Calhoun (SC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Calhoun (SC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Calhoun (SC)
2,895
Total Investors in Calhoun (SC)
185
Investor Owned SFR in Calhoun (SC)
142(4.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
161
SFR Owned
120
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
24
SFR Owned
24
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 142 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Calhoun County Investor Market Amidst Minimal Q4 Activity
Landlords own 142 SFR properties, representing 4.9% of Calhoun County's market, with individual investors holding 84.5% versus 16.9% for companies. Q4 saw only 1 landlord purchase (5.3% of all sales), driven entirely by a new single-property landlord, highlighting a subdued market with strong mom-and-pop presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 84.5% of 142 landlord-owned SFR properties in Calhoun County, significantly outpacing companies.
A high majority of landlord-owned properties, 119, are held outright for cash (83.8%), while 127 properties are rented, demonstrating a focus on cash-flow and rental income. Individual landlords account for 161 entities (87.0%) compared to 24 company entities (13.0%).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured substantial discounts in Q1 2025, paying $68,750 (27.2%) less than traditional homeowners in Calhoun County.
Due to a lack of recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, the most recent comparison shows landlords paid $184,250 in Q1 2025, significantly below homeowner prices of $253,000. This discount has fluctuated, from an 88.5% gap in Q3 2025 to 27.2% in Q1 2025, indicating variable market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for a minimal 5.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Calhoun County, with only one recorded transaction.
The single landlord purchase in Q4 2025 was by a mom-and-pop investor (single-property tier), representing 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter. This indicates a subdued market where new, small-scale investors are the sole participants, as institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Calhoun County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, holding 85.3% (122 properties) of the total investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) possess a negligible 2.1% (3 properties) share. The data does not provide specific acquisition prices by tier for Calhoun County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate within every available tier, owning 89.4% of single-property portfolios in Calhoun County.
Companies hold only a minor presence in smaller portfolios, peaking at 18.2% in the 3-5 property tier. Given the limited data, no tier shows companies as majority owners, reinforcing individual investor prevalence. Pricing data split by tier and owner type is not available for this county.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 29135 leads Calhoun County with 80 investor-owned properties, while 29112 boasts the highest ownership rate at 9.1%.
Zip codes 29030 and 29135 appear in the top rankings for both total investor-owned properties and ownership percentage, indicating concentrated investor activity. In contrast, 29053 has a lower ownership rate of 2.1% despite being in the top 5 by count, showing varied market penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County were net buyers in 2024 and 2025, acquiring 13 properties versus 3 sells in 2025.
In 2025, landlords accumulated a net of 10 properties, maintaining a strong buy-side presence with 13 buys against 3 sells. However, Q3 2025 showed a balanced market with 1 buy and 1 sell. Data on institutional investor transactions is not available for Calhoun County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised a mere 3.2% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Calhoun County, with only one recorded transaction.
This single Q4 transaction was executed by a mom-and-pop landlord (Tier 01), who did not purchase from another landlord. There were no institutional investor transactions or average purchase prices available for any tier in Q4, indicating extremely low investor trading activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 84.5% of 142 landlord-owned SFR properties in Calhoun County, significantly outpacing companies.
Detailed Findings

In Calhoun County, landlords collectively own 142 SFR properties, comprising 4.9% of the total 2,895 SFR properties in the market, indicating a relatively low investor penetration rate.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 120 (84.5%) of the investor-held SFR properties, while company-owned properties represent a smaller 24 (16.9%) share.

The prevalence of individual investors extends to entity counts, with 161 individual landlords (87.0%) significantly outnumbering 24 company landlords (13.0%).

A notable pattern in property holdings reveals that 119 of the 142 landlord-owned properties (83.8%) were acquired for cash, with only 23 being financed, highlighting a preference for unencumbered assets.

The majority of these investor properties are non-owner-occupied and rented out, with 127 properties explicitly designated as rented, confirming a strong rental-focused strategy among landlords in the county.

While individual investors hold 89.4% of single-property portfolios and 81.8% of 3-5 property portfolios, companies demonstrate a minor, yet present, role even in these smaller tiers, holding 10.6% and 18.2% respectively.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured substantial discounts in Q1 2025, paying $68,750 (27.2%) less than traditional homeowners in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

In Calhoun County, landlords consistently secured properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners in early 2025; in Q1 2025, they paid $184,250 on average, which was $68,750 (27.2%) less than homeowners who paid $253,000.

The landlord discount against homeowner prices has shown notable volatility, ranging from an exceptional $345,219 (88.5%) in Q3 2025 (landlord at $45,000 vs homeowner at $390,219) to $68,750 (27.2%) in Q1 2025, indicating shifts in market dynamics or acquisition strategies.

Due to extremely limited landlord buying activity, there were no recorded landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025 with an average price, making direct quarterly comparison challenging for the most recent period.

Average acquisition prices for landlords, when available, show a historical increase from $124,023 during 2020-2023 to $175,714 in Year 2024, demonstrating property value appreciation over time, though current year data is sparse.

While Q4 2025 lacked recorded landlord purchases, the overall trend from Q3 2025 to Q1 2025 showed a narrowing of the percentage discount landlords obtained relative to homeowners, from 88.5% to 27.2%.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a minimal 5.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Calhoun County, with only one recorded transaction.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Calhoun County had an exceptionally quiet Q4 2025, completing only 1 SFR purchase, which represents a mere 5.3% of the total 19 SFR properties acquired in the county during this period.

This solitary Q4 landlord acquisition was made by a single-property landlord, indicating that all new investor activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of landlord purchases.

The Q4 purchasing landscape was devoid of institutional investor (Tier 09) activity, reinforcing the dominance of small-scale investors in Calhoun County's limited market.

The single entity that made a purchase in Q4 2025 was a new single-property landlord, signaling that market entry for small investors continues despite low overall activity.

With only one landlord purchase against 18 non-landlord acquisitions, the Q4 data reveals a market primarily driven by traditional homeowners or other buyer types, not by investor expansion.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned housing market in Calhoun County, controlling 95.1% of all 142 SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone constitute the vast majority of investor holdings, accounting for 122 properties, which is 85.3% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, hold a minimal 3 properties, representing only 2.1% of the total investor-owned SFR market.

The remaining small-to-medium landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively hold a modest share, with two-property landlords owning 1.4% (2 properties), 3-5 property landlords holding 7.0% (10 properties), and the 6-10 property tier at 1.4% (2 properties).

This highly skewed distribution underscores that Calhoun County's rental market is primarily supported by individual, small-scale investors rather than large corporate entities.

The data provided for Calhoun County does not include specific acquisition prices broken down by tier, preventing a comparison of pricing strategies across different investor sizes.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate within every available tier, owning 89.4% of single-property portfolios in Calhoun County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a strong majority across all available portfolio tiers in Calhoun County, holding 89.4% of single-property portfolios and 81.8% of properties in the 3-5 property tier.

Companies, while present, represent a significantly smaller portion of ownership within these tiers, holding only 10.6% of single-property portfolios and 18.2% in the 3-5 property segment.

The two-property tier is exclusively dominated by individual investors, who own 100.0% of properties in this category, with no company presence recorded.

Based on the provided data, there is no visible crossover point where companies become the majority owners, indicating that individual investors continue to hold the predominant share even as portfolio sizes grow into the small landlord categories.

The absence of pricing data broken down by owner type within each tier prevents an analysis of whether individual or company investors employ different pricing strategies or achieve varying acquisition costs.

This distribution highlights that even as individuals expand their portfolios to 3-5 properties, they largely remain the primary owners, rather than seeing a significant shift to corporate ownership within these smaller market segments.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 29135 leads Calhoun County with 80 investor-owned properties, while 29112 boasts the highest ownership rate at 9.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties are geographically concentrated within Calhoun County, with zip code SC-Calhoun-29135 leading by count with 80 landlord-owned properties, representing a 5.0% ownership rate.

The highest investor ownership rate is found in SC-Calhoun-29112, where 9.1% of SFR properties are investor-owned, signaling a high landlord penetration in that specific sub-geography.

Zip code SC-Calhoun-29030 demonstrates significant investor interest, ranking second both in property count with 24 investor-owned properties and by ownership percentage at 8.2%.

While SC-Calhoun-29135 and SC-Calhoun-29030 appear in the top five for both count and percentage, other areas like SC-Calhoun-29053, with 6 properties and a 2.1% rate, show a lower concentration despite having a notable number of investor-owned properties.

Conversely, zip codes like SC-Calhoun-29160 (14 properties, 4.2% rate) and SC-Calhoun-29047 (13 properties, 4.4% rate) also exhibit strong investor presence, reflecting diverse pockets of activity within the county.

This varied distribution suggests that while some areas attract a high volume of investors, others demonstrate a higher density of investor-owned properties relative to their total housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Calhoun County were net buyers in 2024 and 2025, acquiring 13 properties versus 3 sells in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Calhoun County have consistently been net buyers over the past two years, acquiring 13 properties against 3 sells in Year 2025, resulting in a net accumulation of 10 properties.

This buying trend was also evident in Year 2024, where landlords completed 9 buy transactions compared to 3 sell transactions, accumulating a net of 6 properties.

Despite the overall net buyer status, Q3 2025 saw a balanced market with 1 buy transaction and 1 sell transaction, indicating a temporary equilibrium in activity for that quarter.

The most active period for landlord buying in 2025 was Q2, with 7 purchases against 2 sells, contributing significantly to the year's net buyer position.

The lack of data for institutional (1000+ tier) transactions prevents a comparison of their activity patterns with the overall landlord market in Calhoun County.

The consistent net buying over recent years suggests a strategy of portfolio expansion among landlords in the county, even with fluctuations in quarterly activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised a mere 3.2% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Calhoun County, with only one recorded transaction.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented an exceptionally small portion of the Q4 2025 real estate market in Calhoun County, participating in only 1 transaction out of a total of 31, equating to a meager 3.2% share.

The sole landlord transaction in Q4 2025 originated from a single-property landlord (Tier 01), highlighting that all current quarter investor activity came from mom-and-pop segments.

There was no inter-landlord trading observed in Q4, as the single landlord transaction was not bought from another landlord, indicating a direct purchase from a non-investor seller.

Due to the extremely limited transaction volume, there is no reliable average purchase price data available for Tier 01 or any other tier for Q4 2025, reflecting a near-standstill in investor acquisitions.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no activity in Q4, aligning with the overall pattern of subdued investor engagement in Calhoun County during this period.

The concentration of Q4 transaction activity with a single mom-and-pop entity suggests a highly selective and minimal entry of new small-scale investors into the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Calhoun County Market; Landlords Net Buyers Amidst Low Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 142 SFR properties in Calhoun County, representing 4.9% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 120 properties (84.5%), while companies own 24 properties (16.9%).
Pricing
Due to a lack of recorded Q4 landlord purchases, the most recent data from Q1 2025 shows landlords paid $184,250, a $68,750 (27.2%) discount compared to homeowners at $253,000.
Activity
Q4 saw only 1 landlord purchase (5.3% of 19 total SFR sales), entirely by a new single-property landlord, indicating very low market entry and no activity from larger tiers.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.1% of investor housing in Calhoun County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 2.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across available tiers, holding 89.4% of single-property portfolios; no crossover point where companies become majority owners is observed in the data.
Transactions
Landlords in Calhoun County are net buyers, with 13 buys versus 3 sells in 2025. Institutional investor transaction data is not available to assess their specific net position.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Calhoun County, South Carolina, is characterized by a strong dominance of small-scale individual landlords. They collectively own 142 SFR properties, making up a modest 4.9% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors hold a commanding 84.5% of these properties, totaling 120 units, while company ownership accounts for only 16.9% with 24 properties. This highly fragmented market further sees mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 95.1% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding a minimal 2.1% share.

Investor behavior in Calhoun County reflects cautious activity, particularly in the latest quarter. Q4 2025 recorded only one landlord purchase, representing a mere 5.3% of all SFR sales, and this single acquisition was by a new single-property landlord. While specific Q4 landlord acquisition prices are unavailable, the most recent data from Q1 2025 indicates landlords secured properties at an average of $184,250, a significant 27.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $253,000. Historically, landlords have been net buyers in Calhoun County, accumulating 13 properties versus 3 sells in 2025, demonstrating an overall strategy of portfolio expansion, though institutional transaction data is not available to confirm their specific position.

These patterns highlight a market largely shaped by local, individual investors seeking rental income opportunities, often securing properties at favorable prices. The minimal activity from larger institutional players, coupled with the low overall investor penetration rate, suggests that Calhoun County's housing market remains primarily driven by traditional homeowners. The consistent net buying by small landlords, even amidst low quarterly transaction volumes, signals a steady, albeit slow, growth in the local rental housing stock predominantly managed by mom-and-pop owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 04:09 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCalhoun (SC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail