Bradford (PA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bradford (PA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bradford (PA)
14,610
Total Investors in Bradford (PA)
3,644
Investor Owned SFR in Bradford (PA)
2,741(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,421
SFR Owned
2,503
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
223
SFR Owned
263
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,741 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Bradford County's SFR market, securing deep Q4 discounts.
Individual investors own 91.3% of the 2,741 landlord-owned SFR properties in Bradford County, controlling 99.6% of the market. In Q4, landlords purchased 23.7% of all SFR sales, paying 14.5% less than homeowners, while remaining consistent net buyers with a 7.00x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 2,741 SFR properties in Bradford (PA), with individuals owning 91.3% of them.
An overwhelming 98.5% of investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental market focus. Over two-thirds (69.3%) of landlord portfolios are cash-owned, significantly outweighing financed properties (30.6%).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 14.5% discount in Q4, paying $191,185 compared to homeowners' $223,656.
The landlord-homeowner price gap fluctuated wildly this year, swinging from an 18.8% discount in Q1 to premiums in Q2 and Q3, before returning to a substantial 14.5% discount in Q4. This volatility suggests varying market conditions or specific deal-making opportunities.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made 31 purchases in Q4, capturing 23.7% of all SFR transactions in Bradford County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 acquisitions, accounting for 30 properties or 96.8% of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords alone purchased 29 properties, demonstrating high activity from new or small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Bradford County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 2,328 properties or 82.5% of the total investor-owned SFRs. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible share with just 1 property (0.0%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift in ownership structure.
While individuals overwhelmingly dominate the 1-5 property tiers (92.8% to 83.6%), company ownership surpasses individuals in the 6-10 property tier at 51.8%. This marks the initial point where corporate entities hold more properties than individuals within a given size segment.
Geographic Distribution
Zip codes 18840 (524 properties) and 18848 (371 properties) lead in investor-owned SFR counts in Bradford County.
Zip code 16945 shows an extraordinary 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a highly specialized or commercialized SFR market. In contrast, 18840 and 18848 have significant property counts but lower penetration rates of 17.3% and 16.7% respectively.
Historical Transactions
All landlords remain strong net buyers in Bradford County with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 7.00x.
Landlords acquired 49 properties while selling only 7 in Q4 2025, continuing a consistent net buying trend throughout the year. Institutional investors, however, showed very low activity, with just 3 buys and 2 sells in 2025, indicating a near-neutral stance.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 23.8% of all Q4 transactions in Bradford County, executing 49 trades.
Single-property landlords dominated Q4 activity with 45 transactions, paying an average of $193,426. Institutional investors, with a single transaction, paid significantly less at $101,500, a 47.5% discount compared to Tier 01 buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 2,741 SFR properties in Bradford (PA), with individuals owning 91.3% of them.
Detailed Findings

In Bradford County, landlords collectively own 2,741 SFR properties, representing a significant 18.8% of the total 14,610 SFR properties in the market. This reveals a substantial investor presence within the local housing stock.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, controlling 2,503 properties, which accounts for 91.3% of all investor-owned SFR homes. In contrast, companies hold a much smaller share, owning only 263 properties (9.6%).

The investor market in Bradford County is heavily rental-focused, with 2,699 properties (98.5%) designated as rented. This indicates that nearly all investor-owned SFR properties are actively contributing to the rental supply.

A notable majority of investor properties, 1,901 (69.3%), are held outright through cash purchases, suggesting a preference for debt-free assets or strong financial liquidity among landlords. Only 840 properties (30.6%) are financed.

The distribution of landlord entities further emphasizes individual dominance, with 3,421 individual landlords making up 93.9% of the total 3,644 landlords in the county, compared to just 223 company landlords (6.1%). This signals a market heavily influenced by small-scale, individual operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 14.5% discount in Q4, paying $191,185 compared to homeowners' $223,656.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Bradford County paid an average of $191,185 for SFR properties, securing a considerable $32,471 discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $223,656. This represents a significant 14.5% price advantage for investors in the current quarter.

The price differential between landlords and homeowners has exhibited high volatility throughout 2025. Starting with a substantial 18.8% discount for landlords in Q1 ($170,524 vs $209,902), the market shifted in Q2 where landlords paid a 4.9% premium ($205,562 vs $196,008), and a 1.4% premium in Q3 ($218,932 vs $215,869), before reverting to a large discount in Q4.

This fluctuating pattern, from a major discount to premiums and back again, suggests a dynamic market where landlord buying strategies or property types acquired varied significantly each quarter. The Q4 return to a deep discount implies a renewed ability for investors to find undervalued assets or negotiate better deals.

Looking at annual trends, average landlord acquisition prices peaked at $218,932 in Q3 2025, showing higher price points compared to the Q1 average of $170,524, despite the overall Year 2025 average being $198,172.

