landlord-owned, with individuals holding 83.7%.
Detailed Findings

In Fairfield County, SC, landlords own a significant 2,455 SFR properties, constituting 37.5% of the entire SFR market, highlighting a substantial investor presence in the region.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 2,056 properties, which accounts for 83.7% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio. This contrasts sharply with companies, which hold 431 properties (17.6%).

The prevalence of individual ownership is further underscored by entity counts, with 2,497 individual landlords compared to 341 company landlords, a ratio exceeding 7-to-1.

A vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 2,428 properties (98.9%), are actively rented, emphasizing the rental-focused nature of investor holdings in the county.

Financial analysis of holdings reveals that 2,135 properties (87.0%) are owned outright with cash, indicating a strong preference for unencumbered assets among landlords, while 320 properties (13.0%) are financed.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $210,577 in Q4 2025, a slight $782 premium (0.4%) compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Fairfield County, SC, paid an average of $210,577 for SFR properties, a marginal $782 premium or 0.4% more than traditional homeowners who paid $209,795.

The pricing dynamic between landlords and homeowners was highly inconsistent throughout 2025; landlords secured a significant $119,613 discount (35.8%) in Q3 ($214,469 vs $334,082), but paid a $26,790 premium (9.5%) in Q2 ($309,396 vs $282,606).

Quarter-over-quarter, the price gap swung dramatically from a 28.4% discount for landlords in Q1 ($223,939 vs $312,982) to a 9.5% premium in Q2, then back to a deep discount in Q3 before reverting to a slight premium in Q4.

Overall, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stood at $238,379, representing a notable 18.0% decrease compared to the average price of $290,809 during the 2020-2023 period, signaling a significant market cooling.

Landlord acquisition prices in 2025 (averaging $238,379) were also considerably lower than in 2024 (averaging $279,672), reflecting a continued downward trend in average purchase costs for investors in the region.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 56.8% of all SFR purchases in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, acquiring 25 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in Fairfield County's Q4 2025 housing market, accounting for 25 of the 44 total SFR purchases, a significant 56.8% market share.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) spearheaded this purchasing activity, making 24 acquisitions and representing an overwhelming 92.3% of all landlord purchases this quarter.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) showed robust entry-level activity, with 23 distinct entities acquiring 17 properties, making it the most active individual tier by both property and entity count.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) remained completely inactive in Q4 2025, recording zero purchases and maintaining a 0.0% share of landlord acquisitions.

Beyond the single-property tier, a mix of smaller and mid-sized landlords contributed to Q4 purchases, including 5 properties by 4 two-property (Tier 02) entities, and single properties each by small landlord (Tiers 03-05 and 06-10), small-medium (Tier 11-20), and large (Tier 101-1000) entities.

The significant concentration of Q4 purchases within Tiers 01-04, specifically 24 properties by 29 entities, underscores the continued strength of smaller, local investors in the Fairfield County market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.9% of all investor-owned SFR in Fairfield County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing portfolios of 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert near-total control over Fairfield County's investor-owned SFR market, holding a staggering 96.9% of all properties.

The foundation of this market dominance lies with single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone account for 1,974 properties, representing 78.9% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

Further consolidating the mom-and-pop segment, two-property (Tier 02) and small landlords (Tiers 03-05) own an additional 193 properties (7.7%) and 204 properties (8.2%) respectively, reinforcing the market's grassroots structure.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a marginal footprint, owning only 4 properties, which translates to a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market in Fairfield County, SC.

Medium-sized landlords (Tiers 11-1000) collectively hold a small portion of the market, with Tiers 11-20, 21-50, 51-100, and 101-1000 together representing only 3.1% (73 properties) of total investor holdings.

The distribution clearly highlights a highly fragmented investor market, with the vast majority of properties owned by individuals or small entities rather than large corporations or funds.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become majority owners from Tier 06-10 in Fairfield County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers of landlord ownership in Fairfield County, SC, controlling 86.6% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios (1,736 properties) and 83.9% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios (162 properties).

The market experiences a clear crossover point within the small landlord segment: for portfolios ranging from 6-10 properties (Tier 06-10), companies become the majority owners, holding 31 properties (56.4%) compared to individuals' 24 properties (43.6%).

This trend of increasing company dominance continues into larger tiers, with small-medium landlords (11-20 properties, Tier 11-20) seeing companies own 39 properties (60.9%) compared to individuals' 25 properties (39.1%).

While individuals maintain a strong presence in the 3-5 property tier (156 properties, 76.1%), their influence significantly diminishes as portfolio size increases, indicating distinct investment strategies by owner type.

The data reveals that as investor portfolios grow beyond five properties, the operational advantages or financial structures favored by companies enable them to acquire a larger share of properties compared to individual investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 29180 leads Fairfield County with 1,374 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

In Fairfield County, SC, investor-owned SFR properties are highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 29180 leading by volume with 1,374 properties, representing 35.1% of its local SFR market.

The zip code 29130 is also a significant hotspot, with 714 investor-owned properties and a notably high investor ownership rate of 48.1%.

A striking pattern emerges in Zip Code 29928, where investors own an extraordinary 90.9% of all SFR properties, marking it as the highest investor penetration rate in the county.

Geographic concentration is evident as four zip codes—29180, 29130, 29065, and 29015—appear in both the top five lists for investor-owned property count and investor ownership percentage, signaling key areas for investor activity.

While 29180 has the highest count, its 35.1% ownership rate indicates a larger overall SFR market compared to 29928, which, despite a smaller count (not listed in top 5 by count, but top by %), has nearly all its SFR properties controlled by investors.

The top five zip codes by count (29180, 29130, 29015, 29065, 29055) collectively account for a substantial portion of Fairfield County's investor-owned SFR properties, highlighting specific areas of focus for landlords.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Fairfield County are strong net buyers, with Q4 showing a 17.0x buy/sell ratio (34 buys vs 2 sells).
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Fairfield County, SC, consistently operated as strong net buyers throughout 2025, culminating in a robust 17.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (34 buy transactions vs. 2 sell transactions).

The trend for landlord acquisition activity shows increasing momentum; the buy/sell ratio climbed from 5.67x in Q2 2025 (34 buys vs 6 sells) to 10.0x in Q3 (30 buys vs 3 sells) and peaking at 17.0x in Q4.

Over the entire Year 2025, landlords completed 125 buy transactions against 16 sell transactions, resulting in a net increase of 109 properties and a 7.81x buy/sell ratio.

Comparing year-over-year, landlord buying activity in 2025 (125 buys) was slightly lower than 2024 (160 buys), but the overall net acquisition remained high (109 in 2025 vs 117 in 2024).

In stark contrast to the overall landlord trend, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2024, divesting 2 properties while only acquiring 1, showing a net negative position. No institutional transaction data is recorded for 2025, suggesting a period of inactivity or continued divestment.

The consistent net buying by the general landlord population, combined with institutional withdrawal, underscores the fragmented nature of the Fairfield County investor market, driven primarily by smaller-scale players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 52.3% of all SFR transactions in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, totaling 34 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were central to Fairfield County's Q4 2025 SFR market, participating in 34 of the 65 total transactions, which represents a dominant 52.3% share of all activity.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was by far the most active, completing 24 transactions at an average purchase price of $253,740, underscoring its significant role in the quarter's market dynamics.

Transaction activity decreased substantially for larger landlord tiers; Tier 02 recorded 6 transactions, while Tiers 03-05, 06-10, 11-20, and 101-1000 each recorded only 1 transaction, highlighting concentrated activity at the smallest portfolio sizes.

A notable price disparity exists across tiers, with Tier 01 purchasers paying the highest average price of $253,740, contrasting sharply with the $36,000 average price paid by the Large (101-1000) tier, a difference of $217,740.

Inter-landlord trading activity was minimal in Q4 2025; only 1 transaction by Tier 01 (4.2% of its purchases) and 1 transaction by Tier 02 (16.7% of its purchases) involved buying from another landlord, indicating most acquisitions came from non-investor sellers.

The Tier 02 landlords showed the highest proportion of inter-landlord purchases at 16.7%, suggesting a slightly more active internal market for properties among smaller, multi-property landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Fairfield County's SFR Market, Dominating Holdings and Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 2,455 SFR properties in Fairfield County, SC, representing 37.5% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold the majority with 2,056 properties (83.7%), while companies own 431 properties (17.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $210,577 in Q4 2025, which was a $782 premium (0.4%) compared to traditional homeowners, although prices varied significantly across the year. The average landlord acquisition price for 2025 ($238,379) marked an 18.0% decline from the 2020-2023 average ($290,809).
Activity
Landlords accounted for 56.8% (25 properties) of all Q4 SFR purchases in Fairfield County, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) responsible for 92.3% of these acquisitions. Notably, 23 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entered the market, acquiring 17 properties this quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties), commonly known as mom-and-pop, control a substantial 96.9% of investor-owned housing in Fairfield County. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.2% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, especially Tier 01 with 86.6% ownership, but company ownership becomes the majority at the 6-10 property tier. Companies' share continues to grow, holding 60.9% of properties in the 11-20 tier.
Transactions
Landlords are robust net buyers in Fairfield County, demonstrating a significant 17.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (34 buys vs 2 sells). Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers in 2024 (1 buy vs 2 sells) and showed no recorded transaction activity in 2025.
Market Narrative

Fairfield County, SC's SFR market is significantly influenced by investors, with 2,455 properties (37.5% of the total market) owned by landlords. This sector is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who collectively hold 2,056 properties (83.7%), far outpacing company ownership. Small, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) are the primary market participants, commanding a dominant 96.9% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights a highly active acquisition market, with landlords securing 56.8% of all SFR purchases, totaling 25 properties. Pricing showed volatility, with landlords paying a slight 0.4% premium in Q4 ($210,577 vs $209,795) but securing substantial discounts in prior quarters. Overall, 2025 acquisition prices ($238,379) reflect an 18.0% decline from the 2020-2023 pandemic peak, suggesting a market correction. Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4 with a 17.0x buy/sell ratio, while institutions notably retreated as net sellers in 2024 and remained inactive in 2025.

The data underscores a robust, locally driven investor market in Fairfield County, SC, largely insulated from institutional influence. The consistent net buying by mom-and-pop landlords, despite varied pricing relative to homeowners, indicates sustained confidence and demand for rental properties within the county's specific zip codes, such as 29180 and 29130, which show high investor concentration. This dynamic suggests a resilient, small-scale landlord ecosystem supporting the region's rental housing supply, particularly in areas like Zip Code 29928 where investor ownership reaches an extraordinary 90.9%.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 04:18 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFairfield (SC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4