Historical data shows a notable price appreciation, with the average landlord acquisition price for Years 2020-2023 being $160,493. This has risen to an average of $198,172 for Year 2025, indicating an increase of 23.5% over the earlier pandemic-era period, suggesting overall market value shifts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords made 31 purchases in Q4, capturing 23.7% of all SFR transactions in Bradford County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bradford County were active purchasers in Q4 2025, acquiring 31 SFR properties. This represented a substantial 23.7% share of the total 131 SFR purchases in the market during the quarter, highlighting investor confidence.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord activity came from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who purchased 30 properties, accounting for 96.8% of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores the fragmented nature of investor buying in the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly prominent, acquiring 29 properties and representing 93.5% of all landlord purchases in Q4. These purchases were made by 45 distinct entities, suggesting a significant influx of new or very small-scale landlords into the market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, contributing just 3.2% to the total landlord acquisition volume. This indicates minimal current quarter activity from large-scale players in Bradford County.

The high number of entities (45) associated with Tier 01 purchases (29 properties) suggests that many of these are new entrants, each acquiring their first investment property in Q4. This signals strong grassroots investor interest in the local SFR market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Bradford County.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor-owned SFR properties in Bradford County are held by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 2,811 properties, representing an overwhelming 99.6% of the total 2,822 investor-owned SFR properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the dominant force within this market structure, owning 2,328 properties, which accounts for 82.5% of all investor-held SFRs. This highlights a highly fragmented ownership landscape, primarily driven by individuals with one property.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal presence, with 5 properties in Tier 11-20, 2 in Tier 21-50, and 2 in Tier 51-100, collectively less than 0.5% of the market. This suggests a significant gap between single-property owners and any emerging larger portfolios.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have an almost non-existent footprint in Bradford County, owning just 1 property, which translates to a mere 0.0% of the total investor-owned SFR market. This definitively counters any narrative of large corporations dominating the local rental supply.

Comparing Q4 acquisition prices from Section 12, single-property landlords paid an average of $193,426, significantly more than institutional investors (Tier 09) who paid $101,500. This indicates larger investors may be targeting distressed or lower-priced assets, or that their single Q4 purchase was an outlier.

The market structure in Bradford County clearly shows that individual, small-scale investors are the primary custodians of the rental housing supply. Their dominance in both property counts and Q4 acquisitions confirms their role as the driving force behind investor activity in this region.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift in ownership structure.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Bradford County transitions significantly as portfolio size increases. While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, with 92.8% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 83.6% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings, their share begins to diminish in larger portfolios.

A critical crossover point occurs in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where companies become the majority owners. In this tier, corporate entities own 29 properties (51.8%), surpassing the 27 properties (48.2%) held by individual investors. This signals a strategic shift in entity type for expanding portfolios.

For tiers 1-5 properties, individual investors maintain a strong hold, owning 2,177 properties (92.8%) in Tier 01, 178 properties (83.6%) in Tier 02, and 195 properties (90.3%) in Tier 03-05. This reinforces the mom-and-pop character of the smaller end of the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) only hold 1 property in total within the county, which, if company-owned as typically assumed, represents a minimal corporate presence at the very top tier.

This distribution reveals that while grassroots individual investors drive the bulk of the market, those looking to scale beyond 5 properties in Bradford County tend to do so under a corporate structure. This strategic decision for larger portfolios suggests benefits in liability, financing, or management for companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip codes 18840 (524 properties) and 18848 (371 properties) lead in investor-owned SFR counts in Bradford County.
Detailed Findings

Within Bradford County, investor activity exhibits clear geographic concentrations. Zip code 18840 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 524, closely followed by 18848 with 371 properties and 18810 with 244 properties. These three zip codes represent the primary hubs for investor holdings by volume.

While 18840, 18848, and 18810 lead in raw property counts, their investor ownership rates are relatively moderate at 17.3%, 16.7%, and 16.1% respectively. This indicates a broader SFR market within these areas where investors are present but do not dominate the entire housing stock.

A striking pattern emerges in zip code 16945, which exhibits a remarkable 100.0% investor ownership rate. This extreme concentration suggests a unique market dynamic, possibly involving specific development, or a very small, entirely investor-controlled housing supply.

Other zip codes with high investor penetration rates include 18817 at 57.4% and 16936 at 27.3%. These areas, despite potentially having fewer total investor-owned properties than the top count regions, show a higher proportion of their SFR market dedicated to investment purposes.

The contrast between high-count regions (like 18840) and high-percentage regions (like 16945) reveals different types of investor markets within Bradford County. Some areas attract a large volume of investor purchases while maintaining a diverse ownership base, while others are almost exclusively controlled by investors, potentially impacting local housing affordability and availability for traditional homeowners.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords remain strong net buyers in Bradford County with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 7.00x.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bradford County are consistently net buyers of SFR properties, demonstrating strong accumulation patterns. In Q4 2025, they purchased 49 properties while selling only 7, resulting in a net gain of 42 properties and an impressive buy/sell ratio of 7.00x.

This net buying trend has been sustained throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 236 properties and selling 43, for a cumulative net gain of 193 properties (5.49x ratio). This consistent activity signals robust investor confidence and expansion in the local market.

Comparing annual performance, total landlord purchases in 2025 (236 properties) show a slight decrease from 2024 levels (306 properties), indicating a moderation in acquisition volume year-over-year. However, the overall net buying position remains strong, with fewer sales in 2025 (43) compared to 2024 (36).

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibit a markedly different and low-volume transaction pattern. In 2025, they were marginal net buyers with 3 purchases and 2 sales, resulting in a net gain of just 1 property. In 2024, their activity was completely neutral with 1 buy and 1 sell, signifying an extremely limited and non-expansive presence in this market.

The almost non-existent buy/sell activity from institutional investors underscores that the significant landlord growth and net buying trends in Bradford County are overwhelmingly driven by smaller, non-institutional players. The market dynamics are clearly dictated by individual and mom-and-pop landlords rather than large corporate entities.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 23.8% of all Q4 transactions in Bradford County, executing 49 trades.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active participants in the Bradford County SFR market, engaging in 49 transactions. This represented a substantial 23.8% of the total 206 SFR transactions recorded during the quarter, indicating their significant influence on market liquidity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for the vast majority of these transactions, with single-property (Tier 01) investors leading with 45 transactions. This underscores the fragmented, grassroots nature of the active buyer base in the county.

Average purchase prices varied considerably by tier in Q4. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $193,426, while institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired their single property at a significantly lower average of $101,500. This translates to a 47.5% discount for the institutional buyer compared to the entry-level landlord.

The data indicates extremely low inter-landlord trading activity across all reported tiers, with 0 properties bought from other landlords. This suggests that landlords primarily acquire properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers in Bradford County, rather than recycling properties within the investor ecosystem.

The stark difference in average purchase prices between smaller and larger investors (Tier 01 vs. Tier 09) suggests differing acquisition strategies. Institutional buyers, despite their minimal activity, appear to target properties at a much lower price point, potentially indicating a focus on distressed assets or value-add opportunities compared to the higher-priced purchases of entry-level investors.

This Q4 transaction snapshot confirms the continued dominance of mom-and-pop investors in driving market activity and highlights a clear disparity in pricing strategies between the smallest and largest players in the Bradford County SFR market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords drive Bradford County's SFR market, securing deep Q4 discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,741 SFR properties, representing 18.8% of Bradford County's total SFR market. Individual investors dominate, holding 2,503 properties (91.3%), while companies own 263 properties (9.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 14.5% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $32,471 per property ($191,185 vs $223,656). This marked a significant return to discounts after premiums in Q2 and Q3.
Activity
Landlords purchased 31 properties in Q4, capturing 23.7% of all SFR sales, with 45 new single-property landlords actively entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 96.8% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.6% of investor housing in Bradford County, owning 2,811 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, owning just 1 property (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 92.8% of single-property assets. However, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 51.8% of that tier, indicating a strategic shift for larger-scale operations.
Transactions
Landlords are robust net buyers in Bradford County, with a strong 7.00x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (49 buys vs 7 sells). Institutional investors showed very limited activity in 2025, ending as marginal net buyers with a 1.50x ratio (3 buys vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The Bradford County SFR market is substantially influenced by investors, who collectively own 2,741 properties, representing 18.8% of the total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 2,503 properties (91.3%) compared to companies owning just 263 properties (9.6%). Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) form the backbone, controlling a remarkable 99.6% of investor-owned SFR housing, unequivocally dispelling notions of large corporate dominance in this region.

Investor activity remained robust in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 31 properties, accounting for 23.7% of all SFR sales. Notably, landlords secured a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of $191,185 – a 14.5% discount ($32,471) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $223,656. This return to deep discounts in Q4 followed volatile price gaps earlier in the year. Landlords are consistently net buyers, demonstrated by a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 7.00x (49 buys vs 7 sells), indicating continuous portfolio expansion, primarily driven by individual and small-scale investors.

The Bradford County SFR market is a dynamic arena primarily shaped by the activity of local, small-scale landlords. The negligible presence of institutional investors (owning just 1 property) confirms that market growth and rental supply are fueled by individual entrepreneurs. The significant discount landlords achieved in Q4 suggests a competitive edge in acquisitions, potentially impacting overall market pricing for other buyers. This sustained mom-and-pop activity signals a resilient and accessible market for individual investors, contributing significantly to the county's rental housing stock and overall market liquidity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:48 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBradford (PA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